Discussion:
Univ of Iowa can never confirm real proton = 840MeV not 938 so long as it has propaganda like Sam Wormley
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-22 16:29:14 UTC
Permalink
Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated...
3 posts by 3 authors



***@gmail.com
May 21 (23 hours ago)


"Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated: “Forgive us Sir Isaac Newton, your universe has been overturned.” In that moment, everything we believed about our universe was wrong. Einstein became a science superstar overnight; beers and children were named after him."

How WWI Saved Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-23 14:16:46 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
LIGO's Gravitational Waves: O1/O2 CATALOG
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 8:50 AM

Sam Wormley propaganda. Never understood Logic and Reasoning. Contradictions are stop barriers in science. Pauli Exclusion Principle prevents black holes from ever occurring, but try telling that to scientist wannabe's.

LIGO propaganda is explained by AP in the May edition of AP's magazine.

Sam should concentrate and focus on Global Warming not his propaganda bandwagon worthless spiel.

AP's periodic journal of fakeries in science: Magazine of science and math fakes foisted on general public Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item





See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$3.00 to buy


The world is tired of "peer reviewed science" masquerading as the truth of science, when it is often the case that peer reviewed is false and fake science, even anti-science, as entrenched pork barrel money machines that look more towards "money money money". Or the peer review of magazines and journals that also look more towards "money" as a promotion ladder for unscrupulous professors climbing a promotion ladder at the school they teach. Publish, publish, publish, but seldom truth truth truth.

April 2019 issue-- discusses black holes as pure science fiction fakeries for a world that has a Pauli Exclusion Principle PEP, is a world that cannot simultaneously have a black hole. Physicists just never learned any logic to know that science cannot hold a contradiction. All science laws breakdown the minute you accept contradictions. Either the world has PEP but no black holes, or, the world has both, still a contradiction. Cover picture is HD98800 which is two binary star pairs and looks better as a black hole than does the fake recent black hole photo.

May issue --discusses the unwillingness of scientists and mathematicians to accept true science such as the ellipse is never a conic even when given a High School proof the ellipse is not a conic. And psychology is discussed as to "hate-envy-motivation" of scientists that blocks their minds from accepting the truth of science.

June issue of 2019-- discusses why and what the fake "gravity waves" reports from LIGO; what those reports really mean and measure.

July issue-- as yet to be decided, for the world of fake science is a long list to chose from..

Editor in chief of this magazine journal, AP


File Size: 1755 KB
Print Length: 27 pages
Publication Date: April 28, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07R5Q2199
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-23 14:19:02 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
LIGO's Gravitational Waves: O1/O2 CATALOG
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 8:50 AM

Sam Wormley propaganda. Never understood Logic and Reasoning. Contradictions are stop barriers in science. Pauli Exclusion Principle prevents black holes from ever occurring, but try telling that to scientist wannabe's.

LIGO propaganda is explained by AP in the June edition of AP's magazine.

Sam should concentrate and focus on Global Warming not his propaganda bandwagon worthless spiel.

AP's periodic journal of fakeries in science: Magazine of science and math fakes foisted on general public Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-23 15:58:09 UTC
Permalink
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter
2 posts by 2 authors
***@gmail.com
9:57 AM (53 minutes ago)
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter
AP writes: only degenerates in science cannot handle contradictions, and pander their crazy pet-peeves-- usually for money, or the fact they have no mind to be doing science. Idiots like Sam would be in math class and the teacher says 2+2 = 4, and then Sam says -- it can be overwhelmed and be 6 sometimes. No wonder University of Iowa is going to be in the weeds with real proton = 840MeV not 938, when you have idiocy of "contradictions do not matter"

Sam-- stick to global warming, you are not a physicist
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-23 16:54:30 UTC
Permalink
By ***@gmail.com 3 posts 2 views updated 11:40 AM
Discussion
Measured Proton Mass is 938.2720813(58) MeV/c^2
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated

AP writes: good that people honor and respect science, even if they are not good in physics. But when you get people who "binge in science yet know almost nothing about science" is where you run into problems. So that Sam thinks Physics is what is in print and voiced, and is an "unchanging static enterprise", even if totally wrong. So that Sam, if born 200 years ago would be saying that fossils are not past life but mimics and that the continents never move, all because that is what the science of that time said it was. And there would be Sam, breathing that junk down upon all students, that fossils are not past life, but mimics and that the Continents were forever static. Just as Sam believes in LIGO, in black holes, in Pauli Exclusion is overwhelmed, believes fusion is almost at breakeven, believes the proton is forever 938.

Sam is what gives science a bad name.
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-24 02:14:49 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Consider a black hole with a mass of 4 x 10^20 Kg (3)
By ***@gmail.com 3 posts 4 views updated 8:49 PM

AP writes: at this rate Univ of Iowa will never confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, when still with cave-man physics of black hole phony baloney. Can Sam do the ju-ju totem tap dance?
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated...
3 posts by 3 authors
May 21 (23 hours ago)
"Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated: “Forgive us Sir Isaac Newton, your universe has been overturned.” In that moment, everything we believed about our universe was wrong. Einstein became a science superstar overnight; beers and children were named after him."
How WWI Saved Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Michael Moroney
2019-05-24 06:03:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
Consider a black hole with a mass of 4 x 10^20 Kg (3)
It's bad enough that AutisticPlutonium thinks he's the only one allowed to spam
here, he's always spamming his complaints about spammers.

But now he's complaining about when someone posts physics to a physics group?
Hey Al, how dumb and stoopid is that???

So how dumb and stupid is the stalker Archimedes Plutonium?

Uncle Al said it best!

"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard
stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.
Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
AP writes: at this rate Univ of Iowa will never confirm real proton is 840M
Archie-Poo, just because you are dumb and stoopid enough to believe that garbage
doesn't mean anyone else is, particularly the uninvolved people at Univ of Iowa.



x-no-archive: yes
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-27 18:05:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Moroney
Autistic
AP writes: Sam Wormley is not autistic, and you kibo Parry Moroney are a worthless creep needing booting out of any science newsgroup as a complete failure-- creep failure

For Sam Wormley only slows down and holds back what is true science with his constant propaganda holding up fake Old Physics-- creep science

Holding back Univ of Iowa in confirming real proton is 840MeV not 938

Discussion
Gravity is a curvature of space-time. (3)
By ***@gmail.com 3 posts 0 views updated 12:59 PM



Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (14)
By ***@gmail.com 25 posts 34 views updated 12:43 PM
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-28 15:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Sam Wormley cannot even understand an ellipse is never a conic, when shown the AP proof. A proof that a Iowa High School student can easily do and prove in the Iowa classroom.

So, do you think that the mind of Sam Wormley is useful in science? Absolutely not, for what he is doing is entrenching fakery and misleading our young generation. And holding Iowa universities back from ultimately proving the real proton is 840 MeV not 938.

Wormley is a mind that never wants to fix errors, but keep errors going forever.


World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item





See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$5.00 to buy

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.

Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.

Length: 29 pages
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled

File Size: 1224 KB
Print Length: 29 pages
Publication Date: March 14, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQTNHMY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #293,690 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#18 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#70 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
#471 in Calculus (Books)

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium


AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item





See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$3.00 to buy


Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-28 15:50:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Sam Wormley cannot even understand an ellipse is never a conic, when shown the AP proof. A proof that a Iowa High School student can easily do and prove in the Iowa classroom.
So, do you think that the mind of Sam Wormley is useful in science? Absolutely not, for what he is doing is entrenching fakery and misleading our young generation. And holding Iowa universities back from ultimately proving the real proton is 840 MeV not 938.
Wormley is a mind that never wants to fix errors, but keep errors going forever.
Here is Wormley's most recent propaganda to keep error filled science:


