Discussion:
Kavanaugh nomination in trouble
(too old to reply)
benj
2018-09-18 03:29:12 UTC
Permalink
This is kind of like instant karma, I think.
Repugs could dismiss accusations of sexual misconduct as long as the accuser was anonymous. Now, not so much.
Kind of a tough call, no? "He said, she said". Back when Clarence Thomas was nominated, tie went to the male, essentially by default. So Thomas got confirmed, and Anita Hill got her reputation trashed.
Now, we got #metoo. We also have female Senators on the Judiciary Committee. Repugs can only afford to lose two of their own, and the most likely two (Collins, Murkowski) just happen to be females. And the three Dem senators up for re-election this year from states that went heavily for Trump (Manchin, Donnelly, Heitkamp) now have perfect cover to vote "NO".
To make matters worse, Kavanaugh's high-school buddy isn't helping matters.
The committee vote has been postponed. New hearings are set for next Monday.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet this nomination is going to go down to defeat.
It's almost unfair. Then again, the situation with Thomas was unfair back in '91, wasn't it? And I see that Deficit or Deficient or whatever he calls himself is already foaming at the mouth. And that's a good thing.
What a wonderful fantsy you are having RichL. Maybe if you wish very
very very hard that communism will take root in America Kavanaugh can be
blocked with one of your nutjob pussyhat wearing Kalifornia commie
professors "coming forward" with lies.

You remember just like you tried before and failed with Anita Hill.
Hint: Liars deserve to be trashed. That's why we constantly trash you
because you are a liar.

Note that the guy WHO WAS THERE and supposedly "saved" her from
Kavanaugh says she's lying. Maybe if even ONE witness even slightly
backed up this pussyhat wearing story one might be more inclined to
consider examining what she is saying.

All you dishonest criminals know is lies and fraud. The karma you are
accumulating is far more serious than you know. And that will be where
your gnashing of teeth will be.

Denial is published here:
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/kavanaugh-classmate-named-in-letter-strongly-denies-allegations-of-misconduct

(Which link has virtually disappeared from Google search engine to be
replaced by hundreds of hatchet job links depicting Mark Judge as a
drunken addict by "interpreting" his own books. How low the left sinks
in dishonest politics is simply mind bending)

While hard left blasts witness not as savior of woman but drunken rapist
abettor!

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-high-school-drunk-allegation-alcohol/
Defiant
2018-09-18 04:31:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
This is kind of like instant karma, I think.
Repugs could dismiss accusations of sexual misconduct as long as the accuser was anonymous. Now, not so much.
Kind of a tough call, no? "He said, she said". Back when Clarence Thomas was nominated, tie went to the male, essentially by default. So Thomas got confirmed, and Anita Hill got her reputation trashed.
Now, we got #metoo. We also have female Senators on the Judiciary Committee. Repugs can only afford to lose two of their own, and the most likely two (Collins, Murkowski) just happen to be females. And the three Dem senators up for re-election this year from states that went heavily for Trump (Manchin, Donnelly, Heitkamp) now have perfect cover to vote "NO".
To make matters worse, Kavanaugh's high-school buddy isn't helping matters.
The committee vote has been postponed. New hearings are set for next Monday.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet this nomination is going to go down to defeat.
It's almost unfair. Then again, the situation with Thomas was unfair back in '91, wasn't it? And I see that Deficit or Deficient or whatever he calls himself is already foaming at the mouth. And that's a good thing.
What a wonderful fantsy you are having RichL. Maybe if you wish very
very very hard that communism will take root in America Kavanaugh can be
blocked with one of your nutjob pussyhat wearing Kalifornia commie
professors "coming forward" with lies.
You remember just like you tried before and failed with Anita Hill.
Hint: Liars deserve to be trashed. That's why we constantly trash you
because you are a liar.
Note that the guy WHO WAS THERE and supposedly "saved" her from
Kavanaugh says she's lying. Maybe if even ONE witness even slightly
backed up this pussyhat wearing story one might be more inclined to
consider examining what she is saying.
All you dishonest criminals know is lies and fraud. The karma you are
accumulating is far more serious than you know. And that will be where
your gnashing of teeth will be.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/kavanaugh-classmate-named-in-letter-strongly-denies-allegations-of-misconduct
(Which link has virtually disappeared from Google search engine to be
replaced by hundreds of hatchet job links depicting Mark Judge as a
drunken addict by "interpreting" his own books. How low the left sinks
in dishonest politics is simply mind bending)
While hard left blasts witness not as savior of woman but drunken rapist
abettor!
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-high-school-drunk-allegation-alcohol/
Not to mention Professor Ford can't remember when it happened,
where it happened, how she got there, etc. If she can't remember
that, how does she remember who her supposed attacker was? Fact
is, she is a sketchy witness AT BEST, while Kavanaugh has a history
of honor and decency, with many women vouching for him. The only way
this goes down is if Republicans allow the leftards to win.

