Post by Sylvia Else Post by Claudius Denk
If McGinn is Right What Does it Mean?
A false proposition implies any proposition.
McGinn is a troll, and crank, he also goes by Cladius Denk, and snoring
[the following is from posts by the known troll/crank
McGinn/Denk/SolventPotatoes from the past few days, it shows his ANGER
levels are off the charts, unable to hold a coherent conversation, and
mentions use of LSD, **** are swear words. AP News Article 3987261 Aug
"you ******* stupid *** and why you think it is relevant SINCE THE ISSUE
UNDER DISCUSSION DOESN'T INVOLVE ANY OF THIS YOU STINKING, SLIMEY
TROLL!!! So the **** what? Do you trolls ever have a relevant point?
No, retard, it is liquid. ******* read the phase diagram you mental
retard. No, *******. What the **** is wrong with you people?
Individually nobody could be a dumb as you all are collectively. So,
everbody in the world except you and your fellow trolls are liars?
Did I get this right? Or am I lying about this too? Do your methods in
any way involve pixie dust? Tea leaves? Crystal balls? LSD? Gary, I
think you have to get out of your bubble and look around every once in a
while. You are not the only person on this planet that has an advanced
theory whose reasonable assertions are being attacked by *******,
brain-dead trolls. you post off topic **** on my video and give me a
lecture ....****you **** you, bubble boy who thinks he is the only
person in the world to ever make a scientific discovery. It's all about
you isn't it, you self-centered, spoiled child. Why don't you throw a
pity party so that you can wallow away into obscurity. ******* SAY IT
WAS A THERMODYNAMIC STABILITY DIAGRAM. It's ******* right there plain as
day. There is nothing to discuss or debate. This is a trivial
artifact that you trolls are blowing all out of proportion. Go find
another hobby, you ******* troll. Wow! You are one amazing ******. This
is such a stupid comment I don' t know how to respond." -
James McGinn's Retraction; "The notion that moist air is always heavier
per volume than dry air is refuted. It is proven false. It is mistaken.
It is wrong."
McGinn's statement is the result of his final realization that his
unproven theory consists of only science fiction, his imagination and
verbal hand waving that doesn't make any sense to anyone.
James McGinn, Mr Solving Tornadoes,
RETRACTS HIS BOOK "Solving Tornadoes"
after plagiarism found
from his previous post;
"Well, let's just say that it ain't no textbook.
The confusion you are feeling is by design. And it's not so
simple as me having an objection to pandering to my audience.
It's more like I recognize that most consumers of science are
looking for an excuse not to think. I wrote it with with the
intention of giving you no avenue of escape.
You can try to dispute it if you want. But, let's face it,
you're already entangled. If you struggle you'll just become
more entangled. And there's no way out -- without thinking.
My only advice is that if you haven't gotten to the third
chapter yet stop now. But it sounds like it's too late for
that. Oh well. You had a good run. And it's not like me
making you think is some kind of violation of your civil
rights or something. "
Best of James McGinn (all that could be found, could not find any math
or science anywhere)
"1. The internet makes it easy for people with strong beliefs to become
seduced into believing that their beliefs are factual. And that is all
the rationalization they need to start lying.
2. "The notion that moist air is always heavier per volume than dry air
is refuted. It is proven false. It is mistaken. It is wrong."
3. My inability to convince the hindquarters of a dead cow of anything
only reflects on the status of the cow's hindquarters.
4. Scientific methods were developed so that people like you don't turn
science into a religion
5. I'm not a liar.
6 McGinn is right.
7. I concur with McGinn and Denk. Yes, McGinn and Denk are corrects.
8. I think that is just Claudius screwing with you.
9. BTW, I'm even more of an expert on human evolution than I am an
expert on meteorology and physics
10. I am mainstream science... Nobody can contradict this assertion.
11. Can you provide a Denk to any purported reproducible experimental
evidence to substantiate this assertion?
12. McGinn's Book Review: *insane rambling* 1 out of 5 stars
The author believes that elementary concepts, which have been taught to
and understood by first year Chemistry and Physics students for many
decades, are some kind of meteorological conspiracy. The author also
does not understand the very basic physics that drive convective
updrafts (the positive buoyancy due to warm temperature anomalies that
result from latent heat release). Instead, apparently based largely on
reading websites, he proposes a mechanism that makes no physical sense
and is totally unobserved and unobservable. This text violates even
basic tenets of logic. Totally without merit.
13. McGinn Book Review *Waste of time a non-funny joke*
1.0 out of 5 stars
This book misleads the reader on basic physical concepts like density,
the basics of weather dynamics, and offers a silly idea that confuses
metaphors about how the jet stream operates with reality. It solves
nothing but does offer a way to waste time and money buying and reading
it. This book is an example of the risks posed in the age of inexpensive
self publishing by assholes.
14. You can't even imagine how frustrating it must be to be so sure I
am right, but so completely unable to say how or why.
15. I got nothing!!!