Discussion:
PSI: Reassessing H2O
(too old to reply)
James McGinn
2016-03-13 20:42:11 UTC
Permalink
http://principia-scientific.org/reassessing-climate-role-carbon-dioxide/#comments

JM: Up to this point everything you say is both true and irrelevant to my point.

MH: So, water exist in gaseous form at all temperatures above and below its 1 atmosphere boiling point of 100 C.

JM: This is false. At the ambient temperatures/pressures of the atmosphere, and in accordance with the same chart you mentioned, H2O cannot be gaseous. Thus it can only be liquid H2O suspended in air. As with their application to CO2 in climatology, the application of the Laws of Thermodynamics to H2O in meteorology are not optional. Consequently meteorology's notion that storms are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent release of "latent heat" is refuted.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sci.physics/james$20mcginn$20gaseous$20latent%7Csort:date
http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/#comment-39222
https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/atmospheric-convection-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-8/#comment-114103
Sergio
2016-03-13 21:58:30 UTC
Permalink
<snip crap>


get a new shtik jammie-boy, you're all wet

this one vanished too, like your "Magical Plasma - not Plasma" disaster
Poutnik
2016-03-13 22:14:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
<snip crap>
get a new shtik jammie-boy, you're all wet
this one vanished too, like your "Magical Plasma - not Plasma" disaster
You are ugly on that James guy. :-D
Making up own physics has so many advantages to existing one....

You need not to learn anything...
You need not to understand anything...
You need not to count anything...
You need not to verify anything...
It stimulates imagination...
It stimulates rhetoric...
It makes you feeling smart...
It makes you feeling interesting ...
It makes you feeling important...
You can play word games with other people...

It is fun.... Dont you like fun ? :-D
--
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Sergio
2016-03-14 01:59:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Poutnik
Post by Sergio
<snip crap>
get a new shtik jammie-boy, you're all wet
this one vanished too, like your "Magical Plasma - not Plasma" disaster
You are ugly on that James guy. :-D
Making up own physics has so many advantages to existing one....
You need not to learn anything...
You need not to understand anything...
You need not to count anything...
You need not to verify anything...
It stimulates imagination...
It stimulates rhetoric...
It makes you feeling smart...
It makes you feeling interesting ...
It makes you feeling important...
You can play word games with other people...
It is fun.... Dont you like fun ? :-D
on the darker side of pretend/fictional stuff,

google Bronies

these are guys 20 to 40 that play with My Little Ponys (girls toy for 8
year old girls).

a software guy got hired over here very smart person, but could not
socialize well, he ran a Brony website, so we let him go, too immature,
he was 30, weighed 340 # as he stayed at home on his computer.

some boys growing up played video games in all their spair time, did not
aquire social or adult skills like they should have, and are now very
lame at 25 to 30 years old, with dim future. there are a lot of them out
there. (big market opertunity out there to cure these dudes)

the making up ones own physics is what the New Age people did in the
1970's and 1980's mostly on the west coast, (makes them feel god like,
and there were many cults pushing it) and many are detached from how
things really work, and tend to not be connected strongly in reality, I
think that is where McFly fell into.

I don't care too much, Im practicing my Engrlish skills mostly. McFly is
a nasty troll. But in my spair time I make radiation detectors using
PMTs and scintillators for fun.

Also it is fun looking up stuff that surfaces in the newsgroup, to see
how it really works.
HVAC
2016-03-15 18:06:56 UTC
Permalink
Sergio says
on the darker side of pretend/fictional stuff,

google Bronies

these are guys 20 to 40 that play with My Little Ponys (girls toy for 8
year old girls).

a software guy got hired over here very smart person, but could not
socialize well, he ran a Brony website, so we let him go, too immature,
he was 30, weighed 340 # as he stayed at home on his computer.
-----------

My favorite Pony is Fluttershy. Who's yours?


PS- Bro hoof!
James McGinn
2016-03-15 18:29:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by HVAC
Sergio says
on the darker side of pretend/fictional stuff,
google Bronies
these are guys 20 to 40 that play with My Little Ponys (girls toy for 8
year old girls).
a software guy got hired over here very smart person, but could not
socialize well, he ran a Brony website, so we let him go, too immature,
he was 30, weighed 340 # as he stayed at home on his computer.
-----------
My favorite Pony is Fluttershy. Who's yours?
PS- Bro hoof!
It's great to see that you and Sergio finally have somebody to talk to.
Sergio
2016-03-16 22:37:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by James McGinn
Post by HVAC
Sergio says
on the darker side of pretend/fictional stuff,
google Bronies
these are guys 20 to 40 that play with My Little Ponys (girls toy for 8
year old girls).
a software guy got hired over here very smart person, but could not
socialize well, he ran a Brony website, so we let him go, too immature,
he was 30, weighed 340 # as he stayed at home on his computer.
-----------
My favorite Pony is Fluttershy. Who's yours?
PS- Bro hoof!
It's great to see that you and Sergio finally have somebody to talk to.
perhaps you, Insane James, will find somebody to talk to too, beside the
voices in your head.

If you were a Brony, which is your favorite ?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-14 03:34:50 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
Post by James McGinn
http://principia-scientific.org/reassessing-climate-role-carbon-dioxide/#comments
JM: Up to this point everything you say is both true and irrelevant to my point.
MH: So, water exist in gaseous form at all temperatures above and
below its 1 atmosphere boiling point of 100 C.
JM: This is false. At the ambient temperatures/pressures of the
atmosphere, and in accordance with the same chart you mentioned,
H2O cannot be gaseous. Thus it can only be liquid H2O suspended
in air. As with their application to CO2 in climatology, the
application of the Laws of Thermodynamics to H2O in meteorology
are not optional. Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted", Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so. You've
presented nothing but a demonstrably false fairy tale, the
machinations of a badly bent mind which cannot grasp reality, and has
thus scampered off into the brush, creating a kooky conspiracy theory
that has been proven via more than a half-dozen different avenues to
be utter hogwash.

Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies
watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do
you continue to deny reality?
Post by James McGinn
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sci.physics/james$20mcginn$20gaseous$20latent%7Csort:date
http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/#comment-39222
https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/atmospheric-convection-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-8/#comment-114103
Still demonstrating your inability to grasp how water can be gaseous
phase below its boiling point, James? It's already been fully
explained to you, and in the process, your kooky conspiracy theory has
been utterly demolished.

You postulate the following:

1) There is a "plasma not-a-plasma" that exists in the troposphere,
which you have admitted is merely a hypothetical construct so you can
continue to blather on about your kooky discredited conspiracy theory.

2) This magical "plasma not-a-plasma" is plasmized by an energy source
that is somehow magically plasmizing water in the troposphere without
dissociating it, given that the dissociation energy and nuclear
binding energy of water are identical at 940.8 kJ/mol, and thus water
will dissociate rather than plasmize, unless hit with an extremely
energetic laser.

3) That your kooky energy source is somehow plasmizing only
atmospheric water while not plasmizing or dissociating Earth-bound
water, and is not killing off all life on the planet. Given that the
*minimum* energy necessary to even *begin* to plasmize water would be
equivalent to photons at a *maximum* wavelength of 103.32 nm, just
3.32 nm away from the x-ray range, I'm sure even you can see the
problem inherent in your contention, James.

4) That this magical energy source exists in the troposphere. Except
it cannot exist in the troposphere. Photons of shorter wavelength than
~121 nm are absorbed far above the troposphere due to their ability to
ionize air, thus they are not present in the troposphere, where the
overwhelming majority of all water is.

5) That warm air is heavier than cooler air... tell me, Jim... which
direction does air flow from a flame? Oh, that's right, upward. Why?
Because warm air is lighter and less dense than cooler air and thus
convects upward.

6) That air with gaseous phase water in it is heavier than dry air,
except you forget that science has long known about molar mass and
molar volume...

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Air temperature is a much greater determiner of air density than
humidity.

The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of
the atomic masses of its constituent atoms.

The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen,
1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP.

Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous
phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar
mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the
same volume of 22.414 liters at STP.

The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas
the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP.

Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh:
18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase
28.57 g for dry air

Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore
air containing water in its gaseous phase is lighter than dry air.

Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its
gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant.

Except that's not all, Jim. Because air becomes denser as the altitude
decreases.

At any given altitude, air of the same temperature and gaseous water
partial pressure will have the same density.

At any given altitude, air of lower temperature but similar gaseous
water partial pressure will have higher density.

At any given altitude, air of the same temperature but greater gaseous
water partial pressure will have lower density.

For air of the same temperature and gaseous water partial pressure,
air at a higher altitude will have lower density.

(1) For instance, at sea level, 20 C temperature, and 0% relative
humidity, the air density is 1.204 kg/m^3.

Keeping all other factors in (1) the same but increasing relative
humidity to 100%, or elevation to 74 meters, or temperature to 22.4 C,
the air density is 1.194 kg/m^3.

Thus in order for the air at sea level to rise 74 meters due to
increased buoyancy, it must have 100% more relative humidity than the
air 74 meters above (IOW, the air at sea level must be at 100% RH, the
air 74 meters above must be at 0% RH), given the same temperature; or
the temperature of that sea level air must be at least 2.4 C greater
than the air at 74 meters, given the same relative humidity.

Given that temperature can change much more than 2.4 C, whereas
relative humidity can only max out at 100%, one can see that
temperature-induced convection is the predominant driver of weather
systems, destroying yet another of your kooky contentions.

IOW, in order for air to rise, it must overcome gravity, which
requires energy (said energy in the form of temperature of the air
itself decreasing air density or the latent heat of vaporization of
monomer water in its gaseous phase replacing a certain percentage of
higher molar weight air molecules and thus decreasing air density).

It's not because of your blather that the air at a lower altitude is
"heavier" due to "water droplets", Ko0okTard.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

And before you begin blathering on again about the Ideal Gas Law not
applying to the atmosphere, let me remind you that I've done the
calculations for the van der Waals equation, as well. It is in
agreement with the Ideal Gas Law to a great degree of accuracy even
with the molar volume I used. As air volume increases for the same
relative humidity, air with gaseous phase water in it acts more and
more like an ideal gas, Jim. Compare the Ideal Gas Law to the van der
Waals Equation with all parameters the same except for volume, and
increase the volume through several iterations, then plot the
difference between the results of the Ideal Gas Law and the van der
Waals equation... notice the converging trend?

Do you think for an Earth-atmosphere-sized container, the air with
gaseous phase water in it would be within a very small margin of error
to an ideal gas, Jim? Sure it is. But that's something else you don't
understand because you're a low-information uneducated oaf.

7) Your kooky contention that water polarity changes upon H bonding...
which would also cause random changes in water's solvent properties,
and we know water's solvent properties do not change randomly, Jim.
You didn't know about the two spin isomers of water, which means there
are two hybrids of water with different H bonding strengths:


They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron
orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's
photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is
due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two
phases.

http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
You'll note the double peak of liquid water.

Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory:
====================================================
Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of
water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the
peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to
the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules.
====================================================

You betcha... para and ortho-form water.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ortho_para_water.html>
====================================================
Each hydrogen atom in water has a magnetic moment, which is associated
with the proton's spin of 1/2. As is found in molecular hydrogen (H2),
the protons (within the hydrogen atoms) in water (H2O) may possess
parallel or antiparallel nuclear spin (see right). When the spins are
parallel, there is a paramagnetic state called ortho-H2O with a
magnetic moment = 1. This is the high spin (triplet) state with three
symmetric spin states +1 , 0 , -1 (^^, ^v+^v, vv) where the three
states have equal energy in a zero magnetic field. This spin state
always possesses positive energy with a minimum energy level of 284.7
J mol-1 (23.794352 cm-1) H216O, [607c], 284.4 J mol-1 (23.773510 cm-1)
H217O [607a] or 284.2 J mol-1 (23.754902 cm-1) H218O [607a].

When the spins are opposed there exists the nonmagnetic state called
para-H2O with magnetic moment = 0 with just one antisymmetric spin
state (^v-^v) and magnetic moment = 0. Some of the water molecules in
this low spin (singlet) state will not be rotating even at room
temperature.

Para-H2O does not interact with an external magnetic field, but
ortho-H2O does. Conversion between these isomers is symmetry forbidden
for isolated water molecules and they act as different molecular
species. They can change spin state on interaction with another
particle, including other water molecules. The equilibrium ratio of
these nuclear spin states in H2O is all para- at zero Kelvin, where
the molecules have no rotational spin in their ground state, shifting
to the most stable ratio [1694] of 3:1 ortho:para, in the relative
amounts of the number of magnetic states, at less cold temperatures
(>50 K, see left [2478]); the equilibrium taking months to establish
itself in ice (or gas) and nearly an hour in ambient water [410]. It
is now thought that the ratio lies far from equilibrium and much
closer to 1:1 in liquid water due to hydrogen bond formation [2076].
This means that liquid H2O effectively consists of a mixture of
non-identical molecules and the properties of pure liquid ortho-H2O or
para-H2O are unknown. The differences in the properties of these two
forms of water are expected to be greater in an electric field [1186],
which may be imposed externally, from surfaces or from water
clustering itself. Many materials preferentially adsorb para-H2O due
to its non-rotation ground state [410, 835].

The apparent difference in energy between the two states is a
significant 1-2 kJ mol-1, far greater than expected from spin-spin
interactions (< ÎŒJ mol-1) [835]. It has been suggested that structural
rearrangements may be induced by ortho-H2O : para-H2O conversion
[1430], as it is possible that hydrogen bonds between para-H2O,
possessing no ground state spin, are stronger and last longer than
hydrogen bonds between ortho-H2O [1150]. It is thus possible that
ortho-H2O and para-H2O form separate hydrogen bonded clusters [1150]
with para-H2O being preferred in the low density tetrahedrally
coordinated clusters and ortho-H2O being preferred in the high density
clusters [2070], where their rotation is more easily accommodated.
Picoliter samples of pure ortho-H2O and para-H2O may be separated in a
strong dc electric field [2156].
====================================================

The two spin isomers of water cause a different H bond strength when
water molecules of like spin isomers engage in H bonding to form water
clusters, Jim. Thus the weaker ortho-H2O hydrogen bond is more easily
broken, so most of the gaseous phase water being evaporated should be
ortho-H2O. You'll note above that ortho-H2O even in its liquid form is
very close to the same properties as gaseous phase water under x-ray
spectroscopy, the difference accountable by taking into consideration
temperature and phase.

Remember when I said the surface layer of water was more viscous than
the bulk water? Yeah, that's because the ortho-H2O being evaporated
removes heat from the water, which makes the para-H2O in the ~1.7 nm
thick surface layer act nearly the same as ice.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/interfacial_water.html>
=====================================================
Analysis of simple thermodynamics c shows the surface has considerable
structuring, having identical density to that of bulk water at just
under 4 °C. In addition, the surface water structuring varies less
with temperature than the bulk. Refractive index study of the
water-air surface reveals it to be about 1.7 nm thick at 22 °C and
more dense than the bulk liquid (that is, it behaves like water at a
lower temperature).
=====================================================

As for condensation? Well, it's been found that under circumstances in
which relative humidity is less than ~25%, a four-molecule thick layer
of ice forms on the condensation surface... so apparently what is
happening is that the ortho-H2O being evaporated is colliding with
other molecules in the air, changing their spin isomer and thus giving
off energy, becoming para-H2O, and those are the ones preferentially
condensing, forming that four-molecule thick layer of ice. You'll note
above that para-H2O even in its liquid form is very close to the same
properties as solid phase water (ice) under x-ray spectroscopy, the
difference accountable by taking into consideration temperature and
phase.

For conditions of greater than ~25% relative humidity and thus greater
water gaseous-phase partial pressure in the air, apparently the
condensation process is fast enough to allow even ortho-H2O
gaseous-phase water to condense, thus the four-molecule thick layer of
ice is melted.

So you see, James, it's not because of your kooky contention that the
water molecule's polarity changes upon hydrogen bonding, it's because
there are two spin-isomer hybrids of the water molecule with two
different hydrogen bonding strengths.

Yet again, your kooky conspiracy theory is ripped to shreds by
scientific fact... made especially delicious because it was done
utilizing a link *you* provided. LOL

<http://phys.org/news/2014-09-para-ortho.html>
==============================================
A hydrogen nucleus (proton) can adopt two different states, comparable
to rotation clockwise and counterclockwise. In the case of water, the
nuclear spins of the two — indistinguishable — protons can be combined
in four different ways: one antisymmetric and three symmetric
wavefunctions. Water adopting the antisymmetric wavefunction is called
para water, whereas water adopting one of the symmetric ones is called
ortho water. Because switching from one state to the other is
"forbidden" due to quantum-mechanical symmetry rules, the two spin
isomers cannot interconvert without external influences such as
collisions.
==============================================

Were you not aware that hydrogen has two spin isomers, ortho- and
para-, and thus water, comprised of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen
atoms, also has two spin isomers?

<https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f24e171918d462fac89b809dccaa7c3e>
<Loading Image...>

In pure hydrogen, ortho-hydrogen is thermodynamically unstable even at
low temperature and / or high pressure and it thus spontaneously
converts to para-hydrogen upon molecular collision, which has
implications for liquefied hydrogen storage, as energy is given off by
this spin isomer conversion.

In water, the oxygen atom slows the already slow conversion process to
para-hydrogen by preserving spin state of the hydrogen atom via
partially shielding the hydrogen atom from molecular collision which
would cause spin isomer conversion.

Now, let's you get to answering those questions you've been ducking,
Jim...

How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?

How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?

Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does
not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will,
Jim.

Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with
the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to
protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity.
I note you are doing the same.

I also note that, despite being driven *so* insane by their Usenet
Lord and Master that some kooks forget their own name, they never
forget mine... it haunts them for as long as they live.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
James McGinn
2016-03-14 04:24:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
Post by James McGinn
http://principia-scientific.org/reassessing-climate-role-carbon-dioxide/#comments
JM: Up to this point everything you say is both true and irrelevant to my point.
MH: So, water exist in gaseous form at all temperatures above and
below its 1 atmosphere boiling point of 100 C.
JM: This is false. At the ambient temperatures/pressures of the
atmosphere, and in accordance with the same chart you mentioned,
H2O cannot be gaseous. Thus it can only be liquid H2O suspended
in air. As with their application to CO2 in climatology, the
application of the Laws of Thermodynamics to H2O in meteorology
are not optional. Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted", Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so.
I will gladly make a retraction if anybody can definitively demonstrate that water remains gaseous at ambient temps and/or if moist air (all other things being equal) is lighter than dry air.

Fair enough?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-14 04:43:01 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James McGinn, in
Post by James McGinn
http://principia-scientific.org/reassessing-climate-role-carbon-dioxide/#comments
JM: Up to this point everything you say is both true and irrelevant to my point.
MH: So, water exist in gaseous form at all temperatures above and
below its 1 atmosphere boiling point of 100 C.
JM: This is false. At the ambient temperatures/pressures of the
atmosphere, and in accordance with the same chart you mentioned,
H2O cannot be gaseous. Thus it can only be liquid H2O suspended
in air. As with their application to CO2 in climatology, the
application of the Laws of Thermodynamics to H2O in meteorology
are not optional. Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted", Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so. You've
presented nothing but a demonstrably false fairy tale, the
machinations of a badly bent mind which cannot grasp reality, and has
thus scampered off into the brush, creating a kooky conspiracy theory
that has been proven via more than a half-dozen different avenues to
be utter hogwash.
Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies
watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do
you continue to deny reality?
I
If you think you can just "wait it out" until I lose interest, you
don't know me very well, James. I never give up. You'll pay me the
$100,000 you owe me for meeting not just one but every single one of
the terms of your publicly-made and often-reiterated challenge, and on
top of that, providing the scientific proof that your kooky little
conspiracy theory does not and cannot reflect reality, or you'll spend
the remainder of your days backpedaling and proving yourself to be an
uneducated moron.

Do you think, both of us being in California, I can't put a lien on
your house, Jim?
will gladly make a retraction if anybody can definitively
demonstrate that water remains gaseous at ambient temps and/or
if moist air (all other things being equal) is lighter than dry air.
Already done, Jim, so you're lying.
Fair enough?
You're a kooktard, Jim. You're far too stupid and insane, and far, far
too emotionally invested in your being far too stupid and insane, to
ever acknowledge reality, despite my rubbing your stupid face in it
these past 8 days.

Yeah, Jim... in 8 short days I've utterly destroyed your kooky little
theory, proven it cannot and does not reflect reality, and proven
you're a brain-damaged moron. And I did it with scientific fact you
find yourself utterly unable to refute.

Meanwhile, all you've done is lie, conflate, backpedal, divert, duck,
dodge and non sequitur.

Get right on answering those tough questions, Jim... you've made an
extraordinary claim, and you've presented absolutely zero corroborable
proof to back that claim up.

So you throw out 150+ years of substantive and in-depth research as
means of attempting to salvage your kooky discredited conspiracy
theory in order to maintain your delusion that you know something no
one else, all of them smarter and saner than you, knows, Jim?

Do you really think the entire world has been wrong for a century and
a half, and *you*, the kooktard who cannot answer my tough questions,
are right, Jim?

