Discussion:
Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
(too old to reply)
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-10 04:23:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000

Please do not hold me to the 1/1000, it maybe something like 10^-6 rather than 10^-3.

There is no doubt in the world that fusion exists, and that fission, even more so, exists.

But, what I have discovered is that the Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV and that tiny particle .5MeV is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. What that means for energy of the world, is that every atom is a Faraday Law Demonstration of every hydrogen atom system inside an atom. Every proton with its muon, every neutron, are constantly doing a Faraday law and producing electricity inside the atom, producing magnetic monopoles. And these monopoles can either stay inside the atom or flow out as radiation. This is where stars and our Sun get their power, their energy. There is a tad bit of fusion, but not very much, certainly not as much to let the Sun shine as it does every day of our life.

Now how is the Faraday Law conducted inside atoms? A proton is 8 muons and when formed into a octagon ring, the proton is a closed loop wire, leaving the electronmuon as a bar magnet thrust through the proton ring creates a current-- a magnetic monopole that either stays inside the atom or moves out and becomes sunlight.

Now, all atoms are Faraday law machines, so why does not Earth or Moon or Jupiter shine like a Star? Well, a astro body has to get large enough to get hot enough so that the kinetic energy of its atoms reach a temperature in which the electronmuon moves fast enough through its protons to produce radiation of star shine. But this monopole creation occurs in all atoms and although not star light, some of these monopoles are radio waves, and Jupiter has a large radio emission.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-10 06:51:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Below is a report from government NASA on radio emmisions from Jupiter. The Faraday Law of atoms causes stars to shine and causes planets to emit radio waves.

--- quoting NASA ---

Jupiter does emit radio waves of a different sort at frequencies above 100 MHz. These are the decimetric radio waves and are believed to be emitted by extremely energetic electrons moving at close to the speed of light close to the planet near its equator. (Decimetric means tenth of a meter since the wavelength of this type of radio emission is several tenths of a meter). Jupiter's rotation period was confirmed and other properties of the magnetic field including its axial tilt were determined using decimetric radio observations.

Recently the Hubble Space telescope has been used to observe Jupiter's aurora in the ultraviolet and has found evidence of the powerful currents that are flowing between Jupiter and Io.

These spacecraft are confirming some explanations of Jupiter radio emission but are also discovering new radio phenomena that raise many more questions.
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-10 07:45:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
So, let us do a little bit of philosophy here before turning to bed. We have a universe made of one big atom 231Pu containing mass and space. The mass is other atoms. We have stars that turn Space into more mass via Faraday law of an atom's muons thrusting through an atom's protons and creating monoples-- turning Space into new matter.

Is that appealing? A 231Pu Atom Totality becoming a new generation Atom Totality.

Let us weigh that with Life in biology. Is it acceptable that a generation of life can be happy that their kind, their species lived, prospered and multiplied, and built a new generation to carry into the future?

I can accept that purpose for biology life. But for all of the universe, i somehow am expecting more than just growth. More than just growing from 231Pu into say element 96 then the next one etc etc.

I think every human can be happy to know their life is carried on by a future generation as the meaning of life. But it seems that the cosmos as a whole needs something more in its future, more than just growth.

So, here we go from science to philosophy to religion. For we need something more than just growth to bigger and bigger, to cycle to cycle. We need something of love, to make the whole thing valuable and worthy of the journey. And i cannot think of a better analogy than humanity and plants and animals. The Atom Totality is like God compared to humans and humans are like God compared to the animals and plants. If in the growth of humans into the future it is recognized that our growth cannot proceed unless we carry all the plants and animals with us, not extincting them to make more room for more humans.

In like manner of the Atom Totality, instead of a future of ever bigger Atom Totality with lifeforms perishing in numerous cycles, what if the formula of God was that the Atom Totality becomes humanity, a humanity that carried all the plants and animals like a Noah's Ark onto the doorstep of God, where in an instant of time physics and biology entwined as one God. And then, let the cycle of matter and life begin all over again.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-10 21:01:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Below is a report from government NASA on radio emmisions from Jupiter. The Faraday Law of atoms causes stars to shine and causes planets to emit radio waves.
I do not know if NASA does experimental science? If they do, I entice them into this one.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
--- quoting NASA ---
Jupiter does emit radio waves of a different sort at frequencies above 100 MHz. These are the decimetric radio waves and are believed to be emitted by extremely energetic electrons moving at close to the speed of light close to the planet near its equator. (Decimetric means tenth of a meter since the wavelength of this type of radio emission is several tenths of a meter). Jupiter's rotation period was confirmed and other properties of the magnetic field including its axial tilt were determined using decimetric radio observations.
Recently the Hubble Space telescope has been used to observe Jupiter's aurora in the ultraviolet and has found evidence of the powerful currents that are flowing between Jupiter and Io.
These spacecraft are confirming some explanations of Jupiter radio emission but are also discovering new radio phenomena that raise many more questions.
EXPERIMENT:: Now, I am going on just pure intuition and a tiny bit of experience in radio physics. So here goes.


Find a tower of metal, whether used or not used. It is a antennae of sorts. Find out if that antennae by its sheer composition emits a radio signal. I would guess yes because it is composed of metal atoms and those atoms are doing the Faraday Law. Now the planet Jupiter is a large body of atoms doing the Faraday Law and would be expected to emit much radio waves. Our metal antennae is a small body, but still doing the Faraday Law.

Now here, in this experiment I am backing into, the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation CMBR and what that is, is not the stupid silly Big Bang, but is the fact that all atoms of the entire cosmos is doing a Faraday Law and all those atoms, everyone of them is "leaking out radio waves" of however tiny and small which goes to make up the CMBR.

But here, all I want is a Experiment that proves any given object has atoms which is doing Faraday law and which has a tiny "radio wave noise".

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-10 21:37:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Somewhat amazing that year 2014 was an amazing year in Chemistry Research, two experiments or observations took place in 2014 that is revolutionary science experiments. The one took place in Denmark with Dr. Kjaergaard discovering that two positive charges attract one another of hydrogen and phosphorus. To make a long story short, Kjaergaard is confirming that the Real Electron = 105 MeV and Real Proton = 840MeV and that little .5MeV particle is a magnetic monopole. That is the upshot of Kjaergaard's hugely important experiment in Denmark in 2014.

In another part of the world in 2014, Dr. Brandenburg was finding out that xenon was too much concentrated in Mars, the planet, and otherwise levels of U235 in ore deposits were too high.

Now, Dirac had two major science issues going for him most of his life-- magnetic monopoles and what he called a New Radioactivity-- how the world grows. You see, for Dirac, the Big Bang is science fiction, for Dirac sensed that the Universe grows from some form of radioactivity.

Dirac, in all his life, never found the monopole, but, it was under his nose all the time. For in 1897, JJ Thomson discovered a particle of .5MeV and the sad part about Thomson's discovery, is that he had not found the electron, which he thought this .5MeV particle was, but rather, he had found Dirac's monopole. Only by 1936 with Anderson and Neddermeyer was the REAL ELECTRON discovered, only know one realized it until 2017, by me, who saw that 9muons = 1 proton plus or minus .7% 945/938.

So, Dirac's monopole was there all along, and only by 2014 with Kjaergaard in Denmark do we start to see a massive experiment undertaking to see the theory that Real Electron = 105MeV and that Maxwell theory of EM has no force of repel, for EM has only attract force and we were fooled by Pauli Exclusion as a denial of same space occupancy. Columbus was fooled when he thought he landed in China or India. And physicists were fooled in thinking there is EM repel, when it is just denial of same space. And physicists were fooled in thinking that tiny .5MeV was the electron.

Then on to Dirac's New Radioactivity, how the universe grows. The Universe never had a Big Bang-- that is childish poppycock idea. The Universe grows bigger and more massive by a form of Radioactivity. And the mechanism is Faraday's Law. The proton is 8 muons and forms a proton closed loop wire. The muon acts like a bar magnet and as it thrusts through the proton wire creates a monopole. This is turning Space into energy/matter. So if the universe starts out as 1 Hydrogen atom, that Faraday Law on one proton one muon keeps creating monopoles which are saved and collected inside that atom of hydrogen until it has eaten up enough Space that the monopoles saved add up to a neutron. Now we have 2protons2muons doing the Faraday Law, eating up space and eventually creating a tritium atom, etc etc.

