Discussion:
1-Dr. Bouman's fake black hole-- where binary stars HD98800 are evidence against-- and why clown Brian Greene is sidekick
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-11 19:37:35 UTC
Permalink
1-Dr. Bouman's fake black hole-- where binary stars HD98800 are evidence against-- and why clown Brian Greene is sidekick

So, Bouman's photo is not one single photo but a collection of photos from telescope 1, telescope 2, out to telescope 50.

Bouman's photo is better than a hand artist rendering of " what do you see"

But, is it a theorized (imagination) black hole? When a picture is a composite of many pictures sort of like putting a jigsaw puzzle together, then the final outcome is much better than a artist rendering by imagination. But not a truthful picture because a photo should be take of the entire object all in 1 photo, not 50 jigsaw photos.

Well, the Bouman photo with the Dr. Greene clown cheerleader is not a object of "energy symmetry" for most of the energy is located to the "south end of the photo". If it were the mythical black hole that stupid scientists believe in-- the energy would be symmetrically uniform all the way around.

Also, if a black hole, then the theory says the black hole is a Singularity, not a very long stretched out distance from a center. The Bouman photo would have a black hole be a object the size of many galaxies as a radius.

There is another photo in astronomy where it is uniform energy around a disc-- binary stars and in the HD98800 photo we see a uniform symmetry of energy surrounding halo.

So HD98800 is actually a far better fake black hole than is Dr. Bouman's with Dr. Greene cheerleader fake black hole.

So if Dr.Bouman's photo with clown Dr.Greene cheerleader is a black hole, than the binary stars of HD98800 is even more of a black-hole for those idiots of physics that want to believe in fake physics.

Now why is Dr. Greene being such a clown of physics with this black hole support? I believe psychology can answer this. In that failed physicists are guided not by logical reasoning but guided by a smell and scent of where the "most publicity is" and the most publicity is for those bozos who keep pushing and believing in black holes-- will get them to the center of attention, at the expense of the truth of science. So Dr. Greene is wanting attention, not the truth of science.

In fact, we can go so far as to say, a true blue physicist/s needs to stay away from publicity and mass media and tv phony baloney for publicity corrupts the mind in science. The publicity overruns and overtakes whatever small amount of a logical science brain a person had, just overruns that brain and fills it with publicity b.s. seeking.

So, to get the maximum and best science truth out of a scientist, the scientist needs to stay away from mass media attention, and to keep focused and concentrated on true science.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-13 20:02:56 UTC
Permalink
AP's latest logo picture-- another fake black-hole as HD 98800, which is a binary star or 4-stars making a halo//Recent fake black hole report
1 post by 1 author



me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
2:59 PM (1 minute ago)


AP's latest logo picture-- another fake black-hole as HD 98800, which is a binary star or 4-stars making a halo//Recent fake black hole report

Last week a fake black hole was reported by a group of "ignorant scientists". They thought their image is a black hole photo, but it turns out, their image is not symmetrical, with much lightening in the southern portion of their photo and their alleged black hole would be an enormous distance across, when it should be a "singularity".

These are a group of ignorant scientists wanting fame and fortune but not the truth of science.

For one thing, their photo is of the Virgo cluster and they used the Doppler redshift which is a fakery of physics. The Virgo cluster is actually very nearby the Milky Way and just as we have a photo assimilation of HD98800 as a 4-star or binary star system, their photo of Virgo is another binary or 4 star system but far more non-symmetrical.

The world has NO black holes, despite the fact you have many many ignorant scientists trying to foist that fakery upon us, and grab at fame and fortune. No black holes exist, never did, never will.

P.S. this logo picture is very temporary for about a week or less.

Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.
__
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ( O ) |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-13 20:27:01 UTC
Permalink
On Saturday, April 13, 2019 at 3:20:46 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.math:
Re: AP's latest logo picture-- another fake black-hole as HD 98800, which is a binary star or 4-stars making a halo//Recent fake black hole report

A challenge to Dr. Bouman unless too scared of what it would reveal. She knows where to find HD98800, and train her handicraft of computer image manipulation, train that handicraft upon HD98800 and make a photo of HD98800. Will this binary or 4 star system be more symmetrical and thus-- more likely to be a black hole than her recent claim of a Virgo cluster photo?
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-15 03:03:04 UTC
Permalink
The obvious mistake is the Bouman black hole photo is asymmetrical whereas a black hole is symmetrical. But in Bouman and Greene rush to fame and fortune who cares the southern half of photo has more energy.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-15 06:34:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
The obvious mistake is the Bouman black hole photo is asymmetrical whereas a black hole is symmetrical. But in Bouman and Greene rush to fame and fortune who cares the southern half of photo has more energy.
So why did not Dr. Bouman just plain test out the photo taking technique on something pretty much familar, say, such as HD98800.

I mean, those in academics should really test out a new product to see if it can deliver what is already established.

But no, no, no, Dr. Bouman has to jump headlong first into something never photoed-- black hole.

