CAN SPECIAL RELATIVITY BE SAVED ?

[Pentcho Valev]

http://rockpile.phys.virginia.edu/mod04/mod34.pdf
Paul Fendley: "Now let's see what this does to the frequency of the light. We know that even without special relativity, observers moving at different velocities measure different frequencies. (This is the reason the pitch of an ambulance changes as it passes you it doesn't change if you're on the ambulance). This is called the Doppler shift, and for small relative velocity v it is easy to show that the frequency shifts from f to f(1+v/c) (it goes up heading toward you, down away from you). There are relativistic corrections, but these are negligible here."

That is, if the frequency measured by the stationary observer is f=c/L (L is the wavelength), the frequency measured by an observer moving towards the light source with speed v is:

f' = f(1+v/c) = (c/L)(1+v/c) = (c+v)/L = c'/L

where c'=c+v is the speed of the light waves relative to the moving observer. Clearly special relativity is violated.

The only way to save special relativity is to assume that the motion of the observer somehow changes the wavelength of the incoming light so that, in the frame of the moving observer, the product (frequency)(wavelength), which is equal to the speed of light, remains constant (independent of the speed of the observer). This wavelength change is usually implicit in Einsteiniana's texts but silly Einsteinians sometimes produce explicit explanations similar to this one:

According to special relativity, the speed of light is the same for any observer so if for the moving observer the frequency shifts from f to f'=f(1+v/c), then, for the same observer, the wavelength shifts from L to L'=L/(1+v/c), and the product f'L', which is the speed of light relative to that observer, remains constant, Divine Einstein, yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity.

Clever Einsteinians know that the motion of the observer can change nothing in the incoming light - the idea is too silly even for Divine Albert's world. Tom Roberts explicitly admits this but then proposes an even sillier explanation of the wavelength behaviour: the wavelength of light, in Tom Roberts' imagination, is not an intrinsic property of light; rather, it is a function of mysterious "measuring instruments" possessed by the observer, and the state of those "measuring instruments" is a function of the speed of the observer. To put it simply, as the observer changes his speed, his "measuring instruments" react accordingly and give the precious value of the wavelength guaranteeing constancy of the speed of light and allowing Tom Roberts to safely sing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity":

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/Y7KQjUSdum0/1rvrcjF4JlMJ
Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring instrument."

Pentcho Valev

[Sam Wormley]

Post by Pentcho Valev
Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it
cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is
clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it
propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different
wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING
INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a
measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring
instrument."

This is correct. Furthermore, there has never been an observation
that contradicts a prediction of special relativity.

[Pentcho Valev]

Tom Roberts' idea of measured wavelength of light that depends on the speed of the observer, no matter how silly, is still the only hope for special relativity and deserves special attention:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/JXnwcx0kUIo/0oN0istr3lgJ
Tom Roberts: "...yes, from experimental measurements we know that the motion of an observer does not affect the measured wavelength of sound waves. (...) All that matters is the world we inhabit, and in that world, the wavelength of a light wave is NOT an intrinsic aspect of the wave, but rather represents a RELATIONSHIP between wave and measuring instrument. Differently moving observers in different inertial frames can AND DO measure different values for the wavelength of a given light wave."

That is, by changing his speed relative to the emitter, the observer does not change the incoming light but changes his measuring instruments which give a different value of the wavelength. The mechanism is obscure but the respective calculations are extremely simple:

If the speed of the observer relative to the emitter shifts from zero to v and the frequency measured by the observer shifts accordingly from f to f', then the wavelength as provided by the measuring instrument of the observer shifts from L to L'=fL/f'. So, if c' is the speed of the light relative to the moving observer, we have:

c' = f'L' = fL = c, Divine Einstein, yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity.

http://www.haverford.edu/physics/songs/divine.htm
DIVINE EINSTEIN. "No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein not Maxwell, Curie, or Bohr! His fame went glo-bell, he won the Nobel - He should have been given four! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor with brains galore! No-one could outshine Professor Einstein! He gave us special relativity, That's always made him a hero to me! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor in overdrive!"

We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Everything is relative, even simultaneity, and soon Einstein's become a de facto physics deity. 'cos we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity.

Pentcho Valev

[Sam Wormley]

Post by Pentcho Valev
We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Everything is relative, even simultaneity, and soon Einstein's become a de facto physics deity. 'cos we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity.

Reality is what we measure. Measurement through observation and
experiment is at the heart of science.

[Pentcho Valev]

Special relativity is inherently contradictory when it comes to explaining the alleged wavelength change caused by the motion of the light source or observer:

http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553380168
Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "...we must first understand the Doppler effect. As we have seen, visible light consists of fluctuations, or waves, in the electromagnetic field. The wavelength (or distance from one wave crest to the next) of light is extremely small, ranging from four to seven ten-millionths of a meter. The different wavelengths of light are what the human eye sees as different colors, with the longest wavelengths appearing at the red end of the spectrum and the shortest wavelengths at the blue end. Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary."

That is, if the light source starts moving towards the stationary observer, the shortening of the wavelength occurs at the very beginning, as two consecutive wavecrests leave the source, and then the shortened wavelength starts its journey towards the observer. In other words, the wavelength that travels between source and observer is shortened.

If the observer starts moving towards the stationary source, the situation implied by special relativity is entirely different. This time the wavelength that travels between source and observer is not shortened - rather, it is the original wavelength which could only be shortened upon interaction with the observer.

Clearly the two different pictures - the travelling wavelength is shorter when the source moves towards the observer and longer when the observer moves towards the source - contradict the principle of relativity. The only solution to the problem is to assume that there is no shortening of the wavelength in both cases. So the principle of relativity is restored but special relativity will have to be abandoned.