Discussion
Book Recomendation: On the Shoulders of Giants (1)
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 10:41 AM



Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (27)
By ***@gmail.com 38 posts 45 views updated 10:38 AM
+ 6 others



Discussion
Tycho & Kepler: The Unlikely Partnership That Forever Changed Our Understanding of the Heavens (1)
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 10:38 AM



Discussion
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item
See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$5.00 to buy
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.
Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.
Length: 29 pages
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled
File Size: 1224 KB
Print Length: 29 pages
Publication Date: March 14, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQTNHMY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #293,690 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#18 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#70 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
#471 in Calculus (Books)
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item
See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$3.00 to buy
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Length: 21 pages
File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-28 16:02:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Sam Wormley cannot even understand an ellipse is never a conic, when shown the AP proof. A proof that a Iowa High School student can easily do and prove in the Iowa classroom.
So, do you think that the mind of Sam Wormley is useful in science? Absolutely not, for what he is doing is entrenching fakery and misleading our young generation. And holding Iowa universities back from ultimately proving the real proton is 840 MeV not 938.
Wormley is a mind that never wants to fix errors, but keep errors going forever.
Sorry I seemed to have forgotten to include Sam's recent obnoxious ploy to keep all of Old Science and Old Math no matter how wrong and screwy it is. I just seem to have a distaste of people in science who can never understand that some parts of science are error filled and need to be tossed. And these type of people are just as bad for science as say those who hate science and vociferously shout out against science. So those who entrench error filled science are just as bad as those who actively despise science.

Sam was never a scientist in the first place and can never understand that what is published as science is often just propaganda and not real science.

Book Recomendation: On the Shoulders of Giants (1)
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 10:41 AM



Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (27)
By ***@gmail.com 38 posts 45 views updated 10:38 AM
+ 6 others



Discussion
Tycho & Kepler: The Unlikely Partnership That Forever Changed Our Understanding of the Heavens (1)
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 10:38 AM



Discussion
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 10:27 AM



Discussion
Geometric Proof of FTC [slight redaction]
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 10:23 AM

Sam could not even do a Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and does not understand that Cauchy had a Analytic proof that was full of error, not geometric, but then try explaining that to Sam who is feeble in physics, and even more feeble in math.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item
See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$5.00 to buy
Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.
Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.
Length: 29 pages
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled
File Size: 1224 KB
Print Length: 29 pages
Publication Date: March 14, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQTNHMY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #293,690 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#18 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#70 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
#471 in Calculus (Books)
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item
See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$3.00 to buy
Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
Length: 21 pages
File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-05-30 02:36:24 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Confirmations of Einstein's Relativity
By ***@gmail.com 2 posts 3 views updated 9:12 PM

In fact, the only thing keeping General Relativity from completely being thrown on the dump heap is silly goofy people like Sam. Their brown-nosing Einstein and his failed physics.

What put humans on the Moon and navigate the solar system is old Newtonian mechanics.

In fact, the recent Mars landings and the Jupiter satellite of Juno , none of them had any General Relativity b.s.

When it comes to Sam Wormley in science, just ask yourself, is he going to tell you an ellipse is a conic section, a cut at a slant into the cone-- yes, for Sam does not have a mind of reasoning, only memorization and he is going to tell you a ellipse is always a conic even if a High School student proves to him it is the oval that is the slant cut. Sam is just a piss poor science teacher for he knows not up from down in science.

As for the gravity waves, phony baloney, since Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids a black hole from ever forming is the topic of June's edition of my magazine. Where I explain away what those LIGO reports are.

AP's periodic journal of fakeries in science: Magazine of science and math fakes foisted on general public Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item





See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$3.00 to buy


The world is tired of "peer reviewed science" masquerading as the truth of science, when it is often the case that peer reviewed is false and fake science, even anti-science, as entrenched pork barrel money machines that look more towards "money money money". Or the peer review of magazines and journals that also look more towards "money" as a promotion ladder for unscrupulous professors climbing a promotion ladder at the school they teach. Publish, publish, publish, but seldom truth truth truth.

