Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:58:14 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),=

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer
(aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping
Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd)

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop =
Jockey),

rst

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
into the wood chipper again on Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:07:23 =

http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving =
himself
wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so.
Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation h=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
your
sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed to be.=
SPNAK!
You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
math.
The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, wherea=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do th=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either
addition *or* subtraction.
SPNAK!

now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sin=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done.

You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewav=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding* =
sinewaves
since the 1700s, you pathetic moron.
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a connect=

ion

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
just
as famous as Einstein's E=3Dmc^2. Every physicist and engineer le=

arns =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it
on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped that d=

ay =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
to
suck dicks in a dark alley.
<snicker>

IAWTP!

fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum volta=

ge =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

of
his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close but =

you

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a lo=

ser

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser anyw=

ay.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png
do us a favor and plug y=3D2550.25 into this equation which you've =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

defined
for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"...
150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*si=

n(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=3Dy

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

LOL

Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he=
can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper w=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of doing it. LOL
A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude
150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 =3D 2550.25

that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies a=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative value=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves
oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of "scienc=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

dictates you doing that, mr. wizard?

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and=
destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewave=
summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true. pl=
ug =

it into your equation, slappy. let's all see both how "smart" you are a=
nd =

also how "useful" euler summations are for visualizing =

constructive/destructive interference.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what
you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of
sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the=
Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use.
SPNAK!

in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summatio=

n =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

AND
the subtraction for you.
http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD.

Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't
possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of
complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking=
it up.
You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your
results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators.=
SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd=
see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum=
voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which
means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on everythi=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
you've been spewing, you moron. LOL
Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those
sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky
sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be
*wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eatin=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
shortbus window licker? LOL
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do simp=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transform=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of complex phasors.
There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been th=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use=
by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron,
you halfwit.
SPNAK!

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
Loading Image...

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

Loading Image...

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

Loading Image...

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

Loading Image...

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
=

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-17 18:31:05 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:58:14 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer
(aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping
Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd)

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop

http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving
himself wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so.
Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation has
put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note
your sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed to be.
SPNAK!
You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the
math. The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts, whereas
your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the
calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either
addition *or* subtraction.
SPNAK!

now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine
waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done.

You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave
*summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding*
sinewaves since the 1700s, you pathetic moron.
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a connection
between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely
just as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer learns
it on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped that day
to suck dicks in a dark alley.
<snicker>

IAWTP!

fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum voltage
of his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close but you
went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a loser
with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser anyway.
http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png
do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've
defined for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"...
150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y
LOL

i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true.

Which means you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to
perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let
alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the
Fourier transforms of the phasors.

SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
plug it into your equation, slappy. let's all see both
how "smart" you are and also how "useful" euler summations
are for visualizing constructive/destructive interference.

You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation that's taught in every
introductory physics and engineering class? The Euler sinewave
summation equation that's used by every scientist, physicist and
engineer? The Euler sinewave summation equation that has been the
defacto method of summing sinewaves since the 18th century? Way to
demonstrate that you're so insane you're denying a reality that's so
firmly established it's on par with Einstein's E=mc^2, DildoRider. LOL

It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how
to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing
their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL

Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector
summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no
idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that
you're a math challenged moron.

This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you
apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for
Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have
trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex
numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonions in my head
for fun.

In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and
reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning.
You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down.

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what
you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of
sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the
Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use.
SPNAK!

in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation
AND the subtraction for you.
http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD.

Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't
possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of
complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking
it up.
You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your
results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators.
SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd
see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum
voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which
means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on everything
you've been spewing, you moron. LOL
Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those
sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky
sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be
*wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating
shortbus window licker? LOL
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do simple
addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms
of complex phasors.
There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the
defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use
by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron,
you halfwit.
SPNAK!

SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?

Skeeter

2016-02-17 18:55:44 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:31:05 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true.

You really answered that question directly with your old "fakey spin"
(tm).

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-17 19:04:58 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:31:05 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true.=

Which means you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to
perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, le=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the
Fourier transforms of the phasors.

You really answered that question directly with your old "fakey spin"
(tm).

he can't do it. watch:

where is y=3D2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking =

*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(=C3=8E=C2=B8) =C3=A2=E2=80=B0=C2=A1 E(a) + E(b) can be writ=
ten thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to =

real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/sin=
gle-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between =E2=80=9Chot=E2=80=9D wires=
, we must subtract =

voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each =

other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingl=
eSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180=C2=B0 apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASC=
II =

art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic =

rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." =

<***@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Emeritus <***@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: header=
s =

containing "***@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to =

yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints=
=

to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful =

information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you =

downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try=
: =

http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority =E2=
=80=94 as =

it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjec=
ts =

or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it =

presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, =

Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homewor=
k =

before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason =

many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating =

opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you=
, =

look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassi=
ng =

bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-to=
ed =

boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, =

Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n=
=

friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message =

<***@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users we=
re =

using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then w=
e =

figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers =

while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using =

process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden =

service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum ho=
w =

I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can=
=

get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my =

distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a =
=

kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
=

Skeeter

2016-02-17 19:11:46 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:04:58 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"

Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:31:05 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

You really answered that question directly with your old "fakey spin"
(tm).

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Can't wait to see the bleat.

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 06:25:45 UTC

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Already answered, which you apparently can't comprehend, you math
challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800.
Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means,
DildoRider.

SPNAK!
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?

Skeeter

2016-02-18 08:44:37 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:25:45 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Already answered,

typical

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 14:46:24 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:25:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
where is y=3D2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Already answered,

and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
which you apparently can't comprehend, you math
challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800.=
Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means,
DildoRider.
SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Skeeter

2016-02-18 14:57:46 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:46:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Already answered,

and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

Already answered

Sn!pe

2016-02-18 15:18:24 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:46:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Already answered,

and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

Already answered

[listens hard for echo]

I missed the answer the first time around,
possibly our expert could kindly repeat it?

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 15:22:27 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Already answered,

and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

Already answered

[listens hard for echo]
I missed the answer the first time around,
possibly our expert could kindly repeat it?

here's a preview: "already answered"

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by Skeeter
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Skeeter

2016-02-18 15:33:32 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

Already answered,

and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

Already answered

[listens hard for echo]
I missed the answer the first time around,
possibly our expert could kindly repeat it?

I'll send a memo

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 20:20:44 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:25:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

where is y=2550.25 when summing your sinewave stew, snickers?

and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

Translation:
"I don't know, so I'll demand to be told, to cover up the fact that
I've used an incorrect and thoroughly kooky sinewave subtraction
equation instead of the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, in
use by scientists and engineers since the 18th century. I was so
stoooopid I switched all the minus signs in my kooky equation to plus
signs and thought that magically made it the proper equation... but I
still can't get my equation to work no matter what I do, which is why
I have to have to backpedal and demand that others do the work of
proving me a mathematical moron." LOL

The period is 4444525800 seconds. It'll take that long for the
resultant to fully play out and start repeating itself. Given that you
started with a phase of 0, the peak of the resultant should be
halfway.

Calculate the resultant = 2550.25 volts to find the time on the graph
that this occurs (that'll prove your kooky sinewave subtraction
equation doesn't work because the voltages won't sum to 2550.25
volts... oh wait, you already did that. LOL).

If you do that correctly (you won't, you didn't, because you're a
moron. LOL), you'll get the frequency of the resultant at the point in
time (because remember, it's an irregular periodic sinusoid), from
that you'll get the period of the resultant at that point in time.
Simple, eh?

Now get to work proving you have no fucking clue how to do it,
DildoRider.

<snicker>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
which you apparently can't comprehend, you math
challenged moron. The periodicity of those sinewaves is 4,444,525,800.
Now you further demonstrate that you have no idea what that means,
DildoRider.
SPNAK!

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 20:36:58 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:20:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
and the value of x in seconds is: _________________________

"I don't know, so I'll demand to be told.

Translation: I don't know.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-17 19:03:15 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:31:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:45:50 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop =
Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:27:43 -0500, Sir Gargles Balls, Is Queer
(aka Craptain Kneel Whorin' the Pusillanimous Pail-Pooping
Pooter Pirate of the SS Cut The [mus]Turd)

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:45:51 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
first

http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving
himself wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so.
Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
has
put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Not=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
your sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
to be.
SPNAK!
You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up th=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
math. The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts=

, =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas
your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do =

the

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either=
addition *or* subtraction.
SPNAK!

now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz s=

ine

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done.

You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinew=

ave

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding*
sinewaves since the 1700s, you pathetic moron.
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a =
connection
between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is like=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
just as famous as Einstein's E=3Dmc^2. Every physicist and engi=

neer =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
learns
it on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped =
that day
to suck dicks in a dark alley.
<snicker>

IAWTP!

fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum =
voltage
of his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

but you
went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

loser
with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser =
anyway.
http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png
do us a favor and plug y=3D2550.25 into this equation which you'v=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

defined for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"...
150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*=

sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=3Dy

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

LOL

Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand ho=

w =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
or
why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
way
of doing it. LOL
A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude
150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 =3D 2550.25

that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

and
the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative val=

ues

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine wave=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of =
"science"
dictates you doing that, mr. wizard?

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive a=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewa=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true.

Which means

that once again you can't provide any evidence that you can use your =

equations and whatever it is you're calling a (bird)brain these days to =
=

figure out at what value of x (in seconds) that those waves would =

"constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to
perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let=
alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the
Fourier transforms of the phasors.

which proves that you have no ability to apply those transforms and =

phasors to give someone an answer to a simple question that would probab=
ly =

undeniably prove that you actually know what you're talking about, let =

alone SUM any two of the 3 phases of 3-phase power and show the resultan=
t =

sine wave using your vaporMath.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how
to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing
their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL=
Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector
summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no
idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that
you're a math challenged moron.
This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you
apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for
Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have
trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex
numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonions in my head=
for fun.
In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and
reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning.=
You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down.
SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what
you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of=
sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* t=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use.
SPNAK!

in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summat=

ion

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

AND the subtraction for you.
http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT, SPANKARD.

Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't
possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of=
complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucki=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it up.
You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your
results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operator=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maxim=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, whic=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on =
everything
you've been spewing, you moron. LOL
Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those
sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kook=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ b=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
*wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eat=

ing

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
shortbus window licker? LOL
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do =
simple
addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transfo=

rms

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
of complex phasors.
There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been =

the

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in u=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
you halfwit.
SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Skeeter

2016-02-17 19:11:18 UTC

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:03:15 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
answer to a simple question

From Fakey?