So, when Dr. Brandenburg sees xenon in abundance on Mars, it is not from a nuclear fusion bomb explosion, nor is the African U235 a past long ago bomb explosion remnant, no. What these isotope anomalies really are, is the working of Dirac's New Radioactivities. I like to call it Radioactive Spontaneous Magnetic Monopole Materialization, RSMMM.

The "spontaneous" part of the process is that Faraday's Law is not the movement of electrons in a proton that consists of 8 muons, no, the 8 muons are needed to form a octagon of geometry to be a wire. So the spontaneous part of RSMMM is the fact that Faraday's Law requires a current, and the only particle to be a current inside a proton is a magnetic monopole. Now I am not saying all Magnetic Monopoles = .5MeV, for even radio waves are monopoles and are of eV not MeV.

But, the greatest story of this Faraday Law, is that our Sun and stars shine, not because of Fusion, but because every atom in our Sun is doing a Faraday Law thrusting of muon through proton and even of proton through orbital muons, both ways-- proton through muons and muon through proton. And the enormous photons produced by Faraday's Law is what makes stars shine. There is a tiny contribution by fusion, but if stars had to depend on fusion alone, our universe would be mostly dark black, with only tiny tiny glow from fusion activity.


Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:23:01 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
and .5MeV = monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:23:01 +0000

Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole

Now here is more information on that Mars hypothetical nuclear explosion:: of course i am going to comment line by line explaining that in nuclear fusion there is little to no fusion going on but rather a Faraday Law
--- quoting ---
By Tara MacIsaac, Epoch Times
Mars has a high concentration of the gas isotope Xenon 129 in its atmosphere. Xenon 129 is produced by nuclear reactions. The surface of the red planet also has an excess of uranium and thorium.

These conditions are likely the result of two large anomalous nuclear explosions on Mars in the past, argues propulsion scientist Dr. John Brandenburg in a 2014 paper, titled “Evidence of a Massive Thermonuclear Explosion on Mars in the Past.”

On Earth, in Oklo, Gabon, uranium was extracted in 1972 and found to have unusual properties. Natural uranium deposits all contain about 0.7 percent U235. The isotope U235 in the Oklo mine, however, showed at levels around 0.6 percent, suggesting the U235 had already been “burned.”
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-10 22:05:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Somewhat amazing that year 2014 was an amazing year in Chemistry Research, two experiments or observations took place in 2014 that is revolutionary science experiments. The one took place in Denmark with Dr. Kjaergaard discovering that two positive charges attract one another of hydrogen and phosphorus. To make a long story short, Kjaergaard is confirming that the Real Electron = 105 MeV and Real Proton = 840MeV and that little .5MeV particle is a magnetic monopole. That is the upshot of Kjaergaard's hugely important experiment in Denmark in 2014.
In another part of the world in 2014, Dr. Brandenburg was finding out that xenon was too much concentrated in Mars, the planet, and otherwise levels of U235 in ore deposits were too high.
Now, Dirac had two major science issues going for him most of his life-- magnetic monopoles and what he called a New Radioactivity-- how the world grows. You see, for Dirac, the Big Bang is science fiction, for Dirac sensed that the Universe grows from some form of radioactivity.
Dirac, in all his life, never found the monopole, but, it was under his nose all the time. For in 1897, JJ Thomson discovered a particle of .5MeV and the sad part about Thomson's discovery, is that he had not found the electron, which he thought this .5MeV particle was, but rather, he had found Dirac's monopole. Only by 1936 with Anderson and Neddermeyer was the REAL ELECTRON discovered, only no one realized it until 2017, by me, who saw that 9muons = 1 proton plus or minus .7% 945/938.
A typo in the original for that should read "no one realized" and not "know one realized"
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
So, Dirac's monopole was there all along, and only by 2014 with Kjaergaard in Denmark do we start to see a massive experiment undertaking to see the theory that Real Electron = 105MeV and that Maxwell theory of EM has no force of repel, for EM has only attract force and we were fooled by Pauli Exclusion as a denial of same space occupancy. Columbus was fooled when he thought he landed in China or India. And physicists were fooled in thinking there is EM repel, when it is just denial of same space. And physicists were fooled in thinking that tiny .5MeV was the electron.
Then on to Dirac's New Radioactivity, how the universe grows. The Universe never had a Big Bang-- that is childish poppycock idea. The Universe grows bigger and more massive by a form of Radioactivity. And the mechanism is Faraday's Law. The proton is 8 muons and forms a proton closed loop wire. The muon acts like a bar magnet and as it thrusts through the proton wire creates a monopole. This is turning Space into energy/matter. So if the universe starts out as 1 Hydrogen atom, that Faraday Law on one proton one muon keeps creating monopoles which are saved and collected inside that atom of hydrogen until it has eaten up enough Space that the monopoles saved add up to a neutron. Now we have 2protons2muons doing the Faraday Law, eating up space and eventually creating a tritium atom, etc etc.
So, when Dr. Brandenburg sees xenon in abundance on Mars, it is not from a nuclear fusion bomb explosion, nor is the African U235 a past long ago bomb explosion remnant, no. What these isotope anomalies really are, is the working of Dirac's New Radioactivities. I like to call it Radioactive Spontaneous Magnetic Monopole Materialization, RSMMM.
The "spontaneous" part of the process is that Faraday's Law is not the movement of electrons in a proton that consists of 8 muons, no, the 8 muons are needed to form a octagon of geometry to be a wire. So the spontaneous part of RSMMM is the fact that Faraday's Law requires a current, and the only particle to be a current inside a proton is a magnetic monopole. Now I am not saying all Magnetic Monopoles = .5MeV, for even radio waves are monopoles and are of eV not MeV.
But, the greatest story of this Faraday Law, is that our Sun and stars shine, not because of Fusion, but because every atom in our Sun is doing a Faraday Law thrusting of muon through proton and even of proton through orbital muons, both ways-- proton through muons and muon through proton. And the enormous photons produced by Faraday's Law is what makes stars shine. There is a tiny contribution by fusion, but if stars had to depend on fusion alone, our universe would be mostly dark black, with only tiny tiny glow from fusion activity.
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
and .5MeV = monopole
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:23:01 +0000
Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole
Now here is more information on that Mars hypothetical nuclear explosion:: of course i am going to comment line by line explaining that in nuclear fusion there is little to no fusion going on but rather a Faraday Law
--- quoting ---
By Tara MacIsaac, Epoch Times
Mars has a high concentration of the gas isotope Xenon 129 in its atmosphere. Xenon 129 is produced by nuclear reactions. The surface of the red planet also has an excess of uranium and thorium.
These conditions are likely the result of two large anomalous nuclear explosions on Mars in the past, argues propulsion scientist Dr. John Brandenburg in a 2014 paper, titled “Evidence of a Massive Thermonuclear Explosion on Mars in the Past.”
On Earth, in Oklo, Gabon, uranium was extracted in 1972 and found to have unusual properties. Natural uranium deposits all contain about 0.7 percent U235. The isotope U235 in the Oklo mine, however, showed at levels around 0.6 percent, suggesting the U235 had already been “burned.”
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 01:16:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Somewhat amazing that year 2014 was an amazing year in Chemistry Research, two experiments or observations took place in 2014 that is revolutionary science experiments. The one took place in Denmark with Dr. Kjaergaard discovering that two positive charges attract one another of hydrogen and phosphorus. To make a long story short, Kjaergaard is confirming that the Real Electron = 105 MeV and Real Proton = 840MeV and that little .5MeV particle is a magnetic monopole. That is the upshot of Kjaergaard's hugely important experiment in Denmark in 2014.
In another part of the world in 2014, Dr. Brandenburg was finding out that xenon was too much concentrated in Mars, the planet, and otherwise levels of U235 in ore deposits were too high.
Now, Dirac had two major science issues going for him most of his life-- magnetic monopoles and what he called a New Radioactivity-- how the world grows. You see, for Dirac, the Big Bang is science fiction, for Dirac sensed that the Universe grows from some form of radioactivity.
Dirac, in all his life, never found the monopole, but, it was under his nose all the time. For in 1897, JJ Thomson discovered a particle of .5MeV and the sad part about Thomson's discovery, is that he had not found the electron, which he thought this .5MeV particle was, but rather, he had found Dirac's monopole. Only by 1936 with Anderson and Neddermeyer was the REAL ELECTRON discovered, only no one realized it until 2017, by me, who saw that 9muons = 1 proton plus or minus .7% 945/938.
So, Dirac's monopole was there all along, and only by 2014 with Kjaergaard in Denmark do we start to see a massive experiment undertaking to see the theory that Real Electron = 105MeV and that Maxwell theory of EM has no force of repel, for EM has only attract force and we were fooled by Pauli Exclusion as a denial of same space occupancy. Columbus was fooled when he thought he landed in China or India. And physicists were fooled in thinking there is EM repel, when it is just denial of same space. And physicists were fooled in thinking that tiny .5MeV was the electron.
Then on to Dirac's New Radioactivity, how the universe grows. The Universe never had a Big Bang-- that is childish poppycock idea. The Universe grows bigger and more massive by a form of Radioactivity. And the mechanism is Faraday's Law. The proton is 8 muons and forms a proton closed loop wire. The muon acts like a bar magnet and as it thrusts through the proton wire creates a monopole. This is turning Space into energy/matter. So if the universe starts out as 1 Hydrogen atom, that Faraday Law on one proton one muon keeps creating monopoles which are saved and collected inside that atom of hydrogen until it has eaten up enough Space that the monopoles saved add up to a neutron. Now we have 2protons2muons doing the Faraday Law, eating up space and eventually creating a tritium atom, etc etc.
So, when Dr. Brandenburg sees xenon in abundance on Mars, it is not from a nuclear fusion bomb explosion, nor is the African U235 a past long ago bomb explosion remnant, no. What these isotope anomalies really are, is the working of Dirac's New Radioactivities. I like to call it Radioactive Spontaneous Magnetic Monopole Materialization, RSMMM.
The "spontaneous" part of the process is that Faraday's Law is not the movement of electrons in a proton that consists of 8 muons, no, the 8 muons are needed to form a octagon of geometry to be a wire. So the spontaneous part of RSMMM is the fact that Faraday's Law requires a current, and the only particle to be a current inside a proton is a magnetic monopole. Now I am not saying all Magnetic Monopoles = .5MeV, for even radio waves are monopoles and are of eV not MeV.
But, the greatest story of this Faraday Law, is that our Sun and stars shine, not because of Fusion, but because every atom in our Sun is doing a Faraday Law thrusting of muon through proton and even of proton through orbital muons, both ways-- proton through muons and muon through proton. And the enormous photons produced by Faraday's Law is what makes stars shine. There is a tiny contribution by fusion, but if stars had to depend on fusion alone, our universe would be mostly dark black, with only tiny tiny glow from fusion activity.
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire
understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV
and .5MeV = monopole
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:23:01 +0000
Faraday mechanism explains Atomic Bombs better Re: our entire understanding of how Sun & stars shine is overhauled by Real Electron= 105MeV and .5MeV = monopole
Now here is more information on that Mars hypothetical nuclear explosion:: of course i am going to comment line by line explaining that in nuclear fusion there is little to no fusion going on but rather a Faraday Law
--- quoting ---
By Tara MacIsaac, Epoch Times
Mars has a high concentration of the gas isotope Xenon 129 in its atmosphere. Xenon 129 is produced by nuclear reactions. The surface of the red planet also has an excess of uranium and thorium.
These conditions are likely the result of two large anomalous nuclear explosions on Mars in the past, argues propulsion scientist Dr. John Brandenburg in a 2014 paper, titled “Evidence of a Massive Thermonuclear Explosion on Mars in the Past.”
On Earth, in Oklo, Gabon, uranium was extracted in 1972 and found to have unusual properties. Natural uranium deposits all contain about 0.7 percent U235. The isotope U235 in the Oklo mine, however, showed at levels around 0.6 percent, suggesting the U235 had already been “burned.”
So, all these atoms found that do not fit the picture of modern day physics and chemistry-- are because they are created by RSMMM, and not from fission, fusion, etc
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 03:48:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
does oxygen have a cut above the other first 8 elements? Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law