April 2019 issue-- discusses black holes as pure science fiction fakeries for a world that has a Pauli Exclusion Principle PEP, is a world that cannot simultaneously have a black hole. Physicists just never learned any logic to know that science cannot hold a contradiction. All science laws breakdown the minute you accept contradictions. Either the world has PEP but no black holes, or, the world has both, still a contradiction. Cover picture is HD98800 which is two binary star pairs and looks better as a black hole than does the fake recent black hole photo.

May issue --discusses the unwillingness of scientists and mathematicians to accept true science such as the ellipse is never a conic even when given a High School proof the ellipse is not a conic. And psychology is discussed as to "hate-envy-motivation" of scientists that blocks their minds from accepting the truth of science.

June issue of 2019-- discusses why and what the fake "gravity waves" reports from LIGO; what those reports really mean and measure.

July issue-- as yet to be decided, for the world of fake science is a long list to chose from..

Editor in chief of this magazine journal, AP


File Size: 1755 KB
Print Length: 27 pages
Publication Date: April 28, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07R5Q2199
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-04 06:43:23 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (39)
By ***@gmail.com 50 posts 63 views updated Jun 3

AP writes: thank goodness for the sake of Univ of Iowa, an excellent school, which I have visited many times along with Iowa State Univ..

Thank goodness Sam W. has no say in the science taught at both schools for someone to say "gravity overwhelms Pauli Exclusion Principle is out in far far left field, so far as to be utter fringe science
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-04 17:40:45 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Thermal analog black hole agrees with Hawking radiation theory (3)
By ***@gmail.com 3 posts 0 views updated 11:56 AM


Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (43)
By ***@gmail.com 54 posts 65 views updated 11:48 AM

AP writes: only cartoon science seems to flow out of Sam W. In days gone by, Sam would be arguing yellow bile versus black bile to cure the ill
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-05 01:03:16 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (49)
By ***@gmail.com 60 posts 67 views updated 7:59 PM
+ 9 others


Discussion
Thermal analog black hole agrees with Hawking radiation theory (4)
By ***@gmail.com 4 posts 2 views updated 7:17 PM


AP writes: PEP being overwhelmed, this is not science but anti-science, no wonder true proton is 840 MeV can not be confirmed
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
Thermal analog black hole agrees with Hawking radiation theory (3)
Discussion
Pauli Exclusion Principle is overwhelmed by gravitational collapse of degenerate matter (43)
AP writes: only cartoon science seems to flow out of Sam W. In days gone by, Sam would be arguing yellow bile versus black bile to cure the ill
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-08 00:44:52 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
New Large Hadron Collider data reveal that exotic quark quintets, discovered in 2016, are composites of quark-antiquark mesons and three-quark baryons.
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 7:23 PM


AP writes: Sam is so silly in science, he can't even read a proof that ellipse is never a conic. And neither can the batch of low class physicists of Hadron Collider. What is even worse is that these low class physicists still use Boole logic of 10 OR 4 = 14 with 10 AND 4 = 6. When even the drunk village idiot could navigate through 10 AND 4 = 14. And to think these punks of science shovel b.s. of quarks and black holes.

Say Sam Wormley, what color of toe-nails does the fire breathing dragon wear, as per Large Hadron Collider?


AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item





See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$3.00 to buy


Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 


Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-09 17:37:53 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
A Brief History of Quarks (9)
By ***@gmail.com 9 posts 7 views updated 5:27 AM