Fuck off, leftard *LOSERS!*
Sergio
2018-09-18 16:15:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Defiant
Post by benj
This is kind of like instant karma, I think.
Repugs could dismiss accusations of sexual misconduct as long as the accuser was anonymous. Now, not so much.
Kind of a tough call, no? "He said, she said". Back when Clarence Thomas was nominated, tie went to the male, essentially by default. So Thomas got confirmed, and Anita Hill got her reputation trashed.
Now, we got #metoo. We also have female Senators on the Judiciary Committee. Repugs can only afford to lose two of their own, and the most likely two (Collins, Murkowski) just happen to be females. And the three Dem senators up for re-election this year from states that went heavily for Trump (Manchin, Donnelly, Heitkamp) now have perfect cover to vote "NO".
To make matters worse, Kavanaugh's high-school buddy isn't helping matters.
The committee vote has been postponed. New hearings are set for next Monday.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet this nomination is going to go down to defeat.
It's almost unfair. Then again, the situation with Thomas was unfair back in '91, wasn't it? And I see that Deficit or Deficient or whatever he calls himself is already foaming at the mouth. And that's a good thing.
What a wonderful fantsy you are having RichL. Maybe if you wish very
very very hard that communism will take root in America Kavanaugh can be
blocked with one of your nutjob pussyhat wearing Kalifornia commie
professors "coming forward" with lies.
You remember just like you tried before and failed with Anita Hill.
Hint: Liars deserve to be trashed. That's why we constantly trash you
because you are a liar.
Note that the guy WHO WAS THERE and supposedly "saved" her from
Kavanaugh says she's lying. Maybe if even ONE witness even slightly
backed up this pussyhat wearing story one might be more inclined to
consider examining what she is saying.
All you dishonest criminals know is lies and fraud. The karma you are
accumulating is far more serious than you know. And that will be where
your gnashing of teeth will be.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/kavanaugh-classmate-named-in-letter-strongly-denies-allegations-of-misconduct
(Which link has virtually disappeared from Google search engine to be
replaced by hundreds of hatchet job links depicting Mark Judge as a
drunken addict by "interpreting" his own books. How low the left sinks
in dishonest politics is simply mind bending)
While hard left blasts witness not as savior of woman but drunken rapist
abettor!
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-high-school-drunk-allegation-alcohol/
Not to mention Professor Ford can't remember when it happened,
where it happened, how she got there, etc. If she can't remember
that, how does she remember who her supposed attacker was? Fact
is, she is a sketchy witness AT BEST, while Kavanaugh has a history
of honor and decency, with many women vouching for him. The only way
this goes down is if Republicans allow the leftards to win.
Fuck off, leftard *LOSERS!*
ask Hillary if she ever got molested...
benj
2018-09-18 22:11:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sergio
Post by Defiant
Post by benj
This is kind of like instant karma, I think.
Repugs could dismiss accusations of sexual misconduct as long as the accuser was anonymous. Now, not so much.
Kind of a tough call, no? "He said, she said". Back when Clarence Thomas was nominated, tie went to the male, essentially by default. So Thomas got confirmed, and Anita Hill got her reputation trashed.
Now, we got #metoo. We also have female Senators on the Judiciary Committee. Repugs can only afford to lose two of their own, and the most likely two (Collins, Murkowski) just happen to be females. And the three Dem senators up for re-election this year from states that went heavily for Trump (Manchin, Donnelly, Heitkamp) now have perfect cover to vote "NO".
To make matters worse, Kavanaugh's high-school buddy isn't helping matters.
The committee vote has been postponed. New hearings are set for next Monday.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet this nomination is going to go down to defeat.
It's almost unfair. Then again, the situation with Thomas was unfair back in '91, wasn't it? And I see that Deficit or Deficient or whatever he calls himself is already foaming at the mouth. And that's a good thing.
What a wonderful fantsy you are having RichL. Maybe if you wish very
very very hard that communism will take root in America Kavanaugh can be
blocked with one of your nutjob pussyhat wearing Kalifornia commie
professors "coming forward" with lies.
You remember just like you tried before and failed with Anita Hill.
Hint: Liars deserve to be trashed. That's why we constantly trash you
because you are a liar.
Note that the guy WHO WAS THERE and supposedly "saved" her from
Kavanaugh says she's lying. Maybe if even ONE witness even slightly
backed up this pussyhat wearing story one might be more inclined to
consider examining what she is saying.
All you dishonest criminals know is lies and fraud. The karma you are
accumulating is far more serious than you know. And that will be where
your gnashing of teeth will be.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/kavanaugh-classmate-named-in-letter-strongly-denies-allegations-of-misconduct
(Which link has virtually disappeared from Google search engine to be
replaced by hundreds of hatchet job links depicting Mark Judge as a
drunken addict by "interpreting" his own books. How low the left sinks
in dishonest politics is simply mind bending)
While hard left blasts witness not as savior of woman but drunken rapist
abettor!
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-mark-judge-high-school-drunk-allegation-alcohol/
Not to mention Professor Ford can't remember when it happened,
where it happened, how she got there, etc. If she can't remember
that, how does she remember who her supposed attacker was? Fact
is, she is a sketchy witness AT BEST, while Kavanaugh has a history
of honor and decency, with many women vouching for him. The only way
this goes down is if Republicans allow the leftards to win.
Fuck off, leftard *LOSERS!*
ask Hillary if she ever got molested...
I'm guessing she probably has fond memories of being molested by Bill
when she was still young and hot and before Bill started looking
elsewhere for younger hotter ones. And then again, maybe not.

Loading...