Discussion:
Russian trolls shared some truly terrible climate change memes
(too old to reply)
kensi
2018-03-09 14:28:49 UTC
Permalink
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking the
flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to climate
change during the longest election season of our lives:

https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-09 15:40:12 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:28:49 -0500, kensi
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking the
flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to climate
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
I was wondering when you were going to drag the Russkies into
it...crybaby libtard.
benj
2018-03-09 21:25:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking the
flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to climate
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
"Kensi" are you saying Sergio is as fake a troll as you are?
Say it ain't so!
Sergio
2018-03-10 03:04:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking
the flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
"Kensi" are you saying Sergio is as fake a troll as you are?
Say it ain't so!
I know that russian "trolls" all graduate with a degree in Bachelor of
Science in Internetism, and it is a viable profession doing software as
a service, and software as a joke, but America is not a target, because
most russians feel sorry for Americans with their very sick politics on
display for the world to see.

Can you imagine trying to elect a 70 year old boozer scatterbrain old
lady w Alzheimers like Hillary as president ? That is f*cking nuts!!

I am sure kensi pupa will be welcome in Mother Russia as her politics
are closely aligned with russia, google "socialist democrats" or
"communists", and let the Gov do your thinking for you.
benj
2018-03-10 07:48:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking
the flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
"Kensi" are you saying Sergio is as fake a troll as you are?
Say it ain't so!
I know that russian "trolls" all graduate with a degree in Bachelor of
Science in Internetism, and it is a viable profession doing software as
a service, and software as a joke, but America is not a target, because
most russians feel sorry for Americans with their very sick politics on
display for the world to see.
Can you imagine trying to elect a 70 year old boozer scatterbrain old
lady w Alzheimers like Hillary as president ? That is f*cking nuts!!
It's an amazing story that the power-elite of the world who think that
they are so smart that they have a "divine right" to rule everybody
else, actually promised Hillary the White House! 350 million people in
this country and they picked Hillary as their flagship? And then they
are so pissed at losing because they are sure it had nothing to do with
their choice that they unleash their media on the winner in constant
attack mode.

The same media attacks on Putin are pretty clear evidence that somehow
he's been bucking the world elite too and they are not amused.
Post by Sergio
I am sure kensi pupa will be welcome in Mother Russia as her politics
are closely aligned with russia, google "socialist democrats" or
"communists", and let the Gov do your thinking for you.
Well when you nave no brain, what other choice do you have but to let
someone else think for you? I'm sure they'd love Russia but would pine
for the old days of the KGB when you could just point at a deplorable
and they'd just disappear off the street.

Maybe they will tell Nads what rule #4 is?
Checkmate
2018-03-11 05:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking
the flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
"Kensi" are you saying Sergio is as fake a troll as you are?
Say it ain't so!
I know that russian "trolls" all graduate with a degree in Bachelor of
Science in Internetism, and it is a viable profession doing software as
a service, and software as a joke, but America is not a target, because
most russians feel sorry for Americans with their very sick politics on
display for the world to see.
Can you imagine trying to elect a 70 year old boozer scatterbrain old
lady w Alzheimers like Hillary as president ? That is f*cking nuts!!
I am sure kensi pupa will be welcome in Mother Russia as her politics
are closely aligned with russia, google "socialist democrats" or
"communists", and let the Gov do your thinking for you.
The Kensinads has been slowly but surely revealing its true leanings,
and has even admitted that it was leaning towards communism as superior
to capitalism. I think we all know where this is going... or trying to
go.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Sergio
2018-03-11 07:26:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking
the flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
"Kensi" are you saying Sergio is as fake a troll as you are?
Say it ain't so!
I know that russian "trolls" all graduate with a degree in Bachelor of
Science in Internetism, and it is a viable profession doing software as
a service, and software as a joke, but America is not a target, because
most russians feel sorry for Americans with their very sick politics on
display for the world to see.
Can you imagine trying to elect a 70 year old boozer scatterbrain old
lady w Alzheimers like Hillary as president ? That is f*cking nuts!!
I am sure kensi pupa will be welcome in Mother Russia as her politics
are closely aligned with russia, google "socialist democrats" or
"communists", and let the Gov do your thinking for you.
The Kensinads has been slowly but surely revealing its true leanings,
and has even admitted that it was leaning towards communism as superior
to capitalism. I think we all know where this is going... or trying to
go.
both kensi pupa and nads are welcome to join up with the 'Socialist
Education' branch who help spread the news over tweeter, FB, and other
outlets with the incites of 'new communism', Berney Sanders Socialism,
and the rich forced to give their money over to the rest of us. They
could come on over, pick up their degree in the reeducation camps in
Bachlor of Science in Internetism, and join our counter intellegence
group here. lots of free benifits, a free carp a week, swimming in the
bosphorus once every 2 years, a daily loaf of bread, and they just c+p
the same old shit they have been, win win !
kensi
2018-03-11 16:53:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
The Kensinads has been slowly but surely revealing its true leanings,
and has even admitted that it was leaning towards communism as superior
to capitalism. I think we all know where this is going... or trying to
go.
Nuance is lost on right-wingers, as always.