Now, I believe the muon can be a closed loop wire once there is 8 muons in the orbital of an atom. That would mean element oxygen, where carbon is 2 muons short, and neon is 2 muons advanced. Now can the 10 muons in neon offer neon more stability in a Faraday demonstration?

Anyway, the Oxygen atom has 8 orbital muons which means its nucleus of 8protons and 8neutrons can be a bar thrusting magnet through that of the 8 orbital muons.

So in a Faraday Law Demonstration every single proton is a 8 muons configured into a closed loop proton wire. 1proton = 840MeV = 8muons, where 1muon = 105MeV.

So, in hydrogen there is only one way for a Faraday demonstration-- the orbital muon thrusting through the 8 muons of the single proton.

But in Oxygen there are 8 orbital muons that can form a closed loop wire, call it a orbital-muon-wire and the protons and neutrons can thrust through the 8 orbital muons producing even more magnetic monopoles than just the monopoles formed from the muons acting as bar magnet thrusting through the protons.

So, what I wonder is, if oxygen being the first such element that can produce monopoles from not just proton wires but from orbital muons as wires, wondering if that ability by oxygen is why oxygen is so very special over the other first 8 elements? I know through out Old Chemistry, there is much to do about "oxidation" and oxidation states. But is oxygen recognized for its supreme ability to Faraday Law Demonstrations, which the other first 8 elements simply cannot perform? Does it give oxygen a significant edge above and beyond hydrogen helium lithium Beryllium, Boron Carbon Nitrogen??

What say you-- Old Chemistry-- did oxygen have a cut above these others?

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 06:43:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Alright one property of oxygen that needs explanation by Faraday law theory is its combustible nature. Here i would need to explain its neighbor fluorine also, but then, have to explain why reactivity seems to all shut down with neon.

So is the fact that the orbital muons now are Faraday demonstrable at 8 and 9 cause huge reactivity but at 10 appear to shut down.

I may have to sleep on this one.

But one superlative of oxygen is that it is the 3rd most abundant element in Cosmos after hydrogen and helium. So the fact that 16O has a orbital muon wire is likely the cause of such abundance in Dirac's New Radioactivity

So how can orbital muon wire explain how neon shuts down reactivity? Here i may need to define reactivity via Maxwell theory-- something about the deformation of 8 or 9 orbital muons to become a 10 orbital muon of neon.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 06:58:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Now here i am going to question the famous Rutherford experiment the one in which he shot particles at a gold or metal leaf and where some of those particles recoiled back, telling Rutherford that nearly all the mass is concentrated in the nucleus.

I suspect that experiment needs repeating for the first 26 elements especially oxygen fluorine neon for i suspect the center of those atoms are almost empty of protons and where the protons are more likely found in the muon orbital cloud to enhance the making of orbital cloud wire for Faraday law.

I think it is hard to repeat Rutherford on non metals but not impossible.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 20:06:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Now here i am going to question the famous Rutherford experiment the one in which he shot particles at a gold or metal leaf and where some of those particles recoiled back, telling Rutherford that nearly all the mass is concentrated in the nucleus.
Mind you this is just a guess, that many of the atoms nucleus, does not lie in the center of the atom carrying most of the mass. I suspect the inert gases and the first p row of elements have their protons and neutrons mostly in rings outside the center of those atoms. Unfortunately Rutherford only did his work on metal-- gold and there, most of the mass is in the center.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
I suspect that experiment needs repeating for the first 26 elements especially oxygen fluorine neon for i suspect the center of those atoms are almost empty of protons and where the protons are more likely found in the muon orbital cloud to enhance the making of orbital cloud wire for Faraday law.
I think it is hard to repeat Rutherford on non metals but not impossible.
Time for a modern day repeat of Rutherford, only this time with a inert gas, or say oxygen, hydrogen for I suspect the nuclei of these elements are in a ring around the center, not directly in the center. So sort of like the plum pudding model of Thomson, only arranged in an order of like a wire, not random and chaotic. Time to repeat Rutherford.

Now, fortunately for me, I have Scientific American March 2018, talking about the Table of Elements and talking about element 106 where it lives for about 10 seconds and was able to form a compound of Element 106 with carbon monoxide to form a hexacarbonyl of Element 106.

Now, this is fortuitous because I was having problems with getting neon oxygen fluorine and helium to obey the Faraday Law in a maximum amount of production of monopoles. And after reading that snippet of hexacarbonyl, I realized what my solution must be.