AP writes: may as well write books

A Brief History of Witches in Physics

A Brief History of Loch Ness Monster in Physics

A Brief History of Ghosts and Hobgoblins in Physics

No wonder Univ Iowa has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, having to navigate through all that trash nonsense of Old Physics-- big bang, black holes, quarks, Standard Model, none of which was physics but more like pornographic graffiti with physics losers making money from selling that trash
Michael Moroney
2019-06-10 14:22:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
AP writes: may as well write books
A Brief History of Witches in Physics
A Brief History of Loch Ness Monster in Physics
A Brief History of Ghosts and Hobgoblins in Physics
I think these new books of yours will be more likely to be considered more
truthful than your existing books! Maybe they will even get two star reviews!
Twice as good as your current record!!
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-17 21:39:17 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Synopsis: Mirror, Mirror—Which Coating is the Quietest of Them All
By ***@gmail.com 2 posts 1 view updated 4:33 PM


AP writes: Univ Iowa can never confirm true real proton is 840MeV not 938 at the rate of Sam propaganda science
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
A Brief History of Quarks (9)
AP writes: may as well write books
A Brief History of Witches in Physics
A Brief History of Loch Ness Monster in Physics
A Brief History of Ghosts and Hobgoblins in Physics
No wonder Univ Iowa has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, having to navigate through all that trash nonsense of Old Physics-- big bang, black holes, quarks, Standard Model, none of which was physics but more like pornographic graffiti with physics losers making money from selling that trash
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-18 02:49:03 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Measured Proton Mass is 938.2720813(58) MeV/c^2 (2)
By ***@gmail.com 4 posts 12 views updated 9:24 PM


AP writes: good thing Sam is not in charge of any physics at Univ Iowa, for it would take forever for Iowa to accept the fact real proton is 840MeV and the .5MeV particle as Dirac's monopole



True Chemistry Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item





See all formats and editions
• Kindle
• $0.00 


Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles 
$9.99 to buy




Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of .5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is every where.

Cover picture: shows two of my chemical models, one of CO and the other CO2

Read less


Length: 1097 pages
Word Wise: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Page Flip: Enabled
Matchbook Price: $2.99 What's this?


File Size: 1948 KB
Print Length: 1097 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLVMMSZ
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
                Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
                #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
                #1324 in General Chemistry
                #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)


Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
Synopsis: Mirror, Mirror—Which Coating is the Quietest of Them All
AP writes: Univ Iowa can never confirm true real proton is 840MeV not 938 at the rate of Sam propaganda science
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
A Brief History of Quarks (9)
AP writes: may as well write books
A Brief History of Witches in Physics
A Brief History of Loch Ness Monster in Physics
A Brief History of Ghosts and Hobgoblins in Physics
No wonder Univ Iowa has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, having to navigate through all that trash nonsense of Old Physics-- big bang, black holes, quarks, Standard Model, none of which was physics but more like pornographic graffiti with physics losers making money from selling that trash
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-19 15:48:18 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Measured Proton Mass is 938.2720813(58) MeV/c^2 (8)
By ***@gmail.com 10 posts 22 views updated

AP writes: Sam is far far too dumb to be in science, far too stupid that the proton at 840 with an attached muon of 105 MeV gives 945MeV

So that Univ of Iowa without the stupid Sam in the way, can confirm the real proton is 840MeV. I doubt stupid Sam ever heard of the Dirac monopole
reber G=emc^2
2019-06-24 02:00:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
A Brief History of Quarks (9)
AP writes: may as well write books
A Brief History of Witches in Physics
A Brief History of Loch Ness Monster in Physics
A Brief History of Ghosts and Hobgoblins in Physics
No wonder Univ Iowa has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, having to navigate through all that trash nonsense of Old Physics-- big bang, black holes, quarks, Standard Model, none of which was physics but more like pornographic graffiti with physics losers making money from selling that trash
Salem witches were all woman(ugly) last one was a 14 year old girl. Her crimes was if she walked by tomato plants they died.She was hung at the famous witch tree. England in the very early days started picking on woman.Bert
hanson
2019-06-24 05:30:18 UTC
Permalink
and so "reber G=emc^2" <***@gmail.com> ended
up as a self-anointed vagrant & as a homeless bum, being
alone in his cockroach infested Van with the bucket that
SwineBert shits into".Bert .... and talks to voices from *Treb*.
*Treb* short for the _*The reeking excrement bucket*_ whith which
I have profound discussions with. It's a kicker. O ya. Bert.
"I-park-and-bark-and-fart-in-the-dark." Bert . "It'sa kicker"
"I'm of low-wit-and-a-stupid-shit". Bert "O ya. It's a given".
"I use Cocaine that is a wonder-drug for me". Bert.
"The drugs I'm taking, (21/d), are fogging my mind". Bert
"I can't even remember lots of stuff anymore".Bert ... But...
"I will do even more Drugs till the end of my time". Bert
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true". Bert. "O ya",
""Go figure", "It's on the Money", "Get the picture", Bert
So, for Bert there is a simple Rhyme:
"Bert, you are one STUPID Swine"..."Why not" "it's a given".
" I, SwineBert, have a Fetish to shit into other posters mouth
<Loading Image...> & say
"open wide" ... & have them murdered, for SwineBert to piss
onto their graves, which proves that SwineBert has always-
ONLY-ONE-thing-on his twisted, filthy mind, namely to do
all those items-from-(1)-to-item-(5):
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, ***@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <***@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <***@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" ***@gmail.com:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
On 20Jul2018:
Benj, my posts are way over your head.Reality is your head
is up your ass.So fart it out before you get constipated.Bert
(4)
On 25Mar2008, the criminal Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". -- Bert
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <***@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true". Bert. "O ya",
"That is a given", "Go figure","Get the picture", Bert
__________ "I'm very depressed". Bert _____________
______ "Why am I not loved by all?". Bert. _________
US Jews like SwineBert are traitors that have whored
down this nation. How they did it is seen above and
why so, is described & detailed by the eminent Jewish
Scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal ||R:|| in his epic
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-15 17:38:28 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Minkowski diagram (1)
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 12:22 AM



Discussion
Einstein: His Life and Universe (1)
By ***@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 12:10 AM



Discussion
Time Dilation - Note that the vertical axis is ct, not t (1)

AP writes: there is Sam at it again-- science propaganda, but not science, and holding back of confirming Real Proton = 840 MeV
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated...
3 posts by 3 authors
May 21 (23 hours ago)
"Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated: “Forgive us Sir Isaac Newton, your universe has been overturned.” In that moment, everything we believed about our universe was wrong. Einstein became a science superstar overnight; beers and children were named after him."
How WWI Saved Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-21 19:52:38 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
I’m a Scientist. This is What I’ll Fight For.
By ***@gmail.com 2 posts 0 views updated 1:31 PM

AP writes: well, it is true that Sam has a love of science, but there is a word missing from his post title. For it is plain to me and many others that Sam is lacking in abilities to recognize true science from propaganda and fake science. I think that missing word is "amateur Scientist" yes, that is better for Sam is a amateur scientist, who often cannot tell the difference between fake science from true science
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated...
3 posts by 3 authors
May 21 (23 hours ago)
"Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated: “Forgive us Sir Isaac Newton, your universe has been overturned.” In that moment, everything we believed about our universe was wrong. Einstein became a science superstar overnight; beers and children were named after him."
How WWI Saved Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-23 23:32:21 UTC
Permalink
Discussion
Einstein, Feynman and Hawking Brainwash the World (1)
By Pentcho Valev 6 posts 9 views updated 4:50 PM

Discussion
Feynman about Einstein
By ***@gmail.com 2 posts 1 view updated 4:48 PM

AP writes: little hope in Univ Iowa of confirming real true proton is 840 MeV not 938 when the airwaves are flooded with kooks and their b.s. science like the above two
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
Measured Proton Mass is 938.2720813(58) MeV/c^2 (2)
AP writes: good thing Sam is not in charge of any physics at Univ Iowa, for it would take forever for Iowa to accept the fact real proton is 840MeV and the .5MeV particle as Dirac's monopole
True Chemistry Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of .5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is every where.
Cover picture: shows two of my chemical models, one of CO and the other CO2
Length: 1154 pages
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
Synopsis: Mirror, Mirror—Which Coating is the Quietest of Them All
AP writes: Univ Iowa can never confirm true real proton is 840MeV not 938 at the rate of Sam propaganda science
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Discussion
A Brief History of Quarks (9)
AP writes: may as well write books
A Brief History of Witches in Physics
A Brief History of Loch Ness Monster in Physics
A Brief History of Ghosts and Hobgoblins in Physics
No wonder Univ Iowa has not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, having to navigate through all that trash nonsense of Old Physics-- big bang, black holes, quarks, Standard Model, none of which was physics but more like pornographic graffiti with physics losers making money from selling that trash
Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated...
3 posts by 3 authors
May 21 (23 hours ago)
"Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated: “Forgive us Sir Isaac Newton, your universe has been overturned.” In that moment, everything we believed about our universe was wrong. Einstein became a science superstar overnight; beers and children were named after him."
How WWI Saved Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Michael Moroney
2019-06-24 00:12:17 UTC
Permalink
Was the Saber-Toothed-Tiger, Smilodon, Paleontologists most laughable mistake?
Still crying about your 1 star review? Waah! Waaaahhhh!!! Waaahhhh!!!

Do you realize that there were some 166,000 Smilodon fatalis individuals recovered
at the La Brea pits in Los Angeles? Do you know how many different species/genera of
sabre-tooth cats (not just Smilodon) are known to science? Naah, you'd rather make
up your own facts in your fantasy world....

x-no-archive: yes
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-07-26 19:17:56 UTC
Permalink
About Sam spam under different nymes

Is spam allowed to be taken into the Iowa State Fair grounds????




Discussion
How PAVLOV'S EXPERIMENTS WITH DOGS demonstrated that our behavior can be changed using conditioning. (4)
By ***@gmail.com 5 posts 8 views updated 2:09 PM



Discussion
Why HEAT WAVES are a threat to public health (29)
By ***@gmail.com 29 posts 6 views updated 2:08 PM
+ 10 others



Discussion
A decades-long study of a STAR ORBITING THE BLACK HOLE at the centre of our Galaxy confirms predictions made by Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity. (1)
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated...
3 posts by 3 authors
May 21 (23 hours ago)
"Eddington pointed at the portrait of Sir Isaac Newton and stated: “Forgive us Sir Isaac Newton, your universe has been overturned.” In that moment, everything we believed about our universe was wrong. Einstein became a science superstar overnight; beers and children were named after him."
How WWI Saved Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-08-01 02:01:56 UTC
Permalink
About Rick S and Sam W, spam, is it copyrighted spam like what Pete Olcott does in sci.math ? I suppose spam has value other than as a repellant

Discussion
It has begun - the end of all things (45)
By ***@yahoo.ca 45 posts 22 views updated 8:45 PM


Discussion
Travelling towards a quantum internet at light speed (6)
By ***@gmail.com 6 posts 5 views updated 7:01 PM

Discussion
Lawrence Krauss - Life, the Universe, and Nothing: A Cosmic Mystery Story (2)
By ***@gmail.com 2 posts 2 views updated 7:01 PM
Archimedes Plutonium
2019-08-01 05:53:56 UTC
Permalink
Sam spam— going to the Fair, maybe we get Sam spam on a stick

3 new
3 posts
I wish more USENET readers would take the time to educate themselves about climate science an talk about it
By ***@gmail.com. Last updated 12:31 AM

1 new
2 posts
A new study finds observational evidence of Klein tunneling, a strange phenomenon that enables particles to pass through even the toughest barriers
By ***@gmail.com. Last updated 12:31 AM

2 new
2 posts
Here is something that all good folks interested in physics should read.
By ***@gmail.com. Last updated 12:31 AM

2 new
2 posts
Previously unknown mechanism causes increased forest water use, new study says
By ***@gmail.com. Last updated 12:31 AM

Loading...