A Zero Precession Gyroscope: Tilt the egg to the exact starting place then spin and no precession!"

[Douglas Eagleson]

"A doggie in the park."

Look at my recent set theory answer over on sci.math.research.

I am good. And use theory. I can answer identity theory, symmetry
effect in computer design.

So if people get surprised at inverted set, physics is just the
same.

Real sets were used to infer balance g meters as required. So if a
reader is worried about reality in this modern age, do worry.

We hard to abstractly solve the set inversion in computer causal
design before set theory would accept it. I recently wrote the java
inversion of the set to implement the impossible set solution.

Here is a trick for the children:

I can make parlor tricks of enhance h-bomb yield. Remember the egg to
be rolled.

Answer why it will never roll smoothly if spun like a top. Invert the
field and infer the trick .

A certain gyroscope location on the egg does not precess! Pick the
right axis and non precession occurs. This stuff is before you eye and
it is importent.

When the egg tilts over, while spinning, its balance changes to the
rate of precession exactly sometimes.

"Tilt the egg to the exact starting place then spin and no
precession!"


You have to theorise all reality not just what you infer by theory
itself.

[Douglas Eagleson]

Post by Douglas Eagleson
"A doggie in the park."
Look at my recent set theory answer over on sci.math.research.
I am good. And use theory. I can answer identity theory, symmetry
effect in computer design.
So if people get surprised at inverted set, physics is just the
same.
Real sets were used to infer balance g meters as required. So if a
reader is worried about reality in this modern age, do worry.
We hard to abstractly solve the set inversion in computer causal
design before set theory would accept it. I recently wrote the java
inversion of the set to implement the impossible set solution.
I can make parlor tricks of enhance h-bomb yield. Remember the egg to
be rolled.
Answer why it will never roll smoothly if spun like a top. Invert the
field and infer the trick .
A certain gyroscope location on the egg does not precess! Pick the
right axis and non precession occurs. This stuff is before you eye and
it is importent.
When the egg tilts over, while spinning, its balance changes to the
rate of precession exactly sometimes.
"Tilt the egg to the exact starting place then spin and no
precession!"
You have to theorise all reality not just what you infer by theory
itself.

Here is an implication. Remember the old picture of the guy in the g-
machine?

If the guy was t in weight a certain effect would kill. And you do not
get to not see my cause as stated. Learn toplogy and set inversion
and all.

A guy witha certain mass would always die. Ergo smaller sized limited
size astronauts.

Here is why they dies. A mass in a gimbal has a precession force
inside the fluid. An interior tissue strength does not change with
size of body!

You do not get to make these kinds of mistakes in my world engineer/
physicist.

Large mass connected with like sized tissue. Luckley they just almost
died I believe, but the connective tisue in the stomach limits size of
astronaut.

A g-limit is therefor a growing up warning to the large son. "You
cannot take the g's like me for real reasons."

So infer all warnings to astronauts as a physicist and if you screw up
I would kill you.

You guys is gonna never be in the business because you ain't. No
screw up thinking.


Here is a flight waring for Mr. Hawkings. He was rumored to be going
to go weightless in an aeroplane. He should not. It is dangerous. One
little screwup kill the people in the back.

They forget to tell you the pilot has training and if they do not
EXACTLY follow the rules then they will accidently destroy the people
in the rear. Are you able to infer the rule from what I just warned
of? Plain as day to a real phsyicsit.

Likely you are lazy.