Discussion:
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did you cover the Kjaergaard Experiment of 2014, that in effect proves proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-07 21:39:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did you cover the Kjaergaard Experiment of 2014, that in effect proves proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole

Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did your magazine cover the P+1 bonding to H+1 ??

It happened in late 2014, early 2015.

Was your magazine that good enough to have covered that monumental experiment?

Editors, I need not remind you how Monumentally important the Kjaergaard Experiment was

Because, what it tells us, is that the Real Electron = 105 MeV, the Real Proton is 840 MeV and that little particle we always thought was the electron, is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole.

So, Graham and Bernard, did NEW SCIENTIST cover that great monumental experiment of 2014, or, was NEW SCIENTIST too busy with fake science of Big Bang, black holes, LIGO, gravity waves, neutron stars, Peter Higgs boson fakery, dark matter, dark energy and much much more b.s. Too busy with fake science, that the great science escapes your attention.

Vol. 5: , Issue. 23, : Pages. 4225-4231
Publication Date (Web): November 19, 2014

https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502150d

Phosphorus (P) is an element that is essential to the life of all organisms, and the atmospheric detection of phosphine suggests the existence of a volatile biogeochemical P cycle. Here, we investigate the ability of P to participate in the formation of OH···P hydrogen bonds. Three bimolecular alcohol–trimethylphosphine complexes have been detected. Initially, the complexes were detected using matrix isolation spectroscopy, which favors complex formation. Subsequently, the fundamental OH-stretching vibration was observed in room-temperature gas-phase spectra. On the basis of our measured OH-stretching frequency red shifts and quantum chemical calculations, we find that P is an acceptor atom similar in strength to O and S and that all three P, O, and S atoms are weaker acceptors than N. The quantum chemical calculations show that both H and P in the OH···P hydrogen bond have partial positive charges, as expected from their electronegativities. However, the electrostatic potentials show a negative potential area on the electron density surface around P that facilitates formation of hydrogen bonds.

Re: Sun with molecules proves electron= muon Re: EXPERIMENTAL PROOF Re: Hydrogen is the very best way to prove AP's ION theory Re: proving AP's ion theory

Better yet than the Sun here is where a chemist bonds H+1 with P+1

This fact proves AP's Ion theory as magnetic monopoles but also proves there is no repulsion force in EM theory, only a denial of same space occupancy, but on top of that, proves the Real Electron is 105 MeV, Real Proton is 840 MeV