Or do you think the Occam's Razor explanation is that you're a
delusional Dunning-Kruger afflicted paranoid-schizophrenic kook who's
concocted a kooky conspiracy theory that is laughably wrong?

Why can't you get your kooky conspiracy theory through the peer-review
process, Jim?

Why are there *no* corroborating peer-reviewed papers that back up
your kooky contentions, Jim? The ones you've provided I've used to
prove you and your kooky conspiracy theory *wrong*.

How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?

How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm, extremely
strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons
with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed far above the
troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?

Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does
not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will,
Jim.

Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with
the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to
protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity.
I note you are doing the same.

I also note that, despite being driven *so* insane by their Usenet
Lord and Master that some kooks forget their own name, they never
forget mine... it haunts them for as long as they live.

<snicker>
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
James McGinn
2016-03-14 05:12:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
If you think you can just "wait it out" until I lose interest,
I don't want you to lose interest.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
you
don't know me very well, James. I never give up. You'll pay me the
$100,000 you owe me
If I thought somebody owed me money I would be looking for a lawyer. I honestly hope you do the same.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-14 06:07:51 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 9:53:16 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
If you think you can just "wait it out" until I lose interest, you
don't know me very well, James. I never give up. You'll pay me the
$100,000 you owe me for meeting not just one but every single one of
the terms of your publicly-made and often-reiterated challenge, and on
top of that, providing the scientific proof that your kooky little
conspiracy theory does not and cannot reflect reality, or you'll spend
the remainder of your days backpedaling and proving yourself to be an
uneducated moron.
Do you think, both of us being in California, I can't put a lien on
your house, Jim?
I don't want you to lose interest.
Oh, I'm sure if I put a lien on your house, I'd gain appreciable
equity interest, James. But you'll willingly pay me, James... and be
glad that you're doing so, just to be rid of me.

<snicker>
If I thought somebody owed me money I would be looking for a
lawyer. I honestly hope you do the same.
That's not how I work, Jim. I find it's more fun to drop-kick retards
until they pay up. In fact, by the time I'm done with you, you'll
think paying me what you owe me is just about the best idea you ever
had.

<snicker>

Get right on answering those tough questions, Jim... you've made an
extraordinary claim, and you've presented absolutely zero corroborable
proof to back that claim up.

So you throw out 150+ years of substantive and in-depth research as
means of attempting to salvage your kooky discredited conspiracy
theory in order to maintain your delusion that you know something no
one else, all of them smarter and saner than you, knows, Jim?

Do you really think the entire world has been wrong for a century and
a half, and *you*, the kooktard who cannot answer my tough questions,
are right, Jim?

Or do you think the Occam's Razor explanation is that you're a
delusional Dunning-Kruger afflicted paranoid-schizophrenic kook who's
concocted a kooky conspiracy theory that is laughably wrong?

Why can't you get your kooky conspiracy theory through the peer-review
process, Jim?

Why are there *no* corroborating peer-reviewed papers that back up
your kooky contentions, Jim? The ones you've provided I've used to
prove you and your kooky conspiracy theory *wrong*.

How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?

How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm, extremely
strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons
with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed far above the
troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?

Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does
not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will,
Jim.

Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with
the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to
protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity.
I note you are doing the same.

I also note that, despite being driven *so* insane by their Usenet
Lord and Master that some kooks forget their own name, they never
forget mine... it haunts them for as long as they live.

<snicker>
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
James McGinn
2016-03-14 07:37:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
I don't want you to lose interest.
Oh, I'm sure if I put a lien on your house, I'd gain appreciable
equity interest,
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass. And that would mean you would have to come up with some genuine evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say, that ain't going to happen.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James. But you'll willingly pay me, James... and be
glad that you're doing so, just to be rid of me.
Why don't you see if you can find an expert, somebody willing to publicly vouch for you. Somebody willing to debate. Somebody willing to calmly present the evidence that gets you so flabbergasted.

But here's the problem, anybody smart enough to win such a debate would also be smart enough to realize, upon preparation, that they have no chance of winning.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<snicker>
Post by James McGinn
If I thought somebody owed me money I would be looking for a
lawyer. I honestly hope you do the same.
That's not how I work, Jim. I find it's more fun to drop-kick retards
until they pay up. In fact, by the time I'm done with you, you'll
think paying me what you owe me is just about the best idea you ever
had.
Do they let you out on your own? By yourself?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-14 15:24:15 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
<news:99ef391e-feff-45c1-89b1-***@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 14
Mar 2016 00:37:47 -0700 (PDT):

Look at the moronic kooktard bleating in the wee hours. LOL
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 11:18:05 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
I don't want you to lose interest.
Oh, I'm sure if I put a lien on your house, I'd gain appreciable
equity interest,
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass.
And that would mean you would have to come up with some
genuine evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say,
that ain't going to happen.
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet posts.
Do you not realize that, James? Why, we just had one moron recently go
to jail based in part on evidence consisting of Usenet posts... that
was my doing, I entrapped him. I'm devious like that.

<snicker>
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James. But you'll willingly pay me, James... and be
glad that you're doing so, just to be rid of me.
Why don't you see if you can find an expert, somebody willing
to publicly vouch for you.
There's no need for that, James. The scientific data stands on its
own, as it has done for two centuries, because comprehensive
mathematics back them up, as does empirical evidence.

Conversely, your kooky contentions have absolutely no evidence. Did
you not think of that before you made your public challenge, Jim?
Somebody willing to debate. Somebody willing to calmly present
the evidence that gets you so flabbergasted.
Says the moron bleating out backpedaling denials and attempts at
diversion away from the topic of his being utterly unable to defend
his kooky conspiracy theory, in the wee hours. LOL
But here's the problem, anybody smart enough to win such a
debate would also be smart enough to realize, upon preparation,
that they have no chance of winning.
And why would that be, Jim? Do you realize just what a tight spot
you've gotten yourself into with your insane blathering, Jim? I'm
gonna own your house, Jim.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<snicker>
Post by James McGinn
If I thought somebody owed me money I would be looking for a
lawyer. I honestly hope you do the same.
That's not how I work, Jim. I find it's more fun to drop-kick retards
until they pay up. In fact, by the time I'm done with you, you'll
think paying me what you owe me is just about the best idea you ever
had.
Do they let you out on your own? By yourself?
Your non sequiturs are not adequate substitute for a defense of your
kooky conspiracy theory, James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA.

You will pay me what you owe me, Jim... by the time I'm done with you,
you'll be glad to do so, just to be rid of me.

<snicker>

Now, here's your chance to prove your mettle, Jim... get to refuting
that scientific reality...

==========================================================

Still demonstrating your inability to grasp how water can be gaseous
phase below its boiling point, James? It's already been fully
explained to you, and in the process, your kooky conspiracy theory has
been utterly demolished.

You postulate the following:

1) There is a "plasma not-a-plasma" that exists in the troposphere,
which you have admitted is merely a hypothetical construct so you can
continue to blather on about your kooky discredited conspiracy theory.

2) This magical "plasma not-a-plasma" is plasmized by an energy source
that is somehow magically plasmizing water in the troposphere without
dissociating it, given that the dissociation energy and nuclear
binding energy of water are identical at 940.8 kJ/mol, and thus water
will dissociate rather than plasmize, unless hit with an extremely
energetic laser.

3) That your kooky energy source is somehow plasmizing only
atmospheric water while not plasmizing or dissociating Earth-bound
water, and is not killing off all life on the planet. Given that the
*minimum* energy necessary to even *begin* to plasmize water would be
equivalent to photons at a *maximum* wavelength of 103.32 nm, just
3.32 nm away from the x-ray range, I'm sure even you can see the
problem inherent in your contention, James.

4) That this magical energy source exists in the troposphere. Except
it cannot exist in the troposphere. Photons of shorter wavelength than
~121 nm are absorbed far above the troposphere due to their ability to
ionize air, thus they are not present in the troposphere, where the
overwhelming majority of all water is.

5) That warm air is heavier than cooler air... tell me, Jim... which
direction does air flow from a flame? Oh, that's right, upward. Why?
Because warm air is lighter and less dense than cooler air and thus
convects upward.

6) That air with gaseous phase water in it is heavier than dry air,
except you forget that science has long known about molar mass and
molar volume...

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Air temperature is a much greater determiner of air density than
humidity.

The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of
the atomic masses of its constituent atoms.

The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen,
1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP.

Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous
phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar
mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the
same volume of 22.414 liters at STP.

The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas
the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP.

Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh:
18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase
28.57 g for dry air

Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore
air containing water in its gaseous phase is lighter than dry air.

Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its
gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant.

Except that's not all, Jim. Because air becomes denser as the altitude
decreases.

At any given altitude, air of the same temperature and gaseous water
partial pressure will have the same density.

At any given altitude, air of lower temperature but similar gaseous
water partial pressure will have higher density.

At any given altitude, air of the same temperature but greater gaseous
water partial pressure will have lower density.

For air of the same temperature and gaseous water partial pressure,
air at a higher altitude will have lower density.

(1) For instance, at sea level, 20 C temperature, and 0% relative
humidity, the air density is 1.204 kg/m^3.

Keeping all other factors in (1) the same but increasing relative
humidity to 100%, or elevation to 74 meters, or temperature to 22.4 C,
the air density is 1.194 kg/m^3.

Thus in order for the air at sea level to rise 74 meters due to
increased buoyancy, it must have 100% more relative humidity than the
air 74 meters above (IOW, the air at sea level must be at 100% RH, the
air 74 meters above must be at 0% RH), given the same temperature; or
the temperature of that sea level air must be at least 2.4 C greater
than the air at 74 meters, given the same relative humidity.

Given that temperature can change much more than 2.4 C, whereas
relative humidity can only max out at 100%, one can see that
temperature-induced convection is the predominant driver of weather
systems, destroying yet another of your kooky contentions.

IOW, in order for air to rise, it must overcome gravity, which
requires energy (said energy in the form of temperature of the air
itself decreasing air density or the latent heat of vaporization of
monomer water in its gaseous phase replacing a certain percentage of
higher molar weight air molecules and thus decreasing air density).

It's not because of your blather that the air at a lower altitude is
"heavier" due to "water droplets", Ko0okTard.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

And before you begin blathering on again about the Ideal Gas Law not
applying to the atmosphere, let me remind you that I've done the
calculations for the van der Waals equation, as well. It is in
agreement with the Ideal Gas Law to a great degree of accuracy even
with the molar volume I used. As air volume increases for the same
relative humidity, air with gaseous phase water in it acts more and
more like an ideal gas, Jim. Compare the Ideal Gas Law to the van der
Waals Equation with all parameters the same except for volume, and
increase the volume through several iterations, then plot the
difference between the results of the Ideal Gas Law and the van der
Waals equation... notice the converging trend?

Do you think for an Earth-atmosphere-sized container, the air with
gaseous phase water in it would be within a very small margin of error
to an ideal gas, Jim? Sure it is. But that's something else you don't
understand because you're a low-information uneducated oaf.

7) Your kooky contention that water polarity changes upon H bonding...
which would also cause random changes in water's solvent properties,
and we know water's solvent properties do not change randomly, Jim.
You didn't know about the two spin isomers of water, which means there
are two hybrids of water with different H bonding strengths:

http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron
orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's
photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is
due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two
phases.

http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
You'll note the double peak of liquid water.

Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory:
====================================================
Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of
water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the
peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to
the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules.
====================================================

You betcha... para and ortho-form water.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ortho_para_water.html>
====================================================
Each hydrogen atom in water has a magnetic moment, which is associated
with the proton's spin of 1/2. As is found in molecular hydrogen (H2),
the protons (within the hydrogen atoms) in water (H2O) may possess
parallel or antiparallel nuclear spin (see right). When the spins are
parallel, there is a paramagnetic state called ortho-H2O with a
magnetic moment = 1. This is the high spin (triplet) state with three
symmetric spin states +1 , 0 , -1 (^^, ^v+^v, vv) where the three
states have equal energy in a zero magnetic field. This spin state
always possesses positive energy with a minimum energy level of 284.7
J mol-1 (23.794352 cm-1) H216O, [607c], 284.4 J mol-1 (23.773510 cm-1)
H217O [607a] or 284.2 J mol-1 (23.754902 cm-1) H218O [607a].

When the spins are opposed there exists the nonmagnetic state called
para-H2O with magnetic moment = 0 with just one antisymmetric spin
state (^v-^v) and magnetic moment = 0. Some of the water molecules in
this low spin (singlet) state will not be rotating even at room
temperature.

Para-H2O does not interact with an external magnetic field, but
ortho-H2O does. Conversion between these isomers is symmetry forbidden
for isolated water molecules and they act as different molecular
species. They can change spin state on interaction with another
particle, including other water molecules. The equilibrium ratio of
these nuclear spin states in H2O is all para- at zero Kelvin, where
the molecules have no rotational spin in their ground state, shifting
to the most stable ratio [1694] of 3:1 ortho:para, in the relative
amounts of the number of magnetic states, at less cold temperatures
(>50 K, see left [2478]); the equilibrium taking months to establish
itself in ice (or gas) and nearly an hour in ambient water [410]. It
is now thought that the ratio lies far from equilibrium and much
closer to 1:1 in liquid water due to hydrogen bond formation [2076].
This means that liquid H2O effectively consists of a mixture of
non-identical molecules and the properties of pure liquid ortho-H2O or
para-H2O are unknown. The differences in the properties of these two
forms of water are expected to be greater in an electric field [1186],
which may be imposed externally, from surfaces or from water
clustering itself. Many materials preferentially adsorb para-H2O due
to its non-rotation ground state [410, 835].

The apparent difference in energy between the two states is a
significant 1-2 kJ mol-1, far greater than expected from spin-spin
interactions (< ÎŒJ mol-1) [835]. It has been suggested that structural
rearrangements may be induced by ortho-H2O : para-H2O conversion
[1430], as it is possible that hydrogen bonds between para-H2O,
possessing no ground state spin, are stronger and last longer than
hydrogen bonds between ortho-H2O [1150]. It is thus possible that
ortho-H2O and para-H2O form separate hydrogen bonded clusters [1150]
with para-H2O being preferred in the low density tetrahedrally
coordinated clusters and ortho-H2O being preferred in the high density
clusters [2070], where their rotation is more easily accommodated.
Picoliter samples of pure ortho-H2O and para-H2O may be separated in a
strong dc electric field [2156].
====================================================

The two spin isomers of water cause a different H bond strength when
water molecules of like spin isomers engage in H bonding to form water
clusters, Jim. Thus the weaker ortho-H2O hydrogen bond is more easily
broken, so most of the gaseous phase water being evaporated should be
ortho-H2O. You'll note above that ortho-H2O even in its liquid form is
very close to the same properties as gaseous phase water under x-ray
spectroscopy, the difference accountable by taking into consideration
temperature and phase.

Remember when I said the surface layer of water was more viscous than
the bulk water? Yeah, that's because the ortho-H2O being evaporated
removes heat from the water, which makes the para-H2O in the ~1.7 nm
thick surface layer act nearly the same as ice.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/interfacial_water.html>
=====================================================
Analysis of simple thermodynamics c shows the surface has considerable
structuring, having identical density to that of bulk water at just
under 4 °C. In addition, the surface water structuring varies less
with temperature than the bulk. Refractive index study of the
water-air surface reveals it to be about 1.7 nm thick at 22 °C and
more dense than the bulk liquid (that is, it behaves like water at a
lower temperature).
=====================================================

As for condensation? Well, it's been found that under circumstances in
which relative humidity is less than ~25%, a four-molecule thick layer
of ice forms on the condensation surface... so apparently what is
happening is that the ortho-H2O being evaporated is colliding with
other molecules in the air, changing their spin isomer and thus giving
off energy, becoming para-H2O, and those are the ones preferentially
condensing, forming that four-molecule thick layer of ice. You'll note
above that para-H2O even in its liquid form is very close to the same
properties as solid phase water (ice) under x-ray spectroscopy, the
difference accountable by taking into consideration temperature and
phase.

For conditions of greater than ~25% relative humidity and thus greater
water gaseous-phase partial pressure in the air, apparently the
condensation process is fast enough to allow even ortho-H2O
gaseous-phase water to condense, thus the four-molecule thick layer of
ice is melted.

So you see, James, it's not because of your kooky contention that the
water molecule's polarity changes upon hydrogen bonding, it's because
there are two spin-isomer hybrids of the water molecule with two
different hydrogen bonding strengths.

Yet again, your kooky conspiracy theory is ripped to shreds by
scientific fact... made especially delicious because it was done
utilizing a link *you* provided. LOL

<http://phys.org/news/2014-09-para-ortho.html>
==============================================
A hydrogen nucleus (proton) can adopt two different states, comparable
to rotation clockwise and counterclockwise. In the case of water, the
nuclear spins of the two — indistinguishable — protons can be combined
in four different ways: one antisymmetric and three symmetric
wavefunctions. Water adopting the antisymmetric wavefunction is called
para water, whereas water adopting one of the symmetric ones is called
ortho water. Because switching from one state to the other is
"forbidden" due to quantum-mechanical symmetry rules, the two spin
isomers cannot interconvert without external influences such as
collisions.
==============================================

Were you not aware that hydrogen has two spin isomers, ortho- and
para-, and thus water, comprised of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen
atoms, also has two spin isomers?

<https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f24e171918d462fac89b809dccaa7c3e>
<http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2014/201434press.gif>

In pure hydrogen, ortho-hydrogen is thermodynamically unstable even at
low temperature and / or high pressure and it thus spontaneously
converts to para-hydrogen upon molecular collision, which has
implications for liquefied hydrogen storage, as energy is given off by
this spin isomer conversion.

In water, the oxygen atom slows the already slow conversion process to
para-hydrogen by preserving spin state of the hydrogen atom via
partially shielding the hydrogen atom from molecular collision which
would cause spin isomer conversion.

Now, let's you get to answering those questions you've been ducking,
Jim...

How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?

How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?

Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does
not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will,
Jim.

Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with
the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to
protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity.
I note you are doing the same.

I also note that, despite being driven *so* insane by their Usenet
Lord and Master that some kooks forget their own name, they never
forget mine... it haunts them for as long as they live.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
James McGinn
2016-03-14 16:32:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass.
And that would mean you would have to come up with some
genuine evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say,
that ain't going to happen.
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet posts.
Do you not realize that,
You will be cross examined, not unlike what is happening over at scottish sceptic site, where you are fairing poorly. You will be expected to describe the experiments and actually understand them. You can't just blather on and evade questions like you do here.

What will you do?

You have zero chance of being successful.
Sergio
2016-03-14 17:55:25 UTC
Permalink
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 8:34:30 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet
posts. Do you not realize that,
You will be cross examined, not unlike what is happening over at
scottish septic site,
everyone knows the Scotts do not have indoor plumbing,
and wear kilts so the can squat when needed in the fields

Scott Tissue was an attempt by the English to get the Scotties to wipe
their bottoms.

Didn't work, you can smell a Scott 1/2 mile away.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-14 18:17:00 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 8:34:30 AM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass.
And that would mean you would have to come up with some
genuine evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say,
that ain't going to happen.
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet posts.
Do you not realize that,
You will be cross examined, not unlike what is happening over
at scottish sceptic site, where you are fairing poorly.
"fairing poorly" LOL

This from the kooktard who is running away from answering those tough
questions, and thus far has called the webmaster of that site stupid
and uneducated and failed to provide any data requested of you...
here's another question, Jim... why is that no one, after reviewing
the data, believes you're anything other than a moronic halfwit?

You'll note I've provided references to the experiments, and a
description of the exact experiment which will definitively confirm or
null your kooky theory, Jim... why aren't you doing that experiment to
prove yourself right, Jim? You've made an extraordinary claim, the
onus is upon you to prove yourself right... until then, you're wrong.

That's the way it works, Jim. Deal with it.
You will be expected to describe the experiments and actually
understand them. You can't just blather on and evade questions
like you do here.
You're projecting, James. The only "blathering on and evading of
questions" is being done by you. Conversely I've provided
peer-reviewed empirically-observed scientific experiments from the
past two and a half centuries which explained everything you're trying
to explain while nulling your supposition.

You have no refutation of that scientific reality, so the very best
you can do is bleat, conflate, goalpost-move, evade, topic-change and
use slimy debating tactics as means of protecting your delusions...
but you'll note you cannot defend your kooky "theory not-a-theory"
(because it doesn't rise to the level of theory, nor even
hypothesis... you have *zero* corroborating data, *zero* experimental
data... you only have a hunch, as you've admitted) which uses "plasma
not-a-plasma" (which cannot exist in the troposphere), then when
called on it, you demand proof of that which has been known for
centuries, dismiss it when presented as "irrelevant", claim that your
use of hypothetical constructs to make your kooky theory work is
"semantics", and avoid providing any data or proof because you have
none.

In short, Jim, you've lost. Badly.
What will you do?
You have zero chance of being successful.
Awww, poor Jim. Projection doesn't become you.

Now, Jim... get right on answering those tough questions, or run away
again and prove that your kooky theory is nothing more than a fairy
tale, no better than AGW, believed in by moronic kooktards who can't
grasp the basics of science.

<snicker>

How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're
plasma, Jim?

