[SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

[Mee'k Pagano Selvaggio]

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of
relativity, at least as taught today, was incorrect.
I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being
anti-relativist, which is false. I never said anywhere that the theory
of relativity was false, I simply said, and tenaciously, that it was
incorrect, which is far from being the same thing.

this is not true. Apparently the nazi Hitler kept them protected in red
bricks houses, vacation camps, with theater etc. Most of people are not
living in red bricks houses today. In 1800s they modified The Biblen, me
frendo, apparently.

𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗣𝗹𝗼𝘁_𝘁𝗼_𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹_6_𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻_𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘀
https://bi%74%63%68%75te.com/video/Zvjc2ixWRi06

𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗡𝗦_𝗖𝗮𝗺𝗽𝘀_𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲_𝗡𝗢𝗧_𝗗𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵_𝗖𝗮𝗺𝗽𝘀,_𝗠𝗮𝗿_25,_2024
https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/AsAOlElZebTN

𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗜𝗡_𝗢𝗙_𝗧𝗛𝗘_𝗝𝗘𝗪𝗦_𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗲_𝗝𝗲𝘄𝗶𝘀𝗵_𝗢𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝘀_101
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/GGHH3rvOvOaJ

[Gaylord Chalyh Turubanov]

Since experiment agrees with special relativity, it's obvious that
Richard Hachel is wrong.

Your remark is biased. I'll let you think about why. R.H.

former proverbial Michael Morony is correct. You have to make your theory different regarding A predicted outcome. You have to have an outcome, otherwise you are insignificant.

me suspects, Einstine first had an outcome, then his wife made a theory to him. Einstine was not good enough. As proof, america fighting the nazis WW2 said "𝙬𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙮". They even regret today fighting the nazis. Even Hitler let the blacks at OL in gearmony, which proves the frog homos are worse than Hitler.

𝗠𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘄_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗻𝘀_𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘀_𝗺𝗮𝘆𝗼𝗿’𝘀_𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗲_𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲_𝗼𝗻_𝗢𝗹𝘆𝗺𝗽𝗶𝗰_𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝘀
Some French products could be declared ‘not welcome’ in Russia, the Foreign Ministry spokeswoman has warned
https://www.%72t.com/russia/595182-athletes-olympic-paris-zakharova/

paris mayor calling the israeli genocide in Gaza Death Camp is different because it doesn’t want the israeli media to start publishing the massacres committed by the french in algeria. easy, google french massacres in algeria and click image. You will find that france and israel have the same moral values

THE FRENCH HOMO GOVERNMENT ARE LOOKING FOR A HARD SLAP IN THEIR ARSE

proves homos worse than Hitler.

That should automatically disqualify France from being a host of the Olympics.

Will Paris mayor welcome blood soaked, baby killer, Israeli Jews with open arms? She described Israel as a democracy and said that's why Israel is fine to compete. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻t.

<img alt='fa01' src=''>

[Arindam Banerjee]

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at
least as taught today, was incorrect.

It is rubbish.

I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being anti-relativist, which
is false. I never said anywhere that the theory of relativity was false, I simply
said, and tenaciously, that it was incorrect, which is far from being the same
thing.

No, it is not incorrect. It is rubbish. For light speed varies with the
speed of the emitter, as shown by the correct understanding of the MMI
expt results on one hand; and there is violation of inertia with the
Lorenz force not having equal and opposite reaction. With inertia
violated, with my railgun experiments, the essential basis for Eisntein's
1905 paper gets outed.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

***

Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near
space , and horizontal tunneling shown in

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia
can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting
that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity

*****

Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

*******

2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail

IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

IFE - 2 Experimental setups

IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

IFE - 8 New Physics

****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

*****

[palsing]

Post by Arindam Banerjee

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at
least as taught today, was incorrect.

It is rubbish.

Banjo Boy. you are *still* dumber than a mud fence... and Richard, you have never proven anything is wrong with relativity... nor has anyone else in the last 120 years or so...

[Ross Finlayson]

Post by palsing

Post by Arindam Banerjee

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of
relativity, at least as taught today, was incorrect.

It is rubbish.

Banjo Boy. you are *still* dumber than a mud fence... and Richard, you
have never proven anything is wrong with relativity... nor has anyone
else in the last 120 years or so...

Einstein though sort of walked some things back,
"SR is local and the E-spacial", specifically.

That, and mass-energy equivalency sort of is governed
by GR not SR, and sort of is so about the rotational
and moments, and sort of independent the linear and Galilean.


The wider sky survey, after CMBR and the universe was flat,
and after 2MASS and the reshift was much less pronounced,
and definitely since JWST, has roundly paint-canned what
was the highly-tuned theory of inflationary cosmology.


Also again there's a sort of "Dirac's positronic,
Einstein's white-hole, magnetic micropole, vacuum sea".


So, SR and GR are still pretty great, but GR is in front now.

The "dark matter holding galaxies together" and "dark energy
spacing them apart" really is "the unseen which doesn't say much",
except that Parameterized Post-Newtonian is how the Earth's ephemeris
is modeled, and many modern theories like MOND better fit without
tuning the current, and thusly also historical, contents of
the sky survey.

So, Einstein sort of refined his theories, and into one theory,
to sort of protect himself from his own followers.

It's a continuum mechanics is why, or as Einstein put it,
it's sort of a total field theory of differential inertial-systems.

[Richard Hachel]

Post by Arindam Banerjee

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at
least as taught today, was incorrect.

It is rubbish.

I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being anti-relativist, which
is false. I never said anywhere that the theory of relativity was false, I simply
said, and tenaciously, that it was incorrect, which is far from being the same
thing.

No, it is not incorrect. It is rubbish. For light speed varies with the speed
of the emitter, as shown by the correct understanding of the MMI expt results on
one hand; and there is violation of inertia with the Lorenz force not having equal
and opposite reaction. With inertia violated, with my railgun experiments, the
essential basis for Eisntein's 1905 paper gets outed.

I am surprised that you want to refute things that are so obvious, and
especially by giving false arguments.
It is not possible that the speed of light can be changed by the speed of
the source because the speed of light in a frame of reference is measured
with TWO watches, and the two watches that measure it are in the
receiver's frame of reference .
This de facto makes the speed of the source completely useless to take
into account to produce this speed.
On the other hand, if the speed of the source has no importance on the
speed of the wave, it is important to know that it has an importance on
the wavelength and the energy of the photon.

λ'=λ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosα.Vo/c)
λ'=λ.(1-cosα'.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
λ'=λ.(1+cosµ.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)

hυ'=hυ.(1+cosα.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
hυ'=hυ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1-cosα'.Vo/c)
hυ'=hυ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)

Thank you for listening.

R.H.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Post by Richard Hachel

Post by Arindam Banerjee

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at
least as taught today, was incorrect.

It is rubbish.

I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being anti-relativist, which
is false. I never said anywhere that the theory of relativity was false, I simply
said, and tenaciously, that it was incorrect, which is far from being the same
thing.

No, it is not incorrect. It is rubbish. For light speed varies with the speed
of the emitter, as shown by the correct understanding of the MMI expt results on
one hand; and there is violation of inertia with the Lorenz force not having equal
and opposite reaction. With inertia violated, with my railgun experiments, the
essential basis for Eisntein's 1905 paper gets outed.

I am surprised that you want to refute things that are so obvious, and
especially by giving false arguments.

It is obvious from the MM experiment that the speed of light changes with
the speed of the emitter.
I found the bungle made of the analysis of the experiments back in 2005.
Basically, they ignored the fact that the equipment moves along with the
Earth, as it is on the Earth.
That way, the distances travelled by the light in the two directions are
the same, and so there is the null result. One can check out the detailed
paper, will repost if necessary.
That the light speed changes is most obvious with the Doppler effect,
where frequency changes with the velocity of the emitter.

Thus if c(V)=c+V
f = (c+V)/wavelength.
or f = c/wavelength + V/wavelength
or f(rest) + del f = c/wavelength + V/wavelength
which gives
del f = V/wavelength

See, when we have velocity of sound/light/water changing with the velocity
of the emitter, then there is no need to twist up the wavelength which
remains the same (as it has to, no way it can get twisted up, it only
moves past faster or slower with more or less speed of the emitter).


When v is positive, we get higher f, as is evidenced.
When v is negative, we get lower f.
So most obviously the speed of light changes with that of the emitter of
light.
Which throws out the first postulate of SR and so the whole thing comes
crashing down.
As I have been pointing out since 2005.

Post by Richard Hachel
It is not possible that the speed of light can be changed by the speed of the
source because the speed of light in a frame of reference is measured with TWO
watches, and the two watches that measure it are in the receiver's frame of
reference .

Makes no sense, above. For such an important point, a lot of effort must
be made to make sense.

The speed of light depends upon the quality of the medium, and that is
found from the electromagnetic travelling wave formulations, depending
upon magnetic permeability and electrical permittivity. That the values
from there matched with experimental results is one of the greatest
triumphs of theoretical and experimental physics. After that, the reality
of electromagnetic waves became known, and put to practical use.

Light is kinetic in quality, just like throwing an object from a moving
platform. Wave motion is an essentially kinetic exercise. Just look at the
water wave. When a duck flaps the still water, the waves move faster in
the direction of the force applied. For the source pushes the medium there
with extra velocity.

Post by Richard Hachel
This de facto makes the speed of the source completely useless to take into
account to produce this speed.

Again, this makes no sense.
The speed of the source relates to frequency shift, so we can find how
fast objects are moving.

Post by Richard Hachel
On the other hand, if the speed of the source has no importance on the speed of
the wave,

Which is wrong, of course, see above.
The speed of the source increases or decreases the speed of the wave.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

it is important to know that it has an importance on the wavelength and
the energy of the photon.

Post by Richard Hachel
λ'=λ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosα.Vo/c)
λ'=λ.(1-cosα'.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
λ'=λ.(1+cosµ.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
hυ'=hυ.(1+cosα.Vo/c)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
hυ'=hυ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1-cosα'.Vo/c)
hυ'=hυ.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)
Thank you for listening.
R.H.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Post by Richard Hachel

Post by Arindam Banerjee

For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at
least as taught today, was incorrect.

It is rubbish.

I was then accused, for ideological convenience, of being anti-relativist, which
is false. I never said anywhere that the theory of relativity was false, I simply
said, and tenaciously, that it was incorrect, which is far from being the same
thing.

No, it is not incorrect. It is rubbish. For light speed varies with the speed
of the emitter, as shown by the correct understanding of the MMI expt results on
one hand; and there is violation of inertia with the Lorenz force not having equal
and opposite reaction. With inertia violated, with my railgun experiments, the
essential basis for Eisntein's 1905 paper gets outed.

I am surprised that you want to refute things that are so obvious, and
especially by giving false arguments.

I don't give false arguments. I find new theories in physics and prove
them with detailed experiments.

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

***

Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
http://youtu.be/zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near
space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
http://youtu.be/o6pjy0Wvujs

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia
can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting
that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
http://youtu.be/idsIuzEajTc

*****

Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

*******

2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail

http://youtu.be/hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

http://youtu.be/w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

http://youtu.be/V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

http://youtu.be/3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

http://youtu.be/pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

http://youtu.be/TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

http://youtu.be/H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

http://youtu.be/VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

*****

[Mitchel Shirinkin Balahowski]

Since experiment agrees with special relativity, it's obvious that
Richard Hachel is wrong.

Your remark is biased.

Only toward the facts and what the facts mean.

I'll let you think about why.

Because I want reality.

not what your fucking brain says it is. These guys don't undrestand
physics at all. hERE we go, one more time, so you undrestand what you say.

𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹𝗶_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝗼𝗻_𝗗𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗰𝘂𝘀_𝘄𝗮𝘀_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁_𝗮𝗰𝘁_–_𝗠𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘄
The head of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service called the strike an
“ugly and criminal step” by Israel
https://%72t.com/russia/595291-naryshkin-israel-syria-terrorist-attack/

Dismantling Israel is a universal moral obligation.

Israel - supported terrorists by SATANIC US, period.

Russia let it happen by preventing Syria using their SS -400S

There is no doubt now. The US is a state-sponsor 𝙤𝙛_𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙚 and 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙢.

Who sponsors Israel? USA, UK, Germany . . . Shameful.

[Ren Christakos Haritopoulos]

Since experiment agrees with special relativity, it's obvious that
Richard Hachel is wrong.

Your remark is biased.

Only toward the facts and what the facts mean.

I'll let you think about why.

Because I want reality.

and listen up, when an warning of terrorism 𝙞𝙨_𝙩𝙤𝙤_𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡, that's an
𝙖𝙙𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙤𝙛_𝙜𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙩.

𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮_𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀_𝗼𝗻_𝘁𝗶𝗽-𝗼𝗳𝗳_𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺_𝗨𝗦_𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁_𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸
Moscow was warned about possibility of such an event but data was too
general, Foreign Intelligence chief Sergey Naryshkin said
https://www.%72t.com/russia/595284-us-information-moscow-attack-naryshkin/

Imagine America behind the scenes in bed with these terrorists weaponizing
them against Russia and sitting upon all of the specifics yet sharing
unhelpful general info with Moscow - look at all the shame beaming through
America eyes

Intelligence services of the USA did not share all information with Russia
because the terrorist attack would have failed. And sharing all
informations would mean accepting the responsibility.

This was not a warning 𝙗𝙪𝙩_𝙖_𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩_𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙐𝙎. Giving any details would have
given Russia the means to prepare for it.

The US warns about themselves. It would’ve been strange for it to contain
the information on what the US had intended to do.

Tipoffs like that are only meant to mislead.

lol so the US and Ukraine are responsible even though they warned them?
This is by far the dumbest logic I've ever seen anyone try to use. Good
job.

The Afghanistan-based offshoot of the Islamic State terrorist group
belongs to US/UK/Mossad

[Sammie Pásztor Buzás]

Fact is that "starting set" ("ensemble de départ") and domain ("domaine
de definition") are, even today, not assumed to be identical in the
French educational system. You can whine as much as you want, it is a
fact.

Of course, the reason why you're confused about the properties of a
quite simple English word "function", and making idiotic statemennts
about it - may be caused by your French education, why not?
So, have you already learnt what a "function" is? Still confused about
the clause "for any element of the domain"? ("domain", not "starting
set", poor stinker).

so true indeed, my friend. Here you see the clear difference away from
capitalism, where communism is from the people to the people, and NOT to
some few motherfucker braindead autist capitalists (see bill gaytes)
wanting you dead with vaccines.

also, the Einstine wrong one more time, he hate the chinese, saying the eat
from the ground. lol

2024_𝗫𝗶𝗮𝗼𝗺𝗶_𝗦𝗨7_𝗠𝗮𝘅_𝗶𝗻-𝗱𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗵_𝗪𝗮𝗹𝗸𝗮𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱

these stinking capitalists bombed Yugoslavia and destroyed ukrane.