What I said was that capitalism works for a fast-growing economy: at a
frontier like the wild west, or when there's a major technological
upgrade going on like during much of the 20th century. On the other
hand, socialism is superior when the economy is barely or not growing, a
state it's transitioning into now because we've mostly saturated the
planet's resource base and we've mostly saturated the productivity gains
available from motorizing and mechanizing things.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
benj
2018-03-11 17:07:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
The Kensinads has been slowly but surely revealing its true leanings,
and has even admitted that it was leaning towards communism as superior
to capitalism.  I think we all know where this is going... or trying to
go.
Nuance is lost on right-wingers, as always.
What I said was that capitalism works for a fast-growing economy: at a
frontier like the wild west, or when there's a major technological
upgrade going on like during much of the 20th century. On the other
hand, socialism is superior when the economy is barely or not growing, a
state it's transitioning into now because we've mostly saturated the
planet's resource base and we've mostly saturated the productivity gains
available from motorizing and mechanizing things.
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under the
stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and then
having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.

"Kensi" you are truly a moron.
kensi
2018-03-11 17:30:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under the
stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and then
having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech competition
around, quite socialist, quite stable. Compare the US: high tech, no
frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist, and wracked by
economic and political crises every few years.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2018-03-11 18:25:33 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p83p2u$183v$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Subject: Re: Russian trolls shared some truly terrible climate change memes
Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under the
stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and then
having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world.
"She"? China is NOT a female. I demand gender equality!
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2018-03-11 18:45:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Subject: Re: Russian trolls shared some truly terrible climate change memes
Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under the
stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and then
having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world.
"She"? China is NOT a female. I demand gender equality!
The Kensi/Nads is showing her true commie colors everyday now.
Sn!pe
2018-03-11 19:05:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Subject: Re: Russian trolls shared some truly terrible climate change memes
Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under the
stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and then
having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world.
"She"? China is NOT a female. I demand gender equality!
The Kensi/Nads is showing her true commie colors everyday now.
She's as dull as Derbyshite, tsk.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <***@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.
Sergio
2018-03-13 04:36:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech competition
around, quite socialist, quite stable. Compare the US: high tech, no
frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist, and wracked by
economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,

the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.


"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate job, and you and
your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the Fat cats at the top,
make money off of you. (USSR)
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-13 04:39:57 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 23:36:11 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio
<***@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under the
stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and then
having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech competition
around, quite socialist, quite stable. Compare the US: high tech, no
frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist, and wracked by
economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
yes, it's definitely "innovative" to have another country's gubbament spooks elect your country's supreme leader.
Post by Sergio
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate job, and you and
your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the Fat cats at the
top, make money off of you. (USSR)
i wonder if 40+ year old russians can determine the difference between socialism and communism/leninism?
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT


"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
mixed nuts
2018-03-13 04:48:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
buractate job
Wot?
--
Grizzly H.
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-13 04:51:05 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:48:26 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "mixed nuts
<***@undulatus.budgie>" determined that the following was of
great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Sergio
buractate job
Wot?
perhaps gerg's fingers are all cramped up from responding to dog whistles all day yet again?
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
http://youtu.be/iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Checkmate
2018-03-13 05:23:38 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sergio
buractate job
Wot?
Manuplate.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-13 05:27:14 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:23:38 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "💩
<***@gmail.com>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sergio
buractate job
Wot?
Manuplate.
i have a feeling that this is going in this direction:


--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
http://youtu.be/iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Sergio
2018-03-13 13:54:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
buractate job
Wot?
bueroughcratic, burocratic, burrocrappic, ok => Gov Spelt Checker
benj
2018-03-14 02:48:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
buractate job
Wot?
Hey. libs (especially lib journalists) get to make up their own words to
win their arguments so I'm sure Nads agrees that we must have total
equality!
kensi
2018-03-13 15:00:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech competition
around, quite socialist, quite stable. Compare the US: high tech, no
frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist, and wracked by
economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.

When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does. Done correctly, it turns them into
just a few more ordinary peons, with the same kinds of jobs and pay
scales as the rest of us.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
benj
2018-03-14 02:54:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech competition
around, quite socialist, quite stable. Compare the US: high tech, no
frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist, and wracked by
economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking about
how close you came to putting the final nail in the American coffin with
Hillary. We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does. Done correctly, it turns them into
just a few more ordinary peons, with the same kinds of jobs and pay
scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you. Your
idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race is
simply insane. We could take all the money and wealth in the world right
now and confiscate it (that includes yours too you rich pig) and equally
distribute it among all humans and I assure you that it would take very
little time for the fat cats to soon be fat again and the poor would be
broke and stupid.

Just put the doobie down, "kensi" and things might begin to make sense
again.
Nadegda
2018-03-14 04:08:08 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech
high tech, no frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist,
and wracked by economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking about
how close you came to putting the final nail in the American coffin with
Hillary. We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does. Done correctly, it turns them into
just a few more ordinary peons, with the same kinds of jobs and pay
scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you. Your
idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race is
simply insane.
If you think the superrich got that way by winning a contest of skill,
rather than by winning one form of lottery or another, then I've got a
bridge I'd like to sell you.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Skeeter
2018-03-14 13:18:08 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:08:08 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech
high tech, no frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist,
and wracked by economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking about
how close you came to putting the final nail in the American coffin with
Hillary. We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does. Done correctly, it turns them into
just a few more ordinary peons, with the same kinds of jobs and pay
scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you. Your
idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race is
simply insane.
If you think the superrich got that way by winning a contest of skill,
rather than by winning one form of lottery or another, then I've got a
bridge I'd like to sell you.
Shows just how much you know.
Checkmate
2018-03-14 13:44:55 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:08:08 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech
high tech, no frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist,
and wracked by economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking about
how close you came to putting the final nail in the American coffin with
Hillary. We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does. Done correctly, it turns them into
just a few more ordinary peons, with the same kinds of jobs and pay
scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you. Your
idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race is
simply insane.
If you think the superrich got that way by winning a contest of skill,
rather than by winning one form of lottery or another, then I've got a
bridge I'd like to sell you.
Shows just how much you know.
The Kensinads knows everything... just ask it. Another Usenet
Revolutionary content to just jack its jaw on Usenet and think it's
going to accomplish anything other than waste everyone's time.

