Discussion:
Oil and Gas Companies Now Say Climate Change Will Hurt
(too old to reply)
kensi
2018-03-06 12:20:03 UTC
Permalink
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
less than certain future where climate change makes them less dominant:

http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Sergio
2018-03-06 13:35:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
benj
2018-03-06 17:43:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.

Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the ground
are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can somehow be
made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense government policy. And
nobody is more aware of the true limitations of those wind and solar
fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas outfits. The only true
viable intermediate energy source for civilization is nukes but lib
"idea men" are dead set against anything that might work.

There is an impending horrible disaster for civilization alright, and
that disaster will be that people get stupid enough to actually try the
idiot ideas that the lib greens are selling. The fact that they will win
the Darwin prize and come down with us will be of little comfort. Notice
how many children were murdered as a result of the lib "gun free zone"
signs that created "sanctuaries" for mass killers.
Nadegda
2018-03-06 20:11:26 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the ground
are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can somehow be
made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense government policy. And
nobody is more aware of the true limitations of those wind and solar
fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas outfits. The only true
viable intermediate energy source for civilization is nukes but lib
"idea men" are dead set against anything that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to shut
down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Sergio
2018-03-06 22:45:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the ground
are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can somehow be
made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense government policy. And
nobody is more aware of the true limitations of those wind and solar
fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas outfits. The only true
viable intermediate energy source for civilization is nukes but lib
"idea men" are dead set against anything that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to shut
down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
that is lie, got url ?

natural gas is undercutting all three, solar only has 30 year lifetime
at high cost, Nuk have no CO2, and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Nadegda
2018-03-07 02:54:53 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with
a less than certain future where climate change makes them less
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater,
Oil and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary
suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the
ground are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can
somehow be made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense
government policy. And nobody is more aware of the true limitations of
those wind and solar fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas
outfits. The only true viable intermediate energy source for
civilization is nukes but lib "idea men" are dead set against anything
that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to
shut down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
that is lie,
Nope.
Post by Sergio
got url ?
Yep.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/climate/trump-coal-nuclear.html
Post by Sergio
solar only has 30 year lifetime
Coal plant average life is 40 years. Solar isn't much less ... and is
improving. And doesn't need fuel.

https://qz.com/61423/coal-fired-power-plants-near-retirement/
Post by Sergio
at high cost,
High but decreasing ... and an apples to apples comparison would be a
megawatt PV plant, versus a megawatt coal plant *and all of the coal it
would consume in 30 years of operation*.

Or you can just look at the wholesale electricity prices. Solar, wind, and
coal are all at about parity, and the trend is that coal is going up while
solar and wind decrease.
Post by Sergio
Nuk have no CO2,
Obviously you've never seen a uranium mine in operation.
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Sergio
2018-03-07 05:24:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with
a less than certain future where climate change makes them less
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater,
Oil and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary
suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the
ground are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can
somehow be made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense
government policy. And nobody is more aware of the true limitations of
those wind and solar fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas
outfits. The only true viable intermediate energy source for
civilization is nukes but lib "idea men" are dead set against anything
that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to
shut down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
that is lie,
Nope.
Post by Sergio
got url ?
Yep.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/climate/trump-coal-nuclear.html
Post by Sergio
solar only has 30 year lifetime
Coal plant average life is 40 years. Solar isn't much less ... and is
improving. And doesn't need fuel.
Wrong again.
can't improve solar, sunlight degrades Si, and seals give out, moisture
intrusing and UV death.
coal plants rebuild sections part of maintance
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
at high cost,
High but decreasing ... and an apples to apples comparison would be a
megawatt PV plant, versus a megawatt coal plant *and all of the coal it
would consume in 30 years of operation*.
Or you can just look at the wholesale electricity prices. Solar, wind, and
coal are all at about parity, and the trend is that coal is going up while
solar and wind decrease.
more lies, solar and wind have Gov support $$, and demonstrated lifetime
of solar panels is 17 years, not 30.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
Nuk have no CO2,
Obviously you've never seen a uranium mine in operation.
obviously you have never seen the pollution generated makeing solar
panels, why China has advantage now, hazerdous material waste from solar
panels, what chemicals are used on Si ?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
more lies, show your cost benifit analysis over project lifetime, or
find a url, and c+p it
kensi
2018-03-07 14:53:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
more lies, show your cost benifit analysis over project lifetime, or
find a url, and c+p it
*headdesk*

This STARTED with a NYT link about how coal generation is becoming
unprofitable due to renewables, *remember*?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
benj
2018-03-07 21:48:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
more lies, show your cost benifit analysis over project lifetime, or
find a url, and c+p it
*headdesk*
This STARTED with a NYT link about how coal generation is becoming
unprofitable due to renewables, *remember*?
Hey "professor"! NYT is not a scientific journal. Remember?
Sergio
2018-03-08 18:53:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
more lies, show your cost benifit analysis over project lifetime, or
find a url, and c+p it
*headdesk*
This STARTED with a NYT link about how coal generation is becoming
unprofitable due to renewables, *remember*?
Hey "professor"! NYT is not a scientific journal. Remember?
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables" is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that shows
real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy stuff ?

no.
Because it is not cost effective, and it is not going to improve much
either, solar has been around 40 years, wind for 40 also.
benj
2018-03-08 19:36:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
more lies, show your cost benifit analysis over project lifetime, or
find a url, and c+p it
*headdesk*
This STARTED with a NYT link about how coal generation is becoming
unprofitable due to renewables, *remember*?
Hey "professor"! NYT is not a scientific journal. Remember?
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables" is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that shows
real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy stuff ?
no.
Because it is not cost effective, and it is not going to improve much
either, solar has been around 40 years, wind for 40 also.
Hey Sergio, back in the old days (way longer than 40 years ago) wind
used to power the Netherlands! "kensi" is really into tulip speculation.
Of course in 2014 the total power from wind was 5.2% and this in a land
where there are constant sea breezes. And then the ignorant dingbats
like "kensi" and Nads pretend that somehow a propeller in my back yard
can power my house. Obviously they know nothing about science. Where
does "kensi" teach anyway? I think her school needs a letter or two
about her.
Sergio
2018-03-08 20:06:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
more lies, show your cost benifit analysis over project lifetime, or
find a url, and c+p it
*headdesk*
This STARTED with a NYT link about how coal generation is becoming
unprofitable due to renewables, *remember*?
Hey "professor"! NYT is not a scientific journal. Remember?
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that shows
real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy stuff ?
no.
  Because it is not cost effective, and it is not going to  improve much
either, solar has been around 40 years, wind for 40 also.
Hey Sergio, back in the old days (way longer than 40 years ago) wind
used to power the Netherlands! "kensi" is really into tulip speculation.
Of course in 2014 the total power from wind was 5.2% and this in a land
where there are constant sea breezes. And then the ignorant dingbats
like "kensi" and Nads pretend that somehow a propeller in my back yard
can power my house. Obviously they know nothing about science. Where
does "kensi" teach anyway? I think her school needs a letter or two
about her.
she be a good copy an paste'er for comic books too, put horse glue on
the back and put it on telephone poles around in the black hood, with a
white hood on, .... thar ya go... a new profession!


[she should lookup Southpoint Hawaii wind farm, went bankrupt 2 or 3
times...]
kensi
2018-03-09 15:23:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables" is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that shows
real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money

http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations

Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
benj
2018-03-09 21:52:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that shows
real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations
Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
Stock market isn't "data" you moron. it's reflects economics which
includes all the hype from you crooks and the government subsidies.

You pretend that people think coal is wonderful. It's not. It's messy
and dirty and needs work. However there is a lot more of it than gas and
oil. So when they run out, and your "renewable" wet dreams end up a
massive fail like all Lib brainstorms, coal is still there for 300 more
years of civilization. So unless you are the genius you say your are and
can come up with that "free energy" machine, or nuclear fusion, coal is
all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the head
with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.

snicker (#4)
Nadegda
2018-03-09 23:23:05 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that
shows real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy
stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-
of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money
Post by kensi
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-
soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations
Post by kensi
Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
benj
2018-03-09 23:34:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that
shows real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy
stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-
of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money
Post by kensi
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-
soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations
Post by kensi
Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
And the way you know what is going to happen in the cave is? Look in the
mirror and then reconsider the rape accusation! I hope the FBI looked up
your picture in their files before wasting time on your rape hopes.