Thanks to this researcher in Denmark

phys.org
Unlikely hydrogen bond discovered

March 13, 2015
University of Copenhagen

Unlikely bonding in Copenhagen lab. Henrik G. Kjaergaard and his team discovered positive hydrogen bonding to positive Phosphorus
As with magnets and alternating current, positively charged molecules never aim for one another. Indeed, similarly charged poles are repelled. Nevertheless, a team from the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry has managed to become the first to bond positively charged phosphorus atoms with positively charged hydrogen ones. Their insight may prove pivotal to understanding how biologically important molecules such as DNA and proteins form properly.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-10 22:43:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Michael Moroney
Feb 8
3:57 PM (57 minutes ago)
Feb 6
I can do percentages correctly, and you can't.
AP writes:: yet clearly Moroney is a liar for he fails at percentages. He says he is a engineer but how many engineers do you know who can't do a percentage
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did you cover the Kjaergaard Experiment of 2014, that in effect proves proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did your magazine cover the P+1 bonding to H+1 ??
It happened in late 2014, early 2015.
Was your magazine that good enough to have covered that monumental experiment?
Editors, I need not remind you how Monumentally important the Kjaergaard Experiment was
Because, what it tells us, is that the Real Electron = 105 MeV, the Real Proton is 840 MeV and that little particle we always thought was the electron, is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
So, Graham and Bernard, did NEW SCIENTIST cover that great monumental experiment of 2014, or, was NEW SCIENTIST too busy with fake science of Big Bang, black holes, LIGO, gravity waves, neutron stars, Peter Higgs boson fakery, dark matter, dark energy and much much more b.s. Too busy with fake science, that the great science escapes your attention.
Vol. 5: , Issue. 23, : Pages. 4225-4231
Publication Date (Web): November 19, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502150d
Phosphorus (P) is an element that is essential to the life of all organisms, and the atmospheric detection of phosphine suggests the existence of a volatile biogeochemical P cycle. Here, we investigate the ability of P to participate in the formation of OH···P hydrogen bonds. Three bimolecular alcohol–trimethylphosphine complexes have been detected. Initially, the complexes were detected using matrix isolation spectroscopy, which favors complex formation. Subsequently, the fundamental OH-stretching vibration was observed in room-temperature gas-phase spectra. On the basis of our measured OH-stretching frequency red shifts and quantum chemical calculations, we find that P is an acceptor atom similar in strength to O and S and that all three P, O, and S atoms are weaker acceptors than N. The quantum chemical calculations show that both H and P in the OH···P hydrogen bond have partial positive charges, as expected from their electronegativities. However, the electrostatic potentials show a negative potential area on the electron density surface around P that facilitates formation of hydrogen bonds.
Re: Sun with molecules proves electron= muon Re: EXPERIMENTAL PROOF Re: Hydrogen is the very best way to prove AP's ION theory Re: proving AP's ion theory
Better yet than the Sun here is where a chemist bonds H+1 with P+1
This fact proves AP's Ion theory as magnetic monopoles but also proves there is no repulsion force in EM theory, only a denial of same space occupancy, but on top of that, proves the Real Electron is 105 MeV, Real Proton is 840 MeV
Thanks to this researcher in Denmark
phys.org
Unlikely hydrogen bond discovered
March 13, 2015
University of Copenhagen
Unlikely bonding in Copenhagen lab. Henrik G. Kjaergaard and his team discovered positive hydrogen bonding to positive Phosphorus
As with magnets and alternating current, positively charged molecules never aim for one another. Indeed, similarly charged poles are repelled. Nevertheless, a team from the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry has managed to become the first to bond positively charged phosphorus atoms with positively charged hydrogen ones. Their insight may prove pivotal to understanding how biologically important molecules such as DNA and proteins form properly.
AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-12 23:57:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did you cover the Kjaergaard Experiment of 2014, that in effect proves proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did your magazine cover the P+1 bonding to H+1 ??
It happened in late 2014, early 2015.
Was your magazine that good enough to have covered that monumental experiment?
Editors, I need not remind you how Monumentally important the Kjaergaard Experiment was
Because, what it tells us, is that the Real Electron = 105 MeV, the Real Proton is 840 MeV and that little particle we always thought was the electron, is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
So, Graham and Bernard, did NEW SCIENTIST cover that great monumental experiment of 2014, or, was NEW SCIENTIST too busy with fake science of Big Bang, black holes, LIGO, gravity waves, neutron stars, Peter Higgs boson fakery, dark matter, dark energy and much much more b.s. Too busy with fake science, that the great science escapes your attention.
Vol. 5: , Issue. 23, : Pages. 4225-4231
Publication Date (Web): November 19, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502150d
Phosphorus (P) is an element that is essential to the life of all organisms, and the atmospheric detection of phosphine suggests the existence of a volatile biogeochemical P cycle. Here, we investigate the ability of P to participate in the formation of OH···P hydrogen bonds. Three bimolecular alcohol–trimethylphosphine complexes have been detected. Initially, the complexes were detected using matrix isolation spectroscopy, which favors complex formation. Subsequently, the fundamental OH-stretching vibration was observed in room-temperature gas-phase spectra. On the basis of our measured OH-stretching frequency red shifts and quantum chemical calculations, we find that P is an acceptor atom similar in strength to O and S and that all three P, O, and S atoms are weaker acceptors than N. The quantum chemical calculations show that both H and P in the OH···P hydrogen bond have partial positive charges, as expected from their electronegativities. However, the electrostatic potentials show a negative potential area on the electron density surface around P that facilitates formation of hydrogen bonds.
Re: Sun with molecules proves electron= muon Re: EXPERIMENTAL PROOF Re: Hydrogen is the very best way to prove AP's ION theory Re: proving AP's ion theory
Better yet than the Sun here is where a chemist bonds H+1 with P+1
This fact proves AP's Ion theory as magnetic monopoles but also proves there is no repulsion force in EM theory, only a denial of same space occupancy, but on top of that, proves the Real Electron is 105 MeV, Real Proton is 840 MeV
Thanks to this researcher in Denmark
phys.org
Unlikely hydrogen bond discovered
March 13, 2015
University of Copenhagen
Unlikely bonding in Copenhagen lab. Henrik G. Kjaergaard and his team discovered positive hydrogen bonding to positive Phosphorus
As with magnets and alternating current, positively charged molecules never aim for one another. Indeed, similarly charged poles are repelled. Nevertheless, a team from the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry has managed to become the first to bond positively charged phosphorus atoms with positively charged hydrogen ones. Their insight may prove pivotal to understanding how biologically important molecules such as DNA and proteins form properly.
AP
ha they say in america
By ***@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 4:28 PM




totally legal THE AMERICAN DREAM
By ***@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 4:05 PM


playing your song THIS IS AMERICA im just a cripple now (1)
By ***@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 4:00 PM

spammer ***@__.__ asks
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-13 18:51:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did you cover the Kjaergaard Experiment of 2014, that in effect proves proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's monopole
Graham Lawton, Bernard Gray of NEW SCIENTIST, did your magazine cover the P+1 bonding to H+1 ??
It happened in late 2014, early 2015.
Was your magazine that good enough to have covered that monumental experiment?
Editors, I need not remind you how Monumentally important the Kjaergaard Experiment was
Because, what it tells us, is that the Real Electron = 105 MeV, the Real Proton is 840 MeV and that little particle we always thought was the electron, is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
So, Graham and Bernard, did NEW SCIENTIST cover that great monumental experiment of 2014, or, was NEW SCIENTIST too busy with fake science of Big Bang, black holes, LIGO, gravity waves, neutron stars, Peter Higgs boson fakery, dark matter, dark energy and much much more b.s. Too busy with fake science, that the great science escapes your attention.
Vol. 5: , Issue. 23, : Pages. 4225-4231
Publication Date (Web): November 19, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502150d
Phosphorus (P) is an element that is essential to the life of all organisms, and the atmospheric detection of phosphine suggests the existence of a volatile biogeochemical P cycle. Here, we investigate the ability of P to participate in the formation of OH···P hydrogen bonds. Three bimolecular alcohol–trimethylphosphine complexes have been detected. Initially, the complexes were detected using matrix isolation spectroscopy, which favors complex formation. Subsequently, the fundamental OH-stretching vibration was observed in room-temperature gas-phase spectra. On the basis of our measured OH-stretching frequency red shifts and quantum chemical calculations, we find that P is an acceptor atom similar in strength to O and S and that all three P, O, and S atoms are weaker acceptors than N. The quantum chemical calculations show that both H and P in the OH···P hydrogen bond have partial positive charges, as expected from their electronegativities. However, the electrostatic potentials show a negative potential area on the electron density surface around P that facilitates formation of hydrogen bonds.
Re: Sun with molecules proves electron= muon Re: EXPERIMENTAL PROOF Re: Hydrogen is the very best way to prove AP's ION theory Re: proving AP's ion theory
Better yet than the Sun here is where a chemist bonds H+1 with P+1
This fact proves AP's Ion theory as magnetic monopoles but also proves there is no repulsion force in EM theory, only a denial of same space occupancy, but on top of that, proves the Real Electron is 105 MeV, Real Proton is 840 MeV
Thanks to this researcher in Denmark
phys.org
Unlikely hydrogen bond discovered
March 13, 2015
University of Copenhagen
Unlikely bonding in Copenhagen lab. Henrik G. Kjaergaard and his team discovered positive hydrogen bonding to positive Phosphorus
As with magnets and alternating current, positively charged molecules never aim for one another. Indeed, similarly charged poles are repelled. Nevertheless, a team from the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry has managed to become the first to bond positively charged phosphorus atoms with positively charged hydrogen ones. Their insight may prove pivotal to understanding how biologically important molecules such as DNA and proteins form properly.
AP
Path: n14ni26307wmi.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ***@__.__
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: i was never really laughing in 1999 i was projecting feelings and images in to the stars brains to collect their reactions their anmals responses as animals from the zoo to collect info to study how they can be animals and claim they were humans they are not humans they are animals was the conclusion of my scientific work
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:13:14 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="62b2655360c82ab88056ac730e55af18";
logging-data="628"; mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++4MX7btOsqzYZsToWgKTIByiyEr7adeQ="

9:13 ***@__.__
i was never really laughing in 1999 i was projecting

AP writes:
Spammer asks why not look for the 840 MeV proton in a muon beam

From the language analysis the above spammer ***@__.__ is likely to be Michael Moroney attempting to perpetually disrupt sci.physics

I vote to permanently ban MM from all sci newsgroups


Eternal-September.org
Wolfgang M. Weyand
Berliner Strasse
Bad Homburg

Goethe Universitat Physics dept

Brigitta Wolff president

Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer
Peter Grunberg

math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person
Michael Moroney
2018-02-13 19:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Back doing the stalker list thing again, I see.
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-15 06:07:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-16 21:58:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Moroney
Back doing
***@gmail.com writes
3:48 PM (7 minutes ago)

Nothing like the New Math to make easy things difficult.
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-18 07:14:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 1:58:06 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

Michael Moroney
Feb 17 (8 hours ago)
Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
AP writes: Eh, stupid Moroney what is 1 a percentage of 2? You claim your an engineer--
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-20 01:15:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 1:58:06 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

Michael Moroney writes


6:08 PM (1 hour ago)


You must be laughing constantly
Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
AP writes: failures of science often laugh. Here's one for you moron Moroney-- what is the percentage of 1 out of 2? (hint, it involves "5") Get someone at Harvard or MIT to help you, you failure....
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-02-22 02:21:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Why did not New Scientist cover this story? Too big of news? Or, did they just have no room apart for science fiction of Big Bang, black holes, dark matter nonsense.


Scientists discover impossible hydrogen bond | ScienceNordic
sciencenordic.com/scientists-discover-impossible-hydrogen-bond‎
Mar 25, 2015 ... Scientists have discovered a new type of hydrogen bond which was previously considered impossible or at least highly improbable. "The discovery is significant because hydrogen bonds are such a fundamental part of both chemistry and biology," says Professor Henrik Kjærgaard from the Department of ...

ScienceNordic
Scientists discover impossible hydrogen bond
March 25, 2015 - 06:25

This type of bonding was previously considered near impossible.
Keywords: Atmosphere, Chemistry, hydrogen, Physics
SendPDFPrint

By: Lise Brix

Professor Henrik Kjærgaard and his colleagues have demonstrated that a new kind of hydrogen bond can occur between a hydrogen atom and a phosphorous atom. Pictured here is Kjærgaard in his lab at the University of Copenhagen. (Photo: University of Copenhagen) Scientists have discovered a new type of hydrogen bond which was previously considered impossible or at least highly improbable.
Loading...