Now recently I spoke of that the Old Chemistry Table of Elements needed revision and what I dreamed up was a double cone, with apex to base intersecting at midsection, rather than the silly contraption in Old Math of two apex together. Apex to base is far far better because it is stable when built, and, besides, it is a generalization of the cylinder. For think of the cylinder as a routed out, carved out midsection, like a double cone spool.

But, anyway, reading hexacarbonyl I saw a vision of where the NEW TABLE OF ATOMS must go. Not to a double cone, but rather to Ampere's Law as geometry and Ampere's law is a torus of electric current and then the magnetic field of a torus around a torus. Get out any picture of Ampere's law and you will immediately recognize that geometry where you use the right-hand rule.

Now, I keep the Old Chemistry picture of the Table, keep it all, for it is rather excellent and good. I forget about a 3rd D table or any changes to the 2nd D table. But, where the big changes come is the ALGEBRA of the Table of Elements. The Algebra changes drastically.

This is a picture of the Old Chemistry table (using just one letter to make uniform spacing, and all the s,p,d,f rows are where they should be, not this sad cut-out view, but all intact.)


H H
L B B C N O F N
NM A S P S C A
K C S T V CM F C N C Z G G A S B K
R S Y Z NM T R R P A C  I  S S T  I  X
C B L C P N P S E G T D H E T Y  L H T W R O I P A H T P B P A R
F R A T P U N P AC B C  E FM N  L U U U U U UU U U U UU U U U

So, what did the hexacarbonyl do for my insight?


Well, for one we raise hydrogen above helium to be a single whole row and have helium be a single whole row to have 8 rows in total

H
H
L B B C N O F N
NM A S P S C A
K C S T V CM F C N C Z G G A S B K
R S Y Z NM T R R P A C  I  S S T  I  X
C B L C P N P S E G T D H E T Y  L H T W R O I P A H T P B P A R
F R A T P U N P AC B C  E FM N  L U U U U U UU U U U UU U U U

The number 8 is a crucial critical number in all of physics, for it is 1proton= 8muons. Now, I do not know if 8 shows up in the Maxwell Equations, I do know 137 shows up, but, does 8 show up? It must in the form of the s,p,d,f

Now last night, I was struggling to find how to make MAXIMUM Faraday Law upon oxygen, fluorine, neon and helium to explain them as protons as wires and muons as bar magnet. And here is where the hexacarbonyl image comes to my rescue.

Notice that if we think of the entire ROW of chemical elements as the wire that the oxygen-neon row and the sulfur-argon row is 8

Now, the next two rows are the iron-krypton and the silver-Xenon row. Now, they look like those rows have no magic number 8. And here is where the algebra sinks in. When we have a d row, we make the p elements as 3 and the d elements as 5, so that we have 3+5 = 8. That Algebra is indicative of the Ampere Law, that half of the d and half of the p are going into magnetism, while the other half is going into electric monopole current.

Now, the table has two rows of s, two rows of p, two rows of d, and two rows of f. The Algebra works on the f row, where 14/2 = 7 and now we need a 1 to make 7+1 = 8. So what happens in the f row is that 7 for magnetism, 7 for electricity and the s provides the 1 as 2/2.

So, in d row, the s orbital is masked, while the p and d are cut in half.

In f row, the d and p orbitals are masked, while the f and s are cut in half.

Mind you, this algebra is all for the sake of 8. Why 8? Well the short answer is proton = 8 muons. A longer answer is symmetry of magnetism versus electricity in the Ampere Law.

Now, getting back to the first two rows, the single hydrogen and the single helium of the second row.

For hydrogen it is 8 in the form of a single proton is 8 muons forming a closed loop wire and where that orbital muon must be magnetism of Ampere law along with the bar magnet of Faraday Law.

For helium has 36 muons in total, 32+4. But 36 is also 9x4, and hydrogen is 9 muons. The view of hydrogen is it is the atom of the monopole, and the helium atom is the atom of the dipole.

The geometry view of helium is a perfect sphere, the geometry view of hydrogen is a ellipse of its magnetism to electricity.

Now in mathematics we have another ALGEBRA that is very much similar to the above Algebra, it is the Regular Polyhedra and there again we have 6 items, pyramid, tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron. The algebra of regular polyhedron so much are analogs of the Table of Chemical Elements.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 07:37:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Now a key feature of Faraday Law atomic theory is that the protons and muons are aligned for maximum production of monopoles. Where 1proton =8muons and 1neutron =1proton +1
muon.

Now this is a job for Dirac or Tesla, not me if given, 20 protons 20 muons configure those as wires and bar magnet to yield maximum current inside a neon atom. Do the same of 19protons 19muons for fluorine and finally 16 protons 16 muons for oxygen.

I suspect many of the protons will be in orbitals along with orbital muons and a somewhat vacant center of the atom in order to achieve maximum Faraday production of monopoles.

Now the helium atom would have 4 protons 4muons and those 4protons would be 4x8= 32 muons. So, how to arrange 36 muons for maximum Faraday law. And, helium is the most stable of all inert gases all elements for that sake.

Now 36 is a perfect square, so let me check on neon, we have 20x8= 160 plus 20 is 180.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 08:02:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Now i wish Tesla or Dirac was here to do this, Feynman.

For helium i have 32 muons from the 4 protons and 4 more muons for a total of 36 particles to configure into a maximum Faraday law production of magnetic monopoles. Is it best to use 2 of the 36muons as bar magnet leaving 34 muons to build a coil of 8muons of 4 windings but that leaves 2 extra muons. What if we make the bar magnet 4 muons. Would the windings be in the nucleus? I think so because you get more monopole current the tighter the magnet is thrust through (so Rutherford was right).

Now look at oxygen, 16protons, 16muons is 144 total muons, another perfect square.

More tomorrow,,, time for a milk shake and the fascinating mystery of the milk shake -- milk tastes good, but place cold milk-- has to be cold into a flask and vigorouly shake so you get a lot of milk foam and now you improved the taste of milk by 10 fold over. How can air do that?

AP
p***@gmail.com
2018-03-11 10:58:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sunday, March 11, 201 ht).
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Now look at oxygen, 16protons, 16muons is 144 total muons, another perfect square.
More tomorrow,,, time for a milk shake and the fascinating mystery of the milk shake -- milk tastes good, but place cold milk-- has to be cold into a flask and vigorouly shake so you get a lot of milk foam and now you improved the taste of milk by 10 fold over. How can air do that?
AP
====================
the psychopath spammer
is discussing with himself ....
==
Y.P
==================
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-11 23:16:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
RSMMM builds not only atoms, but molecules Re: Faraday law atomic theory Re: Sun and Stars shine, not due to fusion, but due to protons and muons convert Space into energy/matter via Faraday Law

Now the most abundant top three elements are hydrogen, helium, oxygen. I think something on the order of 90%, 8% for hydrogen and helium and then all the rest at 2% combined.

So in the theory of RSMMM, Dirac's New Radioactivities, what happens is that a atom of hydrogen via the Faraday Law, produces monopole electric current. This current can remain inside the atom or travel outside. If it remains, it can accumulate monopoles and those monopoles can become a muon itself, a rest mass particle of 105 MeV. Now, in a good hydrogen atom it can build not only 1 muon but 8 of them over time in monopole production, thus, with 8 muons built, that hydrogen atom built a proton. It can continue to build on this second proton inside the original hydrogen atom until that proton is a neutron and so the starting out hydrogen atom has transformed into a deuterium atom, in the same manner it can keep building until it becomes a tritium or even a helium atom. So with the slow process of building monopoles in a hydrogen atom it becomes deuterium to tritium to helium.

But let us look at oxygen with its 16 HYASYS, it has 16 hydrogen atom systems all of which is building a maximum electric current of magnetic monopoles, a oxygen atom can build a muon much faster than a hydrogen atom builds a muon.

Now in HYASYS and RSMMM theory, we see the lines of distinction between a molecule and an atom gets blurred. Can we really tell apart if a water molecule H2O is 18HYASYS is a regular normal oxygen atom that has built two new protons from monopoles apart from water molecule? You see, the only real difference here is that 18O or even 18F, both are 16O with two more protons with 2 muons attached.

In a sense, the building of all the Elements from Faraday Law, is hard to tell apart from chemical compounds. Water can come from oxygen binding with two hydrogen, or, water can come from a oxygen atom which builds two more protons and two muons, all inside itself.