Archie always reports my abuse to Google as well. But then he's insane
and thinks that because he posts through google everyone does. That is
about your level of digital understanding too, right?
Skeeter
2018-03-09 23:38:50 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:23:05 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that
shows real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy
stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-
of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money
Post by kensi
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-
soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations
Post by kensi
Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
Nobody was informed and no rape threat was made, isn't it time you
changed your oil? You're starting to sound cranky.
Checkmate
2018-03-10 05:32:31 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p7v50p$1gv$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that
shows real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy
stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-
of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money
Post by kensi
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-
soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations
Post by kensi
Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
benj
2018-03-10 07:53:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
"Coal generation is becoming unprofitable due to renewables"  is a lie,
NYT lie too, show me the cost analysis, got URL kensi pupa ? that
shows real cost anlysis and not just your glowball worming fluffy
stuff ?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/08/death-spiral-half-
of-europes-coal-plants-are-losing-money
Post by kensi
http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1549918/datang-
soars-news-sell-unprofitable-coal-operations
Post by kensi
Reportage based ultimately on stock market data and other ground truths
about what's actually happening. Even k0Oks like you cannot argue that
*stock market prices* are being ideologically spun to promote a carbon
tax ... surely?
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!

She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was massage
her feet! <sniff> <Sniff> Eeeew!

Chortle! (#4)
kensi
2018-03-10 15:13:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!
She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was massage
her feet! <sniff> <Sniff>  Eeeew!
Surrrrre it was.

I concur with Nadegda. A rape threat was definitely implied (and
assault-and-battery threat made explicit).
Post by benj
Chortle! (#4)
There's a good k0ok, keep melting for your mistresses.
*pats benj on the head*
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-10 15:27:12 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:13:16 -0500, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!
She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was massage
her feet! <sniff> <Sniff>  Eeeew!
Surrrrre it was.
I concur with Nadegda. A rape threat was definitely implied (and
assault-and-battery threat made explicit).
You would, yer a lib, look for the worst in everything.
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Chortle! (#4)
There's a good k0ok, keep melting for your mistresses.
*pats benj on the head*
Typical response when someone slaps you down, "yer frothing and
melting down"
Checkmate
2018-03-10 18:41:28 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p80smi$bdk$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!
She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was massage
her feet! <sniff> <Sniff>  Eeeew!
Surrrrre it was.
I concur with Nadegda. A rape threat was definitely implied (and
assault-and-battery threat made explicit).
Post by benj
Chortle! (#4)
There's a good k0ok, keep melting for your mistresses.
*pats benj on the head*
A rape threat may have been inferred by you and your rabidly feminist
"Life Partner," but it was by no means expressed. Your misandrist slip
is obviously showing... again.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
benj
2018-03-10 19:07:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!
She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was massage
her feet! <sniff> <Sniff>  Eeeew!
Surrrrre it was.
I concur with Nadegda. A rape threat was definitely implied (and
assault-and-battery threat made explicit).
Post by benj
Chortle! (#4)
There's a good k0ok, keep melting for your mistresses.
*pats benj on the head*
A rape threat may have been inferred by you and your rabidly feminist
"Life Partner," but it was by no means expressed. Your misandrist slip
is obviously showing... again.
Tell her that her men's clothes look really good on her and she'll purr!

<snort>
Nadegda
2018-03-10 23:32:33 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
benj
2018-03-11 00:59:07 UTC
Permalink
Time to make Nads dance again!
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
No problem. I'll give you the address of a good hospital that can turn
your tongue into a dick. Tell them you want it sized perfect for
"kensi's" cock-holster mouth! BWAHAHAhahahaha! God I'm so funmy when I
pretend to be liberal!
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-15 15:34:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
LOL! That's tantamount to saying you have penis envy.

Sadly, being possessed of a vagina instead of a penis,
guarantees you will NEVER be fully equal. You are
missing a prominent body part.

Not to mention, being possessed of a smaller brain
that is also wired less efficiently guarantees that you
will never be the equal of a man.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
kensi
2018-03-15 15:43:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Sadly, being possessed of a vagina instead of a penis,
guarantees you will NEVER be fully equal. You are
missing a prominent body part.
Says a dude who is missing a uterus, ovaries, breasts, a vagina,
Fallopian tubes, and several other parts.
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Not to mention, being possessed of a smaller brain
that is also wired less efficiently guarantees that you
will never be the equal of a man.
Eh wut? Proof, ko0ky? At least her brain (and mine) is not addled by
testosterone poisoning...
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Nadegda
2018-03-10 23:31:33 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Sergio
2018-03-13 20:35:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
people pay for brains, if you a half wit, you get 1/2 pay at best.
Nadegda
2018-03-10 23:33:03 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
benj
2018-03-11 01:02:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
We heard you the first three times, you moron!

Please tell me more about what it is like to be born without a brain. Is
it a lot like always being on drugs?

Rule 4.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-11 19:17:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
We heard you the first three times, you moron!
LOL, Nads is melting down big time! She's apparently
set her froth nozzle on 4X. LOL
Post by benj
Please tell me more about what it is like to be born without a brain. Is
it a lot like always being on drugs?
Rule 4.
Don't you pity the poor girl? I know I do. It is
clear to me that at one time she was quite intelligent
but,since her leftist indoctrination/brainwashing has
become fully implemented, Nads has become more
and more incoherent, disheveled, and discombobulated.

Now, it would appear Nads has reached the automaton
stage.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
Checkmate
2018-03-11 19:45:26 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by benj
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
We heard you the first three times, you moron!
LOL, Nads is melting down big time! She's apparently
set her froth nozzle on 4X. LOL
Post by benj
Please tell me more about what it is like to be born without a brain. Is
it a lot like always being on drugs?
Rule 4.
Don't you pity the poor girl? I know I do. It is
clear to me that at one time she was quite intelligent
but,since her leftist indoctrination/brainwashing has
become fully implemented, Nads has become more
and more incoherent, disheveled, and discombobulated.
Now, it would appear Nads has reached the automaton
stage.
It may be at least partially my fault. I foiled her plan to take over
AUK, and then destroyed AUK. Now she's set her sights on conquering
the entire country.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Checkmate
2018-03-11 07:34:05 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p81pvf$4he$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
Do you realize you posted this same reply FOUR times, Ko0k? Get a
fucking grip, or we may have to build a containment vessel around you!
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-11 19:17:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
Do you realize you posted this same reply FOUR times, Ko0k? Get a
fucking grip, or we may have to build a containment vessel around you!
SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
Nadegda
2018-03-10 23:32:03 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Checkmate
2018-03-11 07:30:45 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p81ptj$4h9$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something. What about men's equality? Do you think we
never get treated unfairly? Females think they can physically assault
a man, and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to
their advantage every day? We're expected to open doors for you
because you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a
door for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing
by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.

Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men. In turn, men are
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that. You
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them. Nature gave women
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2018-03-11 17:23:26 UTC
Permalink
On 3/11/2018 3:31 AM, Checkmate ranted:
R> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
R> Checkmate! In article <p81ptj$4h9$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
R> @gmail.invalid says...
R>
R>
R>>
R>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
R>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 10:41:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
R>>
R>>> rabidly feminist
R>>
R>> We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
R>
R> You already have full equality,

Wrong:

https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/

R> but it's your nature to spend your entire life whining that you don't.
R> Feminists always think they have to "prove" something. What about
R> men's equality? Do you think we never get treated unfairly? Females
R> think they can physically assault a man, and they'll be protected
R> against him defending himself because they're "the weaker sex". You
R> don't think a lot of females use that to their advantage every day?
R> We're expected to open doors for you because you're females, and
R> presumably either can't manage to open a door for yourselves, or think
R> you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue of your sex. Even
R> then, some of you get offended if a man does open a door for you, when
R> it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.

Wow, one line from Nadegda prompted quite the rantfest from you!

R> Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
R> women,

Wrong again:

https://www.indy100.com/article/women-higher-sex-drive-men-study-research-7900696

R> so women use that as a way to manipulate men. In turn, men are
R> physically stronger,

And surprise surprise, wrong again:

https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576

"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."

Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)

R> and sometimes they take advantage of that. You want to talk about
R> "equality"? Tall people generally make more money than shorter
R> people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many other
R> roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
R> "equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
R> certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
R> takes advantage of the skill set available to them. Nature gave women
R> some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
R> we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
R> make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
R> luck with that...

Nature didn't give us any of the disadvantages in that list. Here, I'll
quote the link again since I bet you didn't click on it the first time:

https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
J***@.
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Permalink
From: EveryDayFeminism.COM/2016/02/160-eXamples-Of-Male-Privilege/
1. Males dominate conversations without being judged.
These men are judged by you ("kensi") and me.
Male or Female, drugs ( caffeine, cocaine, meth, adderall, testosterone )
make us obnoxious and arrogant ( "Bow Down before me, you worm", style ).
166. Sacred and religious figures and deities like the Christian God
are usually portrayed as males.
"Do you believe in God" is a euphemism for "Do you believe in me".
"God is Great" is a euphemism for "I am Great".
"God hates fags" is a euphemism for "I hate fags".