You could accomplish more discussing puppies than politics with the
Kensinads. <--- Free Sig-quote!
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2018-03-14 15:48:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:08:08 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
If you think the superrich got that way by winning a contest of skill,
rather than by winning one form of lottery or another, then I've got a
bridge I'd like to sell you.
Shows just how much you know.
Nadegda is right. There are only so many positions at the top of the
socioeconomic pyramid. Most people up there got that way because of
connections or inherited wealth or both ... so, they were lucky in being
born to the right family. Most of the rest lucked out entrepreneurially,
or won the actual lottery.

A few got there partly on merit, some sort of big talent: top athletes,
top actresses, the odd smart tech guy whose inventions made it big. But
even then, there are so many more people with substantial talent than
top slots in these fields that which ones make the big time and which
languish in obscurity is largely down to luck.

And even in those areas connections and influence count for a lot. Not
only are many of the best-paid talented people connected to influential
families, which was their edge over their equally-talented rivals, but
you'll find talentless hacks right there alongside them who got there
*purely* by string-pulling. (How else do you explain Justin Bieber?)
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-14 15:51:48 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 04:08:08 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
If you think the superrich got that way by winning a contest of skill,
rather than by winning one form of lottery or another, then I've got a
bridge I'd like to sell you.
Shows just how much you know.
Nadegda is right. There are only so many positions at the top of the
socioeconomic pyramid. Most people up there got that way because of
connections or inherited wealth or both ... so, they were lucky in being
born to the right family. Most of the rest lucked out entrepreneurially,
or won the actual lottery.
A few got there partly on merit, some sort of big talent: top athletes,
top actresses, the odd smart tech guy whose inventions made it big. But
even then, there are so many more people with substantial talent than
top slots in these fields that which ones make the big time and which
languish in obscurity is largely down to luck.
And even in those areas connections and influence count for a lot. Not
only are many of the best-paid talented people connected to influential
families, which was their edge over their equally-talented rivals, but
you'll find talentless hacks right there alongside them who got there
*purely* by string-pulling. (How else do you explain Justin Bieber?)
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
kensi
2018-03-14 16:00:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-14 16:11:27 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
Checkmate
2018-03-14 16:20:24 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
I own a tiny piece of it.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2018-03-14 17:02:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
I own a tiny piece of it.
As do we all, it's amazing the back pedaling the Kins/Nads is capable
of.
Checkmate
2018-03-14 18:30:09 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
I own a tiny piece of it.
As do we all, it's amazing the back pedaling the Kins/Nads is capable
of.
You'd need a microscope to see my share of Amazon.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2018-03-14 18:33:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
I own a tiny piece of it.
As do we all, it's amazing the back pedaling the Kins/Nads is capable
of.
You'd need a microscope to see my share of Amazon.
I bought a microscope from Amazon, it had your name stamped on it.
Checkmate
2018-03-14 18:46:50 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
I own a tiny piece of it.
As do we all, it's amazing the back pedaling the Kins/Nads is capable
of.
You'd need a microscope to see my share of Amazon.
I bought a microscope from Amazon, it had your name stamped on it.
Maybe you're confusing it with the cymbal you bought.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us,
who feel that life is but a joke."
Skeeter
2018-03-14 19:22:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:00:36 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:48:11 -0400, kensi
Do you just sit in front of a computer all day obsessively hitting
"refresh" or something, kO0k?
Post by Skeeter
The guy that owns Amazon is one of the richest guys in the world, he
started by selling books out of his basement. Tell me more about
lotteries and shit.
Tell *me*: how many people sold books out of their basements? I'm
guessing a lot more than one. How many ended up in Bezos's position? One.
It's his company spin doctor.
I own a tiny piece of it.
As do we all, it's amazing the back pedaling the Kins/Nads is capable
of.
You'd need a microscope to see my share of Amazon.
I bought a microscope from Amazon, it had your name stamped on it.
Maybe you're confusing it with the cymbal you bought.
Ba Da Boom
J***@.
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
talentless hacks got there *purely* by string-pulling.
How else do you explain Justin Bieber ?
YouTube. Wikipedia.ORG/wiki/Justin_Bieber
10+ billion views, so far. Millions of girls.
The little horn dogs give zero fucks to Gates and Bezos.