So many, very many astronomers and cosmologists have pondered and asked the question of where does all this water come from? Especially Earth? Well, we know oxygen is the most abundant element after hydrogen and helium, so that as oxygen builds more elements, it is going to build 18O which looks like a single atom, but, can be easily seen as water.

So, here we begin to see the Table of Elements be more than just elements/isotopes, we begin to see the table as the Table of Compounds also. Methane is CH4 and we view it as five atoms bonded together. But with New Chemistry, we begin to recognize that as carbon is doing a Faraday Law production of monopoles, it builds up enough monopoles for that carbon atom to have 4 hydrogen HYASYS.

So the concepts of fusion in chemistry, physics and the concept of bonding in chemistry become awfully blurred, because those compounds can be got from just a single atom that grows by monopole production inside itself. Now, some may say, this violates conservation of energy, and like Dirac, would say-- well, what of it. One consolation though, is that Faraday Law turns Space into monopoles. We normally do not think of Space having mass, but we can think of space as having energy. And so when you produce a monopole, you take energy that is Space itself and turn it into rest mass.

We often hear everyone agree that electrons inside atoms are in perpetual motion and not bothered by that. But is perpetual motion any better and easier to accept than is violation of conservation of energy. I mean, if you accept perpetual motion why block acceptance of violation of conservation of energy. Perpetual Motion is a violation of conservation of energy.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 05:47:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Re: solving what the New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements is-- where rows are Ampere's law and columns are Faraday Law
Scientific American, MAR2018, page53, hexacarbonyl Re: repeat the Rutherford experiment for I think maybe the nucleus of gases are spread out
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Now here i am going to question the famous Rutherford experiment the one in which he shot particles at a gold or metal leaf and where some of those particles recoiled back, telling Rutherford that nearly all the mass is concentrated in the nucleus.
Mind you this is just a guess, that many of the atoms nucleus, does not lie in the center of the atom carrying most of the mass. I suspect the inert gases and the first p row of elements have their protons and neutrons mostly in rings outside the center of those atoms. Unfortunately Rutherford only did his work on metal-- gold and there, most of the mass is in the center.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
I suspect that experiment needs repeating for the first 26 elements especially oxygen fluorine neon for i suspect the center of those atoms are almost empty of protons and where the protons are more likely found in the muon orbital cloud to enhance the making of orbital cloud wire for Faraday law.
I think it is hard to repeat Rutherford on non metals but not impossible.
Time for a modern day repeat of Rutherford, only this time with a inert gas, or say oxygen, hydrogen for I suspect the nuclei of these elements are in a ring around the center, not directly in the center. So sort of like the plum pudding model of Thomson, only arranged in an order of like a wire, not random and chaotic. Time to repeat Rutherford.
Now, fortunately for me, I have Scientific American March 2018, talking about the Table of Elements and talking about element 106 where it lives for about 10 seconds and was able to form a compound of Element 106 with carbon monoxide to form a hexacarbonyl of Element 106.
Now, this is fortuitous because I was having problems with getting neon oxygen fluorine and helium to obey the Faraday Law in a maximum amount of production of monopoles. And after reading that snippet of hexacarbonyl, I realized what my solution must be.
Now recently I spoke of that the Old Chemistry Table of Elements needed revision and what I dreamed up was a double cone, with apex to base intersecting at midsection, rather than the silly contraption in Old Math of two apex together. Apex to base is far far better because it is stable when built, and, besides, it is a generalization of the cylinder. For think of the cylinder as a routed out, carved out midsection, like a double cone spool.
But, anyway, reading hexacarbonyl I saw a vision of where the NEW TABLE OF ATOMS must go. Not to a double cone, but rather to Ampere's Law as geometry and Ampere's law is a torus of electric current and then the magnetic field of a torus around a torus. Get out any picture of Ampere's law and you will immediately recognize that geometry where you use the right-hand rule.
Now, I keep the Old Chemistry picture of the Table, keep it all, for it is rather excellent and good. I forget about a 3rd D table or any changes to the 2nd D table. But, where the big changes come is the ALGEBRA of the Table of Elements. The Algebra changes drastically.
This is a picture of the Old Chemistry table (using just one letter to make uniform spacing, and all the s,p,d,f rows are where they should be, not this sad cut-out view, but all intact.)
H H
L B B C N O F N
NM A S P S C A
K C S T V CM F C N C Z G G A S B K
R S Y Z NM T R R P A C  I  S S T  I  X
C B L C P N P S E G T D H E T Y  L H T W R O I P A H T P B P A R
F R A T P U N P AC B C  E FM N  L U U U U U UU U U U UU U U U
So, what did the hexacarbonyl do for my insight?
Well, for one we raise hydrogen above helium to be a single whole row and have helium be a single whole row to have 8 rows in total
So here we have 1Proton = 8Muons and 1 neutron= 9Muons

Further we have 1HYASYS = 9Muons, where HYASYS means hydrogen atom system

Now it could be, just could be that no more elements can exist beyond Element 118, could be, for that would mean we have a totally new row, a 9th row. Some reasoning for this-- an upper limit to holding 8 muons as proton and 1 orbital muon as electron is reached with 295 HYASYS.
H
H
L B B C N O F N
NM A S P S C A
K C S T V CM F C N C Z G G A S B K
R S Y Z NM T R R P A C  I  S S T  I  X
C B L C P N P S E G T D H E T Y  L H T W R O I P A H T P B P A R
F R A T P U N P AC B C  E FM N  L U U U U U UU U U U UU U U U
To me, that would be a nice table for in a way the rows remind me of a closed loop wire in Faraday law and the column are the bar magnet.

But Ampere's law needs obeying and the Table is looking much like Amperes law in that the rows are the electric wire and wrapped around the wire with the right-hand rule is magnetic field.
The number 8 is a crucial critical number in all of physics, for it is 1proton= 8muons. Now, I do not know if 8 shows up in the Maxwell Equations, I do know 137 shows up, but, does 8 show up? It must in the form of the s,p,d,f
Now last night, I was struggling to find how to make MAXIMUM Faraday Law upon oxygen, fluorine, neon and helium to explain them as protons as wires and muons as bar magnet. And here is where the hexacarbonyl image comes to my rescue.
Notice that if we think of the entire ROW of chemical elements as the wire that the oxygen-neon row and the sulfur-argon row is 8
Now, the next two rows are the iron-krypton and the silver-Xenon row. Now, they look like those rows have no magic number 8. And here is where the algebra sinks in. When we have a d row, we make the p elements as 3 and the d elements as 5, so that we have 3+5 = 8. That Algebra is indicative of the Ampere Law, that half of the d and half of the p are going into magnetism, while the other half is going into electric monopole current.
Now, the table has two rows of s, two rows of p, two rows of d, and two rows of f. The Algebra works on the f row, where 14/2 = 7 and now we need a 1 to make 7+1 = 8. So what happens in the f row is that 7 for magnetism, 7 for electricity and the s provides the 1 as 2/2.
So, in d row, the s orbital is masked, while the p and d are cut in half.
In f row, the d and p orbitals are masked, while the f and s are cut in half.
Mind you, this algebra is all for the sake of 8. Why 8? Well the short answer is proton = 8 muons. A longer answer is symmetry of magnetism versus electricity in the Ampere Law.
Now, getting back to the first two rows, the single hydrogen and the single helium of the second row.
For hydrogen it is 8 in the form of a single proton is 8 muons forming a closed loop wire and where that orbital muon must be magnetism of Ampere law along with the bar magnet of Faraday Law.
For helium has 36 muons in total, 32+4. But 36 is also 9x4, and hydrogen is 9 muons. The view of hydrogen is it is the atom of the monopole, and the helium atom is the atom of the dipole.
The geometry view of helium is a perfect sphere, the geometry view of hydrogen is a ellipse of its magnetism to electricity.
Now in mathematics we have another ALGEBRA that is very much similar to the above Algebra, it is the Regular Polyhedra and there again we have 6 items, pyramid, tetrahedron, hexahedron, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron. The algebra of regular polyhedron so much are analogs of the Table of Chemical Elements.
So let us compare Table of Elements with Table of Regular Polyhedra
                  edge face vertex
tetrahedron   6   4   4
pyramid        8   5    5
cube            12   6  8
octahedron  12   8  6
dodecahedron30 12 20
icosahedron   30  20 12

Notice how they are duals, cube has 6 faces, 8 vertices while dual octahedron has 8 faces 6 vertices

Now find the duality in the Table of Elements since magnetism is dual to electricity

1st row  s hydrogen 1+8 = 9  1 muon + proton(8muons)
2nd row s helium 1+8 =9       1 muon + proton(8muons)
3rd row s+p 2+6 =8
4th row s + p 2+6=8

5th row s/2 + d/2 +p/2 = 1 + 5 + 3 = 9
6th row s/2 + d/2 + p/2 = 1 + 5+3 = 9

7th row s/2 + f/2 = 1 +7 = 8   (p becomes degenerate)
8th row s/2 + f/2 = 1 +7 = 8  (p becomes degenerate)

The algebra of Regular Polyhedra remind us as a analog of the Algebra of Table of Elements, where the Faraday law and Ampere law act like rows as wires and columns as magnetic field lines of force.