God is obnoxious and arrogant ( "Bow Down before me, you worm", style ).
167. You can practice a religion that centers around your gender
without facing harassment and backlash. For instance, women-centered sects
of Paganism and Wicca sometimes have to deal with misogyny.
No, there is a backlash, as you demonstrate here and now.
It's wrong, don't do it, don't drink the "caffeine/testosterone".
Checkmate
2018-03-11 18:39:43 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p83omf$17ac$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
I'll just pick one of your arguments, because I haven't got all fucking
day...
R> ...men are physically stronger,
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576
"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."
Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)
If you compare the average musculature of men versus women, men have
larger muscles, particularly in their upper body. Plus, men are
typically larger than women, so the strength-to-weight argument is
irrelevant and doesn't negate my statement that men are generally
physically stronger than women. Also, women on average have a higher
percentage of body fat... and getting more so by the day, I might add.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
mixed nuts
2018-03-11 19:05:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
I'll just pick one of your arguments, because I haven't got all fucking
day...
R> ...men are physically stronger,
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576
"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."
Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)
If you compare the average musculature of men versus women, men have
larger muscles, particularly in their upper body. Plus, men are
typically larger than women, so the strength-to-weight argument is
irrelevant and doesn't negate my statement that men are generally
physically stronger than women. Also, women on average have a higher
percentage of body fat... and getting more so by the day, I might add.
Except for some women who are in pretty good shape from getting exercise
like from running and swimming and karate chopping and fixing truck
motors and the like. And being strong like a moose.
--
Grizzly H.
Janithor
2018-03-11 19:36:03 UTC
Permalink
x-no-archive: yes

x-no-archive: yes
Post by mixed nuts
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
I'll just pick one of your arguments, because I haven't got all fucking
day...
R> ...men are physically stronger,
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576
"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."
Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)
If you compare the average musculature of men versus women, men have
larger muscles, particularly in their upper body.  Plus, men are
typically larger than women, so the strength-to-weight argument is
irrelevant and doesn't negate my statement that men are generally
physically stronger than women.  Also, women on average have a higher
percentage of body fat... and getting more so by the day, I might add.
Except for some women who are in pretty good shape from getting exercise
like from running and swimming and karate chopping and fixing truck
motors and the like.  And being strong like a moose.
Yes, women are a protected (very special) class of people. All women
are the same, because they have vaginas. Except for trans women, but
they're very very special too, unless they vote Republican.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-11 20:29:02 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 15:05:11 -0400, mixed nuts <***@undulatus.budgie> wrote:

<...>
Post by mixed nuts
Except for some women who are in pretty good shape from getting exercise
like from running and swimming and karate chopping and fixing truck
motors and the like. And being strong like a moose.
And, looking like a moose. (Pandora)
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
Nadegda
2018-03-11 19:13:37 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
I'll just pick one of your arguments, because I haven't got all fucking
day...
R> ...men are physically stronger,
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576
"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."
Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)
If you compare the average musculature of men versus women, men have
larger muscles, particularly in their upper body. Plus, men are
typically larger than women, so the strength-to-weight argument is
irrelevant and doesn't negate my statement that men are generally
physically stronger than women. Also, women on average have a higher
percentage of body fat... and getting more so by the day, I might add.
Effects of socialization. Men are expected to do much of the heavy
lifting. As kensi's link points out, though, when women lift weights, they
get comparably strong to men who do likewise.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Skeeter
2018-03-11 21:30:37 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:13:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
I'll just pick one of your arguments, because I haven't got all fucking
day...
R> ...men are physically stronger,
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576
"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."
Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)
If you compare the average musculature of men versus women, men have
larger muscles, particularly in their upper body. Plus, men are
typically larger than women, so the strength-to-weight argument is
irrelevant and doesn't negate my statement that men are generally
physically stronger than women. Also, women on average have a higher
percentage of body fat... and getting more so by the day, I might add.
Effects of socialization. Men are expected to do much of the heavy
lifting. As kensi's link points out, though, when women lift weights, they
get comparably strong to men who do likewise.
What the hell did you just say?
Skeeter
2018-03-11 18:57:57 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 13:23:26 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
R> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
R>
R>
R>>
R>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
R>>
R>>> rabidly feminist
R>>
R>> We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
R>
R> You already have full equality,
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
R> but it's your nature to spend your entire life whining that you don't.
R> Feminists always think they have to "prove" something. What about
R> men's equality? Do you think we never get treated unfairly? Females
R> think they can physically assault a man, and they'll be protected
R> against him defending himself because they're "the weaker sex". You
R> don't think a lot of females use that to their advantage every day?
R> We're expected to open doors for you because you're females, and
R> presumably either can't manage to open a door for yourselves, or think
R> you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue of your sex. Even
R> then, some of you get offended if a man does open a door for you, when
R> it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Wow, one line from Nadegda prompted quite the rantfest from you!
R> Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
R> women,
https://www.indy100.com/article/women-higher-sex-drive-men-study-research-7900696
R> so women use that as a way to manipulate men. In turn, men are
R> physically stronger,
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=68576
"Surprisingly, the Strength-to-Weight ratio for both men & women is
actually rather close. Top end powerlifters have a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1
ratio, generally, across the genders."
Not so surprisingly when you note that mammalian skeletal muscle is
mammalian skeletal muscle is mammalian skeletal muscle. :)
R> and sometimes they take advantage of that. You want to talk about
R> "equality"? Tall people generally make more money than shorter
R> people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many other
R> roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
R> "equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
R> certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
R> takes advantage of the skill set available to them. Nature gave women
R> some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
R> we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
R> make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
R> luck with that...
Nature didn't give us any of the disadvantages in that list. Here, I'll
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
Wow! One little response and we get a rantfest from you.
pandora
2018-03-12 21:16:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have to
"prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It just
IS.

What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.

Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because they're
"the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to their
advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.

We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue
of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man does open a
door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.

In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.

You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.

Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and we
either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
Skeeter
2018-03-12 21:37:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by pandora
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Nice, I did once watch a lady jump a guys ass over offering to help
her with her grocery's. "What! You don't think I can do it because I'm
a woman?"

I hope she dropped all the glass jars and eggs on her way out.
benj
2018-03-12 22:04:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Nice, I did once watch a lady jump a guys ass over offering to help
her with her grocery's. "What! You don't think I can do it because I'm
a woman?"
I hope she dropped all the glass jars and eggs on her way out.
Nads demands TOTAL equality with men! Fine. Here take this rifle and go
kill those guys for me! Oh wait, libs never do their own killing.

chortle #4
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-13 18:07:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Nice, I did once watch a lady jump a guys ass over offering to help
her with her grocery's. "What! You don't think I can do it because I'm
a woman?"
I hope she dropped all the glass jars and eggs on her way out.
Nads demands TOTAL equality with men! Fine. Here take this rifle and go
kill those guys for me! Oh wait, libs never do their own killing.
chortle #4
It is totally illogical this idea that women can ever be
equal to men. As long as women in the workplace get
pregnant and demand paid leave they will be a less
viable option than a man who works full-time.

As long as women continue to have periods and continue
to take more sick leave because of it, women will never
be the equal of a man in the workplace, which man is
never taking sick leave because of a freaking hormone
imbalance.