PseudoSocialists would toss out the baby ( the winners )
with the bath water ( the losers ). Hug a loser, we need them.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-16 18:24:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by J***@.
talentless hacks got there *purely* by string-pulling.
How else do you explain Justin Bieber ?
YouTube. Wikipedia.ORG/wiki/Justin_Bieber
10+ billion views, so far. Millions of girls.
The little horn dogs give zero fucks to Gates and Bezos.
PseudoSocialists would toss out the baby ( the winners )
with the bath water ( the losers ). Hug a loser, we need them.
Come quick, kensi and Nads. I've got a hug 4 U.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
Sergio
2018-03-15 03:01:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living under
the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going capitalist and
then having to put up with all the disaster of a fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in the
Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is there,
communism will be unstable and will result in being outcompeted by
noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the potential for
rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech advances fully
assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than capitalism. Observe
Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no higher-tech competition
around, quite socialist, quite stable. Compare the US: high tech, no
frontier, no higher-tech competition, ultra-capitalist, and wracked by
economic and political crises every few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking about
how close you came to putting the final nail in the American coffin with
Hillary.
Please put more nails in Hillary!!, big ones => through the head, did
you her her tell Indians that "White Men forced their wives a daughters
to Vote for Trump" ? What a narssistic asshole she is, she hates 70% of
america. (this was in WSJ this am)
Post by benj
We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does.
*bullshit*, EU follows Brussels, enough said.
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Done correctly, it turns them into
just a few more ordinary peons, with the same kinds of jobs and pay
scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you. Your
idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race is
simply insane. We could take all the money and wealth in the world right
now and confiscate it (that includes yours too you rich pig) and equally
distribute it among all humans and I assure you that it would take very
little time for the fat cats to soon be fat again and the poor would be
broke and stupid.
Just put the doobie down, "kensi" and things might begin to make sense
again.
she is more than wacked, she's sniffin street cheese an huffin lemon pledge
Nadegda
2018-03-15 03:35:04 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living
under the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going
capitalist and then having to put up with all the disaster of a
fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in
the Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is
there, communism will be unstable and will result in being
outcompeted by noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the
potential for rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech
advances fully assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than
capitalism. Observe Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no
higher-tech competition around, quite socialist, quite stable.
Compare the US: high tech, no frontier, no higher-tech competition,
ultra-capitalist, and wracked by economic and political crises every
few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking
about how close you came to putting the final nail in the American
coffin with Hillary.
Please put more nails in Hillary!!, big ones => through the head,
We have seen, today, homicidal ideation directed at people solely for
holding differing political views, from all of the following kooks:

The Cornhole
Skeeter
Gurgzzl
Checkmate
and now Sergio.

Perhaps I should start a betting pool on which of these lunatics manages
to Bobo first.
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Folderol.
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does.
*bullshit*, EU follows Brussels, enough said.
Non sequitur.
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Done correctly, it turns them into just a few more ordinary peons,
with the same kinds of jobs and pay scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you.
Your idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race
is simply insane. We could take all the money and wealth in the world
right now and confiscate it (that includes yours too you rich pig) and
equally distribute it among all humans and I assure you that it would
take very little time for the fat cats to soon be fat again and the
poor would be broke and stupid.
Just put the doobie down, "kensi" and things might begin to make sense
again.
she is more than wacked, she's sniffin street cheese an huffin lemon pledge
Proof, kook?

... How ironic, coming from the kook who just suggested assassinating
Clinton with a nail gun.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
kensi
2018-03-15 14:18:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
Please put more nails in Hillary!!, big ones => through the head,
We have seen, today, homicidal ideation directed at people solely for
The Cornhole
Skeeter
Gurgzzl
Checkmate
and now Sergio.
Perhaps I should start a betting pool on which of these lunatics manages
to Bobo first.
Well, the Cornhole and Gurgzzl are the same k00k (and the same as
Scatboi, it seems), so that's really four ... but we can add Wile E.
Coyote and Scout to the list for posts made in the past week or two.

Put me down for twenty on puddles going postal first.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Sergio
2018-03-16 01:07:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Yeah, "kensi" has it. IF only China had jsut been happy living
under the stability of the thoughts of Mao instead of going
capitalist and then having to put up with all the disaster of a
fast-growing economy.
Communism in China was unstable because China could mechanize, and
because she faced competition from the rest of the world. Same in
the Soviet Union before that. If the potential for rapid growth is
there, communism will be unstable and will result in being
outcompeted by noncommunists elsewhere in the world. However, if the
potential for rapid growth is not there (no frontier and tech
advances fully assimilated), then socialism becomes stabler than
capitalism. Observe Finland: high tech, hemmed in (no frontier), no
higher-tech competition around, quite socialist, quite stable.
Compare the US: high tech, no frontier, no higher-tech competition,
ultra-capitalist, and wracked by economic and political crises every
few years.
total bullshit,
the USA is the world's technical innovator, and dominator.
"stable socialism", means no personal growth, buractate
What?
Post by Sergio
job, and you and your family are stuck in "1984" for good, while the
Fat cats at the top, make money off of you.
You just described "USA, circa 2018". Quasi police state, no decent
jobs, fat cats at the top make money off you while you stagnate.
Hey! Socialist utopia, Right? Bet you have an orgasm just thinking
about how close you came to putting the final nail in the American
coffin with Hillary.
Please put more nails in Hillary!!, big ones => through the head,
We
which "We" ? you and kensi pupa ?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
We already have most of the Communist Manifesto as law.
Folderol.
that is a laxative.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
When growth ends, it becomes necessary to remove the fat cats at the
top. This is what socialism does.
*bullshit*, EU follows Brussels, enough said.
Non sequitur.
Non sequitur.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Done correctly, it turns them into just a few more ordinary peons,
with the same kinds of jobs and pay scales as the rest of us.
Except that for the most part they aren't ordinary people like you.
Your idea that everyone gets a first place trophy for running the race
is simply insane. We could take all the money and wealth in the world
right now and confiscate it (that includes yours too you rich pig) and
equally distribute it among all humans and I assure you that it would
take very little time for the fat cats to soon be fat again and the
poor would be broke and stupid.
Just put the doobie down, "kensi" and things might begin to make sense
again.
she is more than wacked, she's sniffin street cheese an huffin lemon pledge
Proof, kook?
any time she talks, goofie un-associated thoughts limps out......
google for it.
Post by Nadegda
... How ironic, coming from the kook who just suggested assassinating
Clinton with a nail gun.
no, => Jesus Christ, (who Hillary believes is a lessor god than she is)
the old rusty Roman Nails pounded in with a 20# wood mallet, nothing
modern.