How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding
energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the
water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules
account for the different H bonding strengths which account for
evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky
conspiracy theory is workable, Jim?

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
vallor
2016-03-14 21:15:24 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:24:15 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
jump head first into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016
Look at the moronic kooktard bleating in the wee hours. LOL
About half an hour after your last post last night, if memory serves.

So?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 11:18:05 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
I don't want you to lose interest.
Oh, I'm sure if I put a lien on your house, I'd gain appreciable
equity interest,
Yes, and if Pinocchio lies, his nose grows.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass.
And that would mean you would have to come up with some genuine
evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say,
that ain't going to happen.
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet posts.
But you haven't actually _done_ anything, or even said you were going to
_do_ anything -- just said "if I do X, then Y".

But you and I and everybody on the planet knows you can't put a lien on
James' home, so there is no "X".
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Do you not realize that, James? Why, we just had one moron recently go
to jail based in part on evidence consisting of Usenet posts... that was
my doing,
Mmmhmm.

Just don't sit too close to the screen while your telling these whoppers,
or you'll end up with monitor bits on your nose.

ObPhysics:

Perpetual motion machine: strap a piece of buttered toast to a cat, then
drop her.

Nyuk-nyuk, betcha never heard that one before... ;)
--
-v
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-15 04:27:24 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Post by vallor
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:24:15 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James McGinn, in
jump head first into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016
Look at the moronic kooktard bleating in the wee hours. LOL
About half an hour after your last post last night, if memory serves.
I was fast asleep by 11 PM.
Post by vallor
So?
So remailer latency.

So James McGinn cannot defend the fairy tale he's concocted so he can
tell himself he's smarter than every scientist in the past 250+ years,
despite his scientific education being the sum total of a single Basic
Meteorology elective class, so he spends more and more time bleating
non sequiturs, backpedaling, stomping his feet and demanding proof of
that which has been known, studied and measured for centuries, then
dismissing it, and refusing to do any experiments which would null his
kooky claims or provide any evidence for fear I'll rip it to shreds.
Because I've left him no wiggle room to defend his kooky claims, so
the only thing he's got left is to protect his delusions, so at the
very least, he can continue to think he's anything other than an
insane moronic kooktard who cannot grasp simple physical phenomena.

<snicker>
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 11:18:05 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
I don't want you to lose interest.
Oh, I'm sure if I put a lien on your house, I'd gain appreciable
equity interest,
Yes, and if Pinocchio lies, his nose grows.
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?

I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop. And now that you've started...

<snicker>
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass.
And that would mean you would have to come up with some genuine
evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say,
that ain't going to happen.
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet posts.
But you haven't actually _done_ anything, or even said you were going to
_do_ anything -- just said "if I do X, then Y".
But you and I and everybody on the planet knows you can't put a lien on
James' home, so there is no "X".
Defending the anti-science nitwit who thinks the jet stream and
tornadoes are the same thing, and in fact thinks the jet stream
burrows down through the atmosphere to form tornadoes? LOL

The moronic kooktard who's fabricated an impossible "plasma
not-a-plasma" that cannot exist because water won't plasmize unless
hit with extremely energetic lasers because its nuclear binding energy
and dissociation energy are identical at 940.8 kJ/mol, and thus water
preferentially dissociates into hydrogen and oxygen? LOL

The dimwitted nong who believes there exists in the troposphere an
energy source so energetic it can plasmize all the water in the
troposphere, yet it somehow magically doesn't dissociate or plasmize
all water on the planet (and kill all life)?

The braindead idiot who believes warmer air is heavier than cooler
air? LOL

The uneducated shortbus window licker who cannot grasp molar volume
and molar mass, and thus believes water vapor is heavier than air, and
thus that air with water vapor in it is heavier than dry air? LOL

The crayon-eating kook who dismisses 250+ years of empirical
experimental evidence proving he's delusional, yet won't do a simple
experiment which will most definitely null his kooky claims? LOL

The kooktard who can't get his fantastical fairy tale claims through
the peer-review process, and in fact can't even get his kooky rambling
writings on a pre-print server? LOL

The moron who has to "publish" his "discoveries not-discoveries",
which are nothing more than suppositions built upon suppositions
pulled straight from his ass, on a website that specializes in topics
such as:

"The Expanding Earth" - Earth expands, plate tectonics doesn't exist

"The Place of Reason in Botanical Life" - Genetic mutation doesn't
account for evolutionary change, plants have consciousness!

"Genetic Memory" - Evolution doesn't exist, reproductive systems have
their own consciousness and can intelligently change the offspring.

"An Alternative To Plate Tectonics" - Earth is hollow!

Yeah, this is the level of "science" that James McGinn's kooky claims
rise to. LOL
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Do you not realize that, James? Why, we just had one moron recently go
to jail based in part on evidence consisting of Usenet posts... that was
my doing,
Mmmhmm.
Just don't sit too close to the screen while your telling these whoppers,
or you'll end up with monitor bits on your nose.
Oh, you didn't know? Having been in acting in a prior life, I knew
Renee, and knowing Emmett, I knew Renee would be irresistible bait to
him... all she had to do was a bit of smoking and a mention of anal
sex and Emmett went full-on stalker, as he always does. He exceeded
even our best hopes, with his videos and photos, which stood as
additional evidence against him. Thus, to rid society of a menace, the
plan was hatched and carried out.

It was hoped that a book could be gotten out of it and thereby revive
Renee's acting career via publicity, but no one is interested in an
ugly stalkerish little gargoyle such as Emmett... they just shrugged
their shoulders and said, "Yeah, he's fucking crazy. What'd you
expect? Crazy toothless wonky-eyed guy stalks hot chick. Been done
before. Jodie Foster's story was better. Get that ugly little shit to
take a shot at a politician or Bobbitt himself, and you've got a
story. Next."

Eh, it was fun, at least. And the good it did for both Emmett and
society as a whole was immense.

<snicker>
Post by vallor
Perpetual motion machine: strap a piece of buttered toast to a cat, then
drop her.
Nyuk-nyuk, betcha never heard that one before... ;)
That's a waste of a perfectly good piece of toast. And it's not a
perpetual motion machine, it generates anti-gravity.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-15 04:52:16 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:27:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Post by vallor
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:24:15 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James McGinn, in
sly
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
jump head first into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 14 Mar 201=
6
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Look at the moronic kooktard bleating in the wee hours. LOL
About half an hour after your last post last night, if memory serves.=
I was fast asleep by 11 PM.
i was fast asleep way before that.

YOU LOSE.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
So?
So remailer latency.
So James McGinn cannot defend the fairy tale he's concocted so he can
tell himself he's smarter than every scientist in the past 250+ years,=
despite his scientific education being the sum total of a single Basic=
Meteorology elective class, so he spends more and more time bleating
non sequiturs, backpedaling, stomping his feet and demanding proof of
that which has been known, studied and measured for centuries, then
dismissing it, and refusing to do any experiments which would null his=
kooky claims or provide any evidence for fear I'll rip it to shreds.
Because I've left him no wiggle room to defend his kooky claims, so
the only thing he's got left is to protect his delusions, so at the
very least, he can continue to think he's anything other than an
insane moronic kooktard who cannot grasp simple physical phenomena.
<snicker>
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 11:18:05 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
I don't want you to lose interest.
Oh, I'm sure if I put a lien on your house, I'd gain appreciable
equity interest,
Yes, and if Pinocchio lies, his nose grows.
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop. And now that you've started...
<snicker>
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
LOL. You would have to get a judgement first, dumbass.
And that would mean you would have to come up with some genuine
evidence and . . . well . . . suffice to say,
that ain't going to happen.
Oh, but James, scientific evidence is admissible, as are Usenet post=
s.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
But you haven't actually _done_ anything, or even said you were going=
to
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
_do_ anything -- just said "if I do X, then Y".
But you and I and everybody on the planet knows you can't put a lien =
on
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
James' home, so there is no "X".
Defending the anti-science nitwit who thinks the jet stream and
tornadoes are the same thing, and in fact thinks the jet stream
burrows down through the atmosphere to form tornadoes? LOL
The moronic kooktard who's fabricated an impossible "plasma
not-a-plasma" that cannot exist because water won't plasmize unless
hit with extremely energetic lasers because its nuclear binding energy=
and dissociation energy are identical at 940.8 kJ/mol, and thus water
preferentially dissociates into hydrogen and oxygen? LOL
The dimwitted nong who believes there exists in the troposphere an
energy source so energetic it can plasmize all the water in the
troposphere, yet it somehow magically doesn't dissociate or plasmize
all water on the planet (and kill all life)?
The braindead idiot who believes warmer air is heavier than cooler
air? LOL
The uneducated shortbus window licker who cannot grasp molar volume
and molar mass, and thus believes water vapor is heavier than air, and=
thus that air with water vapor in it is heavier than dry air? LOL
The crayon-eating kook who dismisses 250+ years of empirical
experimental evidence proving he's delusional, yet won't do a simple
experiment which will most definitely null his kooky claims? LOL
The kooktard who can't get his fantastical fairy tale claims through
the peer-review process, and in fact can't even get his kooky rambling=
writings on a pre-print server? LOL
The moron who has to "publish" his "discoveries not-discoveries",
which are nothing more than suppositions built upon suppositions
pulled straight from his ass, on a website that specializes in topics
"The Expanding Earth" - Earth expands, plate tectonics doesn't exist
"The Place of Reason in Botanical Life" - Genetic mutation doesn't
account for evolutionary change, plants have consciousness!
"Genetic Memory" - Evolution doesn't exist, reproductive systems have
their own consciousness and can intelligently change the offspring.
"An Alternative To Plate Tectonics" - Earth is hollow!
Yeah, this is the level of "science" that James McGinn's kooky claims
rise to. LOL
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Do you not realize that, James? Why, we just had one moron recently =
go
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
to jail based in part on evidence consisting of Usenet posts... that=
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
was
my doing,
Mmmhmm.
Just don't sit too close to the screen while your telling these =
whoppers,
or you'll end up with monitor bits on your nose.
Oh, you didn't know? Having been in acting in a prior life, I knew
Renee, and knowing Emmett, I knew Renee would be irresistible bait to
him... all she had to do was a bit of smoking and a mention of anal
sex and Emmett went full-on stalker, as he always does. He exceeded
even our best hopes, with his videos and photos, which stood as
additional evidence against him. Thus, to rid society of a menace, the=
plan was hatched and carried out.
It was hoped that a book could be gotten out of it and thereby revive
Renee's acting career via publicity, but no one is interested in an
ugly stalkerish little gargoyle such as Emmett... they just shrugged
their shoulders and said, "Yeah, he's fucking crazy. What'd you
expect? Crazy toothless wonky-eyed guy stalks hot chick. Been done
before. Jodie Foster's story was better. Get that ugly little shit to
take a shot at a politician or Bobbitt himself, and you've got a
story. Next."
Eh, it was fun, at least. And the good it did for both Emmett and
society as a whole was immense.
<snicker>
Post by vallor
Perpetual motion machine: strap a piece of buttered toast to a cat, =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
then
drop her.
Nyuk-nyuk, betcha never heard that one before... ;)
That's a waste of a perfectly good piece of toast. And it's not a
perpetual motion machine, it generates anti-gravity.
<snicker>
-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
Loading Image...
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
Loading Image...

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

Loading Image...

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

Loading Image...

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

Loading Image...

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007

=
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-15 15:52:06 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:27:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop.
<snicker>
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(Ξ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
-
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
I rest my case. LOL

The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
many months. 150 IQ? LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.
then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-15 21:43:49 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),=
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:27:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangl=
er
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop.
<snicker>
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematic=
s
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by vallor
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in =
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you feckin=
g
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(=C3=83=C5=BD=C3=82=C2=B8) =C3=83=C2=A2=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=
=B0=C3=82=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics t=
o
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/=
single-phase-power-systems/
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=93hot=
=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=9D wires, we must =
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to eac=
h
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSi=
ngleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C3=82=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
-
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's=
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understa=
nd =
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) =
+(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) =
+
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_p=
recision(2)*PI*t)))
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float=
_precision(2)*PI*t)));
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.2=
5
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your =
sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same ti=
me.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That's how stupid you are.
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equation=
s =
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can'=
t
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while=
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as h=
e has
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
t=3D" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classi=
c
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: =
headers
o
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complai=
nts
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=80=9D as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of =
subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously i=
t
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their =
homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reaso=
n
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal =
harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 =
steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks=
,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie p=
r0n
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users=
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, the=
n =
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor header=
s
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden=
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum=
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it =
can
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... m=
y
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was=
a
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency=
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-16 04:34:45 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop.
<snicker>
<snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it
should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as:

1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.

2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.

3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.

4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.

5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.

6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.

And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.
then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-16 15:37:56 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:34:45 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),=
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to blea=
t
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
non-stop.
<snicker>
<snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequen=
cy
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, thes=
e
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation
i don't see any subtraction, k0ok:

Loading Image...
Loading Image...

also:
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it=
1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.
2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases=
of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.
And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-16 16:09:05 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:34:45 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop.
<snicker>
<snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation
http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, switches the minus signs to plus signs like the
moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that
he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler
sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL

Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL

You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.

Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get:
60 - (-60) = 120 degrees
(-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees

According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.

Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again:
60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees
(-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees

According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.

And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL

In actuality, the correct answer is:
60 + (-60) = 0 degrees
(-60) + 60 = 0 degrees
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a
mathematical moron. LOL

SPNAK!
Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti
Code and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put
on your hip waders.

<snicker>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?
Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out
that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it
1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.
2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.
And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.
then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-16 19:12:25 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:05 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),=
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:34:45 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey=
),
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bl=
eat
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
non-stop.
<snicker>
<snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different =
frequency
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, th=
ese
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation
http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave
subtraction equation
you mean the one that has been used since the discovery of electricity t=
o =

compute a voltage difference?

that one?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
, switches the minus signs to plus signs like the
i found it to be a more accurate model of the reality of 2 inverted sine=
=

waves that are present on the phase legs of 120/240 residential =

electricity service.

i'm sorry that you were taught contractor "shortcuts" that bypass any tr=
ue =

knowledge of what you are applying the math to.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that
he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler
sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL
Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
vector summation doesn't plot a graph for me to look at.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.
the fuck are you talking about now?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
60 - (-60) =3D 120 degrees
(-60) - 60 =3D -120 degrees =3D 240 degrees
what does that have to do with you denying that the phases of sine waves=
=

on the legs of 120/240 service are inverted and k0okily klaming that to =
=

determine a potential you use addition?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
according to you you can in sist on adding amplitude vectors of differin=
g =

frequency waveforms and get the wrong answer.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
60 - (-60) =3D 60 - 300 =3D -240 =3D 120 degrees
(-60) - 60 =3D 300 - 60 =3D 240 degrees
do you always do incorrect math? o, wait...
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL
60 + (-60) =3D 0 degrees
(-60) + 60 =3D 0 degrees
thanks for clearing that up for yourself.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a
mathematical moron. LOL
SPNAK!
Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti=
Code
i bet there's a reason that all code looks like spaghetti to you.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put
on your hip waders.
<snicker>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) =
+(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) =
+
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_p=
recision(2)*PI*t)))
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float=
_precision(2)*PI*t)));
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?
Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out
that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL=
i didn't need to. i figured out the correct answer, unlike you.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where =
it
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.
2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phas=
es
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees fro=
m
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side=
,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you=
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.
And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-17 04:50:17 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:05 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
non-stop.
<snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different
frequency and amplitude appears to continue to elude you,
DildoRider. Lo, these many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it
http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave
subtraction equation
you mean the one that has been used since the discovery of electricity to
compute a voltage difference?
that one?
No, the Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use since 1748
by scientists and engineers, whereas your kooky sinewave subtraction
equation has been in use for three months by only one thoroughly
confused moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
, switches the minus signs to plus signs like the
i found it to be a more accurate model of the reality of 2 inverted sine
waves that are present on the phase legs of 120/240 residential
electricity service.
"a more accurate model of the reality" LOL

That from the moron who gets his stoooopid ass regularly drop-kicked
by reality. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
i'm sorry that you were taught contractor "shortcuts" that bypass any true
knowledge of what you are applying the math to.
"contractor shortcuts" LOL

You mean shortcuts such as using the correct equation, you moron? LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that
he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler
sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL
Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
vector summation doesn't plot a graph for me to look at.
Still can't figure out vector summation, I see. 150 IQ? LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.
the fuck are you talking about now?
I'm talking about your inability to apply vector summation to even the
simplest of examples, two lines of different vector and slope. Once
you master that, *then* you can move on to calculating the combined
vector and slope of lines that have constantly changing vectors and
slopes such as sinewaves. Moron. LOL

I'm also talking about the fact that your kooky subtraction equation
is wrong. Moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
60 - (-60) = 120 degrees
(-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees
what does that have to do with you denying that the phases of sine waves
on the legs of 120/240 service are inverted and k0okily klaming that to
determine a potential you use addition?
We've moved on from split-phase midpoint-neutral to 3-phase AC,
DildoRider. You had your stooopid ass kicked hard enough on
split-phase midpoint-neutral, so you started spamming bad 3-phase
sinewaves, remember?

Are you confused, DildoRider? Do you need to take a moment to clear
your head of the crack smoke, Cracky McCrackHead?

<snicker>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
according to you you can in sist on adding amplitude vectors of differing
frequency waveforms and get the wrong answer.
Wrong. The Euler sinewave summation equation can sum any number of
sinewaves of any frequency and amplitude, as the multiple references
I've provided prove. That you're *still* to stupid to grasp how to
properly sum sinewaves, even after being *given* the correct equation
to use, stands as testament to your being Robert Michael Wolfe the
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees
(-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees
do you always do incorrect math? o, wait...
Bwahahaaa! DildoRider k'lames that completely correct math is
"incorrect"... likely because he's a mathematical moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL
60 + (-60) = 0 degrees
(-60) + 60 = 0 degrees
thanks for clearing that up for yourself.
Don't forget that in so clearing it up, I not only proved that vector
summation is the correct mathematical procedure to use, but I also
proved your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, and I proved
you're a mathematical moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a
mathematical moron. LOL
SPNAK!
Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti
Code
i bet there's a reason that all code looks like spaghetti to you.
Because a talentless mathematical moron wrote it. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put
on your hip waders.
<snicker>
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?
Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out
that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
i didn't need to. i figured out the correct answer, unlike you.
No, you used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to irrefutably
prove yourself a mathematical moron. LOL

1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.

2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.

3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.

4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.

5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.

6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.

And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.
then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-17 15:19:12 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS value?
Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate
the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC,
and can thus be graphed.

<Loading Image...>
<Loading Image...>

SPNAK! on Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron and Thoroughly
Confused KookTard.

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.
then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-17 17:06:33 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),=
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to =

compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.

maybe you should graph the mean of a sine wave and tell us it's a sine =

wave.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
display purposes? people use RMS to determine whether their circuit wil=
l =

melt or not when AC voltage is applied. they don't do it for "show", =

fakey.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS =
=
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
value?
Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate
the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC,=
RMS is a value, you twit. it's a number. it's not a sine function.

RMS for a triangle (or any shape) wave is computed exactly the same and =
=

it's result is going to be a number.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and can thus be graphed.
unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of=
=

3-phase which you can't manage to show us?

you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that =

summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave.

you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL

you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
looks like someone stole the other sine graph and changed the designatio=
n =

of "half-cycle", which is correct, to "one cycle", which is profoundly =

incorrect.

do you always seek knowledge from the profoundly incorrect?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK! on Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron and Thoroughly
Confused KookTard.
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-17 21:32:02 UTC
Permalink
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is
a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff.
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
maybe you should graph the mean of a sine wave and tell us it's a sine
wave.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz.
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
display purposes? people use RMS to determine whether their circuit will
melt or not when AC voltage is applied. they don't do it for "show",
fakey.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS value?
Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate
the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC,
RMS is a value, you twit. it's a number. it's not a sine function.
RMS for a triangle (or any shape) wave is computed exactly the same and
it's result is going to be a number.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and can thus be graphed.
unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of
3-phase which you can't manage to show us?
But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2
sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. So,
if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with
components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz.

I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots...

Fakey?
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that
summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave.
you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL
you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
looks like someone stole the other sine graph and changed the designation
of "half-cycle", which is correct, to "one cycle", which is profoundly
incorrect.
Oops!
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-18 05:19:41 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is
a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff.
Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's
a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.

<Loading Image...>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

<snicker>
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz.
Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can
follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2
sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies.
MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing
lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with
components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz.
I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots...
Fakey?
You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that,
or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because
you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real
time. LOL

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-18 06:16:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is
a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff.
Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's
a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not
evidence of anything. Especially since you are a lying
bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine.

Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and
tell us they are the same.

Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what
DIFFERENCE means, right?

Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then
compare that!

Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know
what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
<snicker>
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz.
Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can
follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL
Reading isn't your strong suit, is it.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2
sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies.
MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing
lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you
kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook.

You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want
to retract it now, feel free.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with
components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz.
I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots...
Fakey?
You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that,
or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because
you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real
time. LOL
Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired
of having to stand while you type your silly posts?