AP
benj
2018-03-10 08:41:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
Please do not hold me to the 1/1000, it maybe something like 10^-6 rather than 10^-3.
There is no doubt in the world that fusion exists, and that fission, even more so, exists.
But, what I have discovered is that the Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV and that tiny particle .5MeV is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. What that means for energy of the world, is that every atom is a Faraday Law Demonstration of every hydrogen atom system inside an atom. Every proton with its muon, every neutron, are constantly doing a Faraday law and producing electricity inside the atom, producing magnetic monopoles. And these monopoles can either stay inside the atom or flow out as radiation. This is where stars and our Sun get their power, their energy. There is a tad bit of fusion, but not very much, certainly not as much to let the Sun shine as it does every day of our life.
Now how is the Faraday Law conducted inside atoms? A proton is 8 muons and when formed into a octagon ring, the proton is a closed loop wire, leaving the electronmuon as a bar magnet thrust through the proton ring creates a current-- a magnetic monopole that either stays inside the atom or moves out and becomes sunlight.
Now, all atoms are Faraday law machines, so why does not Earth or Moon or Jupiter shine like a Star? Well, a astro body has to get large enough to get hot enough so that the kinetic energy of its atoms reach a temperature in which the electronmuon moves fast enough through its protons to produce radiation of star shine. But this monopole creation occurs in all atoms and although not star light, some of these monopoles are radio waves, and Jupiter has a large radio emission.
AP
Ohm's law rules!

Archiepoo, you are sinking quickly. Throw out all your aluminum pans.
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 06:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
Please do not hold me to the 1/1000, it maybe something like 10^-6 rather than 10^-3.
There is no doubt in the world that fusion exists, and that fission, even more so, exists.
But, what I have discovered is that the Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV and that tiny particle .5MeV is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. What that means for energy of the world, is that every atom is a Faraday Law Demonstration of every hydrogen atom system inside an atom. Every proton with its muon, every neutron, are constantly doing a Faraday law and producing electricity inside the atom, producing magnetic monopoles. And these monopoles can either stay inside the atom or flow out as radiation. This is where stars and our Sun get their power, their energy. There is a tad bit of fusion, but not very much, certainly not as much to let the Sun shine as it does every day of our life.
So now, is there some kind of means of an atom to store the magnetic monopoles until they reach a point where they add up to being a "new proton"?

Looking at hydrogen tritium decays, I see a radioisotope of .018 MeV. For molybdenum I see .04MeV, for barium I see .03MeV.

So, what I am thinking is that as the atom orbital muon causes a creation of a monopole by passing through the 8 muons of its proton, forming a monopole of .018MeV. How does that monopole become put into storage? Is an atom like a capacitor that can store monopoles?

So, then we need 840/.018 = 46,667 such events of creation of a monopole and stored inside the atom.

A capacitor is usually two metal plates with a nonconductor in between.

So is an atom structure able to be a capacitor.

Now Jupiter is said to have metallic hydrogen and is a electrical conductor, just perfect for storing monopoles inside atoms until they "grow to be a proton".

Perhaps this is the reason Jupiter is the largest planet, with all that mass/matter production by its huge amount of metallic hydrogen.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 08:20:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Revolutionary idea-- Sun and starpower are Faraday's Law turning Space into monopoles, fusion is just a tiny fraction of starpower 1/1000
Please do not hold me to the 1/1000, it maybe something like 10^-6 rather than 10^-3.
Seriously, I wonder if any scientist had the brains to look to see what the ratio of hydrogen to helium was on Jupiter or Saturn and compared it to the ratio in the Sun. I mean, well, if the ratio on Jupiter and Saturn is 90%hydrogen and 8% helium and the ratio in the Sun is the same-- should tell any half brain, that the Sun is not a huge fusion machine but rather instead a Faraday Law machine that is how the Sun shines. If my memory serves me, the literature says the ratio is the same in both Sun and Jupiter.

So, the Sun shines, not from fusion, but from Faraday law inside each atom inside the Sun.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
There is no doubt in the world that fusion exists, and that fission, even more so, exists.
But, what I have discovered is that the Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV and that tiny particle .5MeV is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. What that means for energy of the world, is that every atom is a Faraday Law Demonstration of every hydrogen atom system inside an atom. Every proton with its muon, every neutron, are constantly doing a Faraday law and producing electricity inside the atom, producing magnetic monopoles. And these monopoles can either stay inside the atom or flow out as radiation. This is where stars and our Sun get their power, their energy. There is a tad bit of fusion, but not very much, certainly not as much to let the Sun shine as it does every day of our life.
So now, is there some kind of means of an atom to store the magnetic monopoles until they reach a point where they add up to being a "new proton"?
Looking at hydrogen tritium decays, I see a radioisotope of .018 MeV. For molybdenum I see .04MeV, for barium I see .03MeV.
I just picked that one out of many radioisotopes. It is a good enough estimate of what a orbital muon in a Faraday Law thrust through a closed loop ring as a proton is 8 muons, that such a thrust, considering these muons are traveling 10-90% speed of light, that it would create a monopole of .018MeV

So, basically another proof of Faraday Law is how stars shine, would be to show the photons of our Sun are directly related to monopole production inside hydrogen and helium atoms.

And, the remarkable feature of this StarPower, is that stars seem to increase in mass and volume, never decreasing which they should decrease if fusion was in play.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
So, what I am thinking is that as the atom orbital muon causes a creation of a monopole by passing through the 8 muons of its proton, forming a monopole of .018MeV. How does that monopole become put into storage? Is an atom like a capacitor that can store monopoles?
So, then we need 840/.018 = 46,667 such events of creation of a monopole and stored inside the atom.
A capacitor is usually two metal plates with a nonconductor in between.
I have seen many a capacitor and the usual type is a rolled up cylinder. And a neutron is in an atom for what purpose? In Old Physics, the neutron was thought to deliver the Strong Nuclear Force. But, there is only a force of attraction no matter whether like charge or unlike charge, only attraction exists in EM theory, and what you always thought was repel, is not repel, for it is Pauli Exclusion-- denial of same space occupancy. The world has only an ACTIVE FORCE of ATTRACTION. The world has no repulsion, only denial of same space.

So, that leaves us with the huge question. Since neutrons are not needed to keep protons together, then, what the hell are they they for?

So, you can anticipate where this is going. Capacitors are often shaped like cylinders with contents of many sheets of metal sandwiched in between nonconductors.

So, a NEUTRON in an atom is a capacitor, and its function is to store up all those monopoles that come off the assembly line from the orbital muons and the protons as wires.

Now, do we have any numbers to verify that claim? We most certainly do. For if we look at almost any Chemical Table for the atomic mass we find Boron at 10.811 (Oxtoby Nachtrieb, 1990) where we have a neutron that is 1-.811 = .19 short.

We see Mg at 24.305 which means magnesium has a neutron that is starting to be filled to be a full 1 unit, but has only collected .305 magnetic monopoles.

We see Cl at 35.453 which means it has one neutron that is almost half full of 9muons or 945MeV. In other words, the Faraday production of monopoles in chlorine have filled a neutron to half full capacity.

We see Hg, mercury at 200.59, and here is an atom that has a bit more than a half filled neutron, being grown by the Faraday law creating monopoles.

Now it was discovered that neutrons form satellite neutrons, outside the nucleus, and this goes part and parcel with the idea that neutrons exist in atoms, not because they help hold protons together, no, not at all, but rather, their function is to storage all the monopoles created by the Faraday law upon protons with orbital muons.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 08:35:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
The below is a quote from gov, and if i am understanding it correctly indicates the sun is more abundant in hydrogen which means the Nebular dust cloud theory is trash. It also means everyone in physics and astronomy failed logic, for you cannot have a star burning up its hydrogen in fusion yet end up having more hydrogen than Jupiter.