"stable socialism", what a lie, Venezuela, Cuba, Argentina, Brazil,
colombia, Uruguay, ...............
Nadegda
2018-03-16 01:33:18 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
... How ironic, coming from the kook who just suggested assassinating
Clinton with a nail gun.
no, => Jesus Christ, (who Hillary believes is a lessor god than she is)
the old rusty Roman Nails pounded in with a 20# wood mallet, nothing
modern.
Methinks the Next Bobo Pool's "likely kookery" column needs updating...
Post by Sergio
"stable socialism", what a lie, Venezuela, Cuba, Argentina, Brazil,
colombia, Uruguay, ...............
Well, it can be hard to keep it stable when the CIA is paid good money by
Exxon and Halliburton and De Beers and their ilk to destabilize any
countries that lean left or (especially) try to nationalize their own
natural resources ...

Frankly, it surprises me a bit that they haven't tried to part Norway from
its oil yet, using the same tactics.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Sergio
2018-03-16 02:23:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
... How ironic, coming from the kook who just suggested assassinating
Clinton with a nail gun.
no, => Jesus Christ, (who Hillary believes is a lessor god than she is)
the old rusty Roman Nails pounded in with a 20# wood mallet, nothing
modern.
Methinks the Next Bobo Pool's "likely kookery" column needs updating...
Post by Sergio
"stable socialism", what a lie, Venezuela, Cuba, Argentina, Brazil,
colombia, Uruguay, ...............
Well, it can be hard to keep it stable when the CIA is paid good money by
Exxon and Halliburton and De Beers and their ilk to destabilize any
countries that lean left or (especially) try to nationalize their own
natural resources ...
red herrings..
Post by Nadegda
Frankly, it surprises me a bit that they haven't tried to part Norway from
its oil yet, using the same tactics.
only oil Norway has is fish oil, they use on their hair for the state.
kensi
2018-03-16 17:03:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Well, it can be hard to keep it stable when the CIA is paid good money by
Exxon and Halliburton and De Beers and their ilk to destabilize any
countries that lean left or (especially) try to nationalize their own
natural resources ...
red herrings..
Proof, ko0ky?
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Frankly, it surprises me a bit that they haven't tried to part Norway from
its oil yet, using the same tactics.
only oil Norway has is fish oil, they use on their hair for the state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_proven_oil_reserves

Norway 21 5,139

Over 5 billion barrels of proven reserves in Norway, kOoky.

Does it hurt to be as wrong as you are, as often as you are? I imagine
it must be like constantly stepping on rakes, or getting doors smashed
into your face.

*snicker*
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Sergio
2018-03-16 20:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Well, it can be hard to keep it stable when the CIA is paid good money by
Exxon and Halliburton and De Beers and their ilk to destabilize any
countries that lean left or (especially) try to nationalize their own
natural resources ...
red herrings..
Proof, ko0ky?
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Frankly, it surprises me a bit that they haven't tried to part Norway from
its oil yet, using the same tactics.
only oil Norway has is fish oil, they use on their hair for the state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_proven_oil_reserves
Norway    21    5,139
Over 5 billion barrels of proven reserves in Norway, kOoky.
so that is why they are throwing away their bicycles and buying USA
F-250 trucks


how much CO2 does 5 billion barrels of socilist scum oil make ? (use
online tool)
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-16 20:33:10 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:09:17 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio
<***@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Well, it can be hard to keep it stable when the CIA is paid good money
by Exxon and Halliburton and De Beers and their ilk to destabilize any
countries that lean left or (especially) try to nationalize their own
natural resources ...
red herrings..
Proof, ko0ky?
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Frankly, it surprises me a bit that they haven't tried to part Norway
from its oil yet, using the same tactics.
only oil Norway has is fish oil, they use on their hair for the state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_proven_oil_reserves
Norway    21    5,139 Over 5 billion barrels of proven reserves
in Norway, kOoky.
so that is why they are throwing away their bicycles and buying USA
F-250 trucks
how much CO2 does 5 billion barrels of socilist scum oil make ? (use
online tool)
does norway's "EVOL SEWSHULIST" government subsidize the cost of petroleum products at the expense of taxpayers who don't even own cars or drive (think: old obese republicans on their death beds)?

https://www.expatistan.com/price/gas/oslo

The price of 1 liter (1/4 gallon) of gas in Oslo is $1.92USD = $7.68/gallon

i'd bet if you lived there you'd drive your car less than you do - or you'd whine a lot because your socialist government won't give you extra free communist gas like they do in the USA.
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
http://youtu.be/iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Sergio
2018-03-16 02:30:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
... How ironic, coming from the kook who just suggested assassinating
Clinton with a nail gun.
no, => Jesus Christ, (who Hillary believes is a lessor god than she is)
the old rusty Roman Nails pounded in with a 20# wood mallet, nothing
modern.
Methinks the Next Bobo Pool's "likely kookery" column needs updating...
so you update columns ? You Secretary ?