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 06:20:45 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

Bwahahahaaaaa! I've got DildoRider working so hard at proving
himself wrong that he's up at 2:07 AM doing so.
Way to prove that your fucked up sinewave differential equation
has put your answer 180 degrees out from reality, you spankard. Note
your sinewave differential is reversed from where it's supposed to be.
SPNAK!
You being a math challenged moron, you're *still* fucking up the
math. The sum of all those sinewaves should reach 2550.25 volts,
whereas your fucked up program (because you're far too stoooopid to do the
calculations by hand) doesn't even reach 2500 volts, for either
addition *or* subtraction.
SPNAK!

now let's see you sum the 180 degree phase shifted 120V 60Hz sine
waves with euler's equation and show us how it's REALLY done.

You've just proven yourself *wrong*. That's why the Euler sinewave
*summation* equation has been the defacto means of *adding*
sinewaves since the 1700s, you pathetic moron.
Bwahahahaa! DildoRider doesn't understand that there is a
connection between exponentials and sine waves. The Euler equation is likely
just as famous as Einstein's E=mc^2. Every physicist and engineer
learns it on the first day of class... apparently DildoRider skipped
that day to suck dicks in a dark alley.
<snicker>

IAWTP!

fakey can't seem to figure out the exact amplitude or maximum
voltage of his sinewave summation stew. free kl00, fakey: you were close
but you went over. if this were 'The Sine Wave is Right' you would be a
loser with your guess of 2550.25, but of course you would be a loser
anyway.
http://i.imgur.com/oQuEPhF.png
do us a favor and plug y=2550.25 into this equation which you've
defined for us, solve for x and prove me "wrong"...
150*sin(120*2*pi*x)+20.25*sin(33*2*pi*x)+1400*sin(150*2*pi*x)+20*sin(5013*2*pi*x)+600*sin(13*2*pi*x)+360*sin(1209*2*pi*x)=y
LOL

Bwahahahaaaaa! Oh. My. Gawd. DildoRider is now demonstrating that he
can't even *add* *numbers* correctly, and he doesn't understand how
or why sinewave *summation* per Euler's equation is the *only* proper
way of doing it. LOL
A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude
150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25

that's interesting how you feel you can just ignore the frequencies
and the fact that sometimes the waves you described are at negative values
while others might not be, since they are sine waves, and sine waves
oscillate between positive and negative values. what part of
"science" dictates you doing that, mr. wizard?

i'd like to know the value of x (in seconds) for which that is true.

Which means

that once again you can't provide any evidence that you can use your
equations and whatever it is you're calling a (bird)brain these days to
figure out at what value of x (in seconds) that those waves would
"constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts.

Nicely word-souped, DildoRider... do you get the feeling I'm stringing
you along, letting you provide more evidence that you're a
know-nothing nong, so I can derive more laughter at your expense
later? Of course, I provided the periodicity of the summation of the
Fourier transforms of the phasors of those sinewaves, so your wordsoup
blather is yet again proven to be 180 degrees out from reality... or
are you tacitly admitting above that you're *so* clueless you have no
idea what periodicity means, DildoRider?

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
you yet again demonstrate that you have no clue how to
perform vector summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, let
alone calculate the periodicity of that vector summation of the
Fourier transforms of the phasors.

which proves that you have no ability to apply those transforms and
phasors to give someone an answer to a simple question that would probably
undeniably prove that you actually know what you're talking about, let
alone SUM any two of the 3 phases of 3-phase power and show the resultant
sine wave using your vaporMath.

"vaporMath" LOL

The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use to sum sinewaves
since the 1700s, you witless brainfart. You're the moron who k'lames
it's not the right way of doing it. LOL

Whereas every scientist, physicist and engineer uses the Euler
sinewave summation equation and has since the 18th century, only *one*
hapless incompetent math challenged moron uses your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, only one brainfucked boob then switches the
minus signs to plus signs and doesn't understand why the equation
still doesn't work nor why that doesn't make it the proper Euler
sinewave summation equation, only one idiotic libtarded drooler
doesn't understand that summing the voltages of the sinewaves gives a
quick go-no go test as to whether the equation works because at the
periodicity of the sinewaves, they'll all sum to that total voltage...
that math challenged moron is you, the equation that doesn't work is
your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Moron.

SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation that's taught in every
introductory physics and engineering class? The Euler sinewave
summation equation that's used by every scientist, physicist and
engineer? The Euler sinewave summation equation that has been the
defacto method of summing sinewaves since the 18th century? Way to
demonstrate that you're so insane you're denying a reality that's so
firmly established it's on par with Einstein's E=mc^2, DildoRider. LOL
It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how
to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing
their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL
Just admit that you're *wrong*, that you don't know how to do vector
summation of Fourier transforms of complex phasors, that you have no
idea how constructive and destructive interference works, and that
you're a math challenged moron.
This all goes back to complex numbers and vectors, which you
apparently can't grasp, but which I've already demonstrated twice for
Chimpy that I have an inherent understanding of. Whereas you have
trouble counting to 20 without removing your socks, I juggle complex
numbers, hypercomplex numbers, quaternions and Hamiltonians in my head
for fun.
In short, you're a mathematical moron, and you've proven and
reiterated that fact sufficiently, Spankard. You can stop campaigning.
You've won the Usenet's Biggest Math Moron contest hands down.
SPNAK!

<crickets> LOL

SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That you don't understand this proves you have no fucking clue what
you're doing, nor do you even understand the underlying mechanism of
sinewave constructive and destructive interference, which is *why* the
Euler sinewave summation equation is the proper equation to use.
SPNAK!

in the meantime, i've graphed the solutions to the *correct* summation
AND the subtraction for you.
http://i.imgur.com/XDmQD4A.png

http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
NOTE THAT THEY DO NOT INTERSECT

NOTE: This proves your kooky sinewave subtraction equation doesn't
work. You just *proved* yourself wrong, DildoRider. And yet, you're
*so* stupid you'll continue to blather your retarded gibberish.

What does that make you, DildoRider?

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

, SPANKARD.

That's right, that makes you a spankard.

SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Aaaahahahahahaaaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates that he can't
possibly fathom how to use vector summation of Fourier transforms of
complex phasors. He can't even add or subtract numbers without fucking
it up.
You're using the *wrong* *equation*, you fucking imbecile, so your
results are wrong no matter how you change the mathematical operators.
SPNAK!

*If* your kooky sinewave subtraction equation worked properly, you'd
see all the sinewaves constructively interfere to reach that maximum
voltage, you witless nong. It didn't, therefore it's *wrong*, which
means _you're_ *wrong*. You just proved yourself *wrong* on
everything you've been spewing, you moron. LOL
Did it not occur to you to add the voltage amplitudes of those
sinewaves, knowing that at certain points all the sinewaves would
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts, thus if your kooky
sinewave subtraction equation didn't show that result, it _must_ be
*wrong*, you drooling cross-eyed math-challenged low-IQ crayon-eating
shortbus window licker? LOL
Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider just demonstrated that he can't even do
simple addition, let alone figure out vector summation of Fourier transforms
of complex phasors.
There's a *reason* the Euler sinewave summation equation has been the
defacto method of *summing* sinewaves since the 18th century, in use
by every engineer and physicist, whereas your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is only used by one thoroughly confused moron,
you halfwit.
SPNAK!

SPNAK! on the mathematical moron. LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

kensi

2016-02-17 16:45:23 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude
A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude
150 + 20.25 + 1400 + 20 + 600 + 360 = 2550.25

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if
*any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a
second?

Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you
listed is 4444525800.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
no fucking clue

*snicker*

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of screed
into your obsessive replies you prove it.

Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age is

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
GableTard. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

*snicker*

--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-17 17:17:59 UTC

In article <na283k$18kf$***@gioia.aioe.org>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...

Post by kensi
*snicker*
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate

I'm truly honored, Kensi, to have one of my brilliant quotes enshrined
in your siggy. You da MAN!

--
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016
all rights reserved

Sn!pe, DoW #2

2016-02-17 17:23:58 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

I'm truly honored, Kensi, to have one of my brilliant quotes enshrined
in your siggy. You da MAN!

Three HAWS!
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, DoW #2 <***@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-17 17:35:21 UTC

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:45:23 -0500, kensi <***@gmail.invalid> =
=

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus =

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive an=

destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewav=

summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens =

if =

*any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a =

second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you=

listed is 4444525800.

i was going to let him crow for a month before i told him that. dang it=
!

;)

no fucking clue

*snicker*

Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of scree=

d =

into your obsessive replies you prove it.
Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age =

is =

Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
GableTard. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

*snicker*

phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-17 18:54:17 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:45:23 -0500, Ko0O0oki kensi the

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if
*any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a
second?

That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter,
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts
once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid
test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was,
his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in
fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never
reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts.
DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's
wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL

SPNAK!

Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you
listed is 4444525800.

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his
kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too
stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation,
despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in
fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler
sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed
to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the
aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious.

Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian
curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius.

Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow
giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere.

And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared
at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.

For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water
cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window doesn't exist.

Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of
CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved.

And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a
chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the
top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald
Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the
self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL

SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit.

i was going to let him crow for a month before i told him that. dang it!

Translation:
"Whew! Thanks for coming to my rescue, there, dude! I'm in over my
head. Wait... aren't you the *moron* who k'lames the Gaussian
curvature of a sphere is dependent upon its radius, and that the
Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool
in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity,
and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic
deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler"? DAMN IT! Why
do I *always* attract the morons?!"

<snicker>

;)

Translation:
"You doing anything Friday night? Because my throat's got a 5 minute
vacancy from 11:55 PM to midnight, dude. $5 and I'm all yours. $6 if
you want me to dress up in my tranny garb."

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?

=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Skeeter

2016-02-17 19:10:32 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:54:17 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

Post by kensi
Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above. What happens if
*any* pair of them have zero crossings separated by 1/8889051600 of a
second?

That's because you're a fucking moron.

Fakey bot answer when proven wrong.

kensi

2016-02-17 21:19:37 UTC

The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees.

MID?

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you d<SMACKAK00K!>

Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? Of course, *if* they
all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles
per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and
indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often,
since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than
1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their
relative phases at 0 seconds.

But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at
zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at
(4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter
of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n +
5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for
values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is
always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4.
Uh-oh!

There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously
if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding
them is left as an exercise for the reader.

Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his
kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*,

See above. Since the 120Hz and 150Hz waves never peak together, the
maximum height attained by the waveform obtained by summing them all
really is short of 2550.25.

SPNAK!

Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian
curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius.

Portraits of the Earth: A Mathematician Looks at Maps. Timothy G.
Feeman. p. 39, section 3.1. "Curvature of a sphere".

Look it up in your library. Go on. I dare you.