The Galileo probe mass spectrometer: composition of Jupiter's atmosphere. - NCBI
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pubmed
by HB Niemann · 1996 · Cited by 252 · Related articles
The measured ratio of deuterium to hydrogen (D/H) of (5 +/- 2) x 10(-5) indicates that this ratio is greater in solar-system hydrogen than in local interstellar hydrogen, and the 3He/4He ratio of (1.1 +/- 0.2) x 10(-4) provides a new value for protosolar (solar nebula) helium isotopes.
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 08:54:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Now I better mend my conception of the Faraday Law with a proton as 8muons as a closed loop wire and the orbital muon as a bar magnet.

I was thinking the closed loop wire was a octet of muons

M M

M M

M M

M M

that is 1 proton = 8 muons

And the bar magnet is a orbital muon thrust through the center creating a magnetic monopole.

No, I think the far better picture is this

M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M

as a coil of muons, 8muons = 1proton
And each muon has a center hole so that the thrusting muon goes through a coil of 8 muons creating a monopole current in the coil

Now, possibly the neutrons are connected to the proton and as soon as the monopole is created, it flows into the neutron until that neutron is full with 945MeV.


M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

now it maybe the case where the proton 8muons and neutron building up its 9muons are connected end to end in a torus formation so the constant thrusting of the orbital muon keeps creating more and more monopoles in the fastest time.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 18:59:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Well in Old Physics the electron is seen as .5MeV, in New Physics the electron is so much heavier 105MeV, so that the new view is the muon does not move around as much as .5 did. In Old Physics, it was thought the .5 particle absorbed energy and was lifted into a higher orbital, and once it came back down to a lower orbital it emitted that absorbed energy. Does the same picture hold true for New Physics?

Well, if you consider the .5MeV as a monopole particle that is a tourist particle in a atom, a particle that comes and goes and is not integral to the atom, so that excitation higher and lower states is rather a side-show of atoms and not what is really going on.

In New Physics, the muon and protons are doing a Faraday Law dance to produce more muons and the .5MeV particle is a particle that is on its way to becoming a 105MeV new muon.

In New Physics, the neutrons are Capacitors in atoms and storing this energy, and when the neutron is outside the atom, it ceases to be a capacitor and transforms into a Hydrogen Atom.

Now, the fact on Earth of BIOLUMINESCENCE, that biology can be a microscopic-Sun points to the logical fact, that Sun and stars shine, not from fusion, but rather, from the inner workings of Atoms and molecules doing a Faraday Law dance to create matter out of Space they occupy.

Imagine that-- the firefly proves that stars and our Sun is not a fusion making machine, but rather, is a Faraday Law Machine, where a muon in an atom thrusts through a proton as proton= 8muons.

Picture the Sun, and stars, not as a huge ball of atoms trying to fuse, but picture the Sun as a huger ball of fireflies. A typical light beam from a firefly are photons of 2 to 3 eV, electron volts.

Now, how many atoms in the Sun? Say 10^57, for there are approx 10^23 stars in the universe and thus about 10^80 atoms in the Universe as whole.

But anyway, say we have 10^57 fireflies in a ball in space other than the Sun. And these fireflies, would they be as bright as the Sun? Well, brighter than the Sun when all of them light up at once.

Bioluminescence is a fascinating but neglected study of physics, hugely underestimated, perhaps because, well, few physicists can even spell it correctly, without falling flat on their face.

A typical energy of bioluminescence is 2 to 3 eV. And that is the typical photon that the Sun sends to Earth in Sunlight.

So, if chemistry of biology can produce Sunlight, only a crazy fall flat on his face physicists would think that the Sun and stars shine via some stupid silly proton proton reaction of fusion.

You see, in science-- any science -- when people want an explanation of how things work-- they always-- always pick the dumbest explanation because, a dumb explanation is better than no explanation. The dumb fusion explanation is better than a coal burning on Sun explanation, but not much more better.

The huge problem with fusion is that it is so extremely difficult to work right. Bioluminescence is merely electricity. Look around the world-- do you see any fusion plants around? Now, do you see any electricity around?

The Sun shines, the Stars shine, but they shine because of electricity-- of atoms, each and every atom is doing a thrusting bar magnet through a coil ( a proton is a coil of 8 muons).

Look at how pathetic is the proton to proton fusion reaction-- with its appeal to a diproton-- 1 chance in a billion of doing a fusion event.

Look at modern society, is it a 1 in a billion chance to make electricity today? Of course not.

When any science has no explanation for how things work-- it accepts even the most dumbest of explanations of how something works.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 20:03:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
How easy, or how hard is it, to make a ANALOG Experiment of a analog 1 proton = 8muons. Arrange those 8 entities into a coil and thrust a 1 muon analog through that coil to produce 2 to 3 eV of electricity?

Of course we cannot have a microscope so small that we peer inside a hydrogen atom and watch this Faraday Law going on.

So, we can do a Analog Experiment of getting 2 to 3 eV electricity from a coil of 8.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-12 21:37:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You see, I do not know if the typical Sunlight, the visible, infrared and UV have a fingerprint of where they came from. Did they come from hydrogen fusion, or did they come from a Faraday Law inside all atoms that produces monopoles.

If they come from Faraday Law, the Sun and Stars can directly emit monopoles of say 3 eV wavelengths.

So, I am guessing there is a fingerprint signature, but rather hard to get at. Perhaps it is some wavelengths not usually payed any attention to.

Then, there is the anomaly of fusion for stars yet stars lack deuterium. I bet there are many many anomalies and paradoxes for those who assume the Sun is a fusion machine. The Faraday Law as star shine does not remove fusion altogether, mind you. There is a tiny amount of fusion going on in the Sun, only the bulk of the Sun's power is from Faraday Law, converting Space into electricity.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-13 00:27:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
You see, I do not know if the typical Sunlight, the visible, infrared and UV have a fingerprint of where they came from. Did they come from hydrogen fusion, or did they come from a Faraday Law inside all atoms that produces monopoles.
If they come from Faraday Law, the Sun and Stars can directly emit monopoles of say 3 eV wavelengths.
So now, let me ask a question about every chemical element mass determination.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
So, I am guessing there is a fingerprint signature, but rather hard to get at. Perhaps it is some wavelengths not usually payed any attention to.
Then, there is the anomaly of fusion for stars yet stars lack deuterium. I bet there are many many anomalies and paradoxes for those who assume the Sun is a fusion machine. The Faraday Law as star shine does not remove fusion altogether, mind you. There is a tiny amount of fusion going on in the Sun, only the bulk of the Sun's power is from Faraday Law, converting Space into electricity.
In Oxtoby, Nachtrieb PRINCIPLES of MODERN CHEMISTRY, 2nd ed. 1990

Shows Hg at atomic mass of 200.59 Now why in the world would it have a .59 when protons and neutrons are all, really that of a value of 1 atomic unit. So, we should have a 200 or 2001 for Hg.

So, question, is the figure 200.59 a specific isotope or is it an average over four isotopes of 199Hg, 200Hg, 201Hg, 202Hg (Wikipedia)?

Same question for boron listed at 10.81 weight, it has two stable isotopes 10B and 11B.

So, are these weights an average weight?

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-13 01:56:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
You see, I do not know if the typical Sunlight, the visible, infrared and UV have a fingerprint of where they came from. Did they come from hydrogen fusion, or did they come from a Faraday Law inside all atoms that produces monopoles.
If they come from Faraday Law, the Sun and Stars can directly emit monopoles of say 3 eV wavelengths.
Here I probably made a mistake in my first announcement of this atomic weight of chemical elements. I am looking for a element that is not near a whole number, such as Hg is 200.59
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
So now, let me ask a question about every chemical element mass determination.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
So, I am guessing there is a fingerprint signature, but rather hard to get at. Perhaps it is some wavelengths not usually payed any attention to.
Then, there is the anomaly of fusion for stars yet stars lack deuterium. I bet there are many many anomalies and paradoxes for those who assume the Sun is a fusion machine. The Faraday Law as star shine does not remove fusion altogether, mind you. There is a tiny amount of fusion going on in the Sun, only the bulk of the Sun's power is from Faraday Law, converting Space into electricity.
In Oxtoby, Nachtrieb PRINCIPLES of MODERN CHEMISTRY, 2nd ed. 1990
Shows Hg at atomic mass of 200.59 Now why in the world would it have a .59 when protons and neutrons are all, really that of a value of 1 atomic unit. So, we should have a 200 or 2001 for Hg.
So, question, is the figure 200.59 a specific isotope or is it an average over four isotopes of 199Hg, 200Hg, 201Hg, 202Hg (Wikipedia)?
Same question for boron listed at 10.81 weight, it has two stable isotopes 10B and 11B.
So, are these weights an average weight?
The 200.59 is probably an average weight, not a single isotope weight.