Women cannot be equal in the workplace simply because
women are INFERIOR in the workplace by virtue of their
greater absenteeism.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
benj
2018-03-14 03:01:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by benj
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Nice, I did once watch a lady jump a guys ass over offering to help
her with her grocery's. "What! You don't think I can do it because I'm
a woman?"
I hope she dropped all the glass jars and eggs on her way out.
Nads demands TOTAL equality with men! Fine. Here take this rifle and go
kill those guys for me! Oh wait, libs never do their own killing.
chortle #4
It is totally illogical this idea that women can ever be
equal to men. As long as women in the workplace get
pregnant and demand paid leave they will be a less
viable option than a man who works full-time.
As long as women continue to have periods and continue
to take more sick leave because of it, women will never
be the equal of a man in the workplace, which man is
never taking sick leave because of a freaking hormone
imbalance.
Women cannot be equal in the workplace simply because
women are INFERIOR in the workplace by virtue of their
greater absenteeism.
Not to mention their highly emotional nature that prevents them from
making the kind and quality of decisions it takes to run a company and
become a fat cat. That's why they hate all fat cats. Just read the posts
of "kensi"-Nads here and all you find is fantasy and emotional
name-calling like a 6th grade recess, and yet they want to be paid like
some CEO of Apple? Bwahahahahaha!
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-15 15:34:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by benj
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Nice, I did once watch a lady jump a guys ass over offering to help
her with her grocery's. "What! You don't think I can do it because I'm
a woman?"
I hope she dropped all the glass jars and eggs on her way out.
Nads demands TOTAL equality with men! Fine. Here take this rifle and go
kill those guys for me! Oh wait, libs never do their own killing.
chortle #4
It is totally illogical this idea that women can ever be
equal to men. As long as women in the workplace get
pregnant and demand paid leave they will be a less
viable option than a man who works full-time.
As long as women continue to have periods and continue
to take more sick leave because of it, women will never
be the equal of a man in the workplace, which man is
never taking sick leave because of a freaking hormone
imbalance.
Women cannot be equal in the workplace simply because
women are INFERIOR in the workplace by virtue of their
greater absenteeism.
Not to mention their highly emotional nature that prevents them from
making the kind and quality of decisions it takes to run a company and
become a fat cat. That's why they hate all fat cats. Just read the posts
of "kensi"-Nads here and all you find is fantasy and emotional
name-calling like a 6th grade recess, and yet they want to be paid like
some CEO of Apple? Bwahahahahaha!
They are fond of shrieking, "Equal pay for equal work!"
The trouble is they are not capable of the equal work
part so the equal pay part is a non sequitur.

It's a proven fact that women in the workplace have a
higher absenteeism rate. Let's say, for the sake of
argument, that the average woman, due to her hormone
imbalance, generally weaker physiology, child-rearing
obligations, incapacity during late pregnancy, etc. puts
in 32 hours a week on average while the superior male
worker puts in an average of 38 hours per week.

32 ÷ 38 = 80.5 or 81%. That means a woman in the
workplace is approximately 20% less efficient than a
man so equal pay for equal work would yield for the
woman a paycheck only 81% of a man's paycheck.

Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think
equal pay for equal work means a man must subsidize
their poor performance in order to make things *fair*.

Feminism on steroids!
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
kensi
2018-03-15 15:46:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think
equal pay for equal work means a man must subsidize
their poor performance in order to make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?

Not to mention, women doing most of the parenting-leave is cultural, not
biological. Fathers can also take parental leave ... if society and
labor laws support their doing so. Which they do in places like the
Nordic countries that take achieving equality seriously.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-15 15:51:40 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:46:34 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think
equal pay for equal work means a man must subsidize
their poor performance in order to make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?
Poof kOokie?
Post by kensi
Not to mention, women doing most of the parenting-leave is cultural, not
biological. Fathers can also take parental leave ... if society and
labor laws support their doing so. Which they do in places like the
Nordic countries that take achieving equality seriously.
kensi
2018-03-15 15:55:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:46:34 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think
equal pay for equal work means a man must subsidize
their poor performance in order to make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?
Poof kOokie?
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/03/gender-pay-gap-facts/

"In 2015, women earned 83% of what men earned, according to a Pew
Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and
part-time U.S. workers."

This is per hour of work. So differences in hours worked are not the cause.

Another SPNAK! on one-pack.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Skeeter
2018-03-15 16:00:17 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:55:17 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:46:34 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think
equal pay for equal work means a man must subsidize
their poor performance in order to make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?
Poof kOokie?
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/03/gender-pay-gap-facts/
"In 2015, women earned 83% of what men earned, according to a Pew
Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and
part-time U.S. workers."
This is per hour of work. So differences in hours worked are not the cause.
Another SPNAK! on one-pack.
How old is that research?
Nadegda
2018-03-15 19:09:07 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:55:17 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:46:34 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think equal pay for equal
work means a man must subsidize their poor performance in order to
make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?
Poof kOokie?
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/03/gender-pay-gap-facts/
"In 2015, women earned 83% of what men earned, according to a Pew
Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and
part-time U.S. workers."
This is per hour of work. So differences in hours worked are not the cause.
Another SPNAK! on one-pack.
"One-pack" ... <snicker>
Post by Skeeter
How old is that research?
Read for comprehension.

I'm sure the wage gap hasn't narrowed very much in just three years, kooky.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Skeeter
2018-03-15 19:35:01 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:09:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:55:17 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:46:34 -0400, kensi
Post by kensi
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think equal pay for equal
work means a man must subsidize their poor performance in order to
make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?
Poof kOokie?
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/03/gender-pay-gap-facts/
"In 2015, women earned 83% of what men earned, according to a Pew
Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and
part-time U.S. workers."
This is per hour of work. So differences in hours worked are not the cause.
Another SPNAK! on one-pack.
"One-pack" ... <snicker>
Slurpage noted.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Skeeter
How old is that research?
Read for comprehension.
I'm sure the wage gap hasn't narrowed very much in just three years, kooky.
15 bucks an hour to flip a burger? I would say it's changed a bit.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-15 20:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Skeeter
Post by kensi
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Instead, these arrogant and clueless women think
equal pay for equal work means a man must subsidize
their poor performance in order to make things *fair*.
Fe<SMACKAK00K!>
Women make less even when paid *by the hour*. How do you explain *that*,
d00fus?
Poof kOokie?
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/03/gender-pay-gap-facts/
"In 2015, women earned 83% of what men earned, according to a Pew
Research Center analysis of median hourly earnings of both full- and
part-time U.S. workers."
This is per hour of work. So differences in hours worked are not the cause.
You, imbecile, you. Per hour worked doesn't
mean being paid by the hour. It also includes
salaried workers who theoretically earn the same
amount for the same position. But, few companies
offer PAID maternity leave so, of course, the
greater absenteeism women have is reflected as
lower hourly wage. (based upon a 40-hr work week).
You stupid liberal drone!
Post by kensi
Another SPNAK! on one-pack.
No, the SPNAK's on YOU!
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
Checkmate
2018-03-12 23:58:01 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have to
"prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It just
IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because they're
"the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to their
advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue
of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man does open a
door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and we
either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2018-03-13 00:06:27 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that
to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by
virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave
us certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this
planet takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or
we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing.
Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Skeeter
2018-03-13 00:16:37 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:06:27 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that
to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by
virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave
us certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this
planet takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or
we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing.
Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
No you didn't.
Checkmate
2018-03-13 00:42:12 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p874m2$udb$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that
to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by
virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave
us certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this
planet takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or
we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing.
Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2018-03-13 03:07:50 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they
have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door
for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing
by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a
man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one
way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors
and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the skill
set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life,
and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem
to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss
to understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
Then you have no excuse for your ignorance.

Here, go educate yourself:

https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/

But be warned. I won't post this link a fourth time. This is your last
chance.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Scout
2018-03-13 03:48:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they
have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door
for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing
by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a
man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one
way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors
and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the skill
set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life,
and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem
to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss
to understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
Then you have no excuse for your ignorance.
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
But be warned. I won't post this link a fourth time. This is your last
chance.
1) No longer true.
2) More of a fault of the woman by allowing herself to be interrupted by
anyone.
3) I never assume anyone knows what they are talking about until they show
they do.
4) Historic, no longer relevant.
5) You've clearly never heard men being grilled for their word choices and
manner of speaking.
6) No longer true.
7) Men are expected to give way to women. (so counter to what you're trying
to show)
8) Women can take up whatever space they like, Social norms are only
relevant to those who chose to live their lives by them.
9)Women dominate even when in the minority (again counter to what you're
trying to show)
10) Hardly universal as I've heard men being complained at for not smiling
11) Never heard of a women being called out for not shaving her legs when
traveling.
12) Buy clothes with whatever sort of pockets you want, but don't complain
if you chose the decorative pocket because you would rather have slimming
rather than functional.
13) You have to be willing to bargain if you let yourself settle for a
higher price that is your fault, not that of your gender.
14) Never knew a 'nerd community' yet that would turn down a women member
because of her gender.
15) When you stop giving birth then you might have a point.
16) Clearly you've never heard a mother in law pestering her son in law for
grandchildren.
17) Not if you simply advance your choices. If you make your choices about
gaining attention then you will be considered an attention seeker whatever
your gender.
18) No instead they complain you're trying to impress the women. That SO
much different.

First Section completed.

No clear Male Privilege and those that exist do so largely because of the
way they are worded and likewise any Female privilege is ignored.

Such as
Men are expected to open doors for women.
Men are expected to allow women to be seated even if that means the man has
to stand
Men are expected to stay behind and risk death so that women can escape the
danger first.
Women aren't expected to pay for everything on a first date.
Women aren't expected to change a flat tire.
Men are expected to work through the pregnancy of their child.
Men aren't expected to take a lot of time off from work after the birth of
their child.