Or this one:

Geometry of Surfaces. John Stillwell. p. 75, section 4.1.

Or go here: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/curvature.htm

Or here:
http://mathhelpforum.com/differential-geometry/210395-gaussian-curvature-sphere.html

When not only multiple web sites but also multiple published textbook
authors on topics like mathematics and geography all disagree with you,
the likely explanation is, you're wrong, ko0ky.

But I am very looking forward to you expounding a conspiracy theory here
whereby all of these authors are engaged in a colossal deception against
the public, whether to cover up a climate change hoax or just to make
you look bad.

*snicker*

(Like you even need any help with that...*snicker*)

Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow
giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere.

Everything not at absolute zero and not made of dark matter gives off
blackbody radiation. Didn't you take high school physics? Oh yeah,
right, you're a drop-out.

*snicker*

And it's giving off radiation to a 3 degrees K outer space, at night,
you fucking retard.

And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared
at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.

It emits broadly in the IR, as blackbody emitters at room and lower but
above-liquid-nitrogen temperatures are wont to do. No doubt some tiny
fraction is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed; hence why water vapor
is a greenhouse gas. Most of it just escapes into space, though.

For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water
cause warmer temperatures,

So, you admit that clouds over these cause warmer temperatures. You have
thus conceded the original bone of contention, rendering the rest of
that thread of discussion moot. I win.

*snicker*

because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the
top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald
Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the
self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL

Why should I, when all of these facts and more are available at
http://politicalcompass.org/ ???

S<SMACKAK00K!>

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-17 21:41:10 UTC

In article <na2o5p$kuh$***@gioia.aioe.org>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...

Subject: Re: Fakey here's both complex sine wave equations graphed.
Newsgroups: alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics

The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees.

MID?

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you d<SMACKAK00K!>

Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? Of course, *if* they
all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles
per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and
indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often,
since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than
1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their
relative phases at 0 seconds.
But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at
zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at
(4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter
of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n +
5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for
values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is
always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4.
Uh-oh!
There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously
if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding
them is left as an exercise for the reader.

So they'll produce harmonics, but at lower amplitudes... I never felt
the occasion to anal-ize it to that degree.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-17 21:55:25 UTC

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:19:37 -0500, kensi <***@gmail.invalid> =
=

On 17/02/2016 1:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus =

The starting phase angle of each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees.=

MID?

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you d<SMACKAK00K!=

Confusing your frequencies with your periods again? Of course, *if* th=

ey =

all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycl=

es =

per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and=

indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often, =

since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than=

1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what the=

ir =

relative phases at 0 seconds.
But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all =

at =

zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak a=

t =

(4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarte=

r =

of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n + =
5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for =

values of n that satisfy 20p+5 =3D 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 =

is =

always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod =

4. =

Uh-oh!
There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneous=

ly =

if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding =

them is left as an exercise for the reader.

Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, hi=

kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*,

See above. Since the 120Hz and 150Hz waves never peak together, the =
maximum height attained by the waveform obtained by summing them all =
really is short of 2550.25.
SPNAK!

you're taking away all of my fun of making him go completely insane!

;)

i wonder why his euler equations and quaternions aren't allowing the =

"genius" to give the value of "x" at which all of his sinewaves sum to h=
is =

simpleton's guess of 2550.25?

plotting the function y=3D2550.25 and the sums of the representative =

equations show the resultant function NEVER reaching 2550.25.

is it possible that fakey knows a few things about math but nothing real=
ly =

about the world around him, hence no possible way to knowingly apply tho=
se =

"john nash" skillz of his.

Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian
curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius.

Portraits of the Earth: A Mathematician Looks at Maps. Timothy G. =
Feeman. p. 39, section 3.1. "Curvature of a sphere".
Look it up in your library. Go on. I dare you.
Geometry of Surfaces. John Stillwell. p. 75, section 4.1.
Or go here: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/curvature.htm
Or here: =
http://mathhelpforum.com/differential-geometry/210395-gaussian-curvatu=

re-sphere.html

When not only multiple web sites but also multiple published textbook =

authors on topics like mathematics and geography all disagree with you=

, =

the likely explanation is, you're wrong, ko0ky.

sounds familiar. even the people who make service panels for 120/240V =

electrical service know that the two 120V legs are 180 degrees out of =

phase but k0oky persists with bleating about sinewave summations when =

attempting to calculate potential difference between two 180 degree phas=
e =

shifted sine waves.

But I am very looking forward to you expounding a conspiracy theory he=

re =

whereby all of these authors are engaged in a colossal deception again=

st =

the public, whether to cover up a climate change hoax or just to make =

you look bad.
*snicker*
(Like you even need any help with that...*snicker*)

Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489=
F.

MID?

After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of sno=

giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere.

Everything not at absolute zero and not made of dark matter gives off =

blackbody radiation. Didn't you take high school physics? Oh yeah, =
right, you're a drop-out.
*snicker*
And it's giving off radiation to a 3 degrees K outer space, at night, =

you fucking retard.

And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared=
at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.

It emits broadly in the IR, as blackbody emitters at room and lower bu=

t =

above-liquid-nitrogen temperatures are wont to do. No doubt some tiny =

fraction is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed; hence why water vap=

or =

is a greenhouse gas. Most of it just escapes into space, though.

For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water=
cause warmer temperatures,

So, you admit that clouds over these cause warmer temperatures. You ha=

ve =

thus conceded the original bone of contention, rendering the rest of =
that thread of discussion moot. I win.
*snicker*

because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't=

exist.

MID?

Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the
top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald=
Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the
self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL

Why should I, when all of these facts and more are available at =
http://politicalcompass.org/ ???

S<SMACKAK00K!>

looks like fakey just got another SMACKDOWN.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 05:36:49 UTC

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter,
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts
once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid
test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was,
his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in
fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never
reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts.
DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it's
wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL
SPNAK!

MID?

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

That's what happens when you get bootfucked by reality and have to run
away in embarrassment, LunkHead, you miss out on important
information. But that's never stopped you from blathering out your
delusion in the past, and likely never will.

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

Confusing your frequencies with your periods again?

And just where did I do that, you moronic halfwit? Or do you not
realize that the periodicity of a sinewave in cycles per second and
graphed in seconds would have a periodicity denoted in *seconds*
because the resultant frequency is the reciprocal of the LCM of the
periodicity, you math challenged idiotic goof?

IOW, you know that after one period of each sinewave, each sinewave
will repeat. In order for the resultant sinewave to repeat, all six of
the tributary sinewave's periods must repeat. This only happens after
an integer number of periods for each of the sinewaves, which
corresponds to the LCM of the tributary sinewave's periods.

But then, you're that math challenged moron who got spanked hard, as
outlined in my .sig, so your confusion is understandable.

SPNAK!

Of course, *if* they
all start out at zero, since they all have integer frequencies in cycles
per second they will sum to zero on every integer time in seconds, and
indeed the entire waveform will repeat that often (and no more often,
since there's no common divisor to all of the frequencies greater than
1). Actually, the waveform will repeat every second no matter what their
relative phases at 0 seconds.

Bwahahahaaa! "the waveform will repeat every second"

Ah, math challenged morons are always fun to kick around. Thanks for
yet again demonstrating that while you can calculate LCM, you have no
clue how constructive and destructive interference works to create the
beat frequency at the periodicity, LunkHead.

SPNAK!

But here comes another problem for you, which applies if they are all at
zero and ascending at time zero: the 120 and 150 Hz cycles will peak at
(4*n + 1)/480 and (4*n + 1)/600 seconds, respectively, each one-quarter
of a cycle after crossing zero ascending. This is equal to (20*n +
5)/2400 and (16*n + 4)/2400, so they can only peak simultaneously for
values of n that satisfy 20p+5 = 16q+4 for integers p, q. But 20p+5 is
always congruent to 1 mod 4, while 16q+4 is always congruent to 0 mod 4.
Uh-oh!

Uh-oh! LunkHead yet again proves he has no clue how constructive and
destructive interference works. Do you suppose those two 120 and 150
Hz sinewaves are somehow independent of the resultant sinewave,
LunkHead? Do you suppose the resultant sinewave will eventually reach
its total periodicity peak at interval 4,444,525,800, and thus those
sinewaves will all constructively interfere, which you've already
admitted to when *you* posted the periodicity, you math challenged
moron? IOW, eventually the total resultant sinewave will shift to that
point "one-quarter of a cycle after crossing zero ascending" such that
the 120 and 150 Hz sinewaves constructively interfering adds to the
total constructive interference of the resultant sinewave, which is
the defacto definition of the periodicity, you math challenged moron?

SPNAK!

There are other pairs of waves in there that never *peak* simultaneously
if they sometimes have their *zero crossings* simultaneously. Finding
them is left as an exercise for the reader.

Wrong. In fact, you proved *yourself* wrong when you posted the
periodicity of those six sinewaves. But thanks for yet again
reiterating that you have no clue how sinewave constructive and
destructive interference works, LunkHead.

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his
kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too
stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation,
despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in
fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler
sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed
to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the
aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious.

See above. Since the 120Hz and 150Hz waves never peak together, the
maximum height attained by the waveform obtained by summing them all
really is short of 2550.25.
SPNAK!

Wrong. But thanks for yet again reiterating that you can't calculate
the LCM of two numbers which are most definitely periodic. Oh, did
LunkHead assume the phase angle between the two frequencies didn't
change for each period?

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian
curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius.

Portraits of the Earth: A Mathematician Looks at Maps. Timothy G.
Feeman. p. 39, section 3.1. "Curvature of a sphere".
Look it up in your library. Go on. I dare you.
Geometry of Surfaces. John Stillwell. p. 75, section 4.1.
Or go here: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/curvature.htm
http://mathhelpforum.com/differential-geometry/210395-gaussian-curvature-sphere.html
When not only multiple web sites but also multiple published textbook
authors on topics like mathematics and geography all disagree with you,
the likely explanation is, you're wrong, ko0ky.
But I am very looking forward to you expounding a conspiracy theory here
whereby all of these authors are engaged in a colossal deception against
the public, whether to cover up a climate change hoax or just to make
you look bad.
*snicker*
(Like you even need any help with that...*snicker*)

Bwahahahaaa! LunkHead yet again confuses constant curvature and
Gaussian curvature, which leads the math-challenged moron to k'lame
that Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's
radius.

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow
giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere.

Everything not at absolute zero and not made of dark matter gives off
blackbody radiation. Didn't you take high school physics? Oh yeah,
right, you're a drop-out.

Bwahahaaaaa! Yet again LunkHead demonstrates that he has no fucking
clue how blackbody radiation works, as well as demonstrates his utter
misunderstanding of the Laws of Thermodynamics.