But it begs the question is there an element in which the weight mysteriously is not a whole number? If so, it would be evidentiary proof that atoms produce monopoles which they store inside that atom's neutrons.

I have the feeling that weight measurements are put into a "limbo program" meaning that researchers are not reporting any odd numbers, and instead adjusting their data to fit what they think is the number.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-13 04:27:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Alright some progress here and funny i did not recall the Mendeleev history where the atomic mass did not match the family resemblance sequence on three spots-- argon to potassium and then cobalt to nickel and then tellerium to iodine. Mendeleev did not have isotopes. And the reason for less mass was one of the two had a single stable isotope.

Argon 39.948

Cobalt 58.933

Iodine 126.9

Now notice hydrogen is 1.0079 and neon is 4.0026 slightly above 1 and 4.

But that argon cobalt iodine are slightly below a whole number.

So can this be my long sought for elements in which they have a neutron only .9 built, and needs .1 more monopoles to make argon cobalt and iodine.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-13 06:54:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
Alright some progress here and funny i did not recall the Mendeleev history where the atomic mass did not match the family resemblance sequence on three spots-- argon to potassium and then cobalt to nickel and then tellerium to iodine. Mendeleev did not have isotopes. And the reason for less mass was one of the two had a single stable isotope.
Argon 39.948
Cobalt 58.933
Iodine 126.9
Now notice hydrogen is 1.0079 and neon is 4.0026 slightly above 1 and 4.
Alright, so here is what I set out to prove, only I was hoping for a element to be stuck half way inbetween two whole numbers. I wanted something like iodine being 126.500, but 126.90 is good enough.
Post by Archimedes Plutonium
But that argon cobalt iodine are slightly below a whole number.
So can this be my long sought for elements in which they have a neutron only .9 built, and needs .1 more monopoles to make argon cobalt and iodine.
So here is the argument. The atomic mass should be a whole number or just a bit above. But in the case of iodine we have 126.90 and that means not quite 127 hydrogen atom systems HYASYS. We cannot have a .9 of a neutron.

So what is happening inside of iodine? It is creating more mass/matter out of Space by its protons acting as a coil of 8 muons and the orbital muon is a bar magnet thrusting through the coil, creating a monopole current and this current runs into a neutron as a capacitor. The Faraday Law builds and creates neutrons inside of atoms as capacitors for atoms, and as each neutron is slowly built up from monopoles stored inside-- it becomes a full neutron and then that atom starts building up a new neutron.

So .9 of a neutron is almost a complete muon since a proton= 8muons and thus a neutron = 9muons. So .9 of a neutron is almost 1 full muon, not quite but almost one full muon.

Now, I am really surprized at how accurate these atomic masses are-- out to three decimal places.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-13 21:20:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Alright, last night I was worried about atomic mass of paradoxical, anomalous elements, in particular the Iodine and Tellurium mess

52Te127.60 -> 53 I 126.90

And this gave Mendeleev much troubles and heartaches.

Sadly, from Mendeleev in 1869 with the first Table of Chemical Elements, no scientist ever sought to fix that problem of Te and Iodine, they all simply ignored it under one banner heading-- there are isotopes. But, logically, the fact of existence of isotopes does not, yes, does not solve the paradox.

What solves the paradox of MASS, atomic mass, is the Faraday Law of creating more new mass inside an individual atom, by the sheer dance of its muons thrust through its protons to create new monopoles out of the space the atom is within. So as hydrogen builds up monopoles it creates deuterium. As deuterium creates monopoles it creates tritium. As tritium builds up monopoles, it creates helium, as helium builds up monopoles, it creates lithium, etc etc. There is some fusion going on also, but the biggest creation of heavier atoms is Faraday Law.

But today I need to discuss a obvious proof that Faraday Law is the inside of a atom, producing magnetic monopoles-- all atoms all the time. The proof is obvious in that Radios are obvious. Now I return to my teenager days at a Christmas gift on Christmas day, sometime around 1969. And a gift from an uncle or father, I cannot remember which, and under the Christmas tree, about ten people gathered. And I think the reason I was given this gift, is to see if I had the patience and know how of how to assemble the gift-- crystal radio. Well, eventually it was assembled but with help from my father. And amazingly it worked.

But, the upshot of that assembled crystal radio, is this post and this idea.

Every atom, and every molecule, and every structure of matter-- compounds, you name it-- is a radio emitter. Some structures are loud emitters-- Jupiter. Other structures are quiet emitters-- a blade of grass, a human being, a grain of sand.

The point is, every material structure is composed of atoms and all atoms are doing a Faraday Law of its muons thrust through its protons yields magnetic monopoles. Most of those monopoles are saved inside the atom but some escape and are emitted from the atom. Those that escape, they do so at the speed of light and are photons, radio waves. And if we have a sensitive enough of equipment we can pick up those signals.

So, every atom, and every compound of atoms is a radio-- hence, the Faraday Law must be in action inside every atom.

That is the prime obvious proof, that the inside of Atoms is a Faraday Law Machine in action.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 01:55:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Converting Space into monopoles via Faraday law of thrusting orbital muon into protons.

Explaining the mass paradox of tellurium to iodine
--- quoting wikipedia ---
Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
120Te 0.09% stable
121Te syn 16.78 d ε 121Sb
122Te 2.55% stable
123Te 0.89%[5] stable
124Te 4.74% stable
125Te 7.07% stable
126Te 18.84% stable
127Te syn 9.35 h β− 127I
128Te 31.74% 2.2×1024 y β−β− 128Xe
129Te syn 69.6 min β− 129I
130Te 34.08% 7.9×1020 y β−β− 130Xe
view talk edit | references | in Wikidata
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 03:35:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Let me correlate hydrogen with helium where the atoms themselves create the heavier isotopes

(from Wikipedia)


Main isotopes of hydrogen
Iso­tope
Abun­dance
Half-life (t1/2)
Decay mode
Pro­duct
1H
99.98%
stable
2H
0.02%
stable
3H
trace
12.32 y
β−
3He
• view talk

Iso­tope
Abun­dance
Half-life (t1/2)
Decay mode
Pro­duct
3He
0.0002%
stable
4He
99.9998%
stable
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 04:15:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
That format came out poorly; let me try again

--- quoting Wikipedia ---
Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
1H 99.98% stable
2H 0.02% stable
3H trace 12.32 y β− 3He
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 05:25:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Here is the helium from Wikipedia

Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
3He 0.0002% stable
4He 99.9998% stable
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 05:29:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Here is oxygen from Wikipedia-- once i get these six collected will show how RSMMM creates new elements

Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
16O 99.76% stable
17O 0.04% stable
18O 0.20% stable
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 05:32:05 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
From Wikipedia here is fluorine

Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
18F trace 109.8 min β+ (97%) 18O
ε (3%) 18O
19F 100% stable
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 05:35:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Last of the six, iodine

Quoting Wikipedia

Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
123I syn 13 h ε, γ 123Te
124I syn 4.176 d ε 124Te
125I syn 59.40 d ε 125Te
127I 100% stable
129I trace 1.57×107 y β− 129Xe
131I syn 8.02070 d β−, γ 131Xe
135I syn 6.57 h β− 135Xe
Archimedes Plutonium
2018-03-14 19:14:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I am going to need argon and potassium paradox

--- from Wikipedia ---

Iso­tope Abun­dance Half-life (t1/2) Decay mode Pro­duct
36Ar 0.334% stable
37Ar syn 35 d ε 37Cl
38Ar 0.063% stable
39Ar trace 269 y β− 39K
40Ar 99.604% stable
41Ar syn 109.34 min β− 41K
42Ar syn 32.9 y β− 42K

Loading...