Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 10:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Subject: PAGE9, 1-9, More evidence proving Atom Totality, blackbody
radiation//, Bell Inequality/textbook 8th ed 2017
From: Archimedes Plutonium <***@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:44:35 +0000
PAGE9, 1-9, More evidence proving Atom Totality, blackbody radiation//, Bell Inequality/textbook 8th ed 2017
Alright, in these pages I want to do more major physical supporting evidence that the Universe is a large plutonium atom totality.
Now here I am going to need a current day description of what most physicists believe is true of the Universe but in fact is utter false and nonsense. So I need a name for this current widespread held falsehood. I could just call it Big Bang, but that leaves out too much for it is the Big Bang along with the Einstein General Relativity that are fakeries. So I call it the Big Bang Einstein General Relativity BBEGR, which sounds like "beggar".
I call the Atom Totality Universe as the theory that destroys BBEGR. Atom Totality has 9 key observations, experiments and facts that do this destroying of BBEGR, and they are these nine.
1) Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation is blackbody, meaning cavity, meaning a structure
2) Bell Inequality is true and thus the Universe is quantum mechanical-- meaning it is the inside of an atom
3) Solid Body Rotation can exist only in a Universe in which Electromagnetism EM runs the Universe as seen in the EM theory, and so a universe operated by EM theory is a universe of an atom. In fact, recently it was seen that the North Pole of Saturn was a hexagon, like the hexagons of snowflakes caused by EM as Van der Waals force.
4) Strong Nuclear Force is another EM force of Chemical Bonding only scaled higher
5) the Dirac Sea of positrons works only in an Atom Totality Universe
6) Gravity is EM gravity which means the Universe is electricity and magnetism, which further means the universe is an atom. In other words, gravity as EM runs astronomy. The Coulomb force varies over a range of forces R to 1/R to 1/R^2.
7) The so called Doppler Redshift as a aftermath of the Big Bang, is not a Doppler Redshift at all but due to the fact that the monopole of .5 MeV is a charged photon, and the charge either shifts the spectral lines red or blue.
8) Our Sun is Hollow, because of Gauss's law of electricity-- charges move to outer surface, implying gravity is electricity & magnetism, and since gravity is EM, means the Universe is a structure for only Atoms provide for EM
9) Doppler Redshift has nothing to do with Doppler effect. The Doppler effect works on sound waves, never light waves. What is happening with Redshift of light waves is because of the magnetic monopole carries a charge energy of .5 MeV, whether + or - charge on a photon or neutrino. So, when spectral lines of elements are shifted, either blue or redshift is all because of magnetism, magnetic monopoles.
I call the Atom Totality Universe the theory that destroys BBEGR by these 9 key observations, experiments and facts that do this destroying of BBEGR because of structure versus no structure. Atom Totality is a structure, whereas Big Bang is no structure. An entity with Structure means the Universe has to be something, not a "nothing" for which an explosion, supposedly, to fill up. BBEGR has no structure but a amorphous non-structure from an explosion.
Now, for the reader, let me tell you the big major difference between Atom Totality and BBEGR, if not clear to the reader already. The big difference is the BBEGR is a theory that has the Universe as a structureless entity. The Atom Totality has the universe as being a Structure, and the only plausible structure is a Atom itself. Not an onion as in Ancient times, and not a elephant or turtle carrying a flat surface that holds the Universe as in Ancient times. The only reasonable plausible Structure is a single big atom.
1) the blackbody radiation in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation CMBR. This destroys BBEGR because it is "blackbody radiation". If it were not blackbody, BBEGR could reign supreme. And it is totally ironic that CMBR was used, when first discovered, as a supporting evidence of the Big Bang Explosion. But when first discovered, it took a long time to realize it was blackbody and although most physicists should have discarded the Big Bang the moment it was found blackbody, BBEGR was too far entrenched with its muddle headed wrongness.
A parallel history could be said of the like to like charge as repelling with Thompson in 1904 proposing the plum pudding model and then Rutherford in 1911 shattering the like to like repelling by finding the atom congregates electrons=muons outside the nucleus and congregates protons as the nucleus. So instead of trashcanning the like to like as repelling, the physicists kept on believing in their wrongness.
Alright I did a little exploring to find some historical dates on CMBR and found that the Big Bang is circa 1927 and a Cosmic Background Radiation is about 1950 to present but not until 1990 with the COBE satellite was it known that the Radiation was blackbody at 2.71 K.
The moment it was announced and shown Blackbody CMBR, is the moment that any physicist with a gram of logic would have realized that the Universe itself is a Structure and so the Big Bang with General Relativity is not a theory of the cosmos, but flawed and trash.
Everytime evidence comes in, saying the Universe is a "structure" is another mounting piece of evidence in favor of the Atom Totality theory.
Of the list of 9 major evidences supporting the Atom Totality, I now delve into (2) Bell Inequality that showed that Bohr's Quantum Mechanics was true but that Einstein's physics of General Relativity was false. Here again, the Universe is Quantum Mechanical which means the Universe is a structure, or cavity, or a container of sorts and thus implying Atomic, which means the Universe is a single big atom.
Now the Bell Inequality along with CMBR are cosmic features of quantum mechanics, meaning the Universe has to be an Atom to sustain these quantum features. In CMBR, the single Cosmic Atom is a large container or Structure of this cosmic atom. And the Bell Inequality is further evidence that the Cosmos is quantum, not the Structureless BBEGR.