do you have a real man-boss or a real manlike woman boss ?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
"stable socialism", what a lie, Venezuela, Cuba, Argentina, Brazil,
colombia, Uruguay, ...............
Well, it can be hard to keep it stable when the CIA is paid good money by
Exxon and Halliburton and De Beers and their ilk to destabilize any
countries that lean left or (especially) try to nationalize their own
natural resources ...
Frankly, it surprises me a bit that they haven't tried to part Norway from
its oil yet, using the same tactics.
Skeeter
2018-03-11 17:08:31 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 12:53:02 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
The Kensinads has been slowly but surely revealing its true leanings,
and has even admitted that it was leaning towards communism as superior
to capitalism. I think we all know where this is going... or trying to
go.
Nuance is lost on right-wingers, as always.
What I said was that capitalism works for a fast-growing economy: at a
frontier like the wild west, or when there's a major technological
upgrade going on like during much of the 20th century. On the other
hand, socialism is superior when the economy is barely or not growing, a
state it's transitioning into now because we've mostly saturated the
planet's resource base and we've mostly saturated the productivity gains
available from motorizing and mechanizing things.
So yer a commie, ok then.
J***@.
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
socialism is superior when the economy is barely or not growing,
Under (pseudo)socialism, the house wins[*] and everyone else loses.
[ *: JongUn Kim, Castro, Lenin, Pol Pot style ]

Only (eu)capitalism ( where the market is free to chose )
can prevent dictators and stagnation.

"What we chose" (consumption) has been programmed into us ( by nature ).
There are three ways to do it:

1. Live Fast ( consume more now ), Die Fast.
2. Live Slow, Die Later ( consume more later ).
3. Sacrifice yourself so others can consume more.

Either way, the (PreProgrammed) objective is the same: consume.
We ( you, me, and the stars ) consume what we can, given our options;
we neither know nor control our future.
Ser Gregor Clegane
2018-03-12 15:44:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by J***@.
Post by kensi
socialism is superior when the economy is barely or not growing,
Under (pseudo)socialism, the house wins[*] and everyone else loses.
[ *: JongUn Kim, Castro, Lenin, Pol Pot style ]
Only (eu)capitalism ( where the market is free to chose )
can prevent dictators and stagnation.
What have you been smoking, Relf? An armed citizenry
as guaranteed by the Second Amendment can and does
prevent dictators and stagnation.
Post by J***@.
"What we chose" (consumption) has been programmed into us ( by nature ).
1. Live Fast ( consume more now ), Die Fast.
2. Live Slow, Die Later ( consume more later ).
3. Sacrifice yourself so others can consume more.
What about 4) Kill others and consume what was theirs.
That's what dictators and socialism is all about.
Post by J***@.
Either way, the (PreProgrammed) objective is the same: consume.
We ( you, me, and the stars ) consume what we can, given our options;
we neither know nor control our future.
Bullshit pure, Relf! We control our future in myriad ways
unless we are blithering idiots who never learned how to
think into the future.
--
The Mountain
J***@.
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ser Gregor Clegane
Post by J***@.
Only (eu)capitalism ( where the market is free to chose )
can prevent dictators and stagnation.
What have you been smoking, Relf?
HandRolled cigs.
Post by Ser Gregor Clegane
An armed citizenry, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment,
can and does prevent dictators and stagnation.
The Second Amendment asks for a "Well Regulated Militia",
not horny meth addicts, at BurningMan, with Uzis.
Post by Ser Gregor Clegane
Post by J***@.
"What we chose" (consumption) has been programmed into us ( by nature ).
1. Live Fast ( consume more now ), Die Fast.
2. Live Slow, Die Later ( consume more later ).
3. Sacrifice yourself so others can consume more.
What about 4) Kill others and consume what was theirs.
No, Not if it doesn't benefit the tribe, as a whole;
we ( most of us ) weren't programmed that way.
Post by Ser Gregor Clegane
That's what dictators and socialism is all about.
Dictators get rich by appealing to our desire to
" Live Slow, Die Later ( consume more later ) ".
"kensi" thinks this way.
Post by Ser Gregor Clegane
Post by J***@.
Either way, the (PreProgrammed) objective is the same: consume.
We ( you, me, and the stars ) consume what we can, given our options;
we neither know nor control our future.
Bullshit, Relf! We ( homeless folk ) control our future,
we're not blithering idiots.
Sorry, but RealLife(tm) is more random than your ramblings.
Checkmate
2018-03-10 05:28:01 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p7u5n8$1v5h$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
It should come as no surprise that Russian trolls, known for stoking the
flames of America's cultural divides, turned their attention to climate
https://grist.org/article/russian-trolls-shared-some-truly-terrible-climate-change-memes/
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2018-03-10 15:27:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-10 15:37:22 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:27:43 -0500, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
Good, sounds like they're waking up to reality.
kensi
2018-03-10 16:58:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:27:43 -0500, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
Good, sounds like they're waking up to reality.
*Finally*! We have you on the record supporting the Russian bots. :)