SPNAK!

*snicker*
And it's giving off radiation to a 3 degrees K outer space, at night,
you fucking retard.

But... but... but LunkHead, you k'lamed the clouds were reflecting any
radiation given off by that snow... which means you've been forced by
your Usenet Lord and Master to acknowledge that clouds have an
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window because water is the major
absorber of infrared in the atmosphere, and water in any phase
exhibits that ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared
at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.

"is emitted in the window, and reabsorbed" LOL!

Yet again, LunkHead demonstrates that he doesn't know what the word
"window" means.

I've already proven you *wrong* on this, you pathetic backpedaling
moron. Snow emits at 10.6168 microns to 12.7419 micron, right in the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water
cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window doesn't exist.

So, you admit that clouds over these cause warmer temperatures.

Moron. That's exactly the opposite of what I *proved*.

SPNAK!

You have thus conce<SMACKAKOOK!>

Moron.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of
CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved.

<crickets> LOL!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a
chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

<crickets> LOL!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the
top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald
Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the
self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL
SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit.

Why should I, when all of these facts and more are available at
http://politicalcompass.org/ ???

Bwahahahaaaa! A moronic libtard looks at a moronic libtard website and
eats that shit right up because gullible goofs will be gullible goofs.

SPNAK!

Why have you run away from all the SPNAK!age you received, as outlined
in my .sig, you pathetic backpedaling bootfucked spankard?

<snicker>
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

kensi

2016-02-18 23:35:50 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.

If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
a ***@speranza.aioe.org or a ***@gioia.aioe.org MID to
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.

Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.

If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
a ***@speranza.aioe.org or a ***@gioia.aioe.org MID to
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.

Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-19 03:08:33 UTC

In article <na5kh7$1ea6$***@gioia.aioe.org>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around
and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of
misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he
allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow
missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
douchebag?

Skeeter

2016-02-19 03:57:44 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn around
and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds of
misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he
allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody somehow
missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
douchebag?

That made me laugh, I don't know why, it just did.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-19 03:58:41 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:08:33 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn arou=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he
allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody someho=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
douchebag?

That made me laugh, I don't know why, it just did.

i chortled and then a HAW!

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Sn!pe

2016-02-19 06:32:32 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

I think you're a very nasty man, casting aspersions like that, tsk!

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-19 07:50:01 UTC

In article <1miuss5.60cc3dn0zg9oN%***@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

I think you're a very nasty man, casting aspersions like that, tsk!

I didn't mean any of that in a "BAD" way...

pandora

2016-02-19 16:09:53 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-19 16:13:53 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus=

Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists a=

489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but i=

is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to sho=

w
o

support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to=
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, b=

it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to sho=

w
o

You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn arou=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting hundreds=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID where he
allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody someho=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
douchebag?

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?=

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-19 17:31:16 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
long any day now.

Skeeter

2016-02-19 17:45:47 UTC

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Sn!pe

2016-02-19 17:58:35 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants out.

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-19 18:12:21 UTC

In article <1mivokh.1e8vbgz1tjffejN%***@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

He doesn't run socks. He even said so.

Skeeter

2016-02-19 18:19:19 UTC

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:12:21 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
@gmail.com says...

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

He doesn't run socks. He even said so.

That clinches it then.

pandora

2016-02-20 01:31:23 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
@gmail.com says...

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow
exists at 489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F,
but it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum
remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need
not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who
seems to use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making
outlandishly ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't
exist, but it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the
dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need
not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who
seems to use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making
outlandishly ko0ky k'lames...

You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough,
or dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could
turn around and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be
like posting hundreds of misconstrued MIDs about people, then
refuse to post a MID where he allegedly posted "proof" of
something years ago, but everybody somehow missed it! Could
Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous douchebag?

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be
showing up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure
they'll be long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

He doesn't run socks. He even said so.

Like anyone would believe anything he said.

Sheesh!

Skeeter

2016-02-19 18:14:21 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be showing
up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'll be
long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

You mean he's "butthurt and ran away" ?

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-19 18:17:28 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:31:16 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
says...

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =

Emeritus

Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow =

exists at

489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F=

, =

Post by Skeeter
but it

is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remail=

er.

If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need=

Post by Skeeter
to show

g =

Post by Skeeter
MID to

support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who =

seems to

use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making =

outlandishly

ko0ky k'lames...

because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric =

window

doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't =

exist, but

it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum =

remailer.

If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need=

Post by Skeeter
to show

g =

Post by Skeeter
MID to

support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who =

seems to

use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making =

outlandishly

ko0ky k'lames...

You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough,=

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could tu=

rn =

Post by Skeeter
around

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting =

hundreds of

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID wher=

e =

Post by Skeeter
he

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but everybody=

Post by Skeeter
somehow

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous=
douchebag?

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i called him=

Post by Skeeter
on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be show=

ing

up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency. I'm sure they'l=

l =

Post by Skeeter
be

long any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

You mean he's "butthurt and ran away" ?

maybe posting rot-13 mystery accounts.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by Sn!pe
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Sn!pe

2016-02-19 18:46:41 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
15206-2117 <***@127.0.0.1> wrote:

[...]

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
douchebag?

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i
called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be
showing up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency.
I'm sure they'll be along any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

You mean he's "butthurt and ran away" ?

maybe posting rot-13 mystery accounts.

It would be a hoot if that was someone else with a handle on \him\...
Nah, who would bother?

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants out.

Skeeter

2016-02-19 19:17:05 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Sn!pe, DoW #2
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
[...]

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a disingenuous
douchebag?

Yes.

did anybody notice his "odd for fakey" reaction when i
called him on it?

I haven't seen any of his posts lately. They don't seem to be
showing up on my newsreader. Perhaps it's server latency.
I'm sure they'll be along any day now.

He has been rather quiet.

Maybe he's getting his jollies under another handle.

You mean he's "butthurt and ran away" ?

maybe posting rot-13 mystery accounts.

It would be a hoot if that was someone else with a handle on \him\...
Nah, who would bother?

Skeeter

2016-02-19 17:17:12 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Yes.

I like you, simple and to the point.

pandora

2016-02-20 01:24:07 UTC

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
says...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at
489 F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it
is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist,
but it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum
remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to
use the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly
ko0ky k'lames...

You... you don't suppose that Fakey would be desperate enough, or
dishonest enough to plant a fake post from you, so he could turn
around and attack it... do you? I mean, that would be like posting
hundreds of misconstrued MIDs about people, then refuse to post a MID
where he allegedly posted "proof" of something years ago, but
everybody somehow missed it! Could Fakey possibly be THAT big of a
disingenuous douchebag?

Yes.

I like you, simple and to the point.

Thanx. I like to be straight forward.

:-)

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

2016-02-20 01:29:15 UTC

Post by pandora
Thanx. I like to be straight forward.
:-)

Smile less and spell more, you dumbass.

Straightforward is one word.

HTH!

--
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

pandora

2016-02-20 01:46:55 UTC

Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

Post by pandora
Thanx. I like to be straight forward.
:-)

Smile less and spell more, you dumbass.
Straightforward is one word.
HTH!

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. You wouldn't know straight
if it bit you in the ass.

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-20 01:48:34 UTC

Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

Post by pandora

Post by pandora
Thanx. I like to be straight forward.
:-)

Smile less and spell more, you dumbass.
Straightforward is one word.
HTH!

I meant what I said and I said what I meant. You wouldn't know straight
if it bit you in the ass.

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

2016-02-20 01:58:36 UTC

<trim>

Post by pandora
I meant what I said and I said what I meant. You wouldn't know straight
if it bit you in the ass.

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

:-(

That's why I can't stand her...

--
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

Skeeter

2016-02-20 04:07:49 UTC

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:58:36 -0500, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."

Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<trim>

Post by pandora
I meant what I said and I said what I meant. You wouldn't know straight
if it bit you in the ass.

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

:-(
That's why I can't stand her...

Because she defends herself? You are learning from fakey real good.

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-20 04:09:38 UTC

Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
<trim>

Post by pandora
I meant what I said and I said what I meant. You wouldn't know straight
if it bit you in the ass.

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

:-(
That's why I can't stand her...

She sure put you in your place, didn't she?

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-20 04:59:11 UTC

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in

On 18/02/2016 12:36 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.

You stupid backpedaling fucktard, you k'lamed snow was giving off
blackbody radiation at 5.5 microns. And now you demonstrate yet again
that you have no fucking clue how blackbody radiation works, because
the infrared radiation at that frequency is associated with a
temperature of 489 F via Wien's Displacement Law.

SPNAK!

If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.

Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n95q3a$1k43$***@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:
"IOW, I said most of it is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window."

And you were discussing specifically 5.5 microns.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
========================================================
Here's another SPNAK! on Ko0O0oki Kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard:

We can use Wien's Displacement Law to determine the temperature range
which LunkHead k'lames snow is at when it's emitting blackbody
radiation from 5.5 to 14 micron.

I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
5.5 to 14 microns"

Lunkhead said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of
winter snow".

So let's do the math:

Wien's Displacement Law:
Displacement_max = b/T
Where:
T = absolute temperature in Kelvin
b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K

Given that:
32 F = freezing point of water
32 F = 273.15 K

2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

So, plugging in 14 microns, we come up with a temperature of 207.1428
K or -86.8128 F.

Now we plug in 5.5 microns, we come up with a temperature of 527.2727
K or 489.4209 F. Lunkhead says snow can exist at 489 F! Bwahahahaaa!

What a *spankard*! What a *moron*! What a backpedaling bleatfarting
*idiot*!

SPNAK!

<snicker>
========================================================

SPNAK! _again_ on the backpedaling moron who yet _again_ demonstrates
that he can't even figure out how blackbody radiation works. It must
suck to be so disconnected from reality that you can't even figure
simple things like this out, LunkHead. That level of stupidity should
hurt. Unfortunately, it apparently does not.

<snicker>

Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

You mean the truth you can't refute, so you backpedal away from it
like a spankard? LOL

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window doesn't exist.

MID?

S<MACKAK00K!>

That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

I've booted LunkHead so hard I've scratched the 78 RPM record he calls
a brain. Now he's skipping. Somebody put a penny on his forehead,
maybe he'll stop. LOL

Remember, you're the moron who k'lames snow emits primarily outside
the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, said k'lame I've already
demolished. Thus, given that I've demolished your kooky k'lame, you
must now be stating that the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
doesn't exist, because you persist in k'laming that cloud cover over
snow will reflect that 12.7419 micron to 10.6168 micron radiation,
when in fact snow emits primarily *in* the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window, and the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window
allows ~94% of that energy through to space without absorption.

SPNAK!