Shall I go on?

For if you are to suggest that all "male privileges" are to be eliminated,
then we must also eliminate all "female privileges" and somehow I bet women
would not be in favor of the later.

Let's just accept that men and women are different and as such their
'privileges' are going to different.
I will simply note that YOU decide in manner in which you will be treated.
Social norms only apply if you allow them to apply.
That said, courtesy, respect and helping others should always be an
acceptable social norm, even if you might see it as a 'privilege' of one
gender or the other.
So if offered such, accept it in the manner offered, just as you might
except people to be grateful to you for your courtesy, respect and
willingness to help them.
Nadegda
2018-03-13 04:14:39 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
posts by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend
your entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think
they have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*.
It just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a
door for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic
ass-kissing by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get
offended if a man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be
a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive
than women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news
anchors and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental
differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the
skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's
life, and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you
seem to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss
to understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
Then you have no excuse for your ignorance.
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
But be warned. I won't post this link a fourth time. This is your last
chance.
1) No longer true.
Balderdash.
Post by Scout
2) More of a fault of the woman by allowing herself to be interrupted by
anyone.
BS.
Post by Scout
3) I never assume anyone knows what they are talking about until they
show they do.
Well that's just you then.
Post by Scout
4) Historic, no longer relevant.
Nonsense.
Post by Scout
5) You've clearly never heard men being grilled for their word choices
and manner of speaking.
Because it doesn't happen.
Post by Scout
6) No longer true.
Poppycock.
Post by Scout
7) Men are expected to give way to women. (so counter to what you're
trying to show)
Folderol.
Post by Scout
8) Women can take up whatever space they like,
Hogwash.
Post by Scout
Social norms are only relevant to those who chose to live their lives by
them.
Ah, so you are a sociopath. That explains much about your previous behavior
here.
Post by Scout
9)Women dominate even when in the minority (again counter to what you're
trying to show)
Claptrap.
Post by Scout
10) Hardly universal as I've heard men being complained at for not smiling
No one else has.
Post by Scout
11) Never heard of a women being called out for not shaving her
legs when traveling.
So? Your experience is hardly probative about womens' experiences,
mansplainer.
Post by Scout
12) Buy clothes with whatever sort of pockets you want, but don't
complain if you chose the decorative pocket because you would rather
have slimming rather than functional.
Did you even *read* that item?
Post by Scout
13) You have to be willing to bargain if you let yourself settle for a
higher price that is your fault, not that of your gender.
Twaddle.
Post by Scout
14) Never knew a 'nerd community' yet that would turn down a women
member because of her gender.
That isn't the point. It's how they're treated once there. And as a
programmer I have direct, personal experience of this.
Post by Scout
15) When you stop giving birth then you might have a point.
Drivel.
Post by Scout
16) Clearly you've never heard a mother in law pestering her son in law
for grandchildren.
Nope, I haven't.
Post by Scout
17) Not if you simply advance your choices. If you make your choices
about gaining attention then you will be considered an attention seeker
whatever your gender.
Bunkum.
Post by Scout
18) No instead they complain you're trying to impress the women. That SO
much different.
Codswallop.
Post by Scout
First Section completed.
Baloney. See above.
Post by Scout
No clear Male Privilege and those that exist do so largely because of
the way they are worded and likewise any Female privilege is ignored.
Horsefeathers!
Post by Scout
Such as Men are expected to open doors for women.
Men are expected to allow women to be seated even if that means the man
has to stand Men are expected to stay behind and risk death so that
women can escape the danger first.
Women aren't expected to pay for everything on a first date.
Women aren't expected to change a flat tire.
Men are expected to work through the pregnancy of their child.
Men aren't expected to take a lot of time off from work after the birth
of their child.
Shall I go on?
For if you are to suggest that all "male privileges" are to be
eliminated, then we must also eliminate all "female privileges" and
somehow I bet women would not be in favor of the later.
Actually, I, for one, would. Equality means equality.
Post by Scout
Let's just accept that men and women are different and as such their
'privileges' are going to different.
Let's not.
Post by Scout
I will simply note that YOU decide in manner in which you will be treated.
Horseshit. If that were true then by my decree we'd already have full
equality, no more street harassment, etc.
Post by Scout
Social norms only apply if you allow them to apply.
Careful, kooky, your sociopathy is showing again.
Post by Scout
That said, courtesy, respect and helping others should always be an
acceptable social norm, even if you might see it as a 'privilege' of one
gender or the other.
What would *you* know about any of those things?
Post by Scout
So if offered such, accept it in the manner offered, just as you might
except people to be grateful to you for your courtesy, respect and
willingness to help them.
And yet, when I just offered everyone some educational information about
male privilege, was it accepted?
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-13 04:20:01 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 04:14:39 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda
<***@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It just
IS. What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well. Females think they can
physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because they're
"the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to their
advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions. We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue
of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man does open a
door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior. In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't. You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly. Nature gave
women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and we
either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
But be warned. I won't post this link a fourth time. This is your last
chance.
1) No longer true.
Balderdash.
Post by Scout
2) More of a fault of the woman by allowing herself to be interrupted by
anyone.
BS.
Post by Scout
3) I never assume anyone knows what they are talking about until they
show they do.
Well that's just you then.
Post by Scout
4) Historic, no longer relevant.
Nonsense.
Post by Scout
5) You've clearly never heard men being grilled for their word choices
and manner of speaking.
Because it doesn't happen.
Post by Scout
6) No longer true.
Poppycock.
Post by Scout
7) Men are expected to give way to women. (so counter to what you're
trying to show)
Folderol.
Post by Scout
8) Women can take up whatever space they like,
Hogwash.
Post by Scout
Social norms are only relevant to those who chose to live their lives by
them.
Ah, so you are a sociopath. That explains much about your previous
behavior here.
Post by Scout
9)Women dominate even when in the minority (again counter to what you're
trying to show)
Claptrap.
Post by Scout
10) Hardly universal as I've heard men being complained at for not smiling
No one else has.
Post by Scout
11) Never heard of a women being called out for not shaving her legs
when traveling.
So? Your experience is hardly probative about womens' experiences,
mansplainer.
Post by Scout
12) Buy clothes with whatever sort of pockets you want, but don't
complain if you chose the decorative pocket because you would rather
have slimming rather than functional.
Did you even *read* that item?
Post by Scout
13) You have to be willing to bargain if you let yourself settle for a
higher price that is your fault, not that of your gender.
Twaddle.
Post by Scout
14) Never knew a 'nerd community' yet that would turn down a women
member because of her gender.
That isn't the point. It's how they're treated once there. And as a
programmer I have direct, personal experience of this.
Post by Scout
15) When you stop giving birth then you might have a point.
Drivel.
Post by Scout
16) Clearly you've never heard a mother in law pestering her son in law
for grandchildren.
Nope, I haven't.
Post by Scout
17) Not if you simply advance your choices. If you make your choices
about gaining attention then you will be considered an attention seeker
whatever your gender.
Bunkum.
Post by Scout
18) No instead they complain you're trying to impress the women. That SO
much different.
Codswallop.
Post by Scout
First Section completed.
Baloney. See above.
Post by Scout
No clear Male Privilege and those that exist do so largely because of
the way they are worded and likewise any Female privilege is ignored.
Horsefeathers!
Post by Scout
Such as Men are expected to open doors for women. Men are expected to
allow women to be seated even if that means the man has to stand Men
are expected to stay behind and risk death so that women can escape the
danger first. Women aren't expected to pay for everything on a first
date. Women aren't expected to change a flat tire. Men are expected to
work through the pregnancy of their child. Men aren't expected to take a
lot of time off from work after the birth of their child. Shall I go
on? For if you are to suggest that all "male privileges" are to be
eliminated, then we must also eliminate all "female privileges" and
somehow I bet women would not be in favor of the later.
Actually, I, for one, would. Equality means equality.
Post by Scout
Let's just accept that men and women are different and as such their
'privileges' are going to different.
Let's not.
Post by Scout
I will simply note that YOU decide in manner in which you will be treated.
Horseshit. If that were true then by my decree we'd already have full
equality, no more street harassment, etc.
Post by Scout
Social norms only apply if you allow them to apply.
Careful, kooky, your sociopathy is showing again.
Post by Scout
That said, courtesy, respect and helping others should always be an
acceptable social norm, even if you might see it as a 'privilege' of
one gender or the other.
What would *you* know about any of those things?
Post by Scout
So if offered such, accept it in the manner offered, just as you might
except people to be grateful to you for your courtesy, respect and
willingness to help them.
And yet, when I just offered everyone some educational information about
male privilege, was it accepted?
gerg uses a thesaurus abundantly as well.

