Archimedes Plutonium

2019-05-24 20:33:52 UTC

Autistic

Moroney says the reason Stanford's David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian cannot learn ellipse is never a conic nor real proton is 840MeV,not 938-- is autismStanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)

Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

CalTech math dept

Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari

Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris

Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan

Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,

Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,

Caltech Physics Dept

Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi

Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,

John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,

Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,

Konstantin Batygin

UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology)

UCLA Physics dept

Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis

Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma

Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty

W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker

Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini

George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer

Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko

Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski

Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini

Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick

David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner

Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept

HENRY D. I. ABARBANEL, KAM S. ARNOLD, DANIEL P. AROVAS, RICHARD D. AVERITT, JULIO T. BARREIRO, DIMITRI N. BASOV, STEVEN BOGGS, JAMES G. BRANSON, ADAM J. BURGASSER, LEONID V. BUTOV, ALISON COIL,EVA-MARIA S. COLLINS, MAX (MASSIMILIANO) DI VENTRA,

PATRICK H. DIAMOND, FRED C. DRISCOLL, DANIEL H. DUBIN, OLGA K. DUDKO, RAPHAEL M. FLAUGER,MICHAEL M. FOGLER, ALEX FRAÑÓ, GEORGE M. FULLER,DANIEL R GREEN, KIM GRIEST, BENJAMIN GRINSTEIN,ALEXANDER GROISMAN, TARUN GROVER, JORGE E. HIRSCH, MICHAEL HOLST, TERENCE T. HWA, KENNETH A. INTRILIGATOR, ELIZABETH JENKINS, SUCKJOON JUN, BRIAN KEATING, DUSAN KERES, DAVID KLEINFELD

, QUINN M. KONOPACKY, ELENA F. KOSLOVER, JULIUS KUTI, TONGYAN LIN, ANEESH V. MANOHAR, M. BRIAN MAPLE, JOHN A. MCGREEVY, THOMAS W. MURPHY, KAIXUAN NI, MICHAEL L. NORMAN, THOMAS M. O'NEIL, HANS P. PAAR, MARK PADDOCK, JEREMIE PALACCI, TENIO POPMINTCHEV, WOUTER-JAN RAPPEL,KARIN M. SANDSTROM, IVAN K. SCHULLER, LU J. SHAM,VIVEK SHARMA, TATYANA O. SHARPEE, BRIAN SHOTWELL, OLEG SHPYRKO, ELIZABETH H SIMMONS,SUNIL K. SINHA, DOUGLAS E. SMITH, HARRY SUHL

Math dept Univ Calif, San Diego

Edward Bender, James Bunch, Thomas Enright, Ronald Evans, Jay Fillmore, Carl FitzGerald,

Michael Freedman, Adriano Garsia, Fan Graham, Leonard Haff, Hubert Halkin, Richard Hamilton, Bill Helton, Jim Lin, Alfred Manaster, John O'Quigley, Yose Rinott, Burt Rodin, Murray Rosenblatt, Linda Rothschild, Michael Sharpe, Lance Small, Don Smith, Harold Stark, Audrey Terras, Adrian Wadsworth, Nolan Wallach, John Wavrik, Daniel Wulbert

Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first e.e. in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.Question Caltech-- is the reason you keep teaching the ellipse is a conic even when AP proved it was the oval of a slant cut into the cone (see AP's proof below). Is the reason you keep teaching the ellipse is a conic because all the professors at Caltech have a "joke mind when it comes to science, a joke like Parry is just a joke in science and a failure in science".

..

.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..

, . `.' ' `.

.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;

. ; .' . `. ;

; . ' `. . '

. ' ` `. |

. '. '

. 0 0 ' `.

' `

; `

.' `

; U `

; '; `

: | ;.. :` `

: `;. ```. .-; | '

'. ` ``.., .' :' '

; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am James kibo Parry, for i know no science, no math, no physics but my game is to stalk and demonize other people on the internet, like AP for 27 years. I do this demonizing because it elicits some laughs from other low lifes like myself.

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '

` ` ; ; ' '

` ` ; ; ' '

` `. ````'''''' ' '

` . ' '

/ ` `. ' ' .

/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'

/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''

/ .'' ; ` .' `

...'.' ; .' ` .' `

"" .' .' | ` .; \ `

; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `

:' | ' ` , `. `

| ' ` ' `. `

` ' ` ; `. |

`.' ` ; `-'

`...'

/\-------/\

\::O:::O::/

(::_ ^ _::)

\_`-----'_/

You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in LA?

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.

True Chemistry Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Be the first to review this item

See all formats and editions

• Kindle

• $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $9.99 to buy

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of .5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is every where.

Cover picture: shows two of my chemical models, one of CO and the other CO2

Read less

Length: 1097 pages

Word Wise: Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Page Flip: Enabled

Matchbook Price: $2.99 What's this?

File Size: 1948 KB

Print Length: 1097 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLVMMSZ

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,150,073 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#960 in General Chemistry & Reference

#7113 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#7705 in General Chemistry

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Be the first to review this item

See all formats and editions

• Kindle

• $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB

Print Length: 21 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLSDQWC

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Not Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Proof (Kindle published proof)

Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by

Archimedes Plutonium

--------------------

AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works

Quoting AP's proof

ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::

E

__

.-' `-.

.' `.

/ \

; ;

| G c | H

; ;

\ /

`. .'

`-. _____ .-'

F

Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E

In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.

The side view of a cylinder is this

| |

| |

| |

That allows cE to be the same distance as cF

But the side view of the cone is

/\E

/c \

F / \

The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Be the first to review this item

See all formats and editions

• Kindle

• $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $5.00 to buy

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.

Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.

Length: 29 pages

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Page Flip: Enabled

File Size: 1224 KB

Print Length: 29 pages

Publication Date: March 14, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PQTNHMY

Text-to-Speech: Enabled ￼

X-Ray: Not Enabled ￼

Word Wise: Not Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Screen Reader: Supported ￼

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled ￼

Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.

__

.-' `-.

.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.

/ ::\::|::/:: \ inside the atom is rings of Faraday Law coil and bar magnet

;.......... _ _ ............ ;

|.......... ( ).............|

; - - ;

\ ::/::|::\:: / neutrons form a atom-skin cover over the torus rings

`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'

`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And

each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and

certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought, and perhaps it is a void altogether

because in New Physics the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium