Claudius Denk
2022-06-02 15:17:20 UTC
Perhaps if you would superpose a height (i.e. pressure) vs temperature
profile of atmosphere on a water phase diagram with the correct scales,
then you can make anybody see right away that the atmospheric profile
does not cross any gaseous water area on the phase diagram.
As pointed out before, a phase diagram *is* a pressure vs temperature profile, and the phase diagram for water clearly shows that at very low pressures water exists as a gas at virtually any temperature that you might choose.profile of atmosphere on a water phase diagram with the correct scales,
then you can make anybody see right away that the atmospheric profile
does not cross any gaseous water area on the phase diagram.
For example...
Loading Image...![](https://sci.physics.narkive.com/aHa4qsiK/you-literally-have-no-business-in-a-scientific-discussion:i.1.1.thumb)
... it should be blatantly obvious that the entire area beneath the curved line show where the gaseous form of water can exist, all the way from at least as cold as 0.01°C all the way up to at least 373.99 °C, and with pressures from as low as at least 0.0060 up to at least 217.75 atmospheres.
Yeah, so? Do you have a fucking point?Loading Image...
... it should be blatantly obvious that the entire area beneath the curved line show where the gaseous form of water can exist, all the way from at least as cold as 0.01°C all the way up to at least 373.99 °C, and with pressures from as low as at least 0.0060 up to at least 217.75 atmospheres.
Keep in mind that for air, water vapor only contributes a tiny bit of the volume, varying from just a trace to about 4%, so its contribution to the overall atmospheric pressure at any given time is miniscule when compared with the other components of air and therefore its partial pressure in the atmosphere can be very, very low...
Isn't all of this obvious?Face it, moron, you don't have a relevant point--ever!!!
This is not to say that you might not be confused by something I say. But this would not have anything to do with intent to obfuscate on my part. It would have to do with either or both my inability to explain or your inability to comprehend. (And the fact that I had to explain this to you suggests it is the latter.)
You literally have no business in a scientific discussion.
CD / Genius