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
========================================================

That
you seem to be disputing that (and then using selective quoting, which I
corrected above, to "support" your k'lames) means that *you* have now
just k'lamed that the blackbody radiation from winter snow comes out in
a single narrow emission line at 11 microns,

It's a very narrow range, obviously bordered on the shorter
wavelengths by the temperature reached, and bordered on the longer
wavelengths by the melting point of snow, whereupon that snow would
melt away, exposing the land beneath, which emits at longer
wavelengths. So at the predominant temperatures of, let's say -50 F to
32 F, we get wavelengths of from 12.7419 micron to 10.6168 micron.

Now, if you'll remember, I'd earlier said:
==========================================
Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
==========================================

So for all but the most severe cold, snow emits in the wavelength
range of the infrared atmospheric window, you backpedaling spankard.
========================================================

SPNAK!
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

kensi

2016-02-20 06:38:24 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by kensi
That may well be a MID for a k'lame that snow exists at 489 F, but it is
not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.

<crickets> on the AIOE MID. Meanwhile, I never claimed that the *peak*
of the distribution was at 5.5 microns, and I don't recall making *any*
claim about 5.5 microns. So that'd be a second AIOE MID you'll be
needing to supply, ko0ky.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
"IOW, I said most of it is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window."

No mention there of either 489 F or 5.5 microns, kOok.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

That would be the peak of the distribution, not all of the radiation.
You *do* know that blackbody radiation forms a broad, somewhat
bell-shaped curve with a fat right tail, right?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
What a *spankard*! What a *moron*! What a b<SMACKAK00K!>

You are indeed.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by kensi
That may well be a MID for a k'lame that the window doesn't exist, but
it is not *my* k'lame, as I do not post through the dizum remailer.
If you still contend that I made such a k'lame, you will need to show me
support your ko0ky contention, not a dizum MID.
Of course, there *is* that *one* user of this newsgroup who seems to use
the dizum remailer heavily and is prone to making outlandishly ko0ky
k'lames...

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-17 19:05:06 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated
by 1/8889051600 of a second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you
listed is 4444525800.

Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of screed
into your obsessive replies you prove it.

Yer pwned, and every time you come crawling back to AUK to bleat out
your butthurt, you prove it. Why can't you refute any of the
truthiness in my .sig, LunkHead?

Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age is

Says the moron, still denying reality.

<Loading Image...

>
We're very near the temperature at the bottom of the Little Ice Age,
you moron. It'll only take a drop in temperature of less than a degree
to drop us into another ice age. We're cooler now than at any time in
the past 10,000 years except the Little Ice Age and the 8200 year
cooling. Hell, we're cooler now than the conditions that caused
Antarctic glaciation in the first place! The GDO and PDO are turning
negative, the sun is quiescent, and the planet's tilt, precessional
and obliquity indexes are dropping... all of which cause global
cooling.

<https://www.skepticalscience.com/acrim-pmod-sun-getting-hotter.htm>
"Various independent measurements of solar activity all confirm the
sun has shown a slight cooling trend since 1978."

<http://www.sott.net/article/268621-German-scientists-Solar-cycle-24-points-to-Dalton-or-Maunder-like-minimum-boding-ill-for-a-climate-cooling>

Given the fact that we still have massive amounts of ice (~75% of
fresh water is locked up in ice), given that the GDO and PDO are
turning negative, given that the total global ice mass is growing,
given that we're in a not particularly warm and not particularly
lengthy interglacial, given that the sun has entered a quiescent phase
with lower solar output than at any time since 1750 and sunspot
activity which is now lower than the Dalton Minimum and predicted to
go lower than the Maunder Minimum, given that the planet's tilt,
precession and obliquity indexes are all dropping, and given that
ocean temperature below the thermocline is already about as cold as it
can get (remember, NASA JPL proved the ocean wasn't absorbing even an
iota of heat... so you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks using that to
explain away the 19 year 5 month and counting "global warming" pause
didn't wash. Water temperature at depth is about 29 to 32 F depending
upon location. LOL) we've already got a head start on the next
glaciation period as compared to, say, the long and warm Roman Warm
Period or Medieval Warm Period.

=================================================================
<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
*decrease*.

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.

<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>

Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
cooling has set in... since 1998.

<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.

Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.

"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - James Hansen

<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
"We have been building models and there are now robust
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
physical model says it has to be warming."

===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>

"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.

You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
===============================================================

You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.

SPNAK!
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 03:39:05 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive a=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed sinewa=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated
by 1/8889051600 of a second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies yo=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

listed is 4444525800.

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

so... when does that happen?

<crickets>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, his=
kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too
stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation,
despite him admitting GnuPlot can utilize the proper equation... in
fact he even provided an example of researchers using the proper Euler=
sinewave summation equation in GnuPlot. And even with that, he failed
to acquire clue... but then, one math-challenged moron coming to the
aid of another math-challenged moron is pretty hilarious.
Go on, tell the world again about your kooky theory of the Gaussian
curvature of a sphere being dependent upon that sphere's radius.
Then you can further expound upon your k'lame that snow exists at 489
F.
After that, you can further entertain us with your fairy tales of snow=
giving off "blackbody radiation" to a warmer atmosphere.
And as a finale, you can tell us all how snow *doesn't* emit infrared
at the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.
For an encore, you can tell us all why clouds over snow, ice or water
cause warmer temperatures, because you k'lame the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window doesn't exist.
Then, for your second curtain call, you can reiterate your k'lame of
CO2 being a global warming gas, in violation of the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, as NASA proved.
And as the crowd is kicking your stoooopid ass out the door to a
chorus of booing, you can scream out that the Riemann curvature tensor=
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
Then you can stand outside and stamp your feet as you scream at the
top of your lungs that Hillary Clinton is more right-wing than Ronald
Reagan, that Obama is a conservative, and that Bernie Sanders the
self-admitted socialist is "near the center". LOL
SPNAK! on the delusional halfwit.

Yer pwned, and every time you copy and paste this little blob of scre=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

into your obsessive replies you prove it.

Yer pwned, and every time you come crawling back to AUK to bleat out
your butthurt, you prove it. Why can't you refute any of the
truthiness in my .sig, LunkHead?

Extra irony points for this subset, by the way, Mr. "oh no an ice age=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Says the moron, still denying reality.
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/globalcool3.jpg>
We're very near the temperature at the bottom of the Little Ice Age,
you moron. It'll only take a drop in temperature of less than a degree=
to drop us into another ice age. We're cooler now than at any time in
the past 10,000 years except the Little Ice Age and the 8200 year
cooling. Hell, we're cooler now than the conditions that caused
Antarctic glaciation in the first place! The GDO and PDO are turning
negative, the sun is quiescent, and the planet's tilt, precessional
and obliquity indexes are dropping... all of which cause global
cooling.
<https://www.skepticalscience.com/acrim-pmod-sun-getting-hotter.htm>
"Various independent measurements of solar activity all confirm the
sun has shown a slight cooling trend since 1978."
<http://www.sott.net/article/268621-German-scientists-Solar-cycle-24-p=

oints-to-Dalton-or-Maunder-like-minimum-boding-ill-for-a-climate-cooling=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given the fact that we still have massive amounts of ice (~75% of
fresh water is locked up in ice), given that the GDO and PDO are
turning negative, given that the total global ice mass is growing,
given that we're in a not particularly warm and not particularly
lengthy interglacial, given that the sun has entered a quiescent phase=
with lower solar output than at any time since 1750 and sunspot
activity which is now lower than the Dalton Minimum and predicted to
go lower than the Maunder Minimum, given that the planet's tilt,
precession and obliquity indexes are all dropping, and given that
ocean temperature below the thermocline is already about as cold as it=
can get (remember, NASA JPL proved the ocean wasn't absorbing even an
iota of heat... so you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks using that to=
explain away the 19 year 5 month and counting "global warming" pause
didn't wash. Water temperature at depth is about 29 to 32 F depending
upon location. LOL) we've already got a head start on the next
glaciation period as compared to, say, the long and warm Roman Warm
Period or Medieval Warm Period.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-globa=

l-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
*decrease*.
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F=
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>

rming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in=

_the_climate_system.PDF>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/re=

search/methane/greenhouse.html>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-cli=

mate.html>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
"We have been building models and there are now robust
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
physical model says it has to be warming."
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate=

-science.html>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.
You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow=
do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means=
your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

mariposas rand mair fheal

2016-02-18 04:17:49 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

In article <***@benson.localhost>,
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

so... when does that happen?

it doesnt
ciruit menopause occurs after a few hundred periods

arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins
sacramento - political pigsty of the western world
or a babys arm holding an apple

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 05:47:05 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated
by 1/8889051600 of a second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you
listed is 4444525800.

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

so... when does that happen?

At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the
definition of periodicity, after all. Thanks for yet again
demonstrating that you can't grasp that clue.

SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
<crickets>

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 14:19:45 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:47:05 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

and
destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphed =
sinewave
summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matter=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed=
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts
once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid
test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it was=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in
fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation never
reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 volts=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore it'=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL
SPNAK!

What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated
by 1/8889051600 of a second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies =

you

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

listed is 4444525800.

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will=
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

so... when does that happen?

At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the
definition of periodicity, after all.

so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Thanks for yet again
demonstrating that you can't grasp that clue.
SPNAK!

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
<crickets>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Skeeter

2016-02-18 14:57:22 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:19:45 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the
definition of periodicity, after all.

so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

He already answered that.

LOL

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 20:10:44 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated
by 1/8889051600 of a second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencies you
listed is 4444525800.

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves will
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

so... when does that happen?

At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the
definition of periodicity, after all.

so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

You mean you can't figure it out, Mathematical Moron?

A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude, period =
0.016666666666666666666666666666667 seconds

A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude, period =
0.03030303030303030303030303030303 seconds

A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude, period =
0.0066666666666666666666666666666667 seconds

A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude, period =
0.00019948134849391581887093556752444 seconds

A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude, period =
0.076923076923076923076923076923077 seconds

A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude, period =
0.00082712985938792390405293631100083 seconds

Can you figure out that ultra-simple relationship between frequency
and period, DildoRider? LOL

Now all *you* have to do is properly calculate the resultant sinewave
using either the trigonometric, complex exponential or phasor method,
and you'll know the period of the resultant, and therefore the time of
maximum constructive interference. Don't expect me to do your work for
you, you'll continue to prove yourself a mathematical moron doing your
own fucking work. LOL

But you'll continue using your incorrect equation, in which you
improperly utilize aspects of both the phasor and trigonometric
sinewave expressions, because you don't understand the math, you can't
visualize that a sinewave is really a Fourier transform of a circle,
and you're a moron.

SPNAK!