it's not impressive.
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
http://youtu.be/iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Scout
2018-03-13 05:32:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
posts by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend
your entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think
they have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*.
It just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a
door for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic
ass-kissing by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get
offended if a man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be
a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive
than women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news
anchors and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental
differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the
skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's
life, and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you
seem to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss
to understand what all the bitching is about.
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
Then you have no excuse for your ignorance.
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
But be warned. I won't post this link a fourth time. This is your last
chance.
1) No longer true.
Balderdash.
Sorry, if the truth hurts.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
2) More of a fault of the woman by allowing herself to be interrupted by
anyone.
BS.
On the contrary, if you refuse to be interrupted then you soon won't be.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
3) I never assume anyone knows what they are talking about until they
show they do.
Well that's just you then.
No, actually it's most conservatives. Liberals on the other hand accept
anything said by those in authority regardless of gender. After all, look at
the lies Hillary told her supporters that they swallowed hook, line and
sinker.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
4) Historic, no longer relevant.
Nonsense.
Reality. Deal with it.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
5) You've clearly never heard men being grilled for their word choices
and manner of speaking.
Because it doesn't happen.
Certainly has, but since it doesn't fit your narrative....
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
6) No longer true.
Poppycock.
I love your stunning and well reasoned rebuttals.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
7) Men are expected to give way to women. (so counter to what you're
trying to show)
Folderol.
Reality
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
8) Women can take up whatever space they like,
Hogwash.
No, truth.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
Social norms are only relevant to those who chose to live their lives by
them.
Ah, so you are a sociopath. That explains much about your previous behavior
here.
No, I simply realize that social norms are social norms and not a set of
commandments.

Otherwise, you would still be wearing dresses down to the ground.

Oh, that's right, you don't want to discuss changing the social
norms.....EVEN THOUGH THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE ADVOCATING.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
9)Women dominate even when in the minority (again counter to what you're
trying to show)
Claptrap.
So you're denying your own source?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
10) Hardly universal as I've heard men being complained at for not smiling
No one else has.
So you're now denying the claims within your own source.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
11) Never heard of a women being called out for not shaving her
legs when traveling.
So? Your experience is hardly probative about womens' experiences,
mansplainer.
Excuse me, but what makes you think I'm a man?

What's the matter, afraid to think that a strong self assured woman wouldn't
call out your bullshit?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
12) Buy clothes with whatever sort of pockets you want, but don't
complain if you chose the decorative pocket because you would rather
have slimming rather than functional.
Did you even *read* that item?
Yes, and fashions are driven by what sells.

Thus they get more of what it is they buy.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
13) You have to be willing to bargain if you let yourself settle for a
higher price that is your fault, not that of your gender.
Twaddle.
Reality.

My mother could make a deal far better than anything my father could get.

You simply refuse to settle until you get the deal you want. If you do, then
the failing is your own.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
14) Never knew a 'nerd community' yet that would turn down a women
member because of her gender.
That isn't the point.
Oh, so what actually happens in reality isn't the point?
Post by Nadegda
It's how they're treated once there.
Oh, so now it's not about being able to be an insider, but rather how they
are treated once they are an insider.

Seems to me, how they are treated is up to how they chose to be treated.
Post by Nadegda
And as a
programmer I have direct, personal experience of this.
Maybe you need to be more assertive and refuse to allow yourself to be
defined by others.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
15) When you stop giving birth then you might have a point.
Drivel.
Biological reality.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
16) Clearly you've never heard a mother in law pestering her son in law
for grandchildren.
Nope, I haven't.
I have. Maybe you should get out more.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
17) Not if you simply advance your choices. If you make your choices
about gaining attention then you will be considered an attention seeker
whatever your gender.
Bunkum.
I really am seeing your rational rebuttals.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
18) No instead they complain you're trying to impress the women. That SO
much different.
Codswallop.
You really just can't stand anyone denying your little world of delusion and
fantasy can you?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
First Section completed.
Baloney. See above.
All sections responded to and addressed. Unlike your nonsensical one word
rebuttals.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
No clear Male Privilege and those that exist do so largely because of
the way they are worded and likewise any Female privilege is ignored.
Horsefeathers!
Ok, show me any example of female privilege given in the first section, or
anywhere within the list for that matter.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
Such as Men are expected to open doors for women.
Men are expected to allow women to be seated even if that means the man
has to stand Men are expected to stay behind and risk death so that
women can escape the danger first.
Women aren't expected to pay for everything on a first date.
Women aren't expected to change a flat tire.
Men are expected to work through the pregnancy of their child.
Men aren't expected to take a lot of time off from work after the birth
of their child.
Shall I go on?
<crickets>
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
For if you are to suggest that all "male privileges" are to be
eliminated, then we must also eliminate all "female privileges" and
somehow I bet women would not be in favor of the later.
Actually, I, for one, would. Equality means equality.
So you want to lower yourself down to the level of men?

Oh, and sorry, but equality doesn't mean being identical.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
Let's just accept that men and women are different and as such their
'privileges' are going to different.
Let's not.
Then you have a problem far bigger than anything I can solve or changing
social norms could do because you can't seem to accept that you're different
from a man despite the fact that you are.

So tell me, why do you want to be a man? If being a woman too much for you
to handle?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
I will simply note that YOU decide in manner in which you will be treated.
Horseshit. If that were true then by my decree we'd already have full
equality, no more street harassment, etc.
As I said you decide the manner in which you will be treated. First you have
to earn their respect. You can't demand respect, you have to earn it.
You seem to feel that the world exists to give you whatever you dream up to
want, and that's not the case. It never has been and never will be.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
Social norms only apply if you allow them to apply.
Careful, kooky, your sociopathy is showing again.
Then you should cease to try to change the social norms and accept the "male
privilege' you bring up.

Otherwise, you're wanting to change the social norms because you refuse to
allow them to apply.

Now, who's the sociopath?
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
That said, courtesy, respect and helping others should always be an
acceptable social norm, even if you might see it as a 'privilege' of one
gender or the other.
What would *you* know about any of those things?
Unlike you, I experience real life and accept reality for what it is, rather
than some fanciful delusion it can never be.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Scout
So if offered such, accept it in the manner offered, just as you might
except people to be grateful to you for your courtesy, respect and
willingness to help them.
And yet, when I just offered everyone some educational information about
male privilege, was it accepted?
Since most of it isn't male privilege you simply seem to look like a nag
looking for something to complain about.
Even to the point of denying your own gender, biology, and privileges.

Instead you seem to have this notion you want to be just like a man.

To me, that is the sign of a serious mental conflict and that you have lost
your own identity.
kensi
2018-03-13 15:41:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Scout
3) I never assume anyone knows what they are talking about until they
show they do.
Well that's just you then.
No, actually it's most conservatives. Liberals on the other hand accept
anything said by those in authority regardless of gender.
WHAT?!

Conservatives uncritically believe anything spouted by Fox and
Breitbart, while liberals are more skeptical.

http://www.newsweek.com/liberals-dont-share-believe-fake-news-much-right-wing-study-finds-800219

"Fake news published in the U.S. was overwhelmingly consumed and shared
by right-wing social media users, a new study from the University of
Oxford has revealed."

https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/11/23/503146770/npr-finds-the-head-of-a-covert-fake-news-operation-in-the-suburbs

"Coler says his writers have tried to write fake news for liberals — but
they just never take the bait."
Post by Scout
After all, look at the lies Hillary told her supporters that they
swallowed hook, line and sinker.
[citation needed]

She may be an imperialistic neoliberal, but she's no Repug.
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
It's how they're treated once there.
Oh, so now it's not about being able to be an insider, but rather how
they are treated once they are an insider.
And if they are treated AS AN OUTSIDER? (Academic girl here. Went into
physics. So I'd know.)
Post by Scout
female privilege
Anyone caught using that phrase to justify preserving the status quo, or
in any right-wing context, should have to sit in a corner and write out
that list of male privileges 100 times. :P
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
Actually, I, for one, would. Equality means equality.
So you want to lower yourself down to the level of men?
Being put on a pedestal sometimes is also a form of dehumanization.
Post by Scout
So tell me, why do you want to be a man? If being a woman too much for
you to handle?
Wow, what a non sequitur. Wanting equal treatment isn't the same as
"wanting to be a man", k00k!
Post by Scout
Post by Nadegda
Horseshit. If that were true then by my decree we'd already have full
equality, no more street harassment, etc.
As I said you decide the manner in which you will be treated.
I'll echo Nadegda here: Horseshit. Nobody asks for street harassment.
Post by Scout
Now, who's the sociopath?
It's still you.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2018-03-13 05:43:28 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p87fa6$lvv$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Did you even read that goddamn list? I posted the link twice ...
Of course not. I don't go to your bullshit links.
Then you have no excuse for your ignorance.
https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/02/160-examples-of-male-privilege/
But be warned. I won't post this link a fourth time. This is your last
chance.
Four might be the charm. Are you sure you won't reconsider?
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2018-03-13 00:10:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have to
"prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It just
IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because they're
"the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to their
advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue
of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man does open a
door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and we
either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
Checkmate
2018-03-13 02:41:24 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have to
"prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It just
IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because they're
"the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to their
advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue
of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man does open a
door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and we
either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
Hillary just blamed me for her losing the election.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-13 02:48:02 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 19:41:24 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "💩
<***@gmail.com>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It just
IS. What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well. Females think they can
physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because they're
"the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that to their
advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions. We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by virtue
of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man does open a
door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior. In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't. You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave us
certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this planet
takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly. Nature gave
women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and we
either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or we
make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing. Good
luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
Hillary just blamed me for her losing the election.
hopefully trump doesn't blame you for him, his shitbag son junior, and most of his cronies being thrown in prison for colluding with russians.

PS: there definitely was collusion or the investigation would have quickly ended, dontchathink?
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
http://youtu.be/iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
pandora
2018-03-13 16:11:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they
have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that
to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door
for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by
virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for
me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've
never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors
and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion
about "equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature
gave us certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on
this planet takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life,
and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem
to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
And THAT kind of attitude (and words) are part of the problem.
Skeeter
2018-03-13 16:25:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by pandora
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they
have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that
to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door
for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by
virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for
me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've
never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors
and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion
about "equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature
gave us certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on
this planet takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life,
and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem
to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
And THAT kind of attitude (and words) are part of the problem.
The truth?
pandora
2018-03-13 19:57:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they
have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door
for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing
by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a
man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one
way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors
and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the skill
set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life,
and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem
to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
And THAT kind of attitude (and words) are part of the problem.
The truth?
That may be your opinion but insults don't fix anything.
Skeeter
2018-03-13 21:11:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by pandora
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Post by Skeeter
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they
have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door
for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing
by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a
man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one
way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors
and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the skill
set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life,
and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem
to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I do
know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then they're
crying.
And THAT kind of attitude (and words) are part of the problem.
The truth?
That may be your opinion but insults don't fix anything.
Excepting you that's all I get from them.
pandora
2018-03-13 22:08:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
Post by Skeeter
Post by pandora
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:58:01 -0700, Checkmate
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
by Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes,
melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend
your entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think
they have to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*.
It just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use
that to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be.
I believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a
door for yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic
ass-kissing by virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get
offended if a man does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be
a big deal one way or the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they
male or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open
for me, I smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd
I've never seen anyone be offended by someone holding a door open
for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive
than women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more
money than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news
anchors and many other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a
discussion about "equality" between the sexes without
acknowledging that nature gave us certain fundamental
differences,
and every living thing on this planet takes advantage of the
skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's
life, and we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be
conditional, or we make a big fucking deal out of it like you
seem to enjoy doing. Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's
the *right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss
to understand what all the bitching is about.
This is my first year having anything to do with pollyticks, but I
do know this, democrappers are never happy, if not bitching, then
they're crying.
And THAT kind of attitude (and words) are part of the problem.
The truth?
That may be your opinion but insults don't fix anything.
Excepting you that's all I get from them.
I'm personally trying to set a new trend; differing opinions without
rancor and insults. It's the ONLY way to fly, IMO.
pandora
2018-03-13 16:08:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <S-2dnQM069-DczvHnZ2dnUU7-
Post by pandora
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
rabidly feminist
We will settle for nothing less than full equality.
You already have full equality, but it's your nature to spend your
entire life whining that you don't. Feminists always think they have
to "prove" something.
I am a feminist but I don't believe I have anything to *prove*. It
just IS.
What about men's equality? Do you think we never
Post by Checkmate
get treated unfairly?
Sometimes they do and that needs to stop as well.
Females think they can physically assault a man,
Post by Checkmate
and they'll be protected against him defending himself because
they're "the weaker sex". You don't think a lot of females use that
to their advantage every day?
My brand of feminism is different than what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be able to assault anyone without
repercussions.
We're expected to open doors for you because
Post by Checkmate
you're females, and presumably either can't manage to open a door for
yourselves, or think you're owed some ritualistic ass-kissing by
virtue of your sex. Even then, some of you get offended if a man
does open a door for you, when it shouldn't be a big deal one way or
the other.
Indeed. *I* open and hold doors for whoever is behind me; be they male
or female. No difference. And if someone holds a door open for me, I
smile and say thank you. That's how I was raised. ANd I've never seen
anyone be offended by someone holding a door open for them.
Post by Checkmate
Generally speaking, nature made men have a stronger sex drive than
women, so women use that as a way to manipulate men.
Some women, please and I decry that sort of behavior.
In turn, men are
Post by Checkmate
physically stronger, and sometimes they take advantage of that.
As they shouldn't.
You
Post by Checkmate
want to talk about "equality"? Tall people generally make more money
than shorter people. Pretty girls get jobs as news anchors and many
other roles, ugly ones don't. You can't have a discussion about
"equality" between the sexes without acknowledging that nature gave
us certain fundamental differences, and every living thing on this
planet takes advantage of the skill set available to them.
Equality under the law negates the above, if used properly.
Nature gave women
Post by Checkmate
some advantages, and also gave men some advantages. That's life, and
we either acknowledge that "equality" will always be conditional, or
we make a big fucking deal out of it like you seem to enjoy doing.
Good luck with that...
I have an will continue to push for equality under the law. It's the
*right* thing to do.
I've yet to figure out in just what ways The Kensinads isn't being
treated equally now. According to "both" of them, they have good jobs.
The Nads half allegedly drives an expensive Tesla, so I'm at a loss to
understand what all the bitching is about.
There are some pockets of resistance to equality but for the most part
things are good IMO. Lots better than in MY day that's for sure. I
don't think they realize just how bad it used to be.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-13 18:07:33 UTC
Permalink
My brand of feminism is different tha<<<<SLAP>>>>n what you perceive it to be. I
believe that no one should be ab<<<<SLAP>>>>le to assault anyon<<<PUNCH>>>>e
without repercuss<<<<KICK>>>>ions.
Take THAT, you stupid feminist!
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
pandora
2018-03-13 18:35:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
My brand of feminism is different tha<<<<SLAP>>>>n what you perceive it
to be. I believe that no one should be ab<<<<SLAP>>>>le to assault
anyon<<<PUNCH>>>>e without repercuss<<<<KICK>>>>ions.
Take THAT, you stupid feminist!
We've won already and only dinosaurs such as yourself keep whining about
it.
Nadegda
2018-03-14 04:05:32 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
My brand of feminism is different tha<<<<SLAP>>>>n what you perceive it
to be. I believe that no one should be ab<<<<SLAP>>>>le to assault
anyon<<<PUNCH>>>>e without repercuss<<<<KICK>>>>ions.
Take THAT, you stupid feminist!
Hey Grzglz! Excellent way of showing everyone that you lack a cogent
argument!
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-15 15:34:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
My brand of feminism is different tha<<<<SLAP>>>>n what you perceive it
to be. I believe that no one should be ab<<<<SLAP>>>>le to assault
anyon<<<PUNCH>>>>e without repercuss<<<<KICK>>>>ions.
Take THAT, you stupid feminist!
Hey Grzglz! Excellent way of showing everyone that you lack a cogent
argument!
You shuddup or I'll have to teach you the meaning of
misogynicidal ideation.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
benj
2018-03-10 18:58:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!
She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was
massage her feet! <sniff> <Sniff>  Eeeew!
Surrrrre it was.
Uh Oh! "kensi" is using her Ph.D. "superpowers" again to know what was
in my mind. How can I compete with that?
Post by kensi
I concur with Nadegda. A rape threat was definitely implied (and
assault-and-battery threat made explicit).
Since you ARE Nads, you always agree with her and think she is simply
wonderful. My nose tells me different. Take a good sniff and then tell
me rape was implied!
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Chortle! (#4)
There's a good k0ok, keep melting for your mistresses.
*pats benj on the head*
Still have NO idea what in hell we are talking about do you.
God, you are ignorant. Living proof of why females should stick to
baking cookies. I even give you hints and you don't get it! Unbelievable.