Isn't the solution becoming obvious yet?
--
"When you superimpose two sine waves of different
frequencies, you get components at the sum and difference of
the two frequencies. This can be shown by using a *sum*
*rule* from trigonometry."˜
--Fakey googles shit he can't understand or verify
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-18 16:24:41 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that
Translation:
"wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating."
LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is
a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff.
Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's
a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not
evidence of anything.
Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that
you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Especially since you are a lying
bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine.
Awww, the butthurt kook is bleating fanfic and lying again. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and
tell us they are the same.
I didn't say they were the same, that's merely you conflating that I'd
said they were the same because you're a lying moron. They're both
sinewaves, which makes you a *wrong* moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what
DIFFERENCE means, right?
It means you're a moron. It also means you'll get foot-stompingly
red-facedly pissed and blather out more fanfic, more lies, more
stupidity, and more proof that you're a fucking moron. LOL

<Loading Image...>

Bwahahaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves yet again that he's taken the
Mathematical Moron spot from DildoRider, kicking DildoRider up to
Mathematical Mega-Moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then
compare that!
Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know
what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad.
Says the mathematical moron who can't even properly graph *anything*.
LOL

Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that the Fourier equation had nothing
to do with sinewaves? Then when it was revealed to you that, in fact,
the equation is known as the Euler-Fourier Equation, and it represents
the transform of a circle to a sinewave, you denied that, too?

<Loading Image...>

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
<snicker>
<crickets> LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz.
Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can
follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL
Reading isn't your strong suit, is it.
Sanity isn't your strong suit, is it. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2
sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies.
MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing
lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you
kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook.
You really want to embarrass yourself with all that again? You sure
you want to go through that again? You were pretty embarrassed by it
the first time...

Ok... I'll update your .sig with the MIDs, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, and
prove you're a backpedaling lying kook. I'll do it one entry at a
time, to extend the butthurt you get out of it as you have to relive
the humiliation of being such a fucking moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want
to retract it now, feel free.
Awww, look at the kook backpedal. You made a k'lame of my having made
a statement "that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and
difference frequencies." (your words). Provide the MID or admit you're
a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with
components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz.
I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots...
Fakey?
You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that,
or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because
you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real
time. LOL
Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired
of having to stand while you type your silly posts?
Your merely k'laming it doesn't make it so, Lying Backpedaling Insane
Mathematical Moron. No MID? Oh, you've just proven yourself a lying
backpedaling insane mathematical moron.
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Isn't the solution becoming obvious yet?
The solution is for you to stop being such a fucking moron, Shiny
Tinfoil Brain. LOL

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-18 18:08:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that
"wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating."
LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is
a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff.
Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's
a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not
evidence of anything.
Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that
you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Why are you such an idiot?

"Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Especially since you are a lying
bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine.
Awww, the butthurt kook is bleating fanfic and lying again. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and
tell us they are the same.
I didn't say they were the same, that's merely you conflating that I'd
said they were the same because you're a lying moron. They're both
sinewaves, which makes you a *wrong* moron. LOL
If they are both sinewaves, they must be the same. Sinusoids
don't come in a variety of different shapes, fucktard.

A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.

You, of course, don't know anything about basic maths, so do
continue blathering your silliness.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what
DIFFERENCE means, right?
It means you're a moron. It also means you'll get foot-stompingly
red-facedly pissed and blather out more fanfic, more lies, more
stupidity, and more proof that you're a fucking moron. LOL
<http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png>
I'll give you credit for obedience to your master, fakey.
But why did you put the y axis on the right and then graph
it for negative x? And why don't you display the sin and
sin^2 functions?

In any case, the difference between sin and sin^2 is clearly
significant. So thanks again for proving yourself wrong.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then
compare that!
Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know
what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad.
Says the mathematical moron who can't even properly graph *anything*.
LOL
I already know what sines look like. Do your own homework.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that the Fourier equation had nothing
to do with sinewaves?
No, i didn't say anything like that. You made that up.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then when it was revealed to you that, in fact,
the equation is known as the Euler-Fourier Equation, and it represents
What equation? You mean, some equation that you don't
understand how to use, and that you never posted?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
the transform of a circle to a sinewave, you denied that, too?
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
You don't understand anything on that page. It doesn't say
a sine is a FT of a circle, or even imply that. You are
jumping to conclusions because of your complete ignorance of
fourier transforms.

I've pointed this out to you several times. You are
impervious to clues, so muddle along, sonshine.

"a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."...
Bwahahahahaaaa!!!!!!!1!!!

Good gawd, you're dense.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz.
Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can
follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL
Reading isn't your strong suit, is it.
Sanity isn't your strong suit, is it. LOL
Is that the best argument you can come up with?
Sheesh. What a maroon.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2
sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies.
MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing
lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you
kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook.
You really want to embarrass yourself with all that again? You sure
you want to go through that again? You were pretty embarrassed by it
the first time...
Ok... I'll update your .sig with the MIDs, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, and
prove you're a backpedaling lying kook. I'll do it one entry at a
time, to extend the butthurt you get out of it as you have to relive
the humiliation of being such a fucking moron.
Everything in your sig is either disembly, or shit you don't
understand. MID away, i can't wait to be embarrassed.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want
to retract it now, feel free.
Awww, look at the kook backpedal. You made a k'lame of my having made
a statement "that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and
difference frequencies." (your words). Provide the MID or admit you're
a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron.
You said it, tardlet. Now you are expecting me to keep
track of the mindless blither-blather you spew all over
usenet? If you can't remember what you said, it's your
problem and no one else's. It doesn't stop anyone from
taking you to task over it.

Sux to be you, dunnit?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with
components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz.
I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots...
Fakey?
You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that,
or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because
you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real
time. LOL
Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired
of having to stand while you type your silly posts?
Your merely k'laming it doesn't make it so, Lying Backpedaling Insane
Mathematical Moron. No MID? Oh, you've just proven yourself a lying
backpedaling insane mathematical moron.
So you are distancing yourself from what you said.

I can't blame you for wanting to "forget" what you said,
kooktard. You obviously can't defend it.

Are you still afraid to tell us the electronegativity of
oxygen?
--
"The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector
summation of sinusoids. Moron."
--Phakster offers instruction in the use of Sooper Hi
Maths
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 04:52:12 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that
"wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating."
LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is
a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff.
Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's
a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not
evidence of anything.
Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that
you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Why are you such an idiot?
"Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL

Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny
Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Especially since you are a lying
bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine.
Awww, the butthurt kook is bleating fanfic and lying again. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and
tell us they are the same.
I didn't say they were the same, that's merely you conflating that I'd
said they were the same because you're a lying moron. They're both
sinewaves, which makes you a *wrong* moron. LOL
If they are both sinewaves, they must be the same.
Only to morons. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Sinusoids don't come in a variety of different shapes, fucktard.
Bwahahaaaa! Moron.

<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
"If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you
might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"."

SPNAK!

<http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png>

Bwahahaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves yet again that he's taken the
Mathematical Moron spot from DildoRider, kicking DildoRider up to
Mathematical Mega-Moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You, of course, don't know anything about basic maths, so do
continue blathering your silliness.
You're projecting, Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what
DIFFERENCE means, right?
It means you're a moron. It also means you'll get foot-stompingly
red-facedly pissed and blather out more fanfic, more lies, more
stupidity, and more proof that you're a fucking moron. LOL
<http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png>
I'll give you credit for obedience to your master, fakey.
Translation:
"Wuuull... ok, I'm wrong, I'm a mathematical moron. I have no fucking
clue what I'm blither-blathering about. I can't even graph sin*x or
sin^2*x... but I'm butthurt so I'll keep blither-blathering."

Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
But why did you put the y axis on the right and then graph
it for negative x? And why don't you display the sin and
sin^2 functions?
Translation:
"Why didn't you fully kick my stoooopid ass?"

<Loading Image...>

Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
In any case, the difference between sin and sin^2 is clearly
significant. So thanks again for proving yourself wrong.
Those two *sinusoids* sure look like *sinusoids*. Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then
compare that!
Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know
what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad.
Says the mathematical moron who can't even properly graph *anything*.
LOL
I already know what sines look like. Do your own homework.
You apparently do not. You claim the two sinusoids of sin*x and
sin^2*x are not sinusoids. Moron. LOL

And that doesn't address the fact that you're a mathematical moron who
can't properly graph *anything*. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that the Fourier equation had nothing
to do with sinewaves?
No, i didn't say anything like that. You made that up.
Liar.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

SPNAK! on the butthurt backpedaling blither-blathering bleatfarting
moronic kooktard who's been reduced to lying as he backpedals,
blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves he's a moronic kooktard. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then when it was revealed to you that, in fact,
the equation is known as the Euler-Fourier Equation, and it represents
What equation? You mean, some equation that you don't
understand how to use, and that you never posted?
It's been posted many times now, by me, by LunkHead, by Bill
Jillians... that you're too fucking stupid to understand it is no
one's fault but your own, Shiny Tinfoil Brain.

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
the transform of a circle to a sinewave, you denied that, too?
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
You don't understand anything on that page. It doesn't say
a sine is a FT of a circle, or even imply that. You are
jumping to conclusions because of your complete ignorance of
fourier transforms.
Awww, the kooktard catches himself in his previous lie so he can
bleat out his moronity the same as he did last time.

<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
"The Fourier Transform takes a specific viewpoint: What if any signal
could be filtered into a bunch of circular paths?"

"The Fourier Transform is about circular paths (not 1-d sinusoids) and
Euler's formula is a clever way to generate one:"

"If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you
might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"."

SPNAK! on Shiny Tinfoil Brain, who yet again backpedals,
blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves himself to be Usenet's
Mathematical Moron. LOL

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
I've pointed this out to you several times. You are
impervious to clues, so muddle along, sonshine.
Translation:
"I've been wrong several times. I persist in being wrong. I'm a
mathematical moron. I wish I could be right just once." LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
"a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."...
Bwahahahahaaaa!!!!!!!1!!!
Good gawd, you're dense.
Look at the backpedaling blither-blathering moron prove he's Usenet's
Mathematical Moron! LOL!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz.
Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can
follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL
Reading isn't your strong suit, is it.
Sanity isn't your strong suit, is it. LOL
Is that the best argument you can come up with?
Sheesh. What a maroon.
See above, Mathematical Moron... then get to backpedaling,
bleatfarting, blither-blathering and proving yet again that you're
Usenet's Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2
sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies.
MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing
lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you
kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook.
You really want to embarrass yourself with all that again? You sure
you want to go through that again? You were pretty embarrassed by it
the first time...
Ok... I'll update your .sig with the MIDs, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, and
prove you're a backpedaling lying kook. I'll do it one entry at a
time, to extend the butthurt you get out of it as you have to relive
the humiliation of being such a fucking moron.
Everything in your sig is either disembly, or shit you don't
understand. MID away, i can't wait to be embarrassed.
Awwww, the shut-in spankard is so pathetic that the only attention he
can get is getting his stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want
to retract it now, feel free.
Awww, look at the kook backpedal. You made a k'lame of my having made
a statement "that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and
difference frequencies." (your words). Provide the MID or admit you're
a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron.
You said it, tardlet.
MID? No? Do you think lying as you backpedal and prove that you are
Usenet's Mathematical Moron is a good way of "winning, for fuck sake",
Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Now you are expecting me to keep
track of the mindless blither-blather you spew all over
usenet? If you can't remember what you said, it's your
problem and no one else's. It doesn't stop anyone from
taking you to task over it.
Awww, look at the kook backpedal away from his lie. You've just
destroyed the last tattered shreds of what little credibility you had
left, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. You've proven you're a backpedaling lying
piece of shit who can't be believed about anything... most especially
because you're a fucking moron who doesn't understand much of
anything.

SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Sux to be you, dunnit?
And now he's projecting. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with
components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz.
I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots...
Fakey?
You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that,
or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because
you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real
time. LOL
Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired
of having to stand while you type your silly posts?
Your merely k'laming it doesn't make it so, Lying Backpedaling Insane
Mathematical Moron. No MID? Oh, you've just proven yourself a lying
backpedaling insane mathematical moron.
So you are distancing yourself from what you said.
I can't blame you for wanting to "forget" what you said,
kooktard. You obviously can't defend it.
Your k'laming me to be distancing myself from what you k'lame me to
have said in no way proves my having said it, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. In
light of your utter inability to provide any proof, combined with your
having caught yourself in several lies above, you'll be required to
provide proof of your contentions or it's a lie from a backpedaling
blither-blathering bleatfarting moronic kooktard in the throes of a
massive meltdown because you've proven yourself to be Usenet's
Mathematical Moron.

<snicker>

Why are you *so* *stupid* and *butthurt*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Are you still afraid to tell us the electronegativity of
oxygen?
Are you still too stupid to understand the answer that was given,
proving you're a moron who is incapable of understanding the answer
given, hence your bleating continually for a dumbed-down answer you
*can* understand, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
--
"The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector
summation of sinusoids. Moron."
--Phakster offers instruction in the use of Sooper Hi
Maths
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
"The Fourier Transform takes a specific viewpoint: What if any signal
could be filtered into a bunch of circular paths?"

"The Fourier Transform is about circular paths (not 1-d sinusoids) and
Euler's formula is a clever way to generate one:"

"If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you
might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"."

SPNAK! on Shiny Tinfoil Brain, who yet again backpedals,
blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves himself to be Usenet's
Mathematical Moron. LOL

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-19 09:14:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating.
LOL!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not
evidence of anything.
Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that
you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Why are you such an idiot?
"Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
457 lines of blather, and the closest you can come to
anything factual is "Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a
*sinusoid*."

LOL.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?

They must be the same, right fakazoid?

After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?

What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?

They must be the same, right fakazoid?

After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
--
"...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
--Fakey
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 17:24:39 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
well, except that
"wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating."
LOL!
LOL!
I know, right? DildoRider backpedaled and admitted he's Robert Michael
Wolfe, Usenet's Mathematical Mega-Moron.

Did... did you *not* want to shoot DildoRider in the foot again, Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard?

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?

LOL!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not
evidence of anything.
Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that
you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Why are you such an idiot?
"Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL.
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*.
LOL!

And the Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron finally admits
defeat. Reality has drop-kicked Shiny Tinfoil Spankard across Usenet.
Again.

<snicker>
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!

And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!

And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL

SPNAK!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
--
"...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
--Fakey

"The reason that we have these degree designators is because these
represent fractions of a full circle, and in fact the sine waves are a
manifestation of circular motion, that's why the sine function is
sometimes called a circular function."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
=========================================================
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

<http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to
Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
"Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups,
which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as
groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier
transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT,
group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier*
*transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval
with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle
periodic functions."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."

Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't
it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"Relation with complex exponentials:
The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
Formula"

Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak
3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS
L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.

SPNAK!
=========================================================

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
are.

Spankard. Moron. LOL

SPNAK!

Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-20 18:44:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?

After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?

What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?

Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)

After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.

Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?

Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?

Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
--
"But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
--Fakey lectures on trig identities
Mustaffa Sheboygan
2016-03-20 18:50:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious. Poor
Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego...
--
Mustaffa Sheboygan
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-20 19:05:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mustaffa Sheboygan
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious. Poor
Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego...
In this case, honest to Bob, no trolling was requred.
Fakey blundered into it on his own.
Mustaffa Sheboygan
2016-03-20 20:53:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Mustaffa Sheboygan
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious. Poor
Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego...
In this case, honest to Bob, no trolling was requred.
Fakey blundered into it on his own.
But his ego is what keeps him coming back for more floggings.
--
Mustaffa Sheboygan
Sn!pe
2016-03-20 20:40:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mustaffa Sheboygan
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious.
Poor Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego...
You've got to laff, eh? I'm holding my sides!
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
Mustaffa Sheboygan
2016-03-20 20:51:13 UTC
Permalink
In article <1mkffyy.1h02bx11r0vus0N%***@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...
Post by Sn!pe
Post by Mustaffa Sheboygan
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious.
Poor Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego...
You've got to laff, eh? I'm holding my sides!
YES! It is to laugh!
--
Mustaffa Sheboygan
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-20 19:31:22 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:***@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

Still running from the fact that I proved you're a mathematical moron,
Spankard? LOL

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Bwahahahaaa!

Let's take a look at your "derivative", shall we?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.

So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.

And yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves there's a *reason* he's known
as Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Awww, look at the Mathematical Moron bleating out fanfic because he's
*proven* himself to the Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

dy/dx

SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
<crickets> LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
dy/dx

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
dy/dx

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
--
"But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
--Fakey lectures on trig identities
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL

Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Sn!pe
2016-03-20 20:46:00 UTC
Permalink
Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Still running from the fact that I proved you're a mathematical moron,
Spankard? LOL
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.
If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
<snicker>
===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================
And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."
There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...
<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green
See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.
Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.
In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.
Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.
Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
But wait! It gets even better!
<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
SPNAK!
<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.
I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Bwahahahaaa!
Let's take a look at your "derivative", shall we?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.
So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.
And yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves there's a *reason* he's known
as Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
SPNAK!
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Awww, look at the Mathematical Moron bleating out fanfic because he's
*proven* himself to the Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
dy/dx
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
<crickets> LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
dy/dx
SPNAK!
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
dy/dx
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
--
"But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
--Fakey lectures on trig identities
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>
Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snickerturd>
HAW HAW HAW! He goes for the catch... and he drops the ball!
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-20 20:52:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<snip rambling rerun of screedbleat, meant to divert
attention from fakey's epic self-spnak>
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Bwahahahaaa!
Let's take a look at your "derivative", shall we?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.
ROFL yet again. This is getting too good, you dimwitted
faketard.

dy/dx means the derivitive of the function y(x) with respect
to x. LOL!

How do you express the derivitive of the function sin(x)
with respect to x? Oh yeah... d/dx [sin(x)], of course. Duh
& LOL.

You don't have any clue about what we are talking about, so
you are googling at straws.

You just don't know when to stop digging, do you?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.
Bwaaaahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa!!!

Solve for 'd' !!! This is class-fucking-assic.

Faketard! 'd' is not a variable! Hello?!?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Awww, look at the Mathematical Moron bleating out fanfic because he's
*proven* himself to the Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
Says the fool who can only graph bad sinewaves (wrong) to
hide the fact that he doesn't know any math.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
dy/dx
You have no idea what a derivitive is, do you?

Just admit it, fakey. Bow before my superior knowledge, and
admit that no matter how hard you google-scour, you will
never understand the simple shit that i've known for
decades.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
dy/dx
Say what?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
dy/dx
Faketurd... the 'd' is notation. It's a convention, that
implies "a small change in". It's a convention that i'm not
responsible for defining for you. If you don't have access
to common knowledge, you're already fucked.

And you're already waaaaaay fucked.

If you were smart, you would sit down, shut up and be really
humble. But you aren't, so you won't. Keep the LULs coming.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
--
"But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
--Fakey lectures on trig identities
--
"But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical
Moron. So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic
equation because it's not a derivative, but you didn't
define 'd'"
--Fakezoid bleats his ignorance of something he
understands nothing about
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-21 04:52:50 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
How do you express the derivitive of the function sin(x)
with respect to x? Oh yeah... d/dx [sin(x)], of course. Duh
& LOL.
You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).

Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.

And you did it all while you're backpedaling away from having defended
DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation for a month, because
you're the moron who *still* can't grasp constructive and destructive
interference.

So your blather is just your attempt at diverting attention away from
your being a Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You don't have any clue about what we are talking about, so
you are googling at straws.
You just don't know when to stop digging, do you?
Says the mathematical moron who's raping Google, *still* getting it
wrong, and cowardly snipping out everything that kicks his stooopid
ass. LOL

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you
bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUNNNNN!!!!

Bwahahahahaaaa!
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-21 07:56:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
ctl a, ctl c, ctl q... context restored!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<snip rambling rerun of screedbleat, meant to divert
attention from fakey's epic self-spnak>
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Bwahahahaaa!
Let's take a look at your "derivative", shall we?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.
ROFL yet again. This is getting too good, you dimwitted
faketard.
dy/dx means the derivitive of the function y(x) with respect
to x. LOL!
How do you express the derivitive of the function sin(x)
with respect to x? Oh yeah... d/dx [sin(x)], of course. Duh
& LOL.
You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).
Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.
What masturful google-scouring skills you have, fakey.
You even noticed the derivitive of a sine is another
sinusoid. Wow!

But... you forgot to compare that with
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
Is it still cos(x), fakey?
What's wrong... you couldn't google it?

Hint: chain rule
Another hint: 2sin(x)cos(x)

So if sin^2 is a sinusoid, then we would expect that
d/dx [sin^2(x)] = d/dx [sin(x)], right?

Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?

Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
right twice per cycle.

In other words, you're wrong. Wrong, faketard.
You're a mathematical moron.

Sheesh. What a looney maroon!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
you are googling at straws.
You just don't know when to stop digging, do you?
Says the mathematical moron who's raping Google, *still* getting it
wrong, and cowardly snipping out everything that kicks his stooopid
ass. LOL
What's that, fakey? Oh, you snipped out everything that
kicks your stooooopid ass? Who can blame you... but it's
such a classic SPNAK!, that i kind of like you to see it
again.