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 20:27:51 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:10:44 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler =
=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructi=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

and destructive interference? At some point in a properly graphe=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

sinewave summation of those sinewaves described above, they will=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

*all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of=
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees. Not that that would matt=

er,

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transform=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts=
once, so simply adding the voltages together works as a quick acid=
test to determine if the output of DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is in line with reality... it wasn't. If it w=

as,

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
his graph would have topped out at 2550.25 volts. It didn't... in
fact, he even *graphed* it for us to prove his kooky equation neve=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
reached 2550.25 volts, along with a horizontal line at 2550.25 vol=

ts.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
DildoRider himself said it never reached that voltage. Therefore i=

t's

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
wrong. And DildoRider's a mathematical moron. He's proven it. LOL
SPNAK!

Post by kensi
What happens if *any* pair of them have zero crossings separated
by 1/8889051600 of a second?
Here's a hint, ko0ky: the least common multiple of the frequencie=

s =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by kensi
you
listed is 4444525800.

Yeah, no shit, and at the 4,444,525,800th period, the sinewaves wi=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
constructively interfere to *sum* to 2550.25 volts, you dolt.

so... when does that happen?

At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of th=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
definition of periodicity, after all.

so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

You mean you can't figure it out, Mathematical Moron?
A sinewave of 120 Hz frequency and 150 volt amplitude, period =3D
0.016666666666666666666666666666667 seconds
A sinewave of 33 Hz frequency and 20.25 volt amplitude, period =3D
0.03030303030303030303030303030303 seconds
A sinewave of 150 Hz frequency and 1400 volt amplitude, period =3D
0.0066666666666666666666666666666667 seconds
A sinewave of 5013 Hz frequency and 20 volt amplitude, period =3D
0.00019948134849391581887093556752444 seconds
A sinewave of 13 Hz and 600 volt amplitude, period =3D
0.076923076923076923076923076923077 seconds
A sinewave of 1209 Hz and 360 volt amplitude, period =3D
0.00082712985938792390405293631100083 seconds
Can you figure out that ultra-simple relationship between frequency
and period, DildoRider? LOL
Now all *you* have to do is properly calculate the resultant sinewave
using either the trigonometric, complex exponential or phasor method,
and you'll know the period of the resultant, and therefore the time of=
maximum constructive interference. Don't expect me to do your work for=
you, you'll continue to prove yourself a mathematical moron doing your=
own fucking work. LOL
But you'll continue using your incorrect equation, in which you
improperly utilize aspects of both the phasor and trigonometric
sinewave expressions, because you don't understand the math, you can't=
visualize that a sinewave is really a Fourier transform of a circle,
and you're a moron.
SPNAK!
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

none of that proves that you have *any* clue about at what value of x in=
=

seconds the waves should theoretically "sum constructively" to 2550.25, =
as =

you have klamed.

one question though: if they all start out at zero, and you klame that =

their periodicity is some value, wouldn't that mean that their periodici=
ty =

would dictate when they are all summing tozero again, not an arbitrary =

summation of each equation's respective amplitude?

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-20 04:37:20 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

none of that proves that you have *any* clue about at what value of x in
seconds the waves should theoretically "sum constructively" to 2550.25, as
you have klamed.

Eh, given the slight phase angle difference between the 120 and 150 Hz
sinewaves, it'll be about 1.5% off, but adding up the voltages still
worked as a quick acid test to determine if your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation worked... it didn't. It doesn't.

The nearest I can gather, you used the phasor equation of sinewave
summation in a trigonometric way, didn't understand why it didn't
work, changed the cosine to sine, didn't understand why it still
didn't work, changed the plus signs to minus signs, and *still* don't
understand why it doesn't work. LOL

Now, given that you've made the k'lame that your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation works just as well as the Euler sinewave
summation equation which has been the defacto equation in use since
the 18th century, your task is to prove it does. Given that you can't
even get your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to produce the
correct phase or resultant voltage, I'm betting you can't. You'll yet
again prove yourself wrong.

I have no need to prove anything about the Euler equation, that'd be
akin to you k'laming that E=fc^8, then demanding that I prove
Einstein's E=mc^2 equation. The burden of proof is upon *you*. And
thus far, you've proven you're *wrong*.

Oh, hey... here's the proof after all, using Euler's sinewave
summation equation and proving all your blather *wrong*:
<http://i.imgur.com/sIEvIpF.png>

And that sums to 208.207 volts peak voltage. Which is exactly right. A
120/208 3-phase 4-wire Wye electrical supply (the most common
commercial building electric service in North America) has 120 volt
RMS L-N hot legs, and 208 volt L-L voltage.

SPNAK! on the mathematical moron.

<snicker>

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
one question though: if they all start out at zero, and you klame that
their periodicity is some value, wouldn't that mean that their periodicity
would dictate when they are all summing tozero again, not an arbitrary
summation of each equation's respective amplitude?

Yeah, at the end of the period, but the maximum constructive
interference should take place midway to that point. But it's a
complex periodic irregular resultant, you'd have to graph it to be
sure.

Be getting right on that. Or admit your kooky sinewave subtraction
equation is *wrong*.

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 20:28:19 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:10:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

Don't expect me to do your work for
you

kensi

2016-02-18 23:39:04 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

On 18/02/2016 9:19 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907
Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of the
definition of periodicity, after all.

so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

Even more fascinating is his belief that a periodic function will do
something *new* after umpteen-and-enough periods...

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

It must be nice to have him express your pwnership of him in seemingly
every article he writes...

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 23:44:24 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:39:04 -0500, kensi <***@gmail.invalid> =
=

On 18/02/2016 9:19 AM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 =
Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
At the 4,444,525,800th period, you pathetic moron. That's kind of th=

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
definition of periodicity, after all.

so, what's the length in seconds of one period, according to you?

Even more fascinating is his belief that a periodic function will do =
something *new* after umpteen-and-enough periods...

like sum to zero periodically?

he's going to do some furrier transformers on it and show *us* what's =

what, i reckon.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

It must be nice to have him express your pwnership of him in seemingly=

every article he writes...

it's flattering, but this isn't my first rodeo against a chest-thumping =
=

charlatan goof like snickers. i used to be in lots of sigs back in the =
=

90's.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-20 05:20:40 UTC

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in

On 18/02/2016 9:19 AM, Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied
Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as

Even more fascinating is his belief that a periodic function will do
something *new* after umpteen-and-enough periods...

Even more fascinating is that you just demonstrated that you have no
clue how periodicity works, you fecking nong. LOL

"New" as in "it'll repeat the pattern of the resultant".

But then, you're the mathematical moron who can't even do simple
geometry without fucking it up, who k'lamed the Gaussian curvature of
the universe was predominantly positive thus making gravity *repel*,
and who demonstrated that he didn't know what an integral *or* a
half-integer was. We expect nothing less than rapid-fire and continual
mathematical stupidity from you.

It must be nice to have him express your pwnership of him in seemingly
every article he writes...

It sure is nice of you to come crawling back and announcing my
pwnership of you in seemingly every article you write...

<snicker>
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

2016-02-18 09:20:05 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and
destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
At some point in a properly graphed sinewave

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Paul has already adequately deconstructed this.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

The relative phases were specified by saying they are "sine
waves". Not cosines, not sines +/- some initial phase
angle. So we have to assume they all start at 0° at time 0.

Now if someone knew enough to pick the right starting phases
(say, picking cosines instead of sines) you could make them
all add to 2550 volts at some particular time (time 0). But
he didn't, and they don't.

I don't get why they are being called "sine waves", since
they are just geometric sinusoids with no "wave" properties
in a physical sense, but whatthefuckever.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees.

There we have it.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
Not that that would matter,

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts

What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform
moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So,
if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain,
such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite
pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me.

The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!

Indeed.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

WTF is he talking about? Nobody is talking about complex
analysis (gratuitious fourier blather aside). If you want
to know the values of a bunch of sinusoids at a particular
time, you just add them up.

Sheesh.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 09:26:05 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

Sn!pe

2016-02-18 09:53:08 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

I'm applauding BMSMA's debunking analysis. [phweep-phweep]

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just clapped.

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

2016-02-18 10:14:39 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

I'm applauding BMSMA's debunking analysis. [phweep-phweep]

Allah-allahu fubar!

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 15:19:16 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:14:39 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass =

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

I'm applauding BMSMA's debunking analysis. [phweep-phweep]

Allah-allahu fubar!

fakey got allah-allah'd

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Sn!pe, DoW #2

2016-02-18 15:22:26 UTC

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

I'm applauding BMSMA's debunking analysis. [phweep-phweep]

Allah-allahu fubar!

fakey got allah-allah'd

He also got HAW HAW HAW-ed!
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, DoW #2 <***@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 15:33:55 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:19:16 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

I'm applauding BMSMA's debunking analysis. [phweep-phweep]

Allah-allahu fubar!

And still no one applauded.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
fakey got allah-allah'd

Skeeter

2016-02-18 13:28:17 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:20:05 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

And no one applauded.

I'm applauding BMSMA's debunking analysis. [phweep-phweep]

Me too, guess i could have worded that different.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 16:29:03 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 04:20:05 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass =

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:05:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangl=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructiv=

e =

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

and

destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

At some point in a properly graphed sinewave

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Paul has already adequately deconstructed this.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

The relative phases were specified by saying they are "sine
waves". Not cosines, not sines +/- some initial phase
angle. So we have to assume they all start at 0=C2=B0 at time 0.
Now if someone knew enough to pick the right starting phases
(say, picking cosines instead of sines) you could make them
all add to 2550 volts at some particular time (time 0). But
he didn't, and they don't.

and he can't prove anybody wrong who says that *he's* wrong.

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
I don't get why they are being called "sine waves", since
they are just geometric sinusoids with no "wave" properties
in a physical sense, but whatthefuckever.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees.

There we have it.

Not that that would matter,

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transforme=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts

he likes to shift goalpoasts/phases/polarities/etc...

it's like it's his job.

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!

Indeed.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Since DildoRider's equation didn't even come close to that result, =

his

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
kooky sinewave subtraction equation is *wrong*, and he's far too
stoooopid to use the correct Euler sinewave summation equation,

WTF is he talking about? Nobody is talking about complex
analysis (gratuitious fourier blather aside).

he thinks we're trying to build a bandpass filter or something, here?

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
If you want
to know the values of a bunch of sinusoids at a particular
time, you just add them up.

which i can just have gnuplot sum from zero to 4.5x10^105, and get this:=

Loading Image...

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
Sheesh.

double yoy

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Sn!pe

2016-02-18 16:33:50 UTC

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117
and he can't prove anybody wrong who says that *he's* wrong.

That's because he's a dick. Everyone knows it but him.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 16:45:19 UTC

Post by Sn!pe, DoW #2
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA

That's because he's a dick. Everyone knows it but him.