Snicker (rule #4)
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2018-03-10 21:22:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Coal is all that stands between civilization and me hitting you over the
head with a club and dragging you by the hair into a cave.
snicker (#4)
Rape threat noted, kooky. FBI informed.
How do you get a rape threat out of that, Ko0ky?
Obviously her fantasy life just boiled over and made a mess!
She couldn't understand that all I wanted to do in the cave was
massage her feet! <sniff> <Sniff>  Eeeew!
Surrrrre it was.
Uh Oh! "kensi" is using her Ph.D. "superpowers" again to know what was
in my mind. How can I compete with that?
Post by kensi
I concur with Nadegda. A rape threat was definitely implied (and
assault-and-battery threat made explicit).
Since you ARE Nads, you always agree with her and think she is simply
wonderful. My nose tells me different. Take a good sniff and then tell
me rape was implied!
Post by kensi
Post by benj
Chortle! (#4)
There's a good k0ok, keep melting for your mistresses.
*pats benj on the head*
Still have NO idea what in hell we are talking about do you.
God, you are ignorant. Living proof of why females should stick to
baking cookies. I even give you hints and you don't get it! Unbelievable.
Snicker (rule #4)
Ever notice how the fatter and uglier the woman
is, the more she believes she's going to be a rape
victim?
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Well, Rancho Kookamonga IP nothwithstanding (he used to
have a Texas IP, btw), it should be patently clear to everyone
by now who the Fake really is." --Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
benj
2018-03-07 13:17:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Sergio
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with
a less than certain future where climate change makes them less
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater,
Oil and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary
suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the
ground are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can
somehow be made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense
government policy. And nobody is more aware of the true limitations of
those wind and solar fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas
outfits. The only true viable intermediate energy source for
civilization is nukes but lib "idea men" are dead set against anything
that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to
shut down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
that is lie,
Nope.
Post by Sergio
got url ?
Yep.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/08/climate/trump-coal-nuclear.html
Post by Sergio
solar only has 30 year lifetime
Coal plant average life is 40 years. Solar isn't much less ... and is
improving. And doesn't need fuel.
https://qz.com/61423/coal-fired-power-plants-near-retirement/
Post by Sergio
at high cost,
High but decreasing ... and an apples to apples comparison would be a
megawatt PV plant, versus a megawatt coal plant *and all of the coal it
would consume in 30 years of operation*.
Or you can just look at the wholesale electricity prices. Solar, wind, and
coal are all at about parity, and the trend is that coal is going up while
solar and wind decrease.
Post by Sergio
Nuk have no CO2,
Obviously you've never seen a uranium mine in operation.
Obviously yo know nothing about nuclear science.
Post by Nadegda
Post by Sergio
and coal powers 60% of usa electricity
Not for long. It's going the way of the buggy whip industry.
Maybe, but what do you propose to use once the gas runs out? Aren't all
you idiots against fracking too? Until that free energy machine is
invented reality puts your fantasies to the test. What do you know about
driving an Ox cart?
benj
2018-03-07 02:43:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the ground
are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can somehow be
made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense government policy. And
nobody is more aware of the true limitations of those wind and solar
fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas outfits. The only true
viable intermediate energy source for civilization is nukes but lib
"idea men" are dead set against anything that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to shut
down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
Can't compete with government subsidies. You libs always try tp prop up
your idiot ideas with other people's money and then pretend it's a fair
comparison. And the sad thing is that in spite of this cheating your
ideas still usually crash and burn. That's how stupid they are.
Nadegda
2018-03-07 02:58:52 UTC
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by benj
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with
a less than certain future where climate change makes them less
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater,
Oil and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary
suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the
ground are limited. Only idiot lib greens think that the future can
somehow be made "certain" usually with some kind of nonsense
government policy. And nobody is more aware of the true limitations of
those wind and solar fantasies of greens that practical oil and gas
outfits. The only true viable intermediate energy source for
civilization is nukes but lib "idea men" are dead set against anything
that might work.
Oh, really? Then why are both coal and nuclear power plants having to
shut down because they are less profitable than solar plants?
Can't compete with government subsidies.
When your dirty polluting plants can't compete even *with* giant fossil
fuel subsidies you *know* you have a problem!
--
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
Scout
2018-03-07 04:33:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Lib greens are total brainless morons. "kensi" is the perfect example.
Nobody knows better the oil and gas companies that fuels from the ground
are limited.
Sure which is why the amount of proven reserves is constantly expanding and
we now have a more years of production than they did back in 1985 when we
were told that oil would be exhausted by 2000.

Somehow, we keep finding more than we use.
Frank
2018-03-13 16:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Written by well known Activist Leftist Justin Worland, Trump Hater, Oil
and Energy Hater, Glowball activist Wormer, Repug Hater, Hillary suckup,
Anthony Wiener supporter
Fact is I see a lot of big industries becoming politically correct as
government scope increases and they are the source of funds. Simple:
follow the money.
max headroom
2018-03-06 15:06:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
less than certain future where climate change makes them less
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-will-be-the-worlds-largest-oil-producer-by-2023-says-iea-1520236810
<yawn>
kensi
2018-03-06 16:14:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by max headroom
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
less than certain future where climate change makes them less
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-will-be-the-worlds-largest-oil-producer-by-2023-says-iea-1520236810
<yawn>
And yet you keep reading and posting followups ...
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Sergio
2018-03-06 22:46:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by max headroom
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-will-be-the-worlds-largest-oil-producer-by-2023-says-iea-1520236810
<yawn>
And yet you keep reading and posting followups ...
kensi pupa quacked "And yet you keep reading and posting followups ..."
Checkmate
2018-03-06 16:05:57 UTC
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <p7m11l$6tp$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
Did you know the US is poised to become the largest oil-producing
nation in the world right about now? If you've been reading my posts,
you'd know. What happened to that "Peak Oil" thing that was supposed
to have already happened years ago?

We're no dummies when it comes to energy... we bought up most of
everyone else's first, and left ours in the ground. China is now
pulling that same trick with rare earth commodities, only we were too
busy thinking about oil and missed the next big thing.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
reber G=emc^2
2018-03-06 22:02:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Thinking unknown is the way to go.Google can tell you the known,and its history.Bert
hanson
2018-03-06 22:17:46 UTC
Permalink
"reber G=EMC^2" <***@gmail.com> wrote:
"Why am I posting this,its making me cry as it always does"
"My bar tab for Bud Light broke all records". Bert.
"I use Cocaine which is a wonder-drug for me", Bert.
"I am all alone in my van with my bucket that I shit into"
"Why am I not loved by all. I am very depressed". Bert
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true. O ya" -- Bert.
hmmm...<snicker>...<chortle>...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFLMAO
Wile E. Coyote
2018-03-12 00:27:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
If you are still using any oil or oil byproducts, you are a fraud.

That includes electric cars that get thier electricity for oil or coal fired
plants. And electric lights in your house.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.

Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com> April 25, 2017
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
2018-03-12 15:57:40 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; ""Wile E.
Coyote" <***@sulaco.com>" determined that the
following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely
share it with us in
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
If you are still using any oil or oil byproducts, you are a fraud.
o, this old chestnut? really?
Post by Wile E. Coyote
That includes electric cars that get thier electricity for oil or coal
fired plants. And electric lights in your house.
it also includes eating food shipped to a grocery store.

i guess we'll all just have to keep doing the same polluting bullshit forever just because it's easier for /your lazy ass/ to keep doing it.
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT


"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Skeeter
2018-03-12 17:38:47 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 10:57:40 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
Post by Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; ""Wile E.
following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely
share it with us in
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
If you are still using any oil or oil byproducts, you are a fraud.
o, this old chestnut? really?
Post by Wile E. Coyote
That includes electric cars that get thier electricity for oil or coal
fired plants. And electric lights in your house.
it also includes eating food shipped to a grocery store.
i guess we'll all just have to keep doing the same polluting bullshit forever just because it's easier for /your lazy ass/ to keep doing it.
What are "you" doing about it?
benj
2018-03-12 17:49:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by kensi
For the first time, oil and gas companies are openly grappling with a
http://time.com/5178262/climate-change-oil-companies-future/
If you are still using any oil or oil byproducts, you are a fraud.
That includes electric cars that get thier electricity for oil or coal fired
plants. And electric lights in your house.
I'd love to see these fraudsters driving around in electric cars powered
by solar cells on their roof! Bwahahaha! These are liars who know no
science and never owned a solar cell in their life. Hey I've got a bunch
of them and they are lucky to power my TV set. That's the difference
between fantasy and reality. But hey, the LEDs that light my porch steps
have solar power and they work really great (about half the time).
Loading...