SPNAK!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.
Bwaaaahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa!!!
Solve for 'd' !!! This is class-fucking-assic.
Faketard! 'd' is not a variable! Hello?!?
LOL! Solve for 'd'..... ROFL!
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Awww, look at the Mathematical Moron bleating out fanfic because he's
*proven* himself to the Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
Do you know how to do phasor arithmetic yet, fakey?
Oh, i just showed you how, didn't i. But you still don't
understand it, do you?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Says the fool who can only graph bad sinewaves (wrong) to
hide the fact that he doesn't know any math.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
dy/dx
You have no idea what a derivitive is, do you?
Just admit it, fakey. Bow before my superior knowledge, and
admit that no matter how hard you google-scour, you will
never understand the simple shit that i've known for
decades.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
dy/dx
Say what?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
dy/dx
Faketurd... the 'd' is notation. It's a convention, that
implies "a small change in". It's a convention that i'm not
responsible for defining for you. If you don't have access
to common knowledge, you're already fucked.
And you're already waaaaaay fucked.
If you were smart, you would sit down, shut up and be really
humble. But you aren't, so you won't. Keep the LULs coming.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
--
"But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
--Fakey lectures on trig identities
--
"But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical
Moron. So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic
equation because it's not a derivative, but you didn't
define 'd'"
--Fakezoid bleats his ignorance of something he
understands nothing about
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-21 15:46:47 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
ctl a, ctl c, ctl q... context restored!
What the fuck is Ctrl-Q, Mathematical Moron? In Windows, it quits the
application. In Mac, it quits the application. In Linux, it undoes
Ctrl-S, in other words, allows screen scrolling again.

So in reality, it went like this:
"ctl a, ctl c, ctl q... aw, fuck, I just closed my newsreader! Why am
I *so* *fucking* *stupid*?!"

Bwahahahaaa!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).
Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.
What masturful google-scouring skills you have, fakey.
Almost equal to your GoogleRaping skills, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard...
you did, after all, rape Google to desperately find some diversionary
strawman you could prop up to divert attention away from your having
defended DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation for *weeks*,
until I SPNAK!d you so hard you're *still* cowardly snipping that
SPNAK! out and running away from it... just as you've cowardly run
from all the SPNAK!s you took, in my .sig.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You even noticed the derivitive of a sine is another
sinusoid. Wow!
Sure I did. You're the moron who k'lamed that a sinusoid wasn't a
sinusoid.

=========================================================
A Mathematical Moron wrote:
===========================
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
"Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL.
===========================

FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
===========================
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
===========================
=========================================================

Mathematical Moron. LOL

SPNAK!

You're also the Mathematical Moron who k'lames that formulas aren't
math.

SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
But... you forgot to compare that with
Translation:
"I'M NOT DONE BLEATING! EVERYONE DIVERT YOUR EYES FROM THE SPNAK!AGE I
TOOK, AND PRETEND YOU DON'T SEE ME RUNNING AWAY FROM IT! BLLEEEEAAAT!"

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
Is it still cos(x), fakey?
You're the Mathematical Moron claiming sin^2x = cosx.

Not even close:
<http://i.imgur.com/krRlHYj.png>

Although I'll note they're both sinusoids... which you've denied.
Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's wrong... you couldn't google it?
Hint: chain rule
Another hint: 2sin(x)cos(x)
So if sin^2 is a sinusoid, then we would expect that
d/dx [sin^2(x)] = d/dx [sin(x)], right?
Only to a Mathematical Moron who claims that a sinusoid isn't a
sinusoid, then backpedals to cover up his fuckup. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
right twice per cycle.
Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
<http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron.
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
In other words, you're wrong. Wrong, faketard.
In other words, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. you're wrong.
Wrong, Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You're a mathematical moron.
Says the Mathematical Moron, after yet again proving himself to be a
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Sheesh. What a looney maroon!
Nice diversion away from your having proven you're a Mathematical
Moron, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... you spent days raping Google, propped
up a strawman, knocked the strawman down, declared victolly!, run away
from that giant whomping SPNAK! because you'd proven yourself to be a
Mathematical Moron, and now you've proven yourself a Mathematical
Moron all over again. LOL

Do you really think you're going to escape that giant whomping SPNAK!
so easily, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
LOL! Solve for 'd'..... ROFL!
It got you foaming up a storm... it's called trolling. Now that you're
here, you have no choice but to run away from that giant whomping
SPNAK! you took for proving yourself a Mathematical Moron, thereby
proving yourself a *cowardly* *backpedaling* Mathematical Moron.
Again. LOL

Oh look, here it is... go on, cowardly snip it out again and run away
from it, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... prove to the world what a spankard
you truly are.

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD, RRRRUUUUUNNNNN!!!
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Skeet
2016-03-21 17:21:42 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:46:47 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why am
I *so* *fucking* *stupid*?!"
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-21 08:34:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.
So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.
This is hilarious. Fakey went google-scouring, came back &
blathered somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives,
and got his cherry-read ass re-spanked into next week.

Just as I instructed him! Is fakey predictable, or what?

Solve for 'd'... LOL!
A derivative has to be dy/dx... LOL!

Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
glow-in-the-daylight, re-spanked ass?

Ahhh, fakey, i love this. H,ii?
--
"But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical
Moron. So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic
equation because it's not a derivative, but you didn't
define 'd'."
--Fakezoid bleats his unabashed ignorance
Sn!pe
2016-03-21 09:26:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.
So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.
This is hilarious. Fakey went google-scouring, came back &
blathered somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives,
and got his cherry-read ass re-spanked into next week.
Just as I instructed him! Is fakey predictable, or what?
Ayup, he sure is, oh yes, oh yes indeedy, definitely, mmm-hmm.
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Solve for 'd'... LOL!
A derivative has to be dy/dx... LOL!
Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
glow-in-the-daylight, re-spanked ass?
Ahhh, fakey, i love this. H,ii?
He's undeniably excellent entertainment value.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-21 15:09:43 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
This is hilarious. Fakey went google-scouring, came back &
blathered somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives,
and got his cherry-read ass re-sp<SMACKAKOOK!>
You've been trolled, Tardly. Now you're foaming up a storm and you
have no choice but to either face the SPNAK!s you've taken for being a
mathematical moron, or run away. Again. Yeah, I'm just *that* good.

Let's you get to dealing with your latest demonstration of
Mathematical Moronism, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... of course, we all
know you're a *backpedaling* *coward*, so you'll likely bleat a bit,
cowardly snip out everything, and pro'lame victolly before you run
away and hope your moronism is quickly forgotten. LOL

Oh look, here's yet another massive whomping SPNAK! on you...

===============================================================
===============================================================
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You even noticed the derivitive of a sine is another
sinusoid. Wow!
Sure I did. You're the moron who k'lamed that a sinusoid wasn't a
sinusoid.

=========================================================
A Mathematical Moron wrote:
===========================
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
"Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL.
===========================

FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
===========================
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
===========================
=========================================================

Mathematical Moron. LOL

SPNAK!

You're also the Mathematical Moron who k'lames that formulas aren't
math.

SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
But... you forgot to compare that with
Translation:
"I'M NOT DONE BLEATING! EVERYONE DIVERT YOUR EYES FROM THE SPNAK!AGE I
TOOK, AND PRETEND YOU DON'T SEE ME RUNNING AWAY FROM IT! BLLEEEEAAAT!"

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
Is it still cos(x), fakey?
You're the Mathematical Moron claiming sin^2x = cosx.

Not even close:
<Loading Image...>

Although I'll note they're both sinusoids... which you've denied.
Because you're a mathematical moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What's wrong... you couldn't google it?
Hint: chain rule
Another hint: 2sin(x)cos(x)
So if sin^2 is a sinusoid, then we would expect that
d/dx [sin^2(x)] = d/dx [sin(x)], right?
Only to a Mathematical Moron who claims that a sinusoid isn't a
sinusoid, then backpedals to cover up his fuckup. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
right twice per cycle.
Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
<Loading Image...>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron.
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
In other words, you're wrong. Wrong, faketard.
In other words, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. you're wrong.
Wrong, Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You're a mathematical moron.
Says the Mathematical Moron, after yet again proving himself to be a
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Sheesh. What a looney maroon!
Nice diversion away from your having proven you're a Mathematical
Moron, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... you spent days raping Google, propped
up a strawman, knocked the strawman down, declared victolly!, run away
from that giant whomping SPNAK! because you'd proven yourself to be a
Mathematical Moron, and now you've proven yourself a Mathematical
Moron all over again. LOL

Do you really think you're going to escape that giant whomping SPNAK!
so easily, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
LOL! Solve for 'd'..... ROFL!
It got you foaming up a storm... it's called trolling. Now that you're
here, you have no choice but to run away from that giant whomping
SPNAK! you took for proving yourself a Mathematical Moron, thereby
proving yourself a *cowardly* *backpedaling* Mathematical Moron.
Again. LOL

Oh look, here it is... go on, cowardly snip it out again and run away
from it, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... prove to the world what a spankard
you truly are.

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD, RRRRUUUUUNNNNN!!!
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Skeet
2016-03-21 15:35:07 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:09:43 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
This is hilarious. Fakey went google-scouring, came back &
blathered somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives,
and got his cherry-read ass re-sp<SMACKAKOOK!>
You've been trolled, Tardly.
Fakeys answer when caught in a lie.
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-21 17:02:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeet
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:09:43 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
This is hilarious. Fakey went google-scouring, came back &
blathered somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives,
and got his cherry-read ass re-sp<SMACKAKOOK!>
You've been trolled, Tardly.
Fakeys answer when caught in a lie.
funny how someone bleated that subtracting sine functions to compute =

votage was "wrong" for 3 months but once fakey's screed was debunked wit=
h =

a few infographics, i'm now supposedly "copying his equations", accordin=
g =

to the red-assed bleaty fuckwit. LOL

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Skeet
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
Sn!pe
2016-03-21 15:38:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
"I'M NOT DONE BLEATING! EVERYONE DIVERT YOUR EYES FROM THE SPNAK!AGE I
TOOK, AND PRETEND YOU DON'T SEE ME RUNNING AWAY FROM IT! BLLEEEEAAAT!"
Mmm-hmm.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-21 16:57:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sn!pe
"I'M NOT DONE BLEATING! EVERYONE DIVERT YOUR EYES FROM THE SPNAK!AGE =
I
Post by Sn!pe
TOOK, AND PRETEND YOU DON'T SEE ME RUNNING AWAY FROM IT! BLLEEEEAAAT!=
"
Post by Sn!pe
Mmm-hmm.
yeppers.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Sn!pe
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-21 17:22:22 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:09:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=
Time tohave no choice but to face the SPNAK!s for being a
mathematical moron, or run away. Again. Yeah, I'm just *that* good.
Let's get to dealing with latest demonstration of
Mathematical Moronism, and pro'lame victolly beforeyet another massive=
=
whomping SPNAK!
"I'M NOT DONE BLEATING! EVERYONE DIVERT YOUR EYES FROM THE SPNAK!AGE I=
TOOK, AND PRETEND YOU DON'T SEE ME RUNNING AWAY FROM IT! BLLEEEEAAAT!"=
<snickerTurd>
-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by vallor
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-21 17:29:53 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:34:39 -0400, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass =
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical Moron.
So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic equation because=
it's not a derivative, but you didn't define 'd'... a result of your
moronic inability to suss that a derivative is dy/dx.
This is hilarious. Fakey went google-scouring, came back &
blathered somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives,
and got his cherry-read ass re-spanked into next week.
Just as I instructed him! Is fakey predictable, or what?
Solve for 'd'... LOL!
A derivative has to be dy/dx... LOL!
Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
glow-in-the-daylight, re-spanked ass?
Ahhh, fakey, i love this. H,ii?
added to the ever-growing list of things that fakey doesn't understand.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=

Skeeter
2016-03-20 20:41:57 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:44:38 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
Why are you so moronic and shiny and stuff?
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-20 21:16:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 02:44:38 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything
else is not a sinusoid.
Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids.
Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical
properties of sinusoids.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron.
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ?
What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL!
Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right?
ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron,
mathematical moron?
After all your crowing about the higher maths you have
mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you
don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't
understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!?
What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to
define what + and - mean too?
Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you
express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait
-- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let
alone derivatives.)
After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross
misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your
cherry-red ass into next week.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard
simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out
how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL!
Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you
have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need
pictures because you can't understand math.
Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only
have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"?
Who was that again?... ??
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic
enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL
SPNAK!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
After all, you are the master at deriving things from
themselves, no?
What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ?
What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ?
They must be the same, right fakazoid?
After all, you computed the integral over one period of
[sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey?
Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his
goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes
he did. LOL!
Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL!
Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are
you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are?
Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a
self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to
go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet.
H,ii?
Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon.
Why are you so moronic and shiny and stuff?
Manufacturing defect, Skeeter. But Fry voided my warranty
when he poured Slurm into my alcohol filler, so what can
they do about me.
Skeeter
2016-03-18 20:11:36 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:24:41 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
2016-03-18 20:14:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:24:41 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating
classic fakey!

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
Post by Skeeter
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial =
=

about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as =

snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

//float_precision MIN=3Dfloat_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=3Dfloat_precision(0);

float_precision STEP=3Dfloat_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=3Dfloat_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=3Dfloat_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's =

ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=3Dfloat_precision(2550.25); // =

snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =3D_float_table(_PI,25);

// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand =
why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){

// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: =

<***@dizum.com>
sum =3D (float_precision(150) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(1400)* float_precision( =

sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20=
)* =

float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + =

(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_prec=
ision(2)*PI*t))) =

+ =

(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_pr=
ecision(2)*PI*t)));

// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh =

snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=3D" << t << " sum=3D" << sum << std::endl;
}
t =3D t+STEP;
}
/*

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewav=
es =

never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.=
=

That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations a=
nd =

notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when =

summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't =

figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while =

still having not produced a value for t where the sum=3D2550.25, as he h=
as =

k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=3D=
" << =

t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly =

Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2=
016

=
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-18 05:04:41 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
do you find that when you square a sine wave
Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
DildoRider. LOL
well, except that then when you THEN
Translation:
"well, except I'm *wrong*. Because I'm a *mathematical* *moron*." LOL!
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result
For display purposes only, because your stoooopid little brain can't
comprehend a 60 Hz sinusoid, DildoRider. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
maybe you should graph the mean of a sine wave and tell us it's a sine
wave.
You mean the DC *equivalent* to that AC sinusoid that equals the same
amount of power dissipated in a resistive element as that *AC*? Moron.
LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
take the mean
For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
sinusoids at 60 Hz.
display purposes? people use RMS to determine whether their circuit will
melt or not when AC voltage is applied. they don't do it for "show",
fakey.
No, they do it so they have some way of conceptualizing whether their
circuit will melt or not because your stoooopid brain can't think in
sinusoidal waveforms and vector summation, as you've amply proved. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS value?
Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate
the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC,
RMS is a value, you twit. it's a number. it's not a sine function.
RMS for a triangle (or any shape) wave is computed exactly the same and
it's result is going to be a number.
DildoRider denies that the 120 volts RMS L-N at each and every outlet
in his shitshack half-a-house is AC! Bwahahahaaaa! Moron.
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
and can thus be graphed.
unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of
3-phase which you can't manage to show us?
I did, you moron. I showed the correct phase shift, the correct
amplitude *and* that by using the correct equation, the result doesn't
change just because the two tributaries are moved to different
positions in the equation... contrast that with your kooky sinewave
summation equation... you can't get the correct amplitude, you can't
get the correct phase shift and when you switch the two tributaries in
your kooky equation, you get a different result. Because you're a
mathematical moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that
summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame.
You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, that which has been in
use by scientists and engineers since 1748? That which Bill Jillians
showed you just last night? You *still* can't figure that equation
out, can you, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL!
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave.
you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL
you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal.
Liar. I not only computed (ie: derived, you fucking pedantic twat) the
correct 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, I then computed
(ie: derived, you fucking pedantic twat) the 208 volt RMS L-L,
complete with the correct amplitude and phase shift. That's something
you've repeatedly demonstrated you find yourself utterly incapable of
accomplishing, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
Moron. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
looks like someone stole the other sine graph and changed the designation
of "half-cycle", which is correct, to "one cycle", which is profoundly
incorrect.
do you always seek knowledge from the profoundly incorrect?
I don't seek knowledge from you, so no. LOL
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK! on Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron and Thoroughly
Confused KookTard.
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.
then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-18 22:38:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of
3-phase which you can't manage to show us?
I did, you moron. I showed the correct phase shift, the correct
amplitude *and* that by using the correct equation, the result doesn't
Fakey, this is all blither-blather because you didn't use
*any* equation. All you've shown us is graphs of formulas.
No equal signs, no maths done.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that
summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame.
You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, that which has been in
use by scientists and engineers since 1748? That which Bill Jillians
showed you just last night? You *still* can't figure that equation
out, can you, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL!
Whatever equation you claim to have secretly used, you
didn't show it. Merely graphing sines doesn't prove
anything, except that you don't know how to add phasors.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave.
you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL
you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal.
Liar. I not only computed (ie: derived, you fucking pedantic twat) the
correct 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, I then computed
What a crock. Fakey, a 120v RMS voltage *IS* a 170v peak
voltage. They are one single thing! That you can't
understand this, shows your relentless willful ignorance.
Saying you derived one from the other is like saying you
derived an apple from an apple.

You didn't derive jack shit, you braindead boob. Errr...
you braindead dweebazoid. Boobs are good for something, and
they don't bleat & bray when you squeeze them.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
(ie: derived, you fucking pedantic twat) the 208 volt RMS L-L,
complete with the correct amplitude and phase shift. That's something
you've repeatedly demonstrated you find yourself utterly incapable of
accomplishing, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
Moron. LOL
No, you didn't calculate the 208v, fakey.
You can't, because you don't know how.
You have no idea where to even start.

Did you get on the list yet for an ass transplant?
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I don't seek knowledge
Ersatzia admits the obvious.
--
"It (RMS voltage) is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of
the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform,
and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid."
--Fakey explains "RMS waveforms"
Sn!pe
2016-03-18 22:48:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
you braindead dweebazoid.
Nice; apt, too.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts.
My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 04:36:59 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of
3-phase which you can't manage to show us?
I did, you moron. I showed the correct phase shift, the correct
amplitude *and* that by using the correct equation, the result doesn't
change just because the two tributaries are moved to different
positions in the equation... contrast that with your kooky sinewave
summation equation... you can't get the correct amplitude, you can't
get the correct phase shift and when you switch the two tributaries in
your kooky equation, you get a different result. Because you're a
mathematical moron. LOL
Fakey, this is all blither-blather because you didn't use
*any* equation. All you've shown us is graphs of formulas.
No equal signs, no maths done.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames that the desmos.com graphing calculator
requires an equal sign.

Where's the equal sign in your kooky sinewave which you used to prove
yourself a Mathematical Moron?

<http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png>

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *fucking* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that
summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame.
You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, that which has been in
use by scientists and engineers since 1748? That which Bill Jillians
showed you just last night? You *still* can't figure that equation
out, can you, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL!
Whatever equation you claim to have secretly used, you
didn't show it. Merely graphing sines doesn't prove
anything, except that you don't know how to add phasors.
"secretly used" LOL!

The proper equation has been posted many times, Mathematical Moron.
That you don't understand it is no one's fault but your own. It's been
in use since 1748, so that makes you especially retarded. You can't
even find it, let alone use it. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave.
you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL
you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal.
Liar. I not only computed (ie: derived, you fucking pedantic twat) the
correct 120 volt RMS L-N from the 170 volt peak L-N, I then computed
What a crock. Fakey, a 120v RMS voltage *IS* a 170v peak
voltage. They are one single thing! That you can't
understand this, shows your relentless willful ignorance.
Saying you derived one from the other is like saying you
derived an apple from an apple.
Bwahahahaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Brain denies that there are calculations
involved in deriving RMS voltage from peak voltage.

Why are you *so* *fucking* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
You didn't derive jack shit, you braindead boob. Errr...
you braindead dweebazoid. Boobs are good for something, and
they don't bleat & bray when you squeeze them.
You do every time I step on you. LOL!
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
(ie: derived, you fucking pedantic twat) the 208 volt RMS L-L,
complete with the correct amplitude and phase shift. That's something
you've repeatedly demonstrated you find yourself utterly incapable of
accomplishing, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
Moron. LOL
No, you didn't calculate the 208v, fakey.
You can't, because you don't know how.
You have no idea where to even start.
Awww, look at the pathetic Mathematical Moron, who hasn't been able to
produce even *one* graph, and who came up with his kooky "sin - sin^2"
and "sin^2 - sin" equation as proof of his Mathematical Moronity:

<http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png>

Bwahahaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves yet again that he's taken the
Mathematical Moron spot from DildoRider, kicking DildoRider up to
Mathematical Mega-Moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Did you get on the list yet for an ass transplant?
And now you're projecting, Drop-Kick.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
do you always seek knowledge from the profoundly incorrect?
I don't seek knowledge from you, so no. LOL
Ersatzia admits the obvious.
Bwahahahaaaa! Way to shoot DildoRider in the foot, Moron.

Why are you *so* *fucking* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
--
"It (RMS voltage) is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of
the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform,
and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid."
--Fakey explains "RMS waveforms"
<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron.

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-19 09:18:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Fakey, this is all blither-blather because you didn't use
*any* equation. All you've shown us is graphs of formulas.
No equal signs, no maths done.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames that the desmos.com graphing calculator
requires an equal sign.
Fakey admits he doesn't understand the difference between an
equation and a formula.

*yawn*...

<snip 200+ lines of petulant whining>
--
"Thus using... the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous phase
and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP."
--Fakey rewrites thermodynamics, claiming water follows
the Ideal Gas Law.

"The Ideal Gas Law is applied to the air *and* the gaseous
phase water vapor, because it comes within 10% error, one of
the criteria for using the Ideal Gas Law, you fecking nong."
--Fakey backpedals to "within 10% error," begging the
question of why he claimed 5 significant digits'
accuracy in his previous calculation.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 17:09:22 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Fakey, this is all blither-blather because you didn't use
*any* equation. All you've shown us is graphs of formulas.
No equal signs, no maths done.
Bwahahahaaa! Moron k'lames that the desmos.com graphing calculator
requires an equal sign.
Fakey admits he doesn't understand the difference between an
equation and a formula.
Liar. You're the moron who demanded that I use equations in the
desmos.com graphing calculator, which you claim uses formulas.

Besides which:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula>
=======================================
In mathematics, a formula is an entity constructed using the symbols
and formation rules of a given logical language.[2] For example,
determining the volume of a sphere requires a significant amount of
integral calculus or its geometrical analogue, the method of
exhaustion;[3] but, having done this once in terms of some parameter
(the radius for example), mathematicians have produced a formula to
describe the volume: This particular formula is: V = (4 / 3)*pi*r^3
=======================================

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation>
=======================================
In mathematics, an equation is an equality containing one or more
variables.
=======================================

Gee... that *formula* sure looks like an *equation*. LOL

Now Shiny Tinfoil Brain will backpedal from the fact that the
desmos.com graphing calculator's graphing capability stands in as the
variable, implying an equal sign for a variable displayed on-screen
visually. Because he's Usenet's Mathematical Moron. LOL

So it's *you* who doesn't understand the difference between an
equation and a formula, and you can't figure out how to use the
desmos.com graphing calculator for yourself because you're Usenet's
Mathematical Moron. And you're backpedaling and projecting to cover
that fact up.

You're also the moron who k'lamed that formulas are not math...
because you're bucking to take the Mathematical Mega-Moron spot from
DildoRider.

So now there's something else I can drop-kick your retarded ass for
over the next six months... you claim formulas aren't math! Bahahaa!

"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism

Oh yeah, that one's gonna get a *lot* of play.

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
*yawn*...
<snip 200+ lines of petulant whining>
Translation:
"<cowardly snip of everything that drop-kicks my moronic ass across
Usenet. Again. Why am I *so* *stupid*? I wish I could be right just
once. I'm a moron.">

<snicker>

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<Loading Image...>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<Loading Image...>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<Loading Image...>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you
bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
noTthaTguY
2016-03-16 21:02:56 UTC
Permalink
a droplet of two waters, is heavier than air;
how do they dock
Post by James McGinn
I will gladly make a retraction if anybody can definitively demonstrate that water remains gaseous at ambient temps and/or if moist air (all other things being equal) is lighter than dry air.
Fair enough?
Solving Tornadoes
2016-03-18 19:36:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted",
For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience. Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere. It's just a dumb thing that people believe. Kind of like the greenhouse effect.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so.
The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid. The fact that your only argument involve referencing people that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies
watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do
you continue to deny reality?
LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't imagine how that can happen.

If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens.

Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you would have no need to refer to consensus?
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 04:41:59 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving
Tornadoes, in
<news:dfc64773-2dea-4efa-bfe9-***@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a
desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that
working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard?
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted",
For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually
incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor
being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience.
Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere.
You mean this evidence, James?

Water In The Gas Phase –
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/
Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the
gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers.

Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation
Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation.

http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/
Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to
directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere

And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each
and every time we go to a weather website... the weather satellites
and ground stations can differentiate between monomolecular
gaseous-phase water (humidity) in the atmosphere, and liquid-phase
water (clouds) in the atmosphere, Jim, because each absorbs and emits
at a different wavelength, just as that video *you* *provided*
featuring Anders Nilsson's work on x-ray spectroscopy of water in its
three phases shows.

Remember?
===============================================
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron
orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's
photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is
due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two
phases.

http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
You'll note the double peak of liquid water.

Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory:
"Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of
water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the
peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to
the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules."
===============================================

That was a reference *you* *provided*, Jim, and it proves you
*wrong*... that you didn't and don't realize that fact is testament
that you lack the requisite educational background to even be
attempting to form a model of the atmosphere... hence the reason your
"theory" is so wrong in so many ways.

And as I explained to you, the dual peak of liquid water, one near the
gaseous-phase monomolecular water peak (remember, you've claimed that
all water must be liquid in the atmosphere, thus if a different
spectral peak is observed from liquid water, it *must* be gaseous
phase monomolecular water, not liquid water, which would have the same
spectral peaks as bulk liquid water), and one near the solid-phase
water peaks are due to the two spin isomers of water. There are two
water molecule hybrids.

This also happens to utterly destroy your contention that water
molecule polarity changes upon H bonding (which would mean that water
solvent properties randomly change... and we know that's not the case,
James). The water molecule polarity isn't changing upon H bonding,
thereby lending a variable strength H bond, there are two spin isomers
of water with two different H bond strengths. This is well-established
and rigorously-studied science, James, corroborated by study upon
study upon study.
It's just a dumb thing that people believe.
No, your "theory" is a dumb thing that only one dumb person believes,
Jim.

Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer-review process,
Jim?

Why are there *no* corroborating studies to your moronic "theory",
James?

Why have you been proven wrong on every single one of your moronic
claims, Jim?
Kind of like the greenhouse effect.
The greenhouse effect has much more believability to it than your
wholly fabricated "theory", Jim. Your kooky claims are unsupported by
reality, research or reason. They're the mad ranting of a deluded
halfwit.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so.
The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument
advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid.
"consensus" LOL

Facts remain facts regardless of consensus, Jim... and whereas I have
facts *and* consensus on my side, you have neither.
The fact that your only argument involve referencing people
that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all
the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion.
And your argument revolves around denying all of science without proof
so you can claim you're smarter than all those hundreds of thousands
of scientists over the past 250+ years doing careful scientific work.

Except you have no proof, no evidence, no mathematical model, no
physical model, nothing but your suppositions pulled straight from
your ass. You've built supposition upon supposition while dismissing
all evidence that you're a deluded moronic kook... and look at you
now, Jim... you're claiming a sentient "plasmic sky tornado" which can
reach down it's noodly appendages and wreak havoc in the form of
tornados upon the populace on a whim, which somehow disguises itself
as a band of flat, smooth fast jet stream air and somehow hides its
noodly appendages until the last moment before it strikes.

In other words, Jim, you're psychotic.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies
watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do
you continue to deny reality?
LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence
of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't
imagine how that can happen.
Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing, Jim.
If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you
believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens.
If they had corroborable evidence? Now, where's your evidence of your
sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages
stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create
tornadoes, Jim? You believe in something with no evidence, Jim...
you're psychotic.

Take your meds, Jim.
Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you
would have no need to refer to consensus?
Then it's a good thing I've not referred to consensus, Jim. Rather,
I've been drop-kicking your moronic psychotic ass across Usenet using
scientific proof.

Why don't you have any evidence, let alone any proof, for your
sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages
stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create
tornadoes, Jim?

Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer review process,
Jim?

Why is there no corroborating research to your kooky "theory", Jim?

Why haven't you taken your meds, Jim?

<snicker>

Now, before you run away, you'll be getting right on addressing those
tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and
contradictions in your kooky "theory", Jim... those flaws are fatal.
Your "theory" is dead, Jim.

============================================================
You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way
back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK
pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended
up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from
being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with
recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her
dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject
from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck
goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative
Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost
his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up
with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got
growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had
plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety,
given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be
light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling
abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half
his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling.

"Big things are made out of little things."
HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e.
everywhere at the same time)"
Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear
transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most
universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very
means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big
bang, and most importantly, reality.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing...
he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements:
1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the
negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other."
2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your
consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness."

MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Who said it's your eyes that see?"
HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity.

"The Turing test is overrated anyway."
HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test.

"The now you experience now simply moves to this now."
HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself:
"A fairyboy with an inadequate penis."

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot
he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold
contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when
challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and
contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task
for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling
insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right
alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the
appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to
tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming,
fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his
otherwise-dumbstruck mouth.

<snicker>
James McGinn
2016-03-19 17:40:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving
Tornadoes, in
Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a
desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that
working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard?
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted",
For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually
incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor
being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience.
Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere.
You mean this evidence, James?
Water In The Gas Phase -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/
Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the
gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers.
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation
Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation.
http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/
Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to
directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere
And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each
and every time we go to a weather website...
Hmm. Well, if your only argument is to refer to other people that made the same assumption you did . . . uh . . . well . . . uh . . . what do you think that indicates? (Think about it before you respond.)
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 18:23:16 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 9:52:25 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving
Tornadoes, in
Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a
desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that
working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard?
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted",
For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually
incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor
being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience.
Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere.
You mean this evidence, James?
Water In The Gas Phase -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/
Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the
gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers.
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation
Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation.
http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/
Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to
directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere
And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each
and every time we go to a weather website... the weather satellites
and ground stations can differentiate between monomolecular
gaseous-phase water (humidity) in the atmosphere, and liquid-phase
water (clouds) in the atmosphere, Jim, because each absorbs and emits
at a different wavelength, just as that video *you* *provided*
featuring Anders Nilsson's work on x-ray spectroscopy of water in its
three phases shows.
Remember?
===============================================
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron
orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's
photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is
due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two
phases.
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
You'll note the double peak of liquid water.
"Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of
water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the
peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to
the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules."
===============================================
That was a reference *you* *provided*, Jim, and it proves you
*wrong*... that you didn't and don't realize that fact is testament
that you lack the requisite educational background to even be
attempting to form a model of the atmosphere... hence the reason your
"theory" is so wrong in so many ways.
And as I explained to you, the dual peak of liquid water, one near the
gaseous-phase monomolecular water peak (remember, you've claimed that
all water must be liquid in the atmosphere, thus if a different
spectral peak is observed from liquid water, it *must* be gaseous
phase monomolecular water, not liquid water, which would have the same
spectral peaks as bulk liquid water), and one near the solid-phase
water peaks are due to the two spin isomers of water. There are two
water molecule hybrids.
This also happens to utterly destroy your contention that water
molecule polarity changes upon H bonding (which would mean that water
solvent properties randomly change... and we know that's not the case,
James). The water molecule polarity isn't changing upon H bonding,
thereby lending a variable strength H bond, there are two spin isomers
of water with two different H bond strengths. This is well-established
and rigorously-studied science, James, corroborated by study upon
study upon study.
It's just a dumb thing that people believe.
No, your "theory" is a dumb thing that only one dumb person believes,
Jim.
Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer-review process,
Jim?
Why are there *no* corroborating studies to your moronic "theory",
James?
Why have you been proven wrong on every single one of your moronic
claims, Jim?
Kind of like the greenhouse effect.
The greenhouse effect has much more believability to it than your
wholly fabricated "theory", Jim. Your kooky claims are unsupported by
reality, research or reason. They're the mad ranting of a deluded
halfwit.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so.
The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument
advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid.
"consensus" LOL
Facts remain facts regardless of consensus, Jim... and whereas I have
facts *and* consensus on my side, you have neither.
The fact that your only argument involve referencing people
that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all
the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion.
And your argument revolves around denying all of science without proof
so you can claim you're smarter than all those hundreds of thousands
of scientists over the past 250+ years doing careful scientific work.
Except you have no proof, no evidence, no mathematical model, no
physical model, nothing but your suppositions pulled straight from
your ass. You've built supposition upon supposition while dismissing
all evidence that you're a deluded moronic kook... and look at you
now, Jim... you're claiming a sentient "plasmic sky tornado" which can
reach down it's noodly appendages and wreak havoc in the form of
tornados upon the populace on a whim, which somehow disguises itself
as a band of flat, smooth fast jet stream air and somehow hides its
noodly appendages until the last moment before it strikes.
In other words, Jim, you're psychotic.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies
watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do
you continue to deny reality?
LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence
of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't
imagine how that can happen.
Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing, Jim.
If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you
believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens.
If they had corroborable evidence? Now, where's your evidence of your
sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages
stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create
tornadoes, Jim? You believe in something with no evidence, Jim...
you're psychotic.
Take your meds, Jim.
Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you
would have no need to refer to consensus?
Then it's a good thing I've not referred to consensus, Jim. Rather,
I've been drop-kicking your moronic psychotic ass across Usenet using
scientific proof.
Why don't you have any evidence, let alone any proof, for your
sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages
stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create
tornadoes, Jim?
Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer review process,
Jim?
Why is there no corroborating research to your kooky "theory", Jim?
Why haven't you taken your meds, Jim?
Hmm. Well, if your only argument is to refer to other people
that made the same assumption you did . . . uh . . . well . . .
uh . . . what do you think that indicates? (Think about it before
you respond.)
It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to
understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory"
torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself,
James.

The H bonding of solid-phase and liquid-phase water affects the photon
energy released, the more closely-held are the H bonds, the lesser the
photon energy, exactly as Anders Nilsson shows here:
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw

That Anders Nilsson et. al. were measuring a spectral peak that did
not coincide with solid-phase water nor with liquid-phase water, a
spectral peak with *higher* photon energy than liquid-phase water,
means they were measuring gaseous-phase water, Jim. No H bonding,
monomolecular.

You'll note the gaseous-phase water's photon energy was *higher*
because it was monomer water, and thus had no inter-molecular H bonds.
If it had had any H bonds, it would have been liquid water, and thus
would have had a spectral peak identical to that of liquid water.

It could *not* have been liquid water, no matter how small the
droplet, James, or the spectral peak would have been identical to that
of liquid water.

Do you not understand this, James? That fact proves the existence of
gaseous water, hence that evaporation is a per-molecule process, hence
that latent heat of evaporation exists, hence the central premise of
your retarded "theory" is yet again destroyed, Jim.

Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a
scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever
model the atmosphere.

Now before you run away again, James, do get right on addressing those
tough questions you've been running from... they highlight the gaping
logic holes in your "theory not-a-theory". Your continuing failure to
address them stands as your tacit admission that you know your theory
is indefensible.

============================================================
Anders Nilsson measured http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Cipher (aka Dave A. Howard the Coward) is an ancient mainframe Usenet
bot that never got shut off. He walkered his way back into AUK after
an eternity spent in an infinite loop, started clacking his dentures
and bragging about what a big man he *used* to be and how we kids
should get the hell off his lawn, promptly outed himself, slipped in
the urine dribbling down his leg from his over-full Depends, his
walker went flying, his dentures clattered to the floor, and he lay
there, hearing aid squealing, stabbing an arthritic finger at his
Life-Alert pendant and crying "Help, I've soiled myself and I can't
get up!" as we youngsters laughed raucously at him. Don't ask him
about the Port-A-Potty that drove him so bonkers that he ended up in a
tight-white jacket in a rubber room in a mental institution... that
wasn't Dave, man. He's blocked all that out.
James McGinn
2016-03-19 19:25:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 9:52:25 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving
Tornadoes, in
Bwahahahaaa! I've got the kooktard James McGinn bleating all day as a
desperate last-ditch attempt at defending his delusions... how's that
working for you, Jim, you fucking moronic psychotic spankard?
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:45:06 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Consequently meteorology's notion that storms
are caused by the convective upwelling of gaseous H2O and subsequent
release of "latent heat" is refuted.
No, it's not "refuted",
For most people it's unfalsyfiable in that the are intellectually
incapable of making a distinction between gas and vapor (vapor
being liquid suspended in air). Either way its pseudoscience.
Nobody has ever produced evidence of gaseous H2O in our atmosphere.
You mean this evidence, James?
Water In The Gas Phase -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/
Not ab initio... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the
gaseous phase. 16 referenced papers.
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation
Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation.
http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/
Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to
directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere
And that's not to mention that we see a perfect example of this each
and every time we go to a weather website... the weather satellites
and ground stations can differentiate between monomolecular
gaseous-phase water (humidity) in the atmosphere, and liquid-phase
water (clouds) in the atmosphere, Jim, because each absorbs and emits
at a different wavelength, just as that video *you* *provided*
featuring Anders Nilsson's work on x-ray spectroscopy of water in its
three phases shows.
Remember?
===============================================
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron
orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's
photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is
due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two
phases.
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
You'll note the double peak of liquid water.
"Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of
water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the
peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to
the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules."
===============================================
That was a reference *you* *provided*, Jim, and it proves you
*wrong*... that you didn't and don't realize that fact is testament
that you lack the requisite educational background to even be
attempting to form a model of the atmosphere... hence the reason your
"theory" is so wrong in so many ways.
And as I explained to you, the dual peak of liquid water, one near the
gaseous-phase monomolecular water peak (remember, you've claimed that
all water must be liquid in the atmosphere, thus if a different
spectral peak is observed from liquid water, it *must* be gaseous
phase monomolecular water, not liquid water, which would have the same
spectral peaks as bulk liquid water), and one near the solid-phase
water peaks are due to the two spin isomers of water. There are two
water molecule hybrids.
This also happens to utterly destroy your contention that water
molecule polarity changes upon H bonding (which would mean that water
solvent properties randomly change... and we know that's not the case,
James). The water molecule polarity isn't changing upon H bonding,
thereby lending a variable strength H bond, there are two spin isomers
of water with two different H bond strengths. This is well-established
and rigorously-studied science, James, corroborated by study upon
study upon study.
It's just a dumb thing that people believe.
No, your "theory" is a dumb thing that only one dumb person believes,
Jim.
Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer-review process,
Jim?
Why are there *no* corroborating studies to your moronic "theory",
James?
Why have you been proven wrong on every single one of your moronic
claims, Jim?
Kind of like the greenhouse effect.
The greenhouse effect has much more believability to it than your
wholly fabricated "theory", Jim. Your kooky claims are unsupported by
reality, research or reason. They're the mad ranting of a deluded
halfwit.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Jim. Your saying so doesn't make it so.
The fact that you resort to consensus to make your argument
advertises the fact that empirically your argument is invalid.
"consensus" LOL
Facts remain facts regardless of consensus, Jim... and whereas I have
facts *and* consensus on my side, you have neither.
The fact that your only argument involve referencing people
that made the same dumbass assumptions that you made is all
the evidence necessary to substantiate that this is a group delusion.
And your argument revolves around denying all of science without proof
so you can claim you're smarter than all those hundreds of thousands
of scientists over the past 250+ years doing careful scientific work.
Except you have no proof, no evidence, no mathematical model, no
physical model, nothing but your suppositions pulled straight from
your ass. You've built supposition upon supposition while dismissing
all evidence that you're a deluded moronic kook... and look at you
now, Jim... you're claiming a sentient "plasmic sky tornado" which can
reach down it's noodly appendages and wreak havoc in the form of
tornados upon the populace on a whim, which somehow disguises itself
as a band of flat, smooth fast jet stream air and somehow hides its
noodly appendages until the last moment before it strikes.
In other words, Jim, you're psychotic.
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Meanwhile, there are several satellites operated by several agencies
watching latent heat of condensation release from clouds, Jim. Why do
you continue to deny reality?
LOL. So, publicly funded agencies are confirming the existence
of something the public generally believes. Gee golly. I can't
imagine how that can happen.
Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing, Jim.
If a public agency confirmed the existence of angels would you
believe that? Ghosts? Bigfoot? Space aliens.
If they had corroborable evidence? Now, where's your evidence of your
sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages
stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create
tornadoes, Jim? You believe in something with no evidence, Jim...
you're psychotic.
Take your meds, Jim.
Has it occurred to you that if you had a valid argument you
would have no need to refer to consensus?
Then it's a good thing I've not referred to consensus, Jim. Rather,
I've been drop-kicking your moronic psychotic ass across Usenet using
scientific proof.
Why don't you have any evidence, let alone any proof, for your
sentient "plasmic sky tornado" with invisible noodly appendages
stretching hundreds upon hundreds of miles through the sky to create
tornadoes, Jim?
Why can't you get your kooky "theory" through the peer review process,
Jim?
Why is there no corroborating research to your kooky "theory", Jim?
Why haven't you taken your meds, Jim?
Hmm. Well, if your only argument is to refer to other people
that made the same assumption you did . . . uh . . . well . . .
uh . . . what do you think that indicates? (Think about it before
you respond.)
It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to
understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory"
torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself,
James.
Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-19 20:20:04 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:33:43 AM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to
understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory"
torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself,
James.
The H bonding of solid-phase and liquid-phase water affects the photon
energy released, the more closely-held are the H bonds, the lesser the
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
That Anders Nilsson et. al. were measuring a spectral peak that did
not coincide with solid-phase water nor with liquid-phase water, a
spectral peak with *higher* photon energy than liquid-phase water,
means they were measuring gaseous-phase water, Jim. No H bonding,
monomolecular.
You'll note the gaseous-phase water's photon energy was *higher*
because it was monomer water, and thus had no inter-molecular H bonds.
If it had had any H bonds, it would have been liquid water, and thus
would have had a spectral peak identical to that of liquid water.
It could *not* have been liquid water, no matter how small the
droplet, James, or the spectral peak would have been identical to that
of liquid water.
Do you not understand this, James? That fact proves the existence of
gaseous water, hence that evaporation is a per-molecule process, hence
that latent heat of evaporation exists, hence the central premise of
your retarded "theory" is yet again destroyed, Jim.
Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a
scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever
model the atmosphere.
Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki.
No, Jim, not "oki doki". You've been proven *wrong*. Your retarded
theory is *dead*.

All you're doing now is proving that you're sprinting down the path
toward full-blown psychosis as you deny every single scientific
principle garnered from carefully controlled scientific
experimentation over the past 250+ years, and as you expand your
retarded conspiracy theory to include every field of science.

In fact, you're *so* far gone you're going to sue *science*, James.
You've stated you're going to waltz into court with your kooky "class
action" kooksoot written in crayon, and *sue* *science*.

And I have no doubt that when that kooksoot is laughed out of court,
and after you're released from your 72 hour psychiatric hold, you'll
get right to work on that "class action" kooksoot to sue *reality*.
LOL

You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a scientific fraud
and a laughingstock, James.

That's reality. Deal with it.

Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":

============================================================
Anders Nilsson measured http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
James McGinn
2016-03-19 22:04:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a
scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever
model the atmosphere.
Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki.
No, Jim, not "oki doki". You've been proven *wrong*.
Maybe you should write a book on it.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-20 06:14:23 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch CA, in
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 1:30:32 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
It indicates that you're too fucking retarded and delusional to
understand that you've just had your kooky fabrication of a "theory"
torn to shreds, and now you're making a laughingstock of yourself,
James.
The H bonding of solid-phase and liquid-phase water affects the photon
energy released, the more closely-held are the H bonds, the lesser the
http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
That Anders Nilsson et. al. were measuring a spectral peak that did
not coincide with solid-phase water nor with liquid-phase water, a
spectral peak with *higher* photon energy than liquid-phase water,
means they were measuring gaseous-phase water, Jim. No H bonding,
monomolecular.
You'll note the gaseous-phase water's photon energy was *higher*
because it was monomer water, and thus had no inter-molecular H bonds.
If it had had any H bonds, it would have been liquid water, and thus
would have had a spectral peak identical to that of liquid water.
It could *not* have been liquid water, no matter how small the
droplet, James, or the spectral peak would have been identical to that
of liquid water.
Do you not understand this, James? That fact proves the existence of
gaseous water, hence that evaporation is a per-molecule process, hence
that latent heat of evaporation exists, hence the central premise of
your retarded "theory" is yet again destroyed, Jim.
Stop embarrassing yourself, Jim. It's over. You've been exposed as a
scientific fraud and a moron far too stupid and delusional to ever
model the atmosphere.
Uh, . . . er . . . uh. Well, uh . . . oki doki.
No, Jim, not "oki doki". You've been proven *wrong*. Your retarded
theory is *dead*.
All you're doing now is proving that you're sprinting down the path
toward full-blown psychosis as you deny every single scientific
principle garnered from carefully controlled scientific
experimentation over the past 250+ years, and as you expand your
retarded conspiracy theory to include every field of science.
In fact, you're *so* far gone you're going to sue *science*, James.
You've stated you're going to waltz into court with your kooky "class
action" kooksoot written in crayon, and *sue* *science*.
And I have no doubt that when that kooksoot is laughed out of court,
and after you're released from your 72 hour psychiatric hold, you'll
get right to work on that "class action" kooksoot to sue *reality*.
LOL
You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a scientific fraud
and a laughingstock, James.
That's reality. Deal with it.
Maybe you should write a book on it.
You've already written two books detailing your insanity, James... two
entire books filled with your uneducated halfwitted denial of reality,
with absolutely no experimental data to back your drool up.

And what is the result? People laugh at you all the harder. The
reviews of your "books" show that people consider you a pathetic
moron, a joke.

And that pisses you off, doesn't it, James? It pisses you off *so*
much that you're going to break out your crayon box, scribble yourself
up an illegible "class action" kooksoot, and you're going to sue
*science*. LOL

And when you're escorted from the courtroom, yelling "It's a
conspiracy! All of it! All of science! Don't you see?!", to be carted
away for a psychological examination and forced 72 hour psychiatric
hold, I'm sure you'll yet again break out your crayons and angrily
scribble up a "class action" kooksoot to sue *reality*. LOL

That'll show 'em, James. That'll show 'em all.

You sad pathetic loser, just quit while you're behind. You're far too
stupid, uneducated and insane to even comprehend reality, let alone
model it.

You've proven yourself a scientific fraud, James Bernard McGinn, Jr.
of Antioch, CA. And you've made yourself a laughingstock... the whole
world points and laughs at you.

That's reality, James. Deal with it.

Now, do get right on proving the above by running away from all the
logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your moronic "theory",
outlined in my .sig, James.
--
Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":

============================================================
Anders Nilsson measured http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
James McGinn
2016-03-20 06:34:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a scientific fraud
and a laughingstock, James.
That's reality. Deal with it.
Maybe you should write a book on it.
You've already written two books
Right. I didn't just sit around calling people names and dropping links to irrelevant websites.

You appear desperate, scattered, and frustrated.

Get a grip and make a substantive argument.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-20 18:27:46 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Saturday, March 19, 2016 at 11:24:50 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You're a moronic idiotic insane uneducated halfwit, a
scientific fraud and a laughingstock, James.
That's reality. Deal with it.
Maybe you should write a book on it.
You've already written two books
Right. I didn't just sit around calling people names and dropping
links to irrelevant websites.
"irrelevant website" LOL

Those are links to scientific studies which prove you *wrong*, Jim.
For which you have no rebuttal. You've run away from all of them.

As for your books... they're as big a laughingstock as you... not one
good review. People have called you deluded in the reviews, James.
You appear desperate, scattered, and frustrated.
No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning.
Get a grip and make a substantive argument.
Already made here:
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

Each of those posts destroys portions, sometimes huge swaths of your
moronic "theory", James. You've mounted not even a whit of defense,
instead choosing to run away, blather out more stupidity, expand your
conspiracy theory to now include the Standard Model, electrons and
photons, convection, molar volume and molar mass, density and pretty
much every bit of scientific knowledge over the past 250+ years.

You've slapped more patches on your moronic "theory" and in so doing
exposed even more logical contradictions, to now include a circulus in
probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys the central premise
of your "theory".

You've run away from and refused to perform the experiment which would
definitively null your "theory", thereby shirking your responsibility
to fulfill the onus of proving your kooktard claims.

You've not made one substantive argument in favor of your theory,
every time you attempt to defend it you expose it and yourself as more
of a scientific fraud, and you've become a pathetic laughingstock.

In other words, the world must be a thoroughly confusing place to you,
James. I'd suggest you educate yourself, but we both know you've tried
and failed at that in the past, only deepening your psychosis from
having tried.

As proof that what I write above is 100% truth, you will yet again run
away from substantively addressing those tough questions in my .sig,
which highlight the gaping logical contradictions in your moronic
"theory".
--
Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":

============================================================
Anders Nilsson measured http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
Skeeter
2016-03-20 20:47:00 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning.
Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo
again.
Mustaffa Sheboygan
2016-03-20 20:56:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning.
Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo
again.
People who are really "winning," don't have to proclaim they're winning,
for fuck's sake.
--
Mustaffa Sheboygan
Sn!pe
2016-03-20 21:14:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mustaffa Sheboygan
Post by Skeeter
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET),
Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning.
Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo
again.
People who are really "winning," don't have to proclaim they're winning,
for fuck's sake.
But, *BUT,* We're *WINNING* for fuck's sake !!!1!
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-21 04:37:37 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing
Wife-Beating Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist
High-School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum (aka
Tony Ray Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58,
Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked up as Skeeter, in
Post by Skeeter
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning.
Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo
again.
Awww, look at the Pissbum... he doesn't even know what winning is. LOL
Post by Skeeter
<http://imgur.com/xt9bcTq>
I were a execyootive reegunal sailes man making deleverys.
Now I are a toofless unemployalbe pissbum.
<snicker>
Post by Skeeter
I just found out today. Maybe a year. I love you all.
My shits fucked up anyboby givs a damn?
No.

Lying Drug-Abusing Woman-Beating Pissbum Trailer Trash Tony Ray Eaks.

<snicker>
--
Proof that Lamey (aka Skeeter) is Anton Ray Eaks:
Message-ID: <kus7dj$bh0$***@news.mixmin.net>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/alt.usenet.kooks/messageid$3Akus7dj$24bh0$***@news.mixmin.net/alt.usenet.kooks/MLAQo_O73UM>

Pissbum hard at work to earn his drug-money:
<Loading Image...> <--- LOL!

Just say no to drugs and alcohol, kids!
<Loading Image...> <--- LOL!

It's Howdy Doody Time!:
<Loading Image...> <--- LOL!

The Pissbum Clan:
<Loading Image...> <--- LOL!
MID: <***@dizum.com>

Thanks for admitting you live in single-wide trailer #58 at the Lamp
Lighter Mobile Home Park on Raintree Boulevard in Canon City,
Colorado, Pissbum. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20150301045717/http://coloradovoters.info/by_number/0005/59023_anton_ray_eaks.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20150224004840/http://coloradovoters.info/by_address/81212.html>
600 Raintree Blvd. #58
Canon City, CO 81212

Another single-wide? Of course it is... the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home
Park only has single-wide trailers. LOL

And you get caught in your "I don't do FaceBook" lie again, not to
mention your "I'm not Tony Eaks" lie:

A drug-addled loserly pissbum wrote:
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"It's dump day today, woke up to fire trucks across the street, seems
the house caught fire. What a view I have now...LOL"

<https://www.facebook.com/CanonCityDailyRecord?hc_location=timeline>
"Tony Eaks - Right across the street from me, Woke up to flames and
lights."

<https://web.archive.org/web/20150122055700/http://www.canoncitydailyrecord.com/ci_27053304/early-morning-fire-destroys-home-at-lamp-lighter>

And before he was a Canon City, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling
unemployable pissbum, he was a Fairplay, CO single-wide
trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum. LOL

In Fairplay, CO he mooched his mother to an early death... now he's
mooching his ultra-ugly transsexual Howdy Doody wife Beverly Jean
Johnson-Eaks, who is forced to work two minimum-wage jobs (cashier at
Alco, cashier at Dollar Tree) to support Trailer Trash Tony's drug
habit. LOL

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Unit 66. Trailer Trash Tony is a single-wide pissbum! Bwahahahaaa!
============================================================
Post by Skeeter
Can you prove this single wide trailer thing? Or is it
just another attempt to try and "act" better than me? LOL
Yeah, I can now prove "this single wide trailer thing", Trailer Trash
Tony. Which by your own admission makes me better than you. LOL

So I was right about everything I wrote about you... which makes you a
pissbum, Pissbum. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20140724093727/http://coloradovoters.info/0005/59023.html>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Anton Ray Eaks was born in 1953 and he registered to vote, giving his
address as 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66, FAIRPLAY, PARK COUNTY, COLORADO
80440. His telephone number is 1-719-477-3574. His voting status is:
Active. He is unaffiliated.
RESIDENTIAL_ADDRESS: 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66
RESIDENTIAL_CITY: FAIRPLAY
RESIDENTIAL_STATE: CO
RESIDENTIAL_ZIP_CODE: 80440
REGISTRATION_DATE: 07/31/2012
BIRTH_YEAR: 1953
PHONE_NUM: 719-477-3574
MAILING_ADDRESS_1: PO BOX 473
MAILING_CITY: FAIRPLAY
MAILING_STATE: CO
MAILING_ZIP_CODE: 80440
MAILING_ZIP_PLUS: 0473
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

NOTE: That phone number is the Alcoholics Anonymous hot-line at South
Park Christian Chapel:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20150131161807/http://www.southparkevents.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:on-going-activities-for-the-month-&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=54>
"Alcoholics Anonymouis meeting 7-8pm at So Pk Christian Chapel
719-477-3574"

Trailer Trash Tony is *such* a drunkard that when he registered to
vote, he put down the AA DrunkieLine as his phone number! LOL

A map of the gravel quarry / junkyard / trailer park where Trailer
Trash Tony rented his shitty single-wide trailer for only $675 / month
(and still couldn't pay the rent, and got evicted! LOL):
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/21980+Hwy+285+%2366,+Fairplay,+CO+80440/@39.2157874,-105.9922529,346m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x876ae8155a400885:0xfb9ff5490348163d>

Unit 66:
This is a 3 bd/2ba single-wide trailer.
<https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.318572058245476.1073741834.131803693588981&type=1&_fb_noscript=1>

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

<snicker>
============================================================

Lamey (aka Skeeter) the alcoholic wife-beating outer-filthing
drug-addict:
Message-ID: <lfjfe7$b3t$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

Trailer Trash Tony makes a multi-pronged confession:
MID: <***@4ax.com>
"Yup, I can take 4 or 5 percs and roof your house. It's called the
paradoxical affect."

Pissbum groveled. LOL
Pissbum lost. LOL!
Message-ID: <lchuas$q96$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

Cowardly Pissbum gets caught in lie after lie. LOL!
Message-ID: <l0rfde$hv8$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l0smsq$fcq$***@news.mixmin.net>

Lamey (aka Skeeter) the forger, busted and scrambling for cover like a
coward:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/RE_35HZp8qAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/-RZxQp6TAe4J>
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

Pissbum gets kicked so hard he's *still* bouncing around Usenet like a
SuperBall:
============================================
Message-ID: <kv42gb$vd8$***@news.mixmin.net>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/ZyzzhJiku3c/Q0c2J9_Jc5YJ>

Message-ID: <kuatrj$b2g$***@news.mixmin.net>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/N91lSABoN2s/JYDwKwwIZn4J>
============================================

Trailer Trash Tony the Single-Wide Trailer-Dwelling Pissbum is driven
so insane by my truthiness that he's forced by his psychiatric
professional to take Seroquel, a strong anti-psychotic that its maker
(Astra Zeneca) only indicates for use in treating schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder:
==================================================
Lamey (aka Skeeter) admits he now takes Seroquel "to sleep"... it's a
prescription medication for the treatment of mania and depression
associated with bipolar disease and schizophrenia. I've driven him
mad. LOL

Pissbum tries to k'lame his doctor-recommended dosage is only half of
the smallest tablet Astra Zeneca produces for Seroquel:
MID: <***@4ax.com>:
"Just like seriquil, I take it for sleep at night, 12.5 mg"

I shred Pissbum Tony's lies and prove he's gone batty:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
==================================================
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
2016-03-21 07:23:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing
Post by Skeeter
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:27:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
No, you're projecting, James. I'm winning.
Winning what Faketard? make this good now so we don't laff at joo
again.
Awww, look at the Pissbum... he doesn't even know what winning is. LOL
Fakey, did you solve for 'd' in dy/dx yet?

Are you winning?

Yeah... yeah, i think you won First Prize... a cherry-red
glow-in-the-dark ass emiting red-body radiation at 700 nm.

LOL!
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-21 15:36:38 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Fakey, did you solve for 'd' in dy/dx yet?
Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)?

Bwahahahaa! I've primed your foam pump and now you're all eager to
barf foam for me again... and now you can get drop-kicked across
Usenet all over again. LOL

Now, you've been blathering hard as means of covering up the fact that
you failed to grasp vector summation and constructive/destructive
interference for three months, to include your defending DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation... and all that while you found
yourself utterly unable to produce even *one* graph.

And now that I've primed the pump and I've got you bleating out your
froth at a steady pace, you'll get right on addressing that giant
whomping drop-kick you received for being such a fucking moron...

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

Run, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, run! Bwahahahaaaa!

SPNAK!


Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Are you winning?
You're not. You're cowardly snipping, running away from that giant
whomping SPNAK!, running away from all the SPNAK!age you took as
outlined in my .sig, and proving yourself a GoogleRaping Mathematical
Moron. LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Yeah... yeah, i think you won First Prize... a cherry-red
glow-in-the-dark ass emiting red-body radiation at 700 nm.
What the fuck is a "red-body", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? Are you a
moron, or what? LOL
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
LOL!
RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD, RUUUUUUUNNNNNNN!!!

Bwahahahaaa!
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
Skeet
2016-03-21 17:25:04 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:36:38 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Fakey, did you solve for 'd' in dy/dx yet?
Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)?
Bwahahahaa! I've primed your foam pump and now you're all eager to
barf foam for me again... and now you can get drop-kicked across
Usenet all over again. LOL
Now, you've been blathering hard as means of covering up the fact that
you failed to grasp vector summation and constructive/destructive
interference for three months, to include your defending DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation... and all that while you found
yourself utterly unable to produce even *one* graph.
And now that I've primed the pump and I've got you bleating out your
froth at a steady pace, you'll get right on addressing that giant
whomping drop-kick you received for being such a fucking moron...
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.
If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
All that foam and you still didnt answer the question.
James McGinn
2016-03-16 22:05:22 UTC
Permalink
He didn't show that. He assumed it. In fact it has never been shown, it's been assumed through all of human history. As with the thermodynamic realities of CO2 the thermodynamic realities of H2O are not a matter of opinion. It is impossible for H2O to exist as a gas at temperatures above and pressures below those delineated in steam tables. It doesn't matter that most people assume clear moist air contains gaseous H2O. It matters that the laboratory evidence indisputably proves that the moisture in clear moist air must consist of droplets/clusters that are too small to be visible.

The laws of thermodynamics are not optional.
Sergio
2016-03-16 22:19:41 UTC
Permalink
On 3/16/2016 5:05 PM, James McGinn wrote:


<snip crap>



nothing
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-17 03:46:04 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
Post by James McGinn
He didn't show that. He assumed it. In fact it has never been shown,
it's been assumed through all of human history. As with the
thermodynamic realities of CO2 the thermodynamic realities of H2O are
not a matter of opinion. It is impossible for H2O to exist as a gas
at temperatures above and pressures below those delineated in steam
tables.
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere. Are you confused, Jim? Why yes, you most certainly
are... you demonstrate that fact each and every day. LOL
Post by James McGinn
It doesn't matter that most people assume clear moist air contains
gaseous H2O.
It's not an assumption, James. I've provided two peer-reviewed studies
which prove that monomer water is all that is evaporating unless the
water is boiling. You ran away from them because they prove you wrong.
Post by James McGinn
It matters that the laboratory evidence
Which you don't have. All you have is your kooky little 4th grade
level uncontrolled experiment, James.
Post by James McGinn
indisputably proves that the moisture in clear moist air must
consist of droplets/clusters that are too small to be visible.
And how, exactly, does your kooky little 4th grade level uncontrolled
experiment show that, James? You've provided *no* results of *any*
kind... likely because your margin of error is so large your results
are essentially random.
Post by James McGinn
The laws of thermodynamics are not optional.
No indeed they are not. That's why they explain exactly what is
happening in terms of latent heat of evaporation, James. You can't
tout the Laws of Thermodynamics on one hand, and deny them on the
other, James... doing that makes you look like a kooktard.

Here you go, James... another chance for you to run away from
scientific reality...

==========================================================

Still demonstrating your inability to grasp how water can be gaseous
phase below its boiling point, James? It's already been fully
explained to you, and in the process, your kooky conspiracy theory has
been utterly demolished.

You postulate the following:

1) There is a "plasma not-a-plasma" that exists in the troposphere,
which you have admitted is merely a hypothetical construct so you can
continue to blather on about your kooky discredited conspiracy theory.

2) This magical "plasma not-a-plasma" is plasmized by an energy source
that is somehow magically plasmizing water in the troposphere without
dissociating it, given that the dissociation energy and nuclear
binding energy of water are identical at 940.8 kJ/mol, and thus water
will dissociate rather than plasmize, unless hit with an extremely
energetic laser.

3) That your kooky energy source is somehow plasmizing only
atmospheric water while not plasmizing or dissociating Earth-bound
water, and is not killing off all life on the planet. Given that the
*minimum* energy necessary to even *begin* to plasmize water would be
equivalent to photons at a *maximum* wavelength of 103.32 nm, just
3.32 nm wavelength away from the x-ray range, I'm sure even you can
see the problem inherent in your contention, James.

4) That this magical energy source exists in the troposphere. Except
it cannot exist in the troposphere. Photons of shorter wavelength than
~121 nm are absorbed far above the troposphere due to their ability to
ionize air, thus they are not present in the troposphere, where the
overwhelming majority of all water is.

5) That warm air is heavier than cooler air... tell me, Jim... which
direction does air flow from a flame? Oh, that's right, upward. Why?
Because warm air is lighter and less dense than cooler air and thus
convects upward.

6) That air with gaseous phase water in it is heavier than dry air,
except you forget that science has long known about molar mass and
molar volume...

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Air temperature is a much greater determiner of air density than
humidity.

The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of
the atomic masses of its constituent atoms.

The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen,
1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP.

Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous
phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar
mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the
same volume of 22.414 liters at STP.

The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas
the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP.

Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh:
18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase
28.57 g for dry air

Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore
air containing water in its gaseous phase is lighter than dry air.

Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its
gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant.

Except that's not all, Jim. Because air becomes denser as the altitude
decreases.

At any given altitude, air of the same temperature and gaseous water
partial pressure will have the same density.

At any given altitude, air of lower temperature but similar gaseous
water partial pressure will have higher density.

At any given altitude, air of the same temperature but greater gaseous
water partial pressure will have lower density.

For air of the same temperature and gaseous water partial pressure,
air at a higher altitude will have lower density.

(1) For instance, at sea level, 20 C temperature, and 0% relative
humidity, the air density is 1.204 kg/m^3.

Keeping all other factors in (1) the same but increasing relative
humidity to 100%, or elevation to 74 meters, or temperature to 22.4 C,
the air density is 1.194 kg/m^3.

Thus in order for the air at sea level to rise 74 meters due to
increased buoyancy, it must have 100% more relative humidity than the
air 74 meters above (IOW, the air at sea level must be at 100% RH, the
air 74 meters above must be at 0% RH), given the same temperature; or
the temperature of that sea level air must be at least 2.4 C greater
than the air at 74 meters, given the same relative humidity.

Given that temperature can change much more than 2.4 C, whereas
relative humidity can only max out at 100%, one can see that
temperature-induced convection is the predominant driver of weather
systems, destroying yet another of your kooky contentions.

IOW, in order for air to rise, it must overcome gravity, which
requires energy (said energy in the form of temperature of the air
itself decreasing air density or the latent heat of vaporization of
monomer water in its gaseous phase replacing a certain percentage of
higher molar weight air molecules and thus decreasing air density).

It's not because of your blather that the air at a lower altitude is
"heavier" due to "water droplets", Ko0okTard.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

And before you begin blathering on again about the Ideal Gas Law not
applying to the atmosphere, let me remind you that I've done the
calculations for the van der Waals equation, as well. It is in
agreement with the Ideal Gas Law to a great degree of accuracy even
with the molar volume I used. As air volume increases for the same
relative humidity, air with gaseous phase water in it acts more and
more like an ideal gas, Jim. Compare the Ideal Gas Law to the van der
Waals Equation with all parameters the same except for volume, and
increase the volume through several iterations, then plot the
difference between the results of the Ideal Gas Law and the van der
Waals equation... notice the converging trend?

Do you think for an Earth-atmosphere-sized container, the air with
gaseous phase water in it would be within a very small margin of error
to an ideal gas, Jim? Sure it is. But that's something else you don't
understand because you're a low-information uneducated oaf.

7) Your kooky contention that water polarity changes upon H bonding...
which would also cause random changes in water's solvent properties,
and we know water's solvent properties do not change randomly, Jim.
You didn't know about the two spin isomers of water, which means there
are two hybrids of water with different H bonding strengths:

http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
They used x-ray spectroscopy to determine photon energy from electron
orbital shell descent. You'll note the gaseous phase water molecule's
photon spectra peaks at a much lower photon energy than ice. This is
due to differences in hydrogen bonding strength between the two
phases.

http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw
You'll note the double peak of liquid water.

Professor Anders Nilsson, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory:
====================================================
Two peaks, what does that mean? Could it be two different types of
water molecules then, in the liquid? And if you look at it, one of the
peaks is very close to the gas phase and the other peak is closer to
the ice. So it looks like water contains two types of molecules.
====================================================

You betcha... para and ortho-form water.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ortho_para_water.html>
====================================================
Each hydrogen atom in water has a magnetic moment, which is associated
with the proton's spin of 1/2. As is found in molecular hydrogen (H2),
the protons (within the hydrogen atoms) in water (H2O) may possess
parallel or antiparallel nuclear spin (see right). When the spins are
parallel, there is a paramagnetic state called ortho-H2O with a
magnetic moment = 1. This is the high spin (triplet) state with three
symmetric spin states +1 , 0 , -1 (^^, ^v+^v, vv) where the three
states have equal energy in a zero magnetic field. This spin state
always possesses positive energy with a minimum energy level of 284.7
J mol-1 (23.794352 cm-1) H216O, [607c], 284.4 J mol-1 (23.773510 cm-1)
H217O [607a] or 284.2 J mol-1 (23.754902 cm-1) H218O [607a].

When the spins are opposed there exists the nonmagnetic state called
para-H2O with magnetic moment = 0 with just one antisymmetric spin
state (^v-^v) and magnetic moment = 0. Some of the water molecules in
this low spin (singlet) state will not be rotating even at room
temperature.

Para-H2O does not interact with an external magnetic field, but
ortho-H2O does. Conversion between these isomers is symmetry forbidden
for isolated water molecules and they act as different molecular
species. They can change spin state on interaction with another
particle, including other water molecules. The equilibrium ratio of
these nuclear spin states in H2O is all para- at zero Kelvin, where
the molecules have no rotational spin in their ground state, shifting
to the most stable ratio [1694] of 3:1 ortho:para, in the relative
amounts of the number of magnetic states, at less cold temperatures
(>50 K, see left [2478]); the equilibrium taking months to establish
itself in ice (or gas) and nearly an hour in ambient water [410]. It
is now thought that the ratio lies far from equilibrium and much
closer to 1:1 in liquid water due to hydrogen bond formation [2076].
This means that liquid H2O effectively consists of a mixture of
non-identical molecules and the properties of pure liquid ortho-H2O or
para-H2O are unknown. The differences in the properties of these two
forms of water are expected to be greater in an electric field [1186],
which may be imposed externally, from surfaces or from water
clustering itself. Many materials preferentially adsorb para-H2O due
to its non-rotation ground state [410, 835].

The apparent difference in energy between the two states is a
significant 1-2 kJ mol-1, far greater than expected from spin-spin
interactions (< ÎŒJ mol-1) [835]. It has been suggested that structural
rearrangements may be induced by ortho-H2O : para-H2O conversion
[1430], as it is possible that hydrogen bonds between para-H2O,
possessing no ground state spin, are stronger and last longer than
hydrogen bonds between ortho-H2O [1150]. It is thus possible that
ortho-H2O and para-H2O form separate hydrogen bonded clusters [1150]
with para-H2O being preferred in the low density tetrahedrally
coordinated clusters and ortho-H2O being preferred in the high density
clusters [2070], where their rotation is more easily accommodated.
Picoliter samples of pure ortho-H2O and para-H2O may be separated in a
strong dc electric field [2156].
====================================================

The two spin isomers of water cause a different H bond strength when
water molecules of like spin isomers engage in H bonding to form water
clusters, Jim. Thus the weaker ortho-H2O hydrogen bond is more easily
broken, so most of the gaseous phase water being evaporated should be
ortho-H2O. You'll note above that ortho-H2O even in its liquid form is
very close to the same properties as gaseous phase water under x-ray
spectroscopy, the difference accountable by taking into consideration
temperature and phase.

Remember when I said the surface layer of water was more viscous than
the bulk water? Yeah, that's because the ortho-H2O being evaporated
removes heat from the water, which makes the para-H2O in the ~1.7 nm
thick surface layer act nearly the same as ice.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/interfacial_water.html>
=====================================================
Analysis of simple thermodynamics c shows the surface has considerable
structuring, having identical density to that of bulk water at just
under 4 °C. In addition, the surface water structuring varies less
with temperature than the bulk. Refractive index study of the
water-air surface reveals it to be about 1.7 nm thick at 22 °C and
more dense than the bulk liquid (that is, it behaves like water at a
lower temperature).
=====================================================

As for condensation? Well, it's been found that under circumstances in
which relative humidity is less than ~25%, a four-molecule thick layer
of ice forms on the condensation surface... so apparently what is
happening is that the ortho-H2O being evaporated is colliding with
other molecules in the air, changing their spin isomer and thus giving
off energy, becoming para-H2O, and those are the ones preferentially
condensing, forming that four-molecule thick layer of ice. You'll note
above that para-H2O even in its liquid form is very close to the same
properties as solid phase water (ice) under x-ray spectroscopy, the
difference accountable by taking into consideration temperature and
phase.

For conditions of greater than ~25% relative humidity and thus greater
water gaseous-phase partial pressure in the air, apparently the
condensation process is fast enough to allow even ortho-H2O
gaseous-phase water to condense, thus the four-molecule thick layer of
ice is melted.

So you see, James, it's not because of your kooky contention that the
water molecule's polarity changes upon hydrogen bonding, it's because
there are two spin-isomer hybrids of the water molecule with two
different hydrogen bonding strengths.

Yet again, your kooky conspiracy theory is ripped to shreds by
scientific fact... made especially delicious because it was done
utilizing a link *you* provided. LOL

<http://phys.org/news/2014-09-para-ortho.html>
==============================================
A hydrogen nucleus (proton) can adopt two different states, comparable
to rotation clockwise and counterclockwise. In the case of water, the
nuclear spins of the two — indistinguishable — protons can be combined
in four different ways: one antisymmetric and three symmetric
wavefunctions. Water adopting the antisymmetric wavefunction is called
para water, whereas water adopting one of the symmetric ones is called
ortho water. Because switching from one state to the other is
"forbidden" due to quantum-mechanical symmetry rules, the two spin
isomers cannot interconvert without external influences such as
collisions.
==============================================

Were you not aware that hydrogen has two spin isomers, ortho- and
para-, and thus water, comprised of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen
atoms, also has two spin isomers?

<https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f24e171918d462fac89b809dccaa7c3e>
<http://cdn.phys.org/newman/csz/news/800/2014/201434press.gif>

In pure hydrogen, ortho-hydrogen is thermodynamically unstable even at
low temperature and / or high pressure and it thus spontaneously
converts to para-hydrogen upon molecular collision, which has
implications for liquefied hydrogen storage, as energy is given off by
this spin isomer conversion.

In water, the oxygen atom slows the already slow conversion process to
para-hydrogen by preserving spin state of the hydrogen atom via
partially shielding the hydrogen atom from molecular collision which
would cause spin isomer conversion.

8) Your kooky claim that the jet stream is a "giant tornado in the
sky" which sends its tendrils down through the troposphere, at
distances that can reach to hundreds of miles from the jet stream, to
drop down tornadoes... but how does the jet stream always know to send
its tendril *only* to cumulonimbus clouds, Jim? How does it know to
avoid nearly every other cloud type, *and* avoid dropping down
tornadoes out of the clear blue sky, James? How does it know to avoid
dropping down a tornado if the ground or water below that cloud is
cooler than the air in the cloud, Jim? Is your "jet stream / giant
tornado in the sky" sentient, James? And why have those tendrils never
been detected, either by satellite, Doppler radar _or_ by planes being
ripped to shreds on a regular basis when they fly into those hundreds
of mile long vortexes, James?

Do you see now how ridiculous your patchwork 'theory' is becoming,
James? You've made yourself a scientific laughingstock.

Now, let's you get to answering those questions you've been ducking,
Jim...

============================================================
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away from
the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and
know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather
than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is
your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your k'laming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further k'laming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in order that your claims have even a semblance
of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Cipher (aka Dave A. Howard the Coward) is an ancient mainframe Usenet
bot that never got shut off. He walkered his way back into AUK after
an eternity spent in an infinite loop, started clacking his dentures
and bragging about what a big man he *used* to be and how we kids
should get the hell off his lawn, promptly outed himself, slipped in
the urine dribbling down his leg from his over-full Depends, his
walker went flying, his dentures clattered to the floor, and he lay
there, hearing aid squealing, stabbing an arthritic finger at his
Life-Alert pendant and crying "Help, I've soiled myself and I can't
get up!" as we youngsters laughed raucously at him. Don't ask him
about the Port-A-Potty that drove him so bonkers that he ended up in a
tight-white jacket in a rubber room in a mental institution... that
wasn't Dave, man. He's blocked all that out.
James McGinn
2016-03-17 04:18:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Post by James McGinn
He didn't show that. He assumed it. In fact it has never been shown,
it's been assumed through all of human history. As with the
thermodynamic realities of CO2 the thermodynamic realities of H2O are
not a matter of opinion. It is impossible for H2O to exist as a gas
at temperatures above and pressures below those delineated in steam
tables.
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
Sergio
2016-03-17 04:26:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Post by James McGinn
He didn't show that. He assumed it. In fact it has never been shown,
it's been assumed through all of human history. As with the
thermodynamic realities of CO2 the thermodynamic realities of H2O are
not a matter of opinion. It is impossible for H2O to exist as a gas
at temperatures above and pressures below those delineated in steam
tables.
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
Steam Tables are for cooking clams, James.
Everyone was in on the Steam Table joke, jokes on you.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-17 05:43:14 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 8:56:25 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
He didn't show that. He assumed it. In fact it has never been shown,
it's been assumed through all of human history. As with the
thermodynamic realities of CO2 the thermodynamic realities of H2O are
not a matter of opinion. It is impossible for H2O to exist as a gas
at temperatures above and pressures below those delineated in steam
tables.
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
What every sane person uses, James, a Mollier diagram.

That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which disproves your blather that latent heat of
evaporation exists.

That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which utterly destroys your kooky 'theory'.

That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which you continue to demonstrate you lack the cranial
capacity to grasp.

<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Mollier.pdf>

Now, on to those questions you keep ducking that highlight the logical
inconsistencies in your kooky 'theory' which is really nothing more
than the mad ramblings of a moron, James:

============================================================
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away from
the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and
know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather
than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is
your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your k'laming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further k'laming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in order that your claims have even a semblance
of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>
James McGinn
2016-03-17 06:00:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
What every sane person uses, James, a Mollier diagram.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data
Too bad you can't prove that.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-17 15:09:03 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:53:35 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
What every sane person uses, James, a Mollier diagram.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which disproves your blather that latent heat of
evaporation exists.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which utterly destroys your kooky 'theory'.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which you continue to demonstrate you lack the cranial
capacity to grasp.
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Mollier.pdf>
Too bad you can't prove that.
Your attempt to turn reality on its head as a pathetic attempt to
continue your kooky claim that you are somehow smarter than every
single scientist in the past 250+ years fails, Jim.

The onus is upon you to prove your contention of the Mollier diagram
being incorrect, and thus the 250+ years of rigorous scientific
inquiry upon which the Mollier diagram is based being incorrect.

Your continued inability to do so is noted.

Now, on to those questions you keep ducking, which highlight the
logical inconsistencies in your kooky 'theory' which is really nothing
more than the mad ramblings of a moron, James:

============================================================
If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel hundreds of miles away from
the jet stream, without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and
know where and when to touch down so they always hit clouds, rather
than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is
your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your k'laming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further k'laming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in order that your claims have even a semblance
of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Cipher (aka Dave A. Howard the Coward) is an ancient mainframe Usenet
bot that never got shut off. He walkered his way back into AUK after
an eternity spent in an infinite loop, started clacking his dentures
and bragging about what a big man he *used* to be and how we kids
should get the hell off his lawn, promptly outed himself, slipped in
the urine dribbling down his leg from his over-full Depends, his
walker went flying, his dentures clattered to the floor, and he lay
there, hearing aid squealing, stabbing an arthritic finger at his
Life-Alert pendant and crying "Help, I've soiled myself and I can't
get up!" as we youngsters laughed raucously at him. Don't ask him
about the Port-A-Potty that drove him so bonkers that he ended up in a
tight-white jacket in a rubber room in a mental institution... that
wasn't Dave, man. He's blocked all that out.
James McGinn
2016-03-17 16:35:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
James McGinn, in
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:53:35 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
What every sane person uses, James, a Mollier diagram.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which disproves your blather that latent heat of
evaporation exists.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which utterly destroys your kooky 'theory'.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which you continue to demonstrate you lack the cranial
capacity to grasp.
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Mollier.pdf>
Too bad you can't prove that.
Your attempt to turn reality on its head as a pathetic attempt to
continue your kooky claim that you are somehow smarter than every
single scientist in the past 250+ years fails, Jim.
I don't know what you are constantly whining about. If Mollier is rigorous then you have your proof. Right? So all you have to do is demonstrate such.

Stop whining and get to it.

Put up or shut up.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-18 05:24:44 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:19:27 AM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
James McGinn, in
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:53:35 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Bwahahahaa! James McGinn the anti-science moron uses the steam tables
on the atmosphere.
What did you use?
What every sane person uses, James, a Mollier diagram.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which disproves your blather that latent heat of
evaporation exists.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which utterly destroys your kooky 'theory'.
That diagram which is based upon empirically-observed data over the
past 250+ years which you continue to demonstrate you lack the cranial
capacity to grasp.
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Mollier.pdf>
Too bad you can't prove that.
Your attempt to turn reality on its head as a pathetic attempt to
continue your kooky claim that you are somehow smarter than every
single scientist in the past 250+ years fails, Jim.
The onus is upon you to prove your contention of the Mollier diagram
being incorrect, and thus the 250+ years of rigorous scientific
inquiry upon which the Mollier diagram is based being incorrect.
Your continued inability to do so is noted.
I don't know what you are constantly whining about.
Drop-kicking your moronic ass with the whole world watching and
laughing at you isn't "whining", Jim. If anyone is whining, it's you,
as you scurry away from all that proof that you're an insane and
delusional idiot.
If Mollier is rigorous then you have your proof. Right?
So all you have to do is demonstrate such.
No, Jim. That established science isn't making the extraordinary
claims, *you* are. It's your job to disprove well-established science
which has been known for 250+ years.

Your continued failure to do so stands as your tacit forced admission
that you're just a delusional halfwit too stupid to understand
reality, let alone refute it. As for your modeling it with your
"theory"? Utterly impossible, you're far too stupid and insane.
Stop whining and get to it.
Put up or shut up.
Yes, Jim. Put up or shut up.

You have made the extraordinary claims that convection doesn't exist;
that latent heat doesn't exist; that all water in the troposphere is
plasma; that plasma can form droplets; that these plasma droplets
cause air with humidity to be *heavier* than dry air; that the jet
stream is a giant tornado just waiting to stretch down to the planet's
surface and wreak havoc... you've run away from substantiating any of
those claims, James.

You've run away mainly because you cannot substantiate your claims,
you know you cannot substantiate your claims, and your continued
evasion is just your attempt at extending your delusion at the cost of
the last shreds of your credibility.

Said delusion consisting of you believing that all of science over the
past 250+ years has gotten it wrong, that you're somehow smarter than
each and every researcher in the past 250+ years.

But everyone is pointing and laughing at you, James. You've made
yourself a laughingstock. And to rectify this situation, do you amend
your wrong thinking? Oh, no... Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards
remain delusional to the very end. You're instead going to sue
*science*, topping your hilarious stupidity with litigious nitwittery
that will only serve to make your delusional state a matter of public
record and provide the world a hilarious news story of the guy who got
laughed out of court for trying to sue *science*.

Whereupon I am sure you'll immediately appeal and add *reality* as a
defendant in your kooksoot.

<snicker>

Now, on to those questions you keep ducking which highlight the
logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your "theory":

============================================================
You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James?

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
noTthaTguY
2016-03-18 17:52:22 UTC
Permalink
HOH is a much stronger glassal houser than OCO;
none of you con or pro bothers with it
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Solving Tornadoes
2016-03-21 05:57:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
It doesn't matter that most people assume clear moist air contains
gaseous H2O.
It's not an assumption, James. I've provided two peer-reviewed studies
which prove that monomer water is all that is evaporating unless the
water is boiling. You ran away from them because they prove you wrong.
I don't care about peer-review. It has to be reproducible experimental evidence. Haven't I told you this about 10 times now.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2016-03-21 15:41:39 UTC
Permalink
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving
Tornadoes, in
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 8:56:25 PM UTC-7,
Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Post by James McGinn
It doesn't matter that most people assume clear moist air contains
gaseous H2O.
It's not an assumption, James. I've provided two peer-reviewed studies
which prove that monomer water is all that is evaporating unless the
water is boiling. You ran away from them because they prove you wrong.
I don't care about peer-review.
You don't care about the truth, James. You're a scientific fraud. The
problem for you is, you're far too insane, stupid and uneducated to
make up a believable lie.
It has to be reproducible experimental evidence.
It is, James. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of reproducible
peer-reviewed experiments, all of them proving that you're a
scientific fraud.
Haven't I told you this about 10 times now.
Only as means of your backpedaling away from mounting a substantive
defense of your fabrication of a 'theory', James.
--
Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":

============================================================
Anders Nilsson measured http://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with
distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an
electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher
energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic
attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the
electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow,
that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic
attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just
violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level.

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly
appearing out of the clear blue sky, James? Is your "jet stream /
giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James?

Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the
troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer,
Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant
tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that
way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim?

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient
jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its
back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to
shreds, Jim?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How does a hot air balloon rise, Jim? That's due to air density
differential due to temperature differential, is it not? That
less-dense air is convecting upward. Do you deny this, Jim? Is your
giant sentient sky tornado monster stretching one of its noodly
appendages down and gently lifting the hot air balloon, Jim?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
Loading...