He knows it, he hates it. That's why he's such a dick.

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

2016-02-18 17:18:32 UTC

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts

he likes to shift goalpoasts/phases/polarities/etc...
it's like it's his job.

Did he have any goalposts in the first place?
I don't know what his whole point was, other than "everybody
look at me".

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!

Indeed.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

WTF is he talking about? Nobody is talking about complex
analysis (gratuitious fourier blather aside).

he thinks we're trying to build a bandpass filter or something, here?

He's building a Phakian Philter. You input everything in
Google, and get out a coupld pages of incoherent word salad.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by mariposas rand mair fheal
If you want
to know the values of a bunch of sinusoids at a particular
time, you just add them up.

http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png

Woohooo! A zillion googols!
I'd like to see "Joshua" count that high.

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-18 17:45:44 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself
from it.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and
destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

I encourage you to study the topic of constructive and destructive
wave interference. You're talking about the same thing.

<http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.html>

You'll note that web page has the proper Euler sinewave summation
equation.

Although I did watch a podcast last night about using Hamiltonian
renormalization transformation ansatz of tensors of many-body
wave-functions as a means of simplification, which was pretty
interesting and analogous to Euler's equation, expanded to
n-dimensional spaces. They're using it as a means of solving QCD,
though. It'd be overkill to calculate sinewave interference.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
At some point in a properly graphed sinewave
summation of those sinewaves described above, they will *all*
constructively interfere to reach 2550.25 volts.

Paul has already adequately deconstructed this.

No, he hasn't. "Paul" was assuming the phase angle would stay the same
and the pattern between the 120 and 150 volt sinewaves would only
cross one-quarter of a cycle after crossing zero and thus never peak
together, but he forgets that the phase angles change over the 600
second periodicity of those two sinewaves such that the cross-over
point is moved successively. His math only worked for the first cycle
of the first period. Because he's a mathematical moron who can't
visualize phase shift between two sinewaves.

<snicker>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Oh, really? I don't see relative phases specified above.

The relative phases were specified by saying they are "sine
waves". Not cosines, not sines +/- some initial phase
angle. So we have to assume they all start at 0Â° at time 0.

Well, duh. Of course, DildoRider didn't know this, so he had to ask
what phase to start at. But "sine wave" is a generic term for
sinusoidal wave, a mathematical curve that describes a smooth
repetitive oscillation, which is a Fourier decomposition of a circle.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Now if someone knew enough to pick the right starting phases
(say, picking cosines instead of sines) you could make them
all add to 2550 volts at some particular time (time 0). But
he didn't, and they don't.

They'll constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts at the
4,444,525,800th period. That's the common periodicity of those six
sinewaves. You'll note both LunkHead and DildoRider k'lame the
sinewaves will not constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts, despite
both of them posting about the periodicity, which highlights a shared
profound misunderstanding on their part.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
I don't get why they are being called "sine waves", since
they are just geometric sinusoids with no "wave" properties
in a physical sense, but whatthefuckever.

Again, "sinewave" is the common term for a sinusoidal pattern.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
That's because you're a fucking moron. The starting phase angle of
each sinewave was specified at 0 degrees.

There we have it.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Not that that would matter,
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transformed
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle, embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of
the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or
complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude. The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)

Where:
w=frequency
a= amplitude
phase = angle in radians

The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin
(phase).

Thus, one can sum vectors:
a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)

It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
correlation using complex exponentials.

The equivalence of the trigonometric, complex exponential and phasor
methods of expressing sinusoids can be verified via Euler's formula.

What DildoRider appears to have done with his kooky sinewave
subtraction equation is mash together the phasor and trigonometric
sinewave expressions, while getting it hilariously wrong.

Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt)

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

I encourage you to educate yourself:
<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true, whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

<snicker>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
SPNAK!

Indeed.

Oh, indeed.

<snicker>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

That's exactly what I did, at the periodicity of those six sinewaves,
to arrive at 2550.25 volts, as a quick acid-test to determine if
DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation outputted the proper
result. It didn't, therefore he's wrong.

And now both LunkHead and DildoRider are k'laming that those six
sinewaves will *never* constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts,
despite them acknowledging that the six sinewaves have a periodicity
of 4,444,525,800.

But then, this isn't the first time they've demonstrated their
mathematical disability.

<snicker>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Sheesh.

Indeed.
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

2016-02-18 19:52:15 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself
from it.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and
destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

I encourage you to study the topic of constructive and destructive
wave interference. You're talking about the same thing.

Superposition is not "interference".

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.html>

This is about traveling waves. You didn't understand it.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

They'll constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts at the
4,444,525,800th period. That's the common periodicity of those six
sinewaves.

LOL! Good gawd amighty, you're stupid. The LCD of the
frequencies is 4.4 Ghz. Totally irrelevant to anything.

The PERIOD is 1 sec. The composite signal repeats itself
every period. The 4 billionth period is exactly the same as
the first. That's what period means.

The sum never reaches 2550 volts, which is why you can't
answer the question of at what time this happens.

<snip incoherent nonsense>

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-19 02:55:53 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself
from it.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and
destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

I encourage you to study the topic of constructive and destructive
wave interference. You're talking about the same thing.

Superposition is not "interference".

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.html>

This is about traveling waves. You didn't understand it.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

They'll constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts at the
4,444,525,800th period. That's the common periodicity of those six
sinewaves.

LOL! Good gawd amighty, you're stupid. The LCD of the
frequencies is 4.4 Ghz. Totally irrelevant to anything.
The PERIOD is 1 sec. The composite signal repeats itself
every period. The 4 billionth period is exactly the same as
the first. That's what period means.
The sum never reaches 2550 volts, which is why you can't
answer the question of at what time this happens.
<snip incoherent nonsense>

And to think the quagmire Fakey "currently" finds himself in, all
started because he thought residential services were only 120 volts.

<mocking snicker>

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-19 03:04:37 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:55:53 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1 =

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

ead

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop =

Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

into

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yoursel=

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
from it.

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of =

constructive and

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

I encourage you to study the topic of constructive and destructive
wave interference. You're talking about the same thing.

Superposition is not "interference".

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
=

<http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.ht=

ml>

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

This is about traveling waves. You didn't understand it.

They'll constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts at the
4,444,525,800th period. That's the common periodicity of those six
sinewaves.

LOL! Good gawd amighty, you're stupid. The LCD of the
frequencies is 4.4 Ghz. Totally irrelevant to anything.
The PERIOD is 1 sec. The composite signal repeats itself
every period. The 4 billionth period is exactly the same as
the first. That's what period means.
The sum never reaches 2550 volts, which is why you can't
answer the question of at what time this happens.

well, he said "already answered".

And to think the quagmire Fakey "currently" finds himself in, all
started because he thought residential services were only 120 volts.
<mocking snicker>

HAHAHAHAHAHA

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-20 05:09:44 UTC

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in

Post by Checkmate, DoW #1
And to think the quagmire Fakey "currently" finds himself in, all
started because he thought residential services were only 120 volts.
<mocking snicker>

Wrong. It's because *you* insisted the two hot legs were 240 volts,
and the midpoint neutral was 120 volts, and the whole thing was
"single-phase" rather than "split-phase midpoint-neutral".

Chimpy's latest SPNAK!, in his own words:
====================================================
"they're 240 volt legs" (Chimpy's words)
"either ONE of the 240 volt lines" (Chimpy's words)
"120 volt neutral" (Chimpy's words)
"New residential service is 240 volts, with a 120 volt neutral center
tap" (Chimpy's words)

Chimpy k'lames each leg running into a house is 240 volts, and neutral
is 120 volts. What a *moron*. LOL!

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
<https://www.blackhillsenergy.com/sites/default/files/bhe-coe-rules-regs.pdf>
=======================================
All new installations of three (3) or more circuits must be wired for
120/240 volt, 3-wire when secondary distribution is single-phase
except when distribution is connected wye, the voltage will be
120/208."
=======================================

<https://www.blackhillspower.com/rates>
=======================================
Type of Service - Residential
Alternating current, 60 hertz, single phase, at nominal voltages of
_120_ _or_ 120/240 volts.
=======================================
What kind of backpedaling *moron* is Chimpy that he k'lames a utility
doesn't provide a service that they have a rate listed for? Of course,
Chimpy's such a *moron* he can't possibly conceive of a separate 120
volt-only service for an outbuilding, separate from a residence. LOL

Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
=======================================

I proved via a quote directly from Pissbum's utility that
they provide a 120 volt-only service.

They didn't say they would provide it. They merely defined it,

You lying, backpedaling pathetic piece of shit.
<https://www.blackhillspower.com/rates>
=======================================
Type of Service - Residential
Alternating current, 60 hertz, single phase, at nominal voltages of
_120_ _or_ 120/240 volts.
=======================================
What's that URL say, you fucking *moron*... *rates*. That's the
*rates* *page*, how much they *charge* for that *service*.

(Chimpy's best lie ever)! LOL!
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Chimpy: "it's NOT 120 volts, it's 120/240", when in fact, 120 volts is
ALL it is. Two oppositely-phased legs, each running at 120 volts, and
the 240 volt "service" is only created by tapping across those two 120
volt hot legs. So Chimpy's doubly wrong. LOL

Chimpy: "Normal residential service is single phase 240 volts." when
in fact it's split-phase 120 volts. The 240 volts is only achieved
in-house by connecting across the oppositely-phased 120 volt legs. LOL
====================================================

Chimpy thinks each leg running into a house is 240 volts: "they're 240
volt legs" (Chimpy's words), and the neutral is 120 volts: "120 volt
neutral" (Chimpy's words), because he's a *moron*.

Chimpy *still* can't figure out the difference between "single-phase"
and "split-phase midpoint-neutral", which is why he was talking about
that guy who called him and talked about "split-phase", which Chimpy
conflated to "2-phase", which Chimpy was making fun of, because
Chimpy's a *moron*. LOL

In fact, Chimpy's demonstrated that he's *such* a bad electrician he
doesn't know the meaning of the word "electrics"... he thinks it's a
misspelling: "Electrics [sic]" (Chimpy's words). LOL!

It's called a "3-wire midpoint-neutral split-phase" system for a
reason, you *moron*. LOL

Chimpy's a bad electrician, a bleatfarting backpedaling spankard and a
*moron*.

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
Muahahaha, etc.

<snicker>

And to think, Chimpy's latest quagmire is all because he was trying to
divert attention away from the fact that he continues to insist that a
vagina is "gay", and that every time Chimpy looks at a clearly labeled
vagina, all he sees is a "man's gaping asshole" (Chimpy's words),
"gaping asshole and balls" (Chimpy's words), "giant ball-like labia"
(Chimpy's words) and "a nut sack swinging" (Chimpy's words). LOL

That's because Chimpy's Gayer Than Gargles (tm).

Melt, Chimpy, melt
Froth, Chimpy, froth
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
Muahahaha, etc.

<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."

In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$***@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$***@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>

In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$***@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>

Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>

Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
MID: <***@dizum.com>

Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <***@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$***@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$***@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$***@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$***@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$***@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$***@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$***@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$***@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$***@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$***@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <***@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <***@news.alt.net> - Percocet

Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <***@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"

Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"

MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."

Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."

MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"

Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."

MID: <***@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."

Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$***@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"

MID: <knnmmb$3a4$***@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."

MID: <***@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."

MID: <l61jjg$tth$***@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."

MID: <l9d76m$k1v$***@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."

MID: <lal84d$g2u$***@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <***@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"

MID: <lamgt8$b2d$***@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."

MID: <lchub0$q96$***@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."

MID: <lcsgjb$obk$***@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."

MID: <***@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL

MID: <***@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL

MID: <***@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL

Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=====================================

What a FAG!

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!

<snicker>

/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.

Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.

databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.

Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$***@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$***@news.mixmin.net>

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-20 04:20:46 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard, in

On 17/02/2016 1:58 AM, Friendly Neighborhood

WTF is supposed to be the significance of a set of arbitrary
signals? Whatever...

If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself
from it.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
You stupid fuck, do you not understand the concept of constructive and
destructive interference?

Bullshit here. Sinusoids superimposed together don't
"interfere", they just add together. It's simple
superposition, not interference. The writer doesn't
understand the concept of interference.

I encourage you to study the topic of constructive and destructive
wave interference. You're talking about the same thing.

Superposition is not "interference".

You don't seem to know very much, yet you seem to talk alot. Out your
ass. LOL

<http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-3/Interference-of-Waves>
=======================================================
The Principle of Superposition
The task of determining the shape of the resultant demands that the
principle of superposition is applied. The principle of superposition
is sometimes stated as follows:

When two waves _interfere_, the resulting displacement of the medium
at any location is the algebraic sum of the displacements of the
individual waves at that same location.
=======================================================

=======================================================
Interference is the combined effect of the disturbance caused by each
individual wave at the same place and at the same time.

This effect can be understood from the principle of superposition of
waves.
=======================================================

"Superposition is not "interference"." LOL!

Moron doesn't even know about constructive and destructive
interference, and stupidly believes it's different than constructive
and destructive interference! LOL

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.html>

This is about traveling waves. You didn't understand it.

Apparently you have no clue about traveling and standing waves,
either, or you'd understand that the principle of constructive and
destructive interference (aka superposition) applies equally to them.

Oh, you didn't see (or conveniently ignored) the "two sine waves
traveling in opposite directions create a standing wave" part of that
web page.

"This is about traveling waves." LOL!

SPNAK!

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

They'll constructively interfere to 2550.25 volts at the
4,444,525,800th period. That's the common periodicity of those six
sinewaves.

LOL! Good gawd amighty, you're stupid. The LCD of the
frequencies is 4.4 Ghz. Totally irrelevant to anything.

WTF? Where do you get 4.4 GHz? It'll take 4,444,525,800 repetitions of
each tributary sinewave in order for the resultant to play out once,
then it repeats.

Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL

SPNAK!

The PERIOD is 1 sec. The composite signal repeats itself
every period. The 4 billionth period is exactly the same as
the first. That's what period means.

The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse of the frequency,
you moron. The period of the resultant is the inverse of the frequency
of the resultant at any given point in time, because remember, it's an
irregular periodic sinusoid.

You don't know much of anything, do you? LOL

SPNAK!

The sum never reaches 2550 volts, which is why you can't
answer the question of at what time this happens.

It peaks at 2517.697 volts, so the acid test of adding the voltages
together as a quick and dirty way of seeing if DildoRider was even
close worked. That's a damn site closer than DildoRider got with his
kooky sinewave subtraction equation.

Are you sure you're not on some sort of stupid pill, or something? LOL

SPNAK!

Translation:
"Snip everything I'm too stupid to understand." LOL

SPNAK!
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <***@dizum.com>
=================================================

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in
barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-20 04:36:39 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL

Tickle your ass with a slide rule?

Skeeter

2016-02-20 04:40:33 UTC

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:36:39 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL

Tickle your ass with a slide rule?

Now I know why he was MIA, it took a lot of google raping to produce
the foam he dropped earlier. he's been a busy little boy.

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-20 06:44:41 UTC

Post by Skeeter
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:36:39 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Good gawd, you're dumb. LOL

Tickle your ass with a slide rule?

Now I know why he was MIA, it took a lot of google raping to produce
the foam he dropped earlier. he's been a busy little boy.

But he's still a cock-juggling gay moron.

Just sayin'... J

kensi

2016-02-20 04:43:19 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
It peaks at 2517.697 volts,

Quiet backpedaling noted.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 20:11:13 UTC

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:45:44 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
If you don't understand the discussion, feel free to excuse yourself
from it.

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

2016-02-18 20:32:27 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.

Why can't you add anything with it?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of
the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or
complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude.

So?...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
w=frequency
a= amplitude
phase = angle in radians
The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b = sin
(phase).
a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
correlation using complex exponentials.

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.

Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt)

You got it wrong again.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

Skeeter

2016-02-18 20:41:05 UTC

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:32:27 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.

Why can't you add anything with it?

He don't know how.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

He is a tad confuselled.

So?...

He wanted to sound important to cover his ass.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

This answer ought to be good.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.

Typical Fakey.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt)

You got it wrong again.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

He can't, he owns none of the above.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-18 20:41:57 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:32:27 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass =

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Not that that would matter,
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier transfor=

med

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volt=

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
What kind of addled silliness is this? Fourier transform
moves you from the time domain to the frequency domain. So,
if you are talking about some behavior in the time domain,
such as peak value at some particular time, it's quite
pointless. The rest of the blather makes no sense to me.

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.

Why can't you add anything with it?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of
the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors, or=
complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude.

So?...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
x(t) =3D a * cos(wt + phase)
w=3Dfrequency
a=3D amplitude
phase =3D angle in radians
The phasor of x(t) is then X =3D a + jb, thus a =3D cos(phase) and b =

=3D sin

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
(phase).
a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
correlation using complex exponentials.

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.
Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Phasor: x(t) =3D a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) =3D a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(w=

You got it wrong again.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equation=

s-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functio=
ns/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

most likely he plugged his guess for "x" into the summation and found th=
at =

it wasn't quite 2550.25 and also as a bonus found out that he has no clu=
e =

WTF he's babbling about.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Checkmate, DoW #1

2016-02-19 03:02:43 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.

Why can't you add anything with it?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

So?...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.
Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a * sin(phase)*sin(wt)

You got it wrong again.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

LOL! THAT will never happen. Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, change
the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, a few
straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... but
he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong. He hasn't matured enough
for that yet. It's doubtful he ever will.

2016-02-19 03:06:11 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Not that that would matter,
as over the periodicity of the vector sum of the Fourier
transformed
phasors, constructive interference would cumulate to 2550.25 volts

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.

Why can't you add anything with it?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

So?...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
w=frequency
a= amplitude
phase = angle in radians
The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b =
sin (phase).
a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
correlation using complex exponentials.

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.
Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a *
sin(phase)*sin(wt)

You got it wrong again.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

everybody doubtful

Sn!pe

2016-02-19 05:53:12 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Fakey Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors together.

Why can't you add anything with it?

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

So?...

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
w=frequency
a= amplitude
phase = angle in radians
The phasor of x(t) is then X = a + jb, thus a = cos(phase) and b =
sin (phase).
a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
correlation using complex exponentials.

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.
Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
Phasor: x(t) = a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) = a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a *
sin(phase)*sin(wt)

You got it wrong again.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equations-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-functions/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equations
that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

everybody doubtful

Now you doubtful too.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117

2016-02-19 05:57:28 UTC

Fakey Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus

Vector summation is a means of adding two or more vectors togethe=

Why can't you add anything with it?

Given that a sinusoid is merely the *Fourier* transformation of a=
circle,

No it's not. It's a geometric function. FFS, in a rotating
vector, a sinusoid is a TIME-domain function.

embodying an amplitude and a phase (ie: the angular shift of
the sinusoid, corresponding to a time shift), one can use phasors=

or
complex numbers to denote the phase and amplitude.

So?...

The Fourier
transform "demodulates" the phasor representation of the signal.

No it doesn't. It transforms a function of time into a
function of frequency.

x(t) =3D a * cos(wt + phase)
w=3Dfrequency
a=3D amplitude
phase =3D angle in radians
The phasor of x(t) is then X =3D a + jb, thus a =3D cos(phase) an=

d b =3D

sin (phase).
a1 * cos(w1t + phase1) + a2 * cos(w2t +phase2)
It's more efficient than computing the Fourier coefficients by
correlation using complex exponentials.

You don't compute fourier coefficients by correlation.
None of this has anything to do with adding 6 sinusoids, or
with anything else for that matter.
Can you actually use any of this to solve something?... say,
the time when your composite has a value of 2550 v.?
Take your time....

Phasor: x(t) =3D a * cos(wt + phase)
Trigonometric: x(t) =3D a * cos(phase)*cos(wt) - a *
sin(phase)*sin(wt)

You got it wrong again.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
The poster also demonstrates that s/h/it doesn't know what a
"differential equation" means.

<http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-03sc-differential-equat=

ions-fall-2011/unit-i-first-order-differential-equations/sinusoidal-func=
tions/>

Another link you don't understand.

Post by Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
It all sounds a fool trying to sound wise by babbling about
some nonsense he knows nothing about, and hopes nobody else
does either.

Yeah, except everything I've written is true,

No, it's all bullshit.

whereas DildoRider and
LunkHead are off in La-La Land spouting nonsense and using equati=

ons

that don't work.

No, they were pretty much right. You are pretty much in the
ozone. You're money ahead to cut your losses and move on,
take a spin in the lotus with that hawt wifey.

LOL! THAT will never happen. Fakey will spin, deflect, evade, cha=

nge

the subject, misconstrue what you said, toss in some red herrings, =

few
straw men, and if that doesn't work, he'll faglame you to death... =

but

he'll NEVER back down or admit he was wrong. He hasn't matured eno=

ugh

for that yet. It's doubtful he ever will.

everybody doubtful

Now you doubtful too.

i wonder if gerg will have to order a new cheerleader uniform or if he's=
=

going to continue rah-rah siss-boom-bah-ing for bleaty the spankard.

-- =

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: =

<***@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics

Post by %
phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in tim=
120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =3D 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

2016-02-20 04:37:20 UTC

Post by Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus