Discussion:
Speaking of ellipses...
s***@gmail.com
2019-06-14 13:11:11 UTC
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find the foci of a given ellipse.
benj
2019-06-14 13:24:47 UTC
Post by s***@gmail.com
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find the foci of a given ellipse.
Sorry Sammy, but Archie has told us that ellipses are NOT conic
sections! That pretty much makes your proof invalid!
Sergio
2019-06-14 14:39:36 UTC
Post by benj
Post by s***@gmail.com
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find
the foci of a given ellipse.
Sorry Sammy, but Archie has told us that ellipses are NOT conic
sections!  That pretty much makes your proof invalid!
if you take the AP's hat off, you can cut it into the conic
sections, one needs to show AP this too!
Sergio
2019-06-14 17:15:10 UTC
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by s***@gmail.com
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find
the foci of a given ellipse.
Sorry Sammy, but Archie has told us that ellipses are NOT conic
sections!  That pretty much makes your proof invalid!
if you take the AP's hat off, you can cut it into the conic
sections, one needs to show AP this too!
see ? AP's hat is basically a cone

Michael Moroney
2019-06-14 17:31:29 UTC
Post by Sergio
Post by Sergio
Post by benj
Post by s***@gmail.com
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find
the foci of a given ellipse.
Sorry Sammy, but Archie has told us that ellipses are NOT conic
sections!Â  That pretty much makes your proof invalid!
if you take the AP's hat off, you can cut it into the conic
sections, one needs to show AP this too!
see ? AP's hat is basically a cone
http://enchantedkingdomcreations.com/image/cache/data/products/cone_hat/light_blue-600x600.jpg
No, no, more like this one.

Archimedes Plutonium
2019-06-14 16:18:36 UTC
Post by benj
Post by s***@gmail.com
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find the foci of a given ellipse.
Sorry Sammy, but Archie has told us that ellipses are NOT conic
sections! That pretty much makes your proof invalid!
Yes, thanks Benj, for Sam seems to delight in being a stubborn idiot of science

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Be the first to review this item

See all formats and editions
• Kindle

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled ￼
X-Ray:  Not Enabled ￼
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled ￼

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

Archimedes Plutonium
j***@specsol.spam.sux.com
2019-06-14 17:38:32 UTC
Post by s***@gmail.com
Speaking of ellipses... using only a compass and straightedge, find the foci of a given ellipse.
Seems to me we did that in 7th grade, ass hat.

Are you trying to relive your childhood ass hat or just going senile?
--
Jim Pennino
Mitch Raemsch
2019-06-15 00:42:39 UTC