Pentcho Valev

[Sam Wormley]

Post by Pentcho Valev
Special relativity is inherently contradictory when it comes to
explaining the alleged wavelength change caused by the motion of the

Relativistic Doppler effect

Post by Pentcho Valev
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect
The relativistic Doppler effect is the change in frequency (and
wavelength) of light, caused by the relative motion of the source and
the observer (as in the classical Doppler effect), when taking into
account effects described by the special theory of relativity.
The relativistic Doppler effect is different from the
non-relativistic Doppler effect as the equations include the time
dilation effect of special relativity and do not involve the medium
of propagation as a reference point. They describe the total
difference in observed frequencies and possess the required Lorentz
symmetry.

[hanson]

Post by Sam Wormley

Post by Pentcho Valev
Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it
cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is
clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it
propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different
wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING
INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a
measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring
instrument."

This is correct. Furthermore, there has never
been > an observation that contradicts a prediction
of special relativity [in the setup & interpretation by
Einstein Dingleberries who worship Albert's sphincter]

hanson wrote:
And that is what you call physics, Sam?... "Illucid",
to use your own words. Thanks for the laughs though
AHAHAHAHA.... ahahahahanson

[Sam]

Post by Sam Wormley

Post by Pentcho Valev
Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it
cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is
clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it
propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different
wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING
INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a
measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring
instrument."

This is correct. Furthermore, there has never been an observation
that contradicts a prediction of special relativity.

Caveat: so far as we know.

"Light ray itself is unchanged" has not, and cannot, be disproved with
our available technology. Or conversely, proved. See "working
hypothesis."

Challenges might begin with, "there is no perfect vacuum."

Thus the question, what do we really know?

[hanson]

"Sam" <***@long-invalid.usa> wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote that, Tom Roberts said:
"Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it cannot
be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is
clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it
propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different
wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING
INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a
measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring
instrument."
Wormley wrote:
This is correct. Furthermore, there has never been an
observation that contradicts a prediction of special relativity.
"Sam long" wrote:
Caveat: so far as we know.
"Light ray itself is unchanged" has not, and cannot, be
disproved with our available technology.
Or conversely, proved. See "working hypothesis."
Challenges might begin with, "there is no perfect vacuum."
Thus the question, what do we really know?
hanson wrote:
We know that the _Theo-physics_ of SR/GR is to
relativists what Monotheism is to Evangelists,
Islamists & Kabbalists. There are NO caveats.
See Wormley's Psalm above. To him & his ilk there
are NO caveats. SR/GR is a matter of faith to them.
Their Theo-phyiscs of SR/GR is their salvation.
Wormley and his ilk of fellow believers have
their SR/GR scriptures and their Savior, aka
Einstein whose sphincter they worship, and
came to be known as Einstein Dingleberries.
We also know, but it does not matter to Wormley
and his fellow Einstein Dingleberries, that Einstein
himself, already 60+ years ago, became a
. RELATIVITY DENIER.
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR>
wherein Albert said:
||AE|| All these 50 years of conscious brooding have
||AE|| brought me [= Einstein] no nearer to the answer
||AE|| to the question, 'What are light quanta?' aka photons.
and here is much more about this issue in
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR>:
wherein it says:
Early on Einstein knew & hinted that not all was kosher
in Relativity-Land, by him saying about his 1095 paper:
||AE|| The secret to creativity is knowing
|| AE|| how to hide your sources....
by which Einstein referred to the issue that the 1905 paper
was really the intellectual property of his wife Mileva Maric
to whom he, later on, had to fork over all of his Nobel loot,
as _HUSH MONEY_ to keep Mileva from singing!... ahaha...
Einstein started off in the 1905 paper & wrote:
||AE||| "the velocity of light 'c' in our theory (SR) plays
|||AE||| the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."
Then, during the next 3 decades when Einstein was riding
high on his Zionist financed wake that put and kept him
in the lime light it became clearer that
== Einstein & his contributions to physics is/are what
== Picasso's contributions are to the world of fine art,
namely mental aberrations, Gedanken farts & lunacies
like:
||| AE:: "People like us, who **believe** in physics,
||| AE:: know that the distinction between the
||| AE:: past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly
||| AE:: persistent illusion."
|||AE:: "Space & Time are NOT conditions in which we
||AE:: live; they are simply modes in which we think."
That then was the Weltbild of these 2 Fartist kikes.
<http://tinyurl.com/2-Jewish-Fartists> ... and Einstein
never had the guts to prove his SR/GR by him simply
jumping out of a 5th story window & manipulating the
curvature of space & handling space- time, to avoid him
being splattered on the side walk, and thereby proving
his insistence that Gravity is not a force like Newton said.
But towards the end of his life, Einstein became clean
& he changed his mind by 1954 when he declared that
||AE|| All these 50 years of conscious brooding have
||AE|| brought me [= Einstein] no nearer to the answer
||AE|| to the question, 'What are light quanta?' aka photons.
and furthermore Einstein saw the handwriting on the
wall, when in 1954, a year before he died, he wrote to his
Jewish friend Besso:
|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
|AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
|||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
|||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous
|||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire
|||AE:||| castle in the air, my gravitation theory included."
|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)]
<http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein>.... &
or as expressed by poster Tom Roberts [TR], who rote:
[TR:] ___ "SR/GR happen to be "META-Theories"__, iow:
. ____ Relativity is a theory about a theory.____, iow:
. ______ SR & GR is Physics by "Hear-say"______.
<>
So, all in all:
. ____ SR is short for STUPID RANT _____ and
. ____ GR stands for GULLIBLE RECITAL _____.
Up-shot:
Why then is SR/GR still so popular?
People hang onto & fanatically believe in all kind of
shit, which they do OBSERVE & MEASURE, like "UFO's",
"Crop circles", the "Bible", the "Koran", "SR&GR" and
etc, etc... The list is long and like Einstein said:
||AE:: "they are NOT conditions in which we live;
||AE:: they are simply modes in which we think."
Once indoctrinated by any of these esoteric gags,
which are escapes from harsh reality, people do
built that into their Weltbild, proselytize for it
and defend it with their lives!!!.....
___ It is far easier to believe then to think! _____
... ahahaha.... ahahahahanson

[7]

Post by Sam Wormley

Post by Pentcho Valev
Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it
cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is
clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it
propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different
wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING
INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a
measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring
instrument."