Now this theory of the Bell Inequality seems totally off the deep end. But only for a second. Because if you start learning about John Bell, Einstein/Rosen/Podalsky and Bohr, you start learning how Einstein with BBEGR was found wrong against Bohr and Bell with Quantum Mechanics dominating the physics of the Universe.
The John Bell Inequality which decided EPR-thought- experiment. Was Einstein correct or was Quantum Mechanics correct?
What Bell found out after Aspect did the experiments, is that QM was
correct and Einstein was wrong. BBEGR is wrong.
But then the interpretation of Bell Inequality had begun. And what
Bell concluded was that there was just one way in which to get rid of
speed faster than light and the Bell experiment to hold true. Bell,
found one way to solve the problem-- Superdeterminism.
--- quoting what Archimedes Plutonium gave as a Wikipedia entry on
Physicist John S. Bell as
referenced by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_S._Bell is noted
mostly for his Bell Inequality Theorem which shows us that Quantum
Physics is not just restricted to the microworld but that Quantum
Physics stretches clear across the Cosmos. John Bell not only
discovered the Inequality for which experimental physicists such as
Alain Aspect could then test to see if Quantum Mechanics stretches
across the Cosmos, but one of John Bell's contributions to science is
rarely noted. And John Bell does not discuss this contribution in
printed material but seems to have conveyed it on the BBC television
in interviews. It is my opinion that the concept of Superdeterminism
is John Bell's finest contribution to physics, and much more important
than his Bell Inequality, even though it required his Inequality to
come to his concept of Superdeterminism. As far as I know from the
history of physics, the concept of Superdeterminism begins with John
Bell because it requires John Bell's Inequality Theorem. And the
concept of Superdeterminism is probably John Bell's greatest single
contribution to science.
Here is John Bell defining what Superdeterminism is:
--- Bell stated on the BBC ---
"There is a way to escape the inference of superluminal speeds and
spooky action at a distance. But it (Superdeterminism) involves
absolute determinism in the universe, the complete absence of free
will. Suppose the world is super-deterministic, with not just
inanimate nature running on behind-the-scenes clockwork, but with our
behavior, including our belief that we are free to choose to do one experiment rather than another, absolutely predetermined, including the "decision" by the experimenter to carry out one set of measurements rather than another, the difficulty disappears.
There is no need for a faster than light signal to tell particle A what
measurement has been carried out on particle B, because the universe,
including particle A, already "knows" what that measurement, and its
outcome, will be."
--- end Bell quote ---
--- further statement by John Bell to the BBC on Superdeterminism ---
"The only alternative to quantum probabilities, superpositions of
states, collapse of the wavefunction, and spooky action at a distance,
is that everything is superdetermined. For me it is a dilemma. I think
it is a deep dilemma, and the resolution of it will not be trivial; it will require a substantial change in the way we look at things."
--- end Bell quote---
So, what the Bell Inequality did was further support the idea the Universe as a Whole is a Structure, a Cavity, or a Container and the only plausible structure is a big atom as the Universe. The Bell Inequality, like the blackbody CMBR support the Atom Totality theory and throws out the BBEGR.
The only thing needed for Bell Inequality is the idea of a region of the Cosmos that contains the Nucleus of the Atom Totality, which controls the rest of the Cosmos.
Physicists rarely mention the concept of superdeterminism and how it
solves the problems of Quantum Mechanics. They do not mention it
partly because it disrupts the Big Bang Theory, since it makes no
sense that a Big Bang Universe can have superdeterminism.
John Bell lived under the Big Bang Theory, but if he had lived into the 1990s there arose a rival theory to the Big Bang, called the Atom Totality.
The problem John Bell had with Superdeterminism is that there is no
mechanism in the Big-Bang theory to make Superdeterminism work. In the Atom-Totality theory, there is a mechanism in that the Nucleus of the
Atom-Totality does all the ordering up of every event that takes place
in the Cosmos. The Nucleus pulls the strings of every event that
takes place in the entire Universe. The year that John S. Bell died,
1990, is the year in which the Atom-Totality theory was born.
One ramification of the Bell Inequality and superdeterminism is the explanation of how the brain and mind work, of course that is psychology and not pure physics, but let me amble down that road while here on superdeterminism.
In the Brain Locus theory, the mind is like a radio receiver which is
only one atom or one molecule and the rest of the brain tissue goes to
executing whatever the messages shot from the Atom Totality Nucleus
into the brain. The photons and neutrinos carry these messages. So that all life is puppets whose every action, thought was shot from the Nucleus into our brain locus and we execute that message.
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON=muon of 231Pu
::\ ::|:: /::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy.
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts in comfort and quiet.
COMMENTS:: Now I am looking for the easiest experiment in Chemistry bonding or in Physics Spectral lines that the true electron is the muon at 105 MeV and not the .5 MeV monopole particle which is a photon or neutrino with a charge energy of .5, not a rest-mass energy. Looking for anomalies, I found the Zeeman anomaly.
Now i picked this up from nyu.edu
However, there is an anomalous Zeeman effect which shows up particularly for atoms with odd atomic number $Z$ (hydrogen, for example). In such cases, it is found that the number of Zeeman sub-levels is actually even rather than odd. This cannot be explained within the normal Zeeman theory. However, it suggests the possible existence of an angular momentum like quantity that can take on half-integer values.
--- end quote---
What i am asking is whether this anomaly is explained by the fact the true electron is the muon at 105 MeV and not the monopole particle of .5 MeV.