This is what I mean when I say-- few scientists have more than a microgram brain of logic, and just fumble around in science.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-04-17 18:57:06 UTC
Permalink
What the Doppler redshift & blueshift really are-- heat and magnetism shifts of 8 Rings of the proton in hydrogen
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
1-Dr. Bouman's fake black hole-- where binary stars HD98800 are evidence against-- and why clown Brian Greene is sidekick
So, Bouman's photo is not one single photo but a collection of photos from telescope 1, telescope 2, out to telescope 50.
Bouman's photo is better than a hand artist rendering of " what do you see"
But, is it a theorized (imagination) black hole? When a picture is a composite of many pictures sort of like putting a jigsaw puzzle together, then the final outcome is much better than a artist rendering by imagination. But not a truthful picture because a photo should be take of the entire object all in 1 photo, not 50 jigsaw photos.
Well, the Bouman photo with the Dr. Greene clown cheerleader is not a object of "energy symmetry" for most of the energy is located to the "south end of the photo". If it were the mythical black hole that stupid scientists believe in-- the energy would be symmetrically uniform all the way around.
Also, if a black hole, then the theory says the black hole is a Singularity, not a very long stretched out distance from a center. The Bouman photo would have a black hole be a object the size of many galaxies as a radius.
There is another photo in astronomy where it is uniform energy around a disc-- binary stars and in the HD98800 photo we see a uniform symmetry of energy surrounding halo.
So HD98800 is actually a far better fake black hole than is Dr. Bouman's with Dr. Greene cheerleader fake black hole.
So if Dr.Bouman's photo with clown Dr.Greene cheerleader is a black hole, than the binary stars of HD98800 is even more of a black-hole for those idiots of physics that want to believe in fake physics.
Now why is Dr. Greene being such a clown of physics with this black hole support? I believe psychology can answer this. In that failed physicists are guided not by logical reasoning but guided by a smell and scent of where the "most publicity is" and the most publicity is for those bozos who keep pushing and believing in black holes-- will get them to the center of attention, at the expense of the truth of science. So Dr. Greene is wanting attention, not the truth of science.
In fact, we can go so far as to say, a true blue physicist/s needs to stay away from publicity and mass media and tv phony baloney for publicity corrupts the mind in science. The publicity overruns and overtakes whatever small amount of a logical science brain a person had, just overruns that brain and fills it with publicity b.s. seeking.
So, to get the maximum and best science truth out of a scientist, the scientist needs to stay away from mass media attention, and to keep focused and concentrated on true science.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-12 11:17:17 UTC
Permalink
Rik Chandler says modern day science is absolute trash// what is Science and Sentiment in the USA??
May 10me
Rik Chandler
1.0 out of 5 starsAbsolute trash
May 4, 2019
Verified Purchase
This is an incomprehensible piece of garbage written by an anonymous person using an absurd pseudonym.

Was the Saber-Toothed-Tiger, Smilodon, Paleontologists most laughable mistake? Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
1-Dr. Bouman's fake black hole-- where binary stars HD98800 are evidence against-- and why clown Brian Greene is sidekick
So, Bouman's photo is not one single photo but a collection of photos from telescope 1, telescope 2, out to telescope 50.
Bouman's photo is better than a hand artist rendering of " what do you see"
But, is it a theorized (imagination) black hole? When a picture is a composite of many pictures sort of like putting a jigsaw puzzle together, then the final outcome is much better than a artist rendering by imagination. But not a truthful picture because a photo should be take of the entire object all in 1 photo, not 50 jigsaw photos.
Well, the Bouman photo with the Dr. Greene clown cheerleader is not a object of "energy symmetry" for most of the energy is located to the "south end of the photo". If it were the mythical black hole that stupid scientists believe in-- the energy would be symmetrically uniform all the way around.
Also, if a black hole, then the theory says the black hole is a Singularity, not a very long stretched out distance from a center. The Bouman photo would have a black hole be a object the size of many galaxies as a radius.
There is another photo in astronomy where it is uniform energy around a disc-- binary stars and in the HD98800 photo we see a uniform symmetry of energy surrounding halo.
So HD98800 is actually a far better fake black hole than is Dr. Bouman's with Dr. Greene cheerleader fake black hole.
So if Dr.Bouman's photo with clown Dr.Greene cheerleader is a black hole, than the binary stars of HD98800 is even more of a black-hole for those idiots of physics that want to believe in fake physics.
Now why is Dr. Greene being such a clown of physics with this black hole support? I believe psychology can answer this. In that failed physicists are guided not by logical reasoning but guided by a smell and scent of where the "most publicity is" and the most publicity is for those bozos who keep pushing and believing in black holes-- will get them to the center of attention, at the expense of the truth of science. So Dr. Greene is wanting attention, not the truth of science.
In fact, we can go so far as to say, a true blue physicist/s needs to stay away from publicity and mass media and tv phony baloney for publicity corrupts the mind in science. The publicity overruns and overtakes whatever small amount of a logical science brain a person had, just overruns that brain and fills it with publicity b.s. seeking.
So, to get the maximum and best science truth out of a scientist, the scientist needs to stay away from mass media attention, and to keep focused and concentrated on true science.
AP
Loading...