Took long enough!
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-10 17:10:48 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:58:24 -0500, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:27:43 -0500, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
Good, sounds like they're waking up to reality.
*Finally*! We have you on the record supporting the Russian bots. :)
Took long enough!
So now what? You gonna call the FBI?..oh wait you already did that a
week or so ago, well we have seen how well they work, so I can expect
them in a few years? Maybe when Fakeys DEA and CIA arrive?
Checkmate
2018-03-10 18:47:48 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p80thc$e5d$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides. If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2018-03-10 19:17:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides. If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
Divide and concur, the world is laughing at us right now, when we
fight amongst ourselves it is a master key for our enemies.
Checkmate
2018-03-11 05:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides. If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
Divide and concur, the world is laughing at us right now, when we
fight amongst ourselves it is a master key for our enemies.
And the Kensinads is intent on stirring the pot nonstop, even admitting
it's "leaning" towards communism as a better form of government. I
guess that's why we have to put up a wall to keep people out, while
communist countries put up walls to keep their people IN.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2018-03-10 23:35:57 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in American
society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's. I
wonder why?
Post by Checkmate
If you'll recall, there was a media story alleging that non
other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into participating in a
liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to miss that story, or
just conveniently forget it?
I don't watch Fox News or visit Breitbart, so probably.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Skeeter
2018-03-10 23:38:27 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
CNN and MSNBC?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in American
society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's. I
wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
If you'll recall, there was a media story alleging that non
other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into participating in a
liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to miss that story, or
just conveniently forget it?
I don't watch Fox News or visit Breitbart, so probably.
CNN and the others are so honest eh?
Nadegda
2018-03-10 23:42:21 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).

They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.

There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Chris M. Thomasson
2018-03-10 23:48:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).
They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.
There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
Was the private server compromised in any way? Was it protected?
Checkmate
2018-03-11 05:56:52 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Chris M. Thomasson
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).
They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.
There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
Was the private server compromised in any way? Was it protected?
It was protected with a cloth.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Sergio
2018-03-11 07:31:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Chris M. Thomasson
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).
They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.
There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
Was the private server compromised in any way? Was it protected?
It was protected with a cloth.
Hillary shrugs off suggestion she 'wiped' her server clean with the
snarky response: 'What? With a cloth or something?'

Clinton told reporters she is sure she never sent or received
'material that was marked or designated classified' through her private
email account
Such a marking or stamp, she said, 'is the way you know whether
something is' classified
An aide to a Republican member of the Senate Intelligence Committee
fired back: 'The way you decide if something is classified, when you're
the secretary of state, isn't looking for a stamp. It's looking at the
contents'
'This is the worst buck-passing I've seen since Hillary's husband
decided there was more than one way to define the word "is"'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3202887/Hillary-shrugs-question-wiped-server-clean-like-cloth-insists-did-not-send-classified-material-secret-email-account.html
Checkmate
2018-03-10 23:58:04 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p81qgt$2jm$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).
They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.
There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
He asked for *PROOF* ko0ky... not a declaration.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2018-03-11 00:08:54 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:42:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).
They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.
There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
So you slapping a few words down is "proof"?

No wonder your side lost.
Checkmate
2018-03-11 05:58:52 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:42:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 23:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Proof? I betcha won't.
They leaked the dirty laundry of Clinton's team, posthumper, in exchange
for a promise that if Trump won he'd drop the Russia sanctions. This is
all very well known, public information by now, dug up and exposed by
Mueller, a prosecutor and former FBI head who had been appointed to the
FBI by a Republican administration (so, not a Dem placeman).
They did *not* also leak anything from the Trump team, or receive any
promises from Clinton's for in the event that Clinton won.
There can be no doubt that Putin took sides, and that the side he took was
the Republican one.
So you slapping a few words down is "proof"?
No wonder your side lost.
So the Kensinads is now admitting that Hillary had dirty laundry? I
thought she was squeaky clean, after she wiped her server... with a
cloth, even.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Chris M. Thomasson
2018-03-10 23:41:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in American
society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's. I
wonder why?
First of all, wtf was this shi%:



Hot Mic?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
If you'll recall, there was a media story alleging that non
other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into participating in a
liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to miss that story, or
just conveniently forget it?
I don't watch Fox News or visit Breitbart, so probably.
Checkmate
2018-03-11 00:02:15 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Chris M. Thomasson
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in American
society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's. I
wonder why?
http://youtu.be/keXx0zxTarE
Hot Mic?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
If you'll recall, there was a media story alleging that non
other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into participating in a
liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to miss that story, or
just conveniently forget it?
I don't watch Fox News or visit Breitbart, so probably.
No surprise. O'Bama was a lot sleazier than was readily apparent.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Checkmate
2018-03-11 00:09:45 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p81q4t$2jm$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in American
society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's. I
wonder why?
Who the fuck sold our uranium to Putin, Dummy? Clinton was happy to
accept cash because she thought she had the election in the bag... she
was wrong. I'll reserve judgment on whether there was collusion with
Trump until I actually see the proof. What I've seen so far, was
"someone" in the Clinton campaign paying for a hatchet job against
Trump, that's been widely characterized as just that, and belongs on
the Fiction shelf.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
If you'll recall, there was a media story alleging that non
other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into participating in a
liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to miss that story, or
just conveniently forget it?
I don't watch Fox News or visit Breitbart, so probably.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2018-03-11 03:15:51 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually
Russian trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just
as much sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in
American society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Who the fuck sold our uranium to Putin, Dummy?
And the survey says:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

----------
Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ (Rosatom’s mining subsidiary) is licensed to
export uranium from the U.S. to other countries.
----------

[X]! False.
Post by Checkmate
Clinton was happy to accept cash because she thought she had the
election in the bag... she was wrong.
And the survey says:

----------
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by
Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a
single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s Canadian founder. But Giustra
sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the
Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of
state.
----------

[X][X]! Also false.
Post by Checkmate
I'll reserve judgment on whether there was collusion with Trump until I
actually see the proof. What I've seen so far, was
"someone" in the Clinton campaign paying for a hatchet job against
Trump, that's been widely characterized as just that, and belongs on the
Fiction shelf.
And the survey says:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/03/russia-trump-inquiry-fbi-
knew-of-collusion-allegations-during-campaign

----------
For months, it was suspected that the Steele dossier, which was shared
with US intelligence agencies after the 2016 election, may have prompted
the FBI’s decision to open an investigation into the matter.

But subsequent reporting, including by the Guardian and the New York
Times, has shown that US intelligence agencies were prompted to
investigate the issues before they received the dossier.
----------

Leaving aside that the dossier was partly funded by Republican primary
rivals of Trump's, and not solely by the Democratic Party, this makes your
claim that the investigation is simply a case of Clinton sour grapes:

[X][X][X]! False.

<cue Price is Right fail horn>
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Checkmate
2018-03-11 05:45:01 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p82717$2jm$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually
Russian trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just
as much sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days,
Breitbart and Fox?
Post by Checkmate
is the Russian game plan is to sow the seeds of discontent in
American society by fanning the flames on both sides.
And yet, they colluded only with Trump's team, not also with Clinton's.
I wonder why?
Who the fuck sold our uranium to Putin, Dummy?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
----------
Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ (Rosatom?s mining subsidiary) is licensed to
export uranium from the U.S. to other countries.
Be that as it may, it's been reported that some uranium HAS been
exported from the US. Rather than take all of your bullshit as gospel
when there are still a shitload of questions surrounding the Uranium
One deal, the dossier, and the Clintons, I'll wait for Mueller to
complete his investigation and let the chips fall where they may. In
the meantime, I find it a bit of a stretch that Putin would be that
interested in US Uranium if he didn't figure he could use it to benefit
Russia (as well as his own bank account), nor do I believe that other
Republicans running against Trump actually collaborated with the
leading Democrat to smear Trump with a dossier full of "Trumped up"
allegations. Why did Comey draft a letter exonerating Crooked Hillary
before he even opened his "investigation," hmmm?

I shall now do the same thing with your post, as you usually do with
mine, you sleazy liberal scumbag...

<<<SNIP!>>>
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Sergio
2018-03-11 07:28:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides. If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
who the fuck listens to rancid fat slob michael moore ?
benj
2018-03-11 13:34:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides. If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
who the fuck listens to rancid fat slob michael moore ?
Pot Smokers. I mean like Dude! Did ever look at Michael Moore...
I mean REALLY look at him? Even better than looking at your own hand!
Sergio
2018-03-13 04:43:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence.  It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides.  If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago.  Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
who the fuck listens to rancid fat slob michael moore ?
Pot Smokers. I mean like Dude! Did ever look at Michael Moore...
I mean REALLY look at him?  Even better than looking at your own hand!
Loading Image...

Loading Image...
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-13 04:49:19 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 23:43:30 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio
<***@invalid.com>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Sergio
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence.  It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is to
sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the flames
on both sides.  If you'll recall, there was a media story alleging
that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago.  Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
who the fuck listens to rancid fat slob michael moore ?
Pot Smokers. I mean like Dude! Did ever look at Michael Moore... I mean
REALLY look at him?  Even better than looking at your own hand!
Loading Image...
http://www.the-too-malcontents.com/wp-content/uploads/moore-creosote1.jp
g
my take from your post is this:

bannon was smart enough to distance himself from breitbort.

you aren't.
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
http://youtu.be/iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
kensi
2018-03-13 15:03:14 UTC
Permalink
On 3/13/2018 12:49 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder
Post by Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 23:43:30 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sergio
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
http://media.bartbriet.com/media/2015/01/Michael_Moore_Bl_r640x400.jpg
bannon was smart enough to distance himself from breitbort.
you aren't.
SPANKY-SPANKY!

*snicker*
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2018-03-12 05:07:27 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sergio
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence. It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
The common claim in the media these days, is the Russian game plan is
to sow the seeds of discontent in American society by fanning the
flames on both sides. If you'll recall, there was a media story
alleging that non other than Michael Moore was recently trolled into
participating in a liberal protest just weeks ago. Did you happen to
miss that story, or just conveniently forget it?
who the fuck listens to rancid fat slob michael moore ?
The point is, if the story's true, a major libtard got trolled hard by
the Russians.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
benj
2018-03-10 19:04:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
This raises the question, whether you and "Nads" are actually Russian
trolls working the other side of the fence.  It makes just as much
sense.
The Russian trolls support *your* side, k0oky, remember?
Good question Checkmate. I mean Nads and "kensi" clearly still worship
Marx and you'd think they'd be heroes of the Russian Hardcore that
remains, but on the other hand I think most Russians got the memo what a
massive fail the lib idea of communism was. That simply leaves them
homeless except for the Democrat party that still thinks N. Korea is
Utopia.
Loading...