This is correct.

What a fscking troll!!!!

So worm you just have to appreciate you know nothing about
Einstein, measurements or instruments. You are just a glow ball
warmie infused troll and you should not be giving the bum steer
to users of physics in this newsgroup without your super idiocy
as on display here.

The reason why different moving observers measure
differently has nothing to do with their instruments
or their orientation!!

Space time is a fabric and it stretches around
each observer according to how they are moving.
No matter what instrument you use, so long
as you measure with same units you see whatever
is consistent for your instrument. And that makes
it independent of instrument and orientation.

The OP makes classic mistake of assuming
if something is a vacuum then it must be stationary
and then hangs every conclusion around
that failed assumption.
The OP has no idea what would happen if he were
blind folded, sat in a vacuum and a weak gravitational
force were to act on him. He might even fish out
a scale to measure it to get his dumb vacuum centric
theories correct, all the while conveniently forgetting that
that the dumb fsck is still blind folded.

Under those blind folded conditions,
the oP might just might begin to appreciate
what a space time fabric is.

But worm, disciple of Al Gore,
you are unlikely to make the grades to understand
any of this as you are so easily programmed by energy
trolls such as Al Gore. You do realize most of Al Gore's
glow ball warmies inconvenient truths have inconveniently
shifted. The troll is now is faking his videos to make
up for lost time and audiences.


http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/02/notes-from-a-mole-in-al-gores-climate-leadership-training/

If you don't believe the troll, he will now brand you a denier.
That after ranting and ranting at feigned enemies that
are all deniers.

Like all snake oil selling politicians and new religion infused nuts
Al Gore now move on to faking glow ball warming
in his videos:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/climate-fail-files/gore-and-bill-nye-fail-at-doing-a-simple-co2-experiment/


Oh My GOOD GOD!!!!

Did you help him make this video Sam? If not why not??
And would you allow him to fake the thermometer experiment
without mentioning it in the video that you faked
a science experiment to lie?

[G=EMC^2]

Post by Pentcho Valev
http://rockpile.phys.virginia.edu/mod04/mod34.pdf
Paul Fendley: "Now let's see what this does to the frequency of the light. We know that even without special relativity, observers moving at different velocities measure different frequencies. (This is the reason the pitch of an ambulance changes as it passes you it doesn't change if you're on the ambulance). This is called the Doppler shift, and for small relative velocity v it is easy to show that the frequency shifts from f to f(1+v/c) (it goes up heading toward you, down away from you). There are relativistic corrections, but these are negligible here."
f' = f(1+v/c) = (c/L)(1+v/c) = (c+v)/L = c'/L
where c'=c+v is the speed of the light waves relative to the moving observer. Clearly special relativity is violated.
According to special relativity, the speed of light is the same for any observer so if for the moving observer the frequency shifts from f to f'=f(1+v/c), then, for the same observer, the wavelength shifts from L to L'=L/(1+v/c), and the product f'L', which is the speed of light relative to that observer, remains constant, Divine Einstein, yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/Y7KQjUSdum0/1rvrcjF4JlMJ
Tom Roberts: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring instrument."
Pentcho Valev

Don't need saving SR is a given. Never proven wrong. Only a low wit would post otherwise Not hard to figure,for they are always out there.TreBert

[S***@hotmail.com]

why'd some one say,
length is not an intrinsic property of waves;
did they believe in newton's FaketonS.

the average distance of a planet from its sun,
is half of the major axis (semimajor axis

[Russell Hancock]

Post by S***@hotmail.com
why'd some one say,
length is not an intrinsic property of waves;
did they believe in newton's FaketonS.
the average distance of a planet from its sun,
is half of the major axis (semimajor axis

Tom Roberts wrote: "Wavelength is not an intrinsic property of light, so it cannot be discussed independent of how it is measured. But it is clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it propagates. Differently moving observers will measure different wavelengths for a given light ray, because their MEASURING INSTRUMENTS are oriented differently in spacetime, and such a measurement inherently PROJECTS the light ray onto the measuring instrument.

But it is clear that in vacuum the light ray itself is unchanged as it propagates:
I disagree why wouldn't the photon loose energy in measured quanta as it propagates in a vacuum if the the vacuum has an impedance or Q charge,dielectric constant, now if observed as a wave it could propagate unchanged. I see how no one has proved how to lower the refractive index below 1,I shall win Nobel Peace Prize in physics some day by solving this Delima.

[Sam Wormley]

Post by Russell Hancock
I disagree why wouldn't the photon loose energy in measured quanta as
it propagates in a vacuum if the the vacuum has an impedance or Q
charge,dielectric constant, now if observed as a wave it could
propagate unchanged.

Tired light

Post by Russell Hancock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tired_light
As cosmological measurements became more precise and the statistics
in cosmological data sets improved, *tired light proposals ended up*
*being falsified*,[1][2][3] to the extent that the theory was described
in 2001 by science writer Charles Seife as being "firmly on the
fringe of physics 30 years ago",[5] however tired light theories
still appear occasionally in speculative journals.

[Sam Wormley]

Errors in Tired Light Cosmology

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/tiredlit.htm

[Russell Hancock]

Post by Sam Wormley

Post by Russell Hancock
I disagree why wouldn't the photon loose energy in measured quanta as
it propagates in a vacuum if the the vacuum has an impedance or Q
charge,dielectric constant, now if observed as a wave it could
propagate unchanged.

Tired light

Post by Russell Hancock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tired_light
As cosmological measurements became more precise and the statistics
in cosmological data sets improved, *tired light proposals ended up*
*being falsified*,[1][2][3] to the extent that the theory was described
in 2001 by science writer Charles Seife as being "firmly on the
fringe of physics 30 years ago",[5] however tired light theories
still appear occasionally in speculative journals.

You totally read my mind I was just going their with a new post, Tired light

Post by Sam Wormley
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tired_light

[S***@hotmail.com]

because, there is no pascalian (absolute) vacuum;
there is no zero-point energy;
there are no soi-disant virtual particles;
there just are not very many of them, although
"air" has a refractive index of about 1.0004, and
it is also known as "free space",
as far as experiments go,
viz Young's two-pinhole experiment

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:32:19 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Wilson: In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at c+v relative
to an

observer approaching the source at v.
===================================================

Lord : That's emission theory. In BaTh revision 15.01 light moves at c

relative to the unifuckating h-aether and accelerates with Adoppler.

Wilson: Wavelength is absolute and universal.

============================================

Lord: Phew! At least that makes your crackpottery different from
observation,

we would not want you agreeing with reality. Your Gawd made it that
way, did he?
Frequency is absolute and universal because f = 1/t and time is
absolute and universal, Newton said so.
Wavelength is proportional to speed, treacherous Wilson is full
of shit and can't stop his verbal diarrhoea hitting the fan and
coating everything in his revised revisions of the many flavours
of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
Lord:
Loading Image...
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[Russell Hancock]

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:32:19 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
Wilson: In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at c+v relative
to an

observer approaching the source at v.
===================================================

Lord : That's emission theory. In BaTh revision 15.01 light moves at c

relative to the unifuckating h-aether and accelerates with Adoppler.

Wilson: Wavelength is absolute and universal.

============================================

Lord: Phew! At least that makes your crackpottery different from
observation,

we would not want you agreeing with reality. Your Gawd made it that
way, did he?
Frequency is absolute and universal because f = 1/t and time is
absolute and universal, Newton said so.
Wavelength is proportional to speed, treacherous Wilson is full
of shit and can't stop his verbal diarrhoea hitting the fan and
coating everything in his revised revisions of the many flavours
of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
http://www.51allout.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mallard_ducks.jpg
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
is.
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

negative length ha hah ,look at your giggle stick

[hanson]

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at
c+v relative to an observer approaching the source at v.
Wavelength is absolute and universal.
Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
============================================

"Loads of Analdorkles in porker-Parker's
g/Earl/y pink Androcies. Phew! LAME
<snip>

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

Lascivious
Ahahahen's son
Masticates
Excrement.
Ahahahen's son the giggly black gay girlie is now eating his own shit, his
verbal diarrhoea is drying up.

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at
c+v relative to an observer approaching the source at v.
Wavelength is absolute and universal.
Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
============================================

"Loads of Analdorkles in porker-Parker's
g/Earl/y pink Androcies. Phew! LAME
<snip>

[hanson]

"Lord?..." ... What a "Load of Analdorkles
in porker-Parker's g/Earl/y pink Androcies.
<snip>
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"hanson" wrote in message news:kvugb3$5lj$***@dont-email.me...

"Lord?..."
==========================================
Yes? You called?
Bow before me, I am your master, funnier than you.
Plight thy troth or request a boon.
I have a bargain in boons today, BOGOs on some and 25% off on others.
...ROFLMAO...
...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
...ahahahahahaha...

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[hanson]

with a "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y Androcies",:
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes? You called?
hanson wrote:
"Lord?..." ... What a "Load of Analdorkles
in porker-Parker's g/Earl/y pink Androcies.
<snip>
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMA

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

Lame as in mentally crippled.
Repeating the same joke is unfunny, giggly girly hen's son. They've all
heard it before.
I am your master, I'm funnier than you.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
POKE


"hanson" wrote in message news:kvv01m$at$***@dont-email.me...

with a "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y Androcies",:
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes? You called?
hanson wrote:
"Lord?..." ... What a "Load of Analdorkles
in porker-Parker's g/Earl/y pink Androcies.
<snip>
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ROTFLMA

[hanson]

"unfunny" & with a "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y Androcies",:
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes? You called?
hanson wrote:
"Lord?..." ... Loady, loady, loady... AHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO
"Lord?... What a "Load of Analdorkles in porker-Parker's
g/Earl/y pink Androcies. ... ahahaha...AHAHAHHA....

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"hanson" wrote in message news:kvvstd$elo$***@dont-email.me...

"unfunny" & with a "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y Androcies",:
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes? You called?
hanson wrote:
"Lord?..." ... Loady, loady, loady...
===================================
That's a new one. <polite chuckle>

AHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO
==================================
That's a old one.... <groan>


"Lord?... What a "Load of Analdorkles in porker-Parker's
g/Earl/y pink Androcies.
==================================
That's so old it predates Noah's ark. <more groan>


... ahahaha...AHAHAHHA....
==================================
That's so old it died and went to cackle heaven.

As an undertaker you make a good comedian, hanson.
I'm sure your audience is splitting their sides with laughter,
every moron among them. Nope, I'm wrong, not even the
morons find you funny, but they can't read anyway.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[hanson]

"unfunny" & with a "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y Androcies",:
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes? You called?
hanson wrote:
"Lord?..." ... Loady, loady, loady... AHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO
"Lord?... What a "Load of Analdorkles in porker-Parker's
g/Earl/y pink Androcies. ... ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA....
Porker John wrote:
I'm wrong, .... can't read anyway.
hanson wrote:
Right!... Loady, loady, loady... AHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO

[hanson]

with a "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y Androcies",:
<***@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes? You called?
hanson wrote:
"Lord?..." ... Loady, loady, loady... AHAHAHA... ROTFLMAO
"Lord?... What a "Load of Analdorkles in porker-Parker's
g/Earl/y pink Androcies. ... ahahaha...AHAHAHHA....

[Henry Wilson DSc.]

On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 00:57:27 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:32:19 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
Wilson: In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at c+v relative
to an

observer approaching the source at v.
===================================================

Lord : That's emission theory. In BaTh revision 15.01 light moves at c

relative to the unifuckating h-aether and accelerates with Adoppler.

Wilson: Wavelength is absolute and universal.

============================================

Lord: Phew! At least that makes your crackpottery different from
observation,

we would not want you agreeing with reality. Your Gawd made it that
way, did he?
Frequency is absolute and universal because f = 1/t and time is
absolute and universal, Newton said so.
Wavelength is proportional to speed, treacherous Wilson is full
of shit and can't stop his verbal diarrhoea hitting the fan and
coating everything in his revised revisions of the many flavours
of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
http://www.51allout.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mallard_ducks.jpg
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.

OK I'll ask you an easier question.

Why is the male duck chasing the female?

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Henry Wilson DSc.

[Sam]

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 00:57:27 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:32:19 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
Wilson: In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at c+v relative
to an

observer approaching the source at v.
===================================================

Lord : That's emission theory. In BaTh revision 15.01 light moves at c

relative to the unifuckating h-aether and accelerates with Adoppler.

Wilson: Wavelength is absolute and universal.

============================================

Lord: Phew! At least that makes your crackpottery different from
observation,

we would not want you agreeing with reality. Your Gawd made it that
way, did he?
Frequency is absolute and universal because f = 1/t and time is
absolute and universal, Newton said so.
Wavelength is proportional to speed, treacherous Wilson is full
of shit and can't stop his verbal diarrhoea hitting the fan and
coating everything in his revised revisions of the many flavours
of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
http://www.51allout.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mallard_ducks.jpg
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.

OK I'll ask you an easier question.
Why is the male duck chasing the female?

Because she's relatively female. OTOH she could be quite masculine
compared to some other female and when in her company, perhaps not
attractive to male ducks then. So as you can see, it isn't such an
easy question after all. There's *always* something out there in the
weeds that destroys certainty.

But then again, we cannot realistically expect anyone who is incapable
of working out Doppler to understand primal duck behavior.

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 00:57:27 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:32:19 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
Wilson: In BaTh, light moves at c relative to its source and at c+v relative
to an

observer approaching the source at v.
===================================================

Lord : That's emission theory. In BaTh revision 15.01 light moves at c

relative to the unifuckating h-aether and accelerates with Adoppler.

Wilson: Wavelength is absolute and universal.

============================================

Lord: Phew! At least that makes your crackpottery different from
observation,

we would not want you agreeing with reality. Your Gawd made it that
way, did he?
Frequency is absolute and universal because f = 1/t and time is
absolute and universal, Newton said so.
Wavelength is proportional to speed, treacherous Wilson is full
of shit and can't stop his verbal diarrhoea hitting the fan and
coating everything in his revised revisions of the many flavours
of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
http://www.51allout.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mallard_ducks.jpg
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.

Wilson: OK I'll ask you an easier question.

Why is the male duck chasing the female?
========================================
Lord: Some fowl purpose, of course.

There's little brown duck, swimming in the water,
A little brown duck, doing what she oughta,
She took a bite from the crest of a wave,
She flapped her wings and she said I’m a brave
Little brown duck swimming in the water.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!

There's little green drake, swimming in the water,
A little green drake, doing what he noughta,
He took a peck from the feather ahead,
She opened her beak and he said I’m dead,
I'm gonna get the worst quacking for that sexual
assault since that ozzie Rolf Harris was charged.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!

Now I'll ask you a very easy question.
Why do you make utterly stupid statements such as
"Wavelength is absolute and universal" and point
to the wake behind and the bow wave in front of
a duck paddling on water as an example?

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[Henry Wilson DSc.]

On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:54:25 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
http://www.51allout.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mallard_ducks.jpg
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.

Wilson: OK I'll ask you an easier question.
Why is the male duck chasing the female?
========================================
Lord: Some fowl purpose, of course.
There's little brown duck, swimming in the water,
A little brown duck, doing what she oughta,
She took a bite from the crest of a wave,
She flapped her wings and she said I’m a brave
Little brown duck swimming in the water.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!
There's little green drake, swimming in the water,
A little green drake, doing what he noughta,
He took a peck from the feather ahead,
She opened her beak and he said I’m dead,
I'm gonna get the worst quacking for that sexual
assault since that ozzie Rolf Harris was charged.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!
Now I'll ask you a very easy question.
Why do you make utterly stupid statements such as
"Wavelength is absolute and universal" and point
to the wake behind and the bow wave in front of
a duck paddling on water as an example?

The distance between each wave is the same no matter how fast you fly over the
water. Try it!
PS: So is the distance between each duck.

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Henry Wilson DSc.

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 20:54:25 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

of Wilson's Ballistic Theory of Bullshit.

Wilson : Androcles, closet aetherist, is so demented he thinks the distance
between
water waves depends on the speed of his boat.
==========================================================
http://www.51allout.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mallard_ducks.jpg
Wilson, totally insane, thinks water wavelengths in front of the duck are
not zero
or negative. He's so poorly educated he doesn't know what a negative length
is.

Wilson: OK I'll ask you an easier question.
Why is the male duck chasing the female?
========================================
Lord: Some fowl purpose, of course.
There's little brown duck, swimming in the water,
A little brown duck, doing what she oughta,
She took a bite from the crest of a wave,
She flapped her wings and she said I’m a brave
Little brown duck swimming in the water.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!
There's little green drake, swimming in the water,
A little green drake, doing what he noughta,
He took a peck from the feather ahead,
She opened her beak and he said I’m dead,
I'm gonna get the worst quacking for that sexual
assault since that ozzie Rolf Harris was charged.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!
Now I'll ask you a very easy question.
Why do you make utterly stupid statements such as
"Wavelength is absolute and universal" and point
to the wake behind and the bow wave in front of
a duck paddling on water as an example?

Insane shithead Wilson:
The distance between each wave is the same no matter how fast you fly over
the
water.
Try it!
==============================================
Lord:
Oh, you have to fly over water without disturbing it and that makes
water wavelength absolute. Got it.
Ok, I'll try it. I won't disturb the water like the duck did, I'll
get a dragonfly to help me. They can hover like a helicopter.
We'll call the speed of the ripples c and start at the reed in
the pond.
The dragonfly takes my absolute metre tape measure graduated
in absolute centimetres that don't get disturbed whether you fly
over them or not, puts the 0 end on the reed, waits for a crest
at the reed and unreels the tape as he flies off to find the next
crest. No matter how fast he flies the distance to the next crest
is the same. He flies at c and never gets to the next crest, it keeps
on moving away. I'm holding the 0 end on the reed for him and
he can't be in two places at once, nobody can. How is he supposed
to measure your absolute wavelength, chicken farmer?



Insane shithead Wilson:
PS: So is the distance between each duck.
========================================================
Lord:
Why doesn't the second duck make absolute ripples 180 degrees
out of phase with the first duck and stop the absolute ripples?

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[Henry Wilson DSc.]

On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:17:18 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
a duck paddling on water as an example?

The distance between each wave is the same no matter how fast you fly over the
water.
Try it!
==============================================
Oh, you have to fly over water without disturbing it and that makes
water wavelength absolute. Got it.

Well I just wanted to make the question easier for you.

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
Ok, I'll try it. I won't disturb the water like the duck did, I'll
get a dragonfly to help me. They can hover like a helicopter.
We'll call the speed of the ripples c and start at the reed in
the pond.
The dragonfly takes my absolute metre tape measure graduated
in absolute centimetres that don't get disturbed whether you fly
over them or not, puts the 0 end on the reed, waits for a crest
at the reed and unreels the tape as he flies off to find the next
crest. No matter how fast he flies the distance to the next crest
is the same. He flies at c and never gets to the next crest, it keeps
on moving away. I'm holding the 0 end on the reed for him and
he can't be in two places at once, nobody can. How is he supposed
to measure your absolute wavelength, chicken farmer?

He uses his brain like an old pommie used to.

He gets hold of an adjustable boat, rows out into the waves and adjusts its
length so it fits neatly between two waves. He then gets it moving at exactly
the speed of the waves and is taken across the ocean wthout using any effort.
The length of the boat is, of course equal to the absolute wavelength of the
waves.

Have you noticed any adjustable ducks in your vicinity?

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
PS: So is the distance between each duck.
========================================================
Why doesn't the second duck make absolute ripples 180 degrees
out of phase with the first duck and stop the absolute ripples?

It's not part of the mating ritual. Ripples are pretty.

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

Henry Wilson DSc.

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:17:18 -0700, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
a duck paddling on water as an example?

The distance between each wave is the same no matter how fast you fly over the
water.
Try it!
==============================================
Oh, you have to fly over water without disturbing it and that makes
water wavelength absolute. Got it.

Well I just wanted to make the question easier for you.

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
Ok, I'll try it. I won't disturb the water like the duck did, I'll
get a dragonfly to help me. They can hover like a helicopter.
We'll call the speed of the ripples c and start at the reed in
the pond.
The dragonfly takes my absolute metre tape measure graduated
in absolute centimetres that don't get disturbed whether you fly
over them or not, puts the 0 end on the reed, waits for a crest
at the reed and unreels the tape as he flies off to find the next
crest. No matter how fast he flies the distance to the next crest
is the same. He flies at c and never gets to the next crest, it keeps
on moving away. I'm holding the 0 end on the reed for him and
he can't be in two places at once, nobody can. How is he supposed
to measure your absolute wavelength, chicken farmer?

He uses his brain like an old pommie used to.

He gets hold of an adjustable boat, rows out into the waves and
adjusts its length so it fits neatly between two waves.
==============================================
Adjustable boat, huh? Can you buy one on ebay?

The Duck and the Pussy-cat went to sea
In a pretty adjustable boat,
They took some oars, and Pussy-cat's paws
Were wrapped in an eiderdown coat.
The Duck looked up to the Kitty above,
And said to the Pussy-cat's mitten,
'O variable mitten! How charming you fitten
To the coat of a beautiful Kitten,
fitten,
Kitten,
To the coat of a beautiful Kitten!

II
Pussy said to the Duck, 'You elegant cluck!
How charmingly sweet you quack!
O let us be married! too long we have tarried:
But what shall we do for a mac?'
They sailed away, for a year and a day,
To the land where the cane-toad grows
And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood,
A raincoat at the end of his nose,
His nose,
His nose,
A raincoat at the end of his nose.

III
'Dear pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling
Your mac?' Said the Wilson, 'You bet.'
So they took it away, and were married next day
By the Turkey who lives in Usenet.
They dined on mince, and slices of quince,
Which they raced with a spoon-egg run;
And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand,
They danced by the rays of the sun,
The sun,
The sun,
They danced by the rays of the sun.
(Apologies to Ed Lear.)


He then gets it moving at exactly
the speed of the waves and is taken across the ocean wthout using any
effort.
The length of the boat is, of course equal to the absolute wavelength of the
waves.

Have you noticed any adjustable ducks in your vicinity?
===================================================
Adjustable absolute boats... that's a new one.
Adjustable absolute swans fly with necks stretched, I've noticed that.
Loading Image...
Adjustable absolute ducks, too.
Loading Image...
You did say they had to fly above the waves, right?
Adjustable absolute flying boats...hmm...nah, likely to stall.

Did you notice the back of the boat is not at the reed?
That's why wavelength has nothing whatever to do with speed.
The boat's speed has nothing to do with its length.

Post by Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
PS: So is the distance between each duck.
========================================================
Why doesn't the second duck make absolute ripples 180 degrees
out of phase with the first duck and stop the absolute ripples?

It's not part of the mating ritual. Ripples are pretty.
=============================================
Ducks need raincoats to flash open in their mating rituals.
Raincoats are Mackintoshes, not to be confused with apples.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[hanson]

<snip crap>

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
So is the distance between each duck.

hanson wrote:
Henry Wilson, try to understand that above "Lord" is
John Parker, the porker, with a "Load of Analdorkles
in his g/Earl/y Androcies"... who tries very hard to
cover up the following post in which Parker admits
to his bigotry:
Here, under his old handles, is how John Parker justifies
his behavior. On June 04, 2008 6:46 PM he said
"Hexenmeister" <***@broom.Mickey> wrote: or as
"Androcles" <***@hogwarts.physics> wrote:
"I like to be crass and offend in retribution for a career
of arse-kissing politeness in pursuit of the almighty
buck, and where better than usenet?"
Wilson listen: Parker's bizarre mentation is his admission
of being a loser who was a failure in his professional
career, but hopes to be a big shot on Usenet... ahaha...
To boot, there are other similar posts (Good/Bad Cop
etc) which reflect his reaction to his sorry career.

[Henry Wilson DSc.]

Post by hanson
<snip crap>

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
So is the distance between each duck.

Henry Wilson, try to understand that above "Lord" is
John Parker, the porker, with a "Load of Analdorkles
in his g/Earl/y Androcies"... who tries very hard to
cover up the following post in which Parker admits
Here, under his old handles, is how John Parker justifies
his behavior. On June 04, 2008 6:46 PM he said
"I like to be crass and offend in retribution for a career
of arse-kissing politeness in pursuit of the almighty
buck, and where better than usenet?"
Wilson listen: Parker's bizarre mentation is his admission
of being a loser who was a failure in his professional
career, but hopes to be a big shot on Usenet... ahaha...
To boot, there are other similar posts (Good/Bad Cop
etc) which reflect his reaction to his sorry career.

Ever since Andro the Anti, closet aetherist, took over the piggery in Medway
Castle, which he owns, he has become more Anti everything. He is now posting
more pigshit than bullshit but with the same effectiveness as before.


Henry Wilson DSc.

[hanson]

ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.. Good one!, Henry.
"Henry Wilson DSc." <***@....> wrote:
"hanson" <***@quick.net> wrote:
<snip crap>

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
So is the distance between each duck.

hanson wrote:
Henry Wilson, try to understand that above "Lord" is
John Parker, the porker, with a "Load of Analdorkles
in his g/Earl/y Androcies"... who tries very hard to
cover up the following post in which Parker admits
to his bigotry:
Here, under his old handles, is how John Parker justifies
his behavior. On June 04, 2008 6:46 PM he said
"Hexenmeister" <***@broom.Mickey> wrote: or as
"Androcles" <***@hogwarts.physics> wrote:
"I like to be crass and offend in retribution for a career
of arse-kissing politeness in pursuit of the almighty
buck, and where better than usenet?"
Wilson listen: Parker's bizarre mentation is his admission
of being a loser who was a failure in his professional
career, but hopes to be a big shot on Usenet... ahaha...
To boot, there are other similar posts (Good/Bad Cop
etc) which reflect his reaction to his sorry career.
Henry Wilson wrote:
Ever since Andro the Anti, closet aetherist, took over the
piggery in Medway Castle, which he owns, he has become
more Anti everything. He is now posting more pigshit than
bullshit but with the same effectiveness as before.
-- Henry Wilson DSc.
hanson wrote:
ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.. Good one!, Henry.
But it's NOT a "Castle" that John Parker, the porker,
lives in with his "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y
pink Androcies"...
Porker John bragged and cried also that he lives
in a shabby government subsidized little hovel, and
that he takes advantage of the NHS and the disability
living-allowance, because he is in pain and suffers
from an arthritic and broken ankle, an aortal aneurysm,
and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ... AND
that he became a Usenet Evangelist Preacher who said
" whether or not it is clear to you, be at peace with God,
and strive to be happy."
Unfortunately, for reason of his, Porker's, Napoleon
complex, his Anti-Semitism and his general bigotry
Porker himself is not at peace at all, nor even striving...
... despite all that free exposure he gets from the
Juniors... who are on the way in and up, ... while
Porker ... who is on the way out and down, ...
which make him cry, bitterly.
Mais, c'est la vie, which is something that Porker-John
never grasped.... ahahaha... AHAHA... ROTFLMAO

[Henry Wilson DSc.]

Post by hanson
Wilson listen: Parker's bizarre mentation is his admission
of being a loser who was a failure in his professional
career, but hopes to be a big shot on Usenet... ahaha...
To boot, there are other similar posts (Good/Bad Cop
etc) which reflect his reaction to his sorry career.
Ever since Andro the Anti, closet aetherist, took over the
piggery in Medway Castle, which he owns, he has become
more Anti everything. He is now posting more pigshit than
bullshit but with the same effectiveness as before.
-- Henry Wilson DSc.
ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.. Good one!, Henry.
But it's NOT a "Castle" that John Parker, the porker,
lives in with his "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y
pink Androcies"...
Porker John bragged and cried also that he lives
in a shabby government subsidized little hovel, and
that he takes advantage of the NHS and the disability
living-allowance, because he is in pain and suffers
from an arthritic and broken ankle, an aortal aneurysm,
and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ... AND
that he became a Usenet Evangelist Preacher who said
" whether or not it is clear to you, be at peace with God,
and strive to be happy."
Unfortunately, for reason of his, Porker's, Napoleon
complex, his Anti-Semitism and his general bigotry
Porker himself is not at peace at all, nor even striving...
... despite all that free exposure he gets from the
Juniors... who are on the way in and up, ... while
Porker ... who is on the way out and down, ...
which make him cry, bitterly.
Mais, c'est la vie, which is something that Porker-John
never grasped.... ahahaha... AHAHA... ROTFLMAO

Hahaha!
But the poor old bugger is still good entertainment even if his scientific
abiltiy is verging on the negative....It seems his poetic imagination has run
riot since the subject of ducks was mentioned.

Henry Wilson DSc.

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

Post by hanson
Wilson listen: Parker's bizarre mentation is his admission
of being a loser who was a failure in his professional
career, but hopes to be a big shot on Usenet... ahaha...
To boot, there are other similar posts (Good/Bad Cop
etc) which reflect his reaction to his sorry career.
Ever since Andro the Anti, closet aetherist, took over the
piggery in Medway Castle, which he owns, he has become
more Anti everything. He is now posting more pigshit than
bullshit but with the same effectiveness as before.
-- Henry Wilson DSc.
ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.. Good one!, Henry.
But it's NOT a "Castle" that John Parker, the porker,
lives in with his "Load of Analdorkles in his g/Earl/y
pink Androcies"...
Porker John bragged and cried also that he lives
in a shabby government subsidized little hovel, and
that he takes advantage of the NHS and the disability
living-allowance, because he is in pain and suffers
from an arthritic and broken ankle, an aortal aneurysm,
and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ... AND
that he became a Usenet Evangelist Preacher who said
" whether or not it is clear to you, be at peace with God,
and strive to be happy."
Unfortunately, for reason of his, Porker's, Napoleon
complex, his Anti-Semitism and his general bigotry
Porker himself is not at peace at all, nor even striving...
... despite all that free exposure he gets from the
Juniors... who are on the way in and up, ... while
Porker ... who is on the way out and down, ...
which make him cry, bitterly.
Mais, c'est la vie, which is something that Porker-John
never grasped.... ahahaha... AHAHA... ROTFLMAO

Hahaha!
But the poor old bugger is still good entertainment even if his scientific
abiltiy is verging on the negative....It seems his poetic imagination has
run
riot since the subject of ducks was mentioned.

Henry Wilson DSc.
==================================================
What are you doing in sci.physics, Wilson?
This is where the big lunatics play games, you belong with the little
league lunatics where the Idiot of Oz meets the Wizard of Oz down in
sci.physics.relativity land. Do you want to tell all about your KE?

Post by hanson

KE is not frame dependent.
No form of energy is or can be frame dependent.
You have no better knowledge of basic physics than diaper.

..........................

Post by hanson
" KE f a singkle objkect, defined as 1/2mv^2 IS frame
dependent..OBVIFUCKINGOUSLY. I HAVE NEVER CLAIMED OTHERWISE."- Wilson

Very pretty... and out for a duck. Keeping the Ashes has never been easier.
Wilson will know what "out for a duck" means.
Wilson will know the value of the prized Ashes.
ayayayanks won't know.
-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

[Wizard-Of-Oz]

"Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" <***@gmail.com> wrote
in news:k_MUt.17772$***@fx31.am4:

lson: OK I'll ask you an easier question.

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
Why is the male duck chasing the female?
========================================
Lord: Some fowl purpose, of course.
There's little brown duck, swimming in the water,
A little brown duck, doing what she oughta,
She took a bite from the crest of a wave,
She flapped her wings and she said I’m a brave
Little brown duck swimming in the water.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!
There's little green drake, swimming in the water,
A little green drake, doing what he noughta,
He took a peck from the feather ahead,
She opened her beak and he said I’m dead,
I'm gonna get the worst quacking for that sexual
assault since that ozzie Rolf Harris was charged.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!

I *love* your poetical answer there :D :D

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
Now I'll ask you a very easy question.
Why do you make utterly stupid statements such as
"Wavelength is absolute and universal" and point
to the wake behind and the bow wave in front of
a duck paddling on water as an example?

And I *love* your question

[Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway]

"Wizard-Of-Oz" wrote in message news:l00ebp$6e0$***@speranza.aioe.org...

"Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" <***@gmail.com> wrote
in news:k_MUt.17772$***@fx31.am4:

lson: OK I'll ask you an easier question.

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
Why is the male duck chasing the female?
========================================
Lord: Some fowl purpose, of course.
There's little brown duck, swimming in the water,
A little brown duck, doing what she oughta,
She took a bite from the crest of a wave,
She flapped her wings and she said I’m a brave
Little brown duck swimming in the water.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!
There's little green drake, swimming in the water,
A little green drake, doing what he noughta,
He took a peck from the feather ahead,
She opened her beak and he said I’m dead,
I'm gonna get the worst quacking for that sexual
assault since that ozzie Rolf Harris was charged.
QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!

I *love* your poetical answer there :D :D
======================================
But you've thoughtlessly snipped the url to the image.
I *detest* shitheads still living in the '80s that snip relevant
material prematurely in a panic attack to allow streaming video
bandwidth from You-tube, just to save less than a kilobyte of text.

Post by Henry Wilson DSc.
Now I'll ask you a very easy question.
Why do you make utterly stupid statements such as
"Wavelength is absolute and universal" and point
to the wake behind and the bow wave in front of
a duck paddling on water as an example?

And I *love* your question
==============================================
I'm not your lover. You are the kind of idiot that claims the
speed of light is the same in all frames of reference and
erroneously cites c = wavelength * frequency